Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%)
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%)
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%)
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%)
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Feedback:
Quality of Work Submitted:
The purpose of the paper is clear.--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
No purpose statement was provided.
Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extend to which the work reflects the student's ability to:
Understand and interpret the assignment's key concepts.--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 9 (9%) - 10 (10%)
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
Good 8 (8%) - 8 (8%)
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
Fair 7 (7%) - 7 (7%)
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.
Poor 0 (0%) - 6 (6%)
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extend to which the work reflects the student's ability to:
Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 18 (18%) - 20 (20%)
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view.
Good 16 (16%) - 17 (17%)
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.
Fair 14 (14%) - 15 (15%)
Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.
Poor 0 (0%) - 13 (13%)
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.
Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extend to which the work reflects the student's ability to:
Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 18 (18%) - 20 (20%)
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.
Good 16 (16%) - 17 (17%)
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.
Fair 14 (14%) - 15 (15%)
Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped.
Poor 0 (0%) - 13 (13%)
Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting
Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity
Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.
Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting
English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting
The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Feedback:
Amblerchick
6521Rubric.docx
0
