Hrm 6623 assignment

                                                                                 Strategic Application Rubric #1 – MSHRM Program                                                                    

 Students in HRM6623 (Training and Development) will analyze a case and prepare a research paper that includes the strategic application of training and development concepts.

Dimension

Does Not Meet Expectations (1)

Meets Expectations (2)

Exceeds Expectations (3)

Assessment: Distinguishes current HRD gaps from systemic (non-HRD) gaps, anticipates HRD needs based on organizational strategy, and anticipates HRD needs due to changes in technology

Displays little evidence of assessment or shows weak appreciation of organizational strategy in the attempt

Displays moderate evidence of assessment or shows moderate appreciation of organizational strategy in the attempt

Displays significant evidence of assessment or shows strong appreciation of organizational strategy in the attempt

Design: Defines strategy, objectives, method (fitted to the training target—skill, knowledge, interpersonal competency, or experiential growth), materials, and media (classroom or technological)

Defines few key areas of design or shows weak conception of the needed differences of method in the attempt

Defines some key areas of design or shows moderate conception of the needed differences of method in the attempt

Defines most key areas of design or shows strong conception of the needed differences of method in the attempt

Development: Organizes content assets (developed in the design phase) to plan timely and logical delivery of all learning components with proper integration.

Presents no clear delivery plan based on design components.

Presents clear delivery plan based on design components, but logical linkages to implementation components are unclear.

Presents clear delivery plan based on design components, with logical linkages to implementation components.

Implementation: Determines contractor versus in-house facilitator, type of facility, use of technology, equipment, materials, scheduling/sequencing, constraints, and pilot test if feasible.

Correctly specifies few implementation components or only demonstrates weak linkage to development in the attempt.

Correctly specifies some implementation components or demonstrates moderate linkage to development in the attempt.

Correctly specifies most components of implementation or demonstrates strong linkage to development in the attempt.

Dimension

Exceeds Expectations

Meets Expectations

Does Not Meet Expectations

Submission demonstrates content knowledge, understanding, and application gained from readings, videos, and other coursework or outside research

Submission demonstrates an excellent understanding of subject knowledge and application of knowledge within framework of the assignment. Demonstrates effective use of outside resources. Includes numerous original thoughts, critical thinking and synthesis that are appropriately justified.

Submission demonstrates good understanding of subject knowledge and application of knowledge within framework of the assignment. Some outside resources cited. Includes a number of original thoughts; others are appropriately justified.

Submission shows little understanding of subject knowledge and little ability to apply content knowledge within framework of the assignment.

Submission displays effective organization

Content is well-organized and coherent, topics are in logical sequence, includes clear introduction and conclusion

Content is basically organized but a few topics are out of logical order; introduction and  conclusion are generally clear

Content is difficult to follow; is not organized; weak or no introduction and/or conclusion

Submission displays correct spelling, tense, punctuation, and grammar usage

Submission contains grammatically correct sentences without any spelling errors, punctuation errors, or incorrect tenses.

Submission contains almost no grammatical issues, spelling errors, punctuation errors, or incorrect tenses.

Submission has   multiple grammatically incorrect sentences, spelling errors, punctuation errors, and incorrect tenses.

Submission reflects professional vocabulary appropriate to business or discipline

Submitter uses highly professional vocabulary in submission  reflecting terms and concepts used in the course

Submitter mostly uses professional vocabulary in submission reflecting terms and concepts from the course

Submitter does not use vocabulary appropriate for a professional audience reflecting terms and concepts from the course.

Submission adheres to requirements regarding format, due date, length, spacing, title page, references, or other stated requirements

Submission adheres to all stated requirements of assignment.

Submission fails to adhere to a stated requirement.

Submission fails to adhere to two or more stated requirements.