6053 MOD 4 ASSGN
euro1776
6053MOD4ASSIGNMENTPROMPT.docxWorkplace Environment Assessment
Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.
In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To Prepare:
· Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
· Review the Work Environment Assessment Template*.
· Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
· Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
· Clark (2019)
· Hover and Williams (2022)
· Lee and Miller (2022)
· McDermott, Bernard, and Hathaway (2021)
*Template completed in the Week 7 discussion should not be submitted with this assignment.
The Assignment (3-6 pages total):
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)
· Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
· Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
· Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
· Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)
· Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
· Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
· Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)
· Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
· Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
By Day 7 of Week 9
Submit your Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK9Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NURS_6053_Module04_Week09_Assignment_Rubric
|
NURS_6053_Module04_Week09_Assignment_Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Work Environment Assessment *Template, completed in the week 7 discussion, should not be submitted with this assignment · Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace. · Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea that you believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. · Explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of your workplace. |
45 to >40.0 ptsExcellentThe responses accurately and thoroughly describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace. ... The responses thoroughly and clearly identify two surprising things about the results and thoroughly describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. ... The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace. 40 to >35.0 ptsGoodThe responses accurately describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace. ... The responses accurately identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. ... The responses accurately explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace. 35 to >31.0 ptsFairThe responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague or inaccurate. ... The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague or inaccurate. ... The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague or inaccurate. 31 to >0 ptsPoorThe responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. ... The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. ... The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggest about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. |
45 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Reviewing the Literature · Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article you selected. · Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment. · Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples. |
15 to >13.0 ptsExcellentThe responses accurately and thoroughly describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected. ... The responses accurately and completely explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment. ... The responses accurately and thoroughly explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. ... Specific and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses. 13 to >11.0 ptsGoodThe responses accurately describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected. ... The responses accurately explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment. ... The responses accurately explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. ... Specific examples are provided which may support the responses. 11 to >10.0 ptsFairThe responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague or inaccurate. ... The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate. ... The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague or inaccurate. ... Vague or inaccurate examples are provided which may support the responses. 10 to >0 ptsPoorThe responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. ... The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. ... The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. ... Specific examples are not provided to support the responses. |
15 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams · Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment. · Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment. |
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentUsing the literature, the responses clearly and thoroughly recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. ... The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. 17 to >15.0 ptsGoodUsing the literature, the responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. ... The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. 15 to >13.0 ptsFairUsing the literature, the responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy. ... The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy. 13 to >0 ptsPoorUsing the literature, the responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing. ... The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUsing proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodUsing proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairUsing proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources. 2 to >0 ptsPoorThe response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. ... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. ...Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. 2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. ... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (one or two) APA format errors. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (three or four) APA format errors. 2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (five or more) APA format errors. |
5 pts |
Total Points: 100
LEARNING RESOURCES
Learning Resources
· Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
·
· Chapter 5, “Collaborative Leadership Contexts: It Is All About Working Together (pp. 155–178)
· Chapter 8, “Creating and Shaping the Organizational Environment and Culture to Support Practice Excellence” (pp. 237–272)
· Chapter 7, “Building Cohesive and Effective Teams” (pp. 212–231)
· Clark Healthy Workplace InventoryLinks to an external site.. (2015). American Nurse Today, 10(11), 20.
Select at least ONE of the following:
· Clark, C. M. (2019). Fostering a culture of civility and respect in nursingLinks to an external site.. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 10(1), 44–52.
· Hover, L. A., & Williams, G. B. (2022). New nurses’ experience with lateral violence and their decision to remain in nursingLinks to an external site.. International Journal for Human Caring, 26(4), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.20467/HumanCaring-D-20-00069
· Lee, S., & Miller, K. (2022). Developing a diversity, equity, and civility council to advance health equity in nursing academia and practiceLinks to an external site.. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 46(3), E16–E23.
· McDermott, C., Bernard, N., & Hathaway, W. (2021). Taking a stand against workplace incivilityLinks to an external site.. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 52(5), 232–239.
· Document: Work Environment Assessment Template (Word document) Download Work Environment Assessment Template (Word document)
· TEDx. (2017, April). Jody Hoffer Gittell: The power of a simple ideaLinks to an external site. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7nL5RC5kdE
· Walden University, LLC. (Producer). (2009a). Working with Groups and Teams [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
