INSTRUCTION:
1.
Review the specific elements of the
Danielson Framework
Links to an external site.
and the
HLPs
listed below.
Danielson Domain 3 component: A
HLP 14: Teach cognitive and metacognitive strategies to support learning and independence.
HLP 16: Use explicit instruction.
HLP 20: Provide Intensive Instruction.
2.
Observe your mentor teacher teaching a comprehension strategies using mentor text or math lesson that is building conceptual understanding in math and videotape this lesson
3.
Take
low-inference notes
on the teacher’s lesson.
·
Timestamp and cite from the lesson to support your evidence utilizing
low inference notes (see the directions and transcript template attached below).
·
This is an example of low inference notes:
4.
Complete
Lesson Analysis Template
·
In your analysis, identify and describe key elements of the observed lesson and
analyze the instructional and assessment strategies that are used to engage the learner – focusing on the identified
Danielson 3A and
HLP elements. Furthermore, each
Domain 3 A component is composed of several smaller elements, which serve to further define the component. Make sure you address them in your analysis.
Teacher Observation Critical Analysis
·
Support your findings with at least 2 comments on what went well in the lesson ( “glow”) and 2 suggestions for improvement ( “grow”), supporting your statements with references to the suggested strategies from the HLP description from the (If the suggested in the module HLP is not applicable to the context of your teaching, you may choose another HLP and cite the source).
·
Make recommendations to improve lesson delivery making specific reference to the evidence from the low-inference transcript about the interactions between the teacher(s)/adults, children/children and children and the use of instructional materials/environment.
5.
Submit your completed low inference notes and video lesson analysis via this Canvas assignment. Your submission will be graded with the below rubric.
If you need additional resources or would like citation materials, visit this page:
Citations and Resources
·
File Upload
·
Text Entry
·
Box
·
Google Drive
![A table of text and words Description automatically generated with medium confidence]()
Video Lesson Analysis
|
Video Lesson Analysis
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of the context
|
|
4 pts
Level 4
The context is described: school And grade And number of students And number of teachers And seating arrangements
|
3.4 pts
Level 3
The context is described: school And grade And number of students And number of teachers And/or seating arrangements
|
3 pts
Level 2
The context is described: school And grade And number of students And/or number of teachers And/or seating arrangements
|
2.6 pts
Level 1
The context is described: school And grade And/or number of students And/or number of teachers And/or seating arrangements
|
|
4 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe observed lesson description
|
|
4 pts
Level 4
All the key elements of the observed lesson are identified, described, and analyzed And If some are not applicable, the explanation is provided in the description And Assessment strategies that are used to engage the learner identified
|
3.4 pts
Level 3
All the key elements of the observed lesson are identified, described, and analyzed And If some are not applicable, the explanation is provided in the description And/or Assessment strategies that are used to engage the learner identified
|
3 pts
Level 2
All the key elements of the observed lesson are identified, described, and analyzed And/or If some are not applicable, the explanation is provided in the description And/or Assessment strategies that are used to engage the learner identified
|
2.6 pts
Level 1
Few key elements of the observed lesson are identified, described, and analyzed And/or If some are not applicable, the explanation is provided in the description And/or Assessment strategies that are used to engage the learner identified
|
|
4 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDanielson Rubric Domain and Component
|
|
4 pts
Level 4
The Danielson rubric (domain, component and indicators) are chosen as related to the observed lesson. And The clear, timestamped citations from low-inference notes with a well-supported rationale for the connection is provided with 3 different examples/ citations from low-inference notes. And The analysis of classroom activities directly relates to the Danielson rubric domain and related components are included.
|
3.4 pts
Level 3
The Danielson rubric (domain, component and indicators) are chosen as related to the observed lesson. And The clear, timestamped citations from low-inference notes with a well-supported rationale for the connection is provided with at least 2 different examples/ citations from low-inference notes. And/or The analysis of classroom activities directly relates to the Danielson rubric domain and related components are included.
|
3 pts
Level 2
The Danielson rubric (domain, component and indicators) are chosen as related to the observed lesson. And/or The clear, timestamped citations from low-inference notes with a well-supported rationale for the connection is provided with at least 1 different example/ citation from low-inference notes. And/or The analysis of classroom activities directly relates to the Danielson rubric domain and related components are included.
