Final project source strategies
FPSY 6102/FPSY 8102: Intersection of Crime, Psychology, and the Law
Final Project Assignment Rubric (Weeks 4, 5, 6, and 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CATEGORY |
EXCELLENT – above expectations |
GOOD – met expectations |
FAIR – below expectations |
POOR – significantly below expectations or missing |
SCORE |
|
Content (18 possible points) |
Paper demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper provides significant detail, including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas. (16–18 points)
|
Paper demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas. (14–15 points) |
Paper demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. (12–13 points)
|
Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. (0–11 points) |
|
|
Writing (7 possible points) |
Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper contains multiple, appropriate, and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment. (7 points)
|
Paper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources. (6 points) |
Paper is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality). (5 points) |
Paper is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources. (0–4 points) |
|
|
Instructor comments:
|
|
||||
|
Total Score (25 possible points): |
points |
© 2016 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 1 of 1