Reflection Report: Best Practice of BPI case study

profilerupali
6009PresentationmarkingsheetBrodowicz_SconzaG3.doc

PROJ6009 T1, 2020 Assessment 2A Marking And Feedback Form

Presenter / Group: _____________________Group 6 Daljeet, Rupali_______________________________ Date: __8/4__

Category

Scoring Criteria

Points

Score

Organisation

(15 points)

The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and audience.

5

4

Information is presented in a logical sequence.

5

3

Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references.

5

2

Content

(50 points)

Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation.

5

2

Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target audience, eg mapping, processes etc

10

8

Material included is relevant to the case study and reflect to the BPI theories

15

8

Critical analysis included on the selected case study, lesson learnt recorded

15

8

There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the presentation.

5

5

Presentation

(35 points)

Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around, etc.).

5

5

Speaker uses a clear, audible voice. Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth.

10

10

Good language skills and pronunciation are used.

5

3

Visual aids are well-prepared, informative, effective, and not distracting.

10

8

Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits.

5

2

Total Points

100

68

Feedback and Commentary

Presentation was too long timewise. More examples of companies which changed business model could have been useful. The slides had too many words.

Assessor Name/Group: Sconza-Brodowicz Group 3