|
2.6 pts
Level 1
The Danielson rubric (domain, component and indicators) are chosen as related to the observed lesson. Or The clear, timestamped citations from low-inference notes with a well-supported rationale for the connection is provided with at least 1 different example/ citation from low-inference notes. Or The analysis of classroom activities directly relates to the Danielson rubric domain and related components are included.
|
|
4 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLesson inferences
|
|
4 pts
Level 4
Lesson inferences are clear and connect to the major theme identified in Danielson rubric domain and the component. And Learning strategies/activities candidate plans to use in the future are identified. And The rationale is provided of why candidate finds them effective And Supported by references.
|
3.4 pts
Level 3
Lesson inferences are clear and connect to the major theme identified in Danielson rubric domain and the component. And Learning strategies/activities candidate plans to use in the future are identified. And The rationale is provided of why candidate finds them effective And/or Supported by references.
|
3 pts
Level 2
Lesson inferences are clear and connect to the major theme identified in Danielson rubric domain and the component. And Learning strategies/activities candidate plans to use in the future are identified. And/or The rationale is provided of why candidate finds them effective And/or Supported by references.
|
2.6 pts
Level 1
Lesson inferences are clear and connect to the major theme identified in Danielson rubric domain and the component. And/or Learning strategies/activities candidate plans to use in the future are identified. And The rationale is provided of why candidate finds them effective And/or Supported by references.
|
|
4 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLow-inference notes timestamped
|
|
4 pts
Level 4
Low-inference notes are attached for each 5-mins and teacher-student dialog/actions are captured.
|
3.4 pts
Level 3
Low-inference notes are attached for each 10 mins of the and some teacher-student dialog/actions are captured.
|
3 pts
Level 2
Low-inference notes are inconsistent for each 10 mins period and teacher-student dialog/actions are not captured but described in their own words.
|
2.6 pts
Level 1
Low-inference notes are inconsistent with more than 15 mins period and teacher-student dialog/actions are not captured.
|
|
4 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHLP/Learning Strategy
|
|
4 pts
Level 4
One or more of the high-leverage practices and/or observed learning strategy is described And Detailed explanation of the activity where HLP/or learning strategy were observed provided with in 2 paragraphs And Evidence from low-inference notes is included
|
3.4 pts
Level 3
One or more of the high-leverage practices and/or observed learning strategy is described And Detailed explanation of the activity where HLP/or learning strategy were observed provided with in 2 paragraphs And/or Evidence from low-inference notes is included
|
3 pts
Level 2
One or more of the high-leverage practices and/or observed learning strategy is described And/or Detailed explanation of the activity where HLP/or learning strategy were observed provided with in 2 paragraphs And/r Evidence from low-inference notes is included
|
2.6 pts
Level 1
One or more of the high-leverage practices and/or observed learning strategy is described And/or Detailed explanation of the activity where HLP/or learning strategy were observed provided with in 1 paragraph And/or Evidence from low-inference notes is included
|
|
4 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGlow and Grow
|
|
4 pts
Level 4
Effective learning strategies, activities and assessments implemented in the lesson are described And Plan to use in future practice in place with examples And Suggestion for improvement with references (1) provided
|
3.4 pts
Level 3
Effective learning strategies, activities and assessments implemented in the lesson are described And Plan to use in future practice in place with examples And/or Suggestion for improvement with references (1) provided
|
3 pts
Level 2
Effective learning strategies, activities and assessments implemented in the lesson are described And/or Plan to use in future practice in place with examples And/or Suggestion for improvement with references (1) provided
|
2.6 pts
Level 1
Effective learning strategies, activities and assessments implemented in the lesson are described And/or Plan to use in future practice in place without examples And/or Suggestion for improvement without references provided
|
|
4 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics & APA format
|
|
4 pts
Level 4
Assignment contains 2 or fewer errors And All citations And References follow APA style.
|
3.4 pts
Level 3
Assignment contains 3- 5 errors And/or All citations And/or References follow APA style.
|
3 pts
Level 2
Assignment contains 6-7 errors And/or All citations And/or References follow APA style.
|
2.6 pts
Level 1
Assignment contains 8 or more errors And/or All citations And/or References follow APA style.
|
|
4 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness
|
|
4 pts
Level 4
Paper posted on time
|
3.4 pts
Level 3
Paper is posted one day late
|
3 pts
Level 2
Paper is posted two days late
|
2.6 pts
Level 1
Paper is posted more than two days late
|
|
4 pts
|
|
Total Points: 36
|
image1.jpeg
TinaF
683Module2LessonObservationAnalysis.docx
