Research and Planning for Intervention
Literacy Work Sample (LWS)
Clinical Field Experience Journal Link:
|
Classroom Observation Data Collection |
||
|
Observation Notes: B ehavior, participati fluency is low but decoding skills are strong; vocabulary development is low; comprehension is low from reading text, but higher from oral listening tasks on, learning style, strengths/weaknesses, learning challenges, social interactions, distractions, perseverance/motivation, etc. |
||
|
Student 1: Williams |
Student 2: Taylor |
Student 3: Wilkans |
|
· Behavior- follows rules most part. easily influence by others so he needs to be reminded a little more frequently. · Participation- when Williams can understand what is going on he will give his all but when he does not, he will lose focus, and must be promoted to stay on task. · Learning style- likes to be shown how to do something; looks for examples and wants to copy them; copying correctly transferring is a problem. · Learning challenges- there is a language delay in native language and English. · Literacy strengths/weaknesses- fluency is low; decoding skills are low and slow; vocabulary development is low; comprehension is low. · Social interactions- loves to try and talk with teacher, and other students even though there is a language barrier. · Distractions- a self-distractor, plays with shoes, clothes, and looks away. · Perseverance/motivation- people pleaser and wants to do well; looks to adults for help and to make sure he has things correct. Likes to hear good job and how proud you are of him.
|
· Behavior- follows rules all the time. Very well mannered. · Participation- she will interact with lesson no matter if her answer is right or wrong. · Learning style-likes to be shown how to do something. Also, will copy work sometimes she copies correctly sometimes she does not. · Literacy strengths/weaknesses- fluency is low but decoding skills are a little strong; vocabulary development is low; comprehension low, may be able to retail a story orally sometimes. · Learning challenges- she will shut down when she is defeated, or unsure about her work . · Social interactions- Taylor is very social and makes friends with anyone and makes everyone feel welcome. · Distractions- she loses focus very easily, needs redirection some days more than others, especially if she does not understand the lesson. · Perseverance/motivation-likes to hear she is doing a good job; this makes her want to keep trying and working. But this also slows her down with work if she is not constantly reminded, she is doing well. |
· Behavior- follows rules all the time. · Participation- she will interact with lessons but once she gets a few problems wrong she shuts down. · Learning style- needs for problems to be model. Will copy work and examples but does not copy off the board right. · Literacy strengths/weaknesses- can spell and decode some words but still needs help with certain sounds. · Learning challenges- will not ask for help. Will just sit and look at the assignments. Must be prompt for everything. · Social interactions- very shy and does not ask many questions or for help. · Distractions- loses focus easily, self-distractor. · Perseverance/motivation- no motivation. When told good job or she got something right she may smile. |
|
Discussion Notes/Additional Information: Individual literacy needs based on assessment data, individual behavior/social-emotional needs, IEP/504 plan, language needs, successful strategies used, and unsuccessful strategies used. |
||
|
Student 1: |
Student 2: |
Student 3: |
|
· Williams has an IEP in place and has been on an IEP since kindergarten. · Lives with mom and dad. · Dad speaks English and mom speaks a little English her original native language is Thai. · William needs close contact to teacher. He is allowed extra time with classwork or accommodated to do half for example if given 20 problems he only must complete 10. · does best in smaller group sizes. · smaller tasks and sets of directions work well.
|
· Lives with mom and dad. · Graduated from RTI because she was no longer below the 25 percentiles. But still shows risk for falling between the gaps. · She has a LAP in place (literacy, assessment portfolio. · She is a people pleaser. Needs to hear she is doing a good job to be motivated to continue do the work. · Knows a few sounds and how to decode words. · Small group works best for her. · Parents very supportive on pushing student to be better with skills needed to read and write. · Needs more practice on a task especially reading than given during usual core reading time. |
· Lives with mom and dad · Little information about at home background because she came right before winter break. · Graduated from RTI because she was no longer below the 25 percentiles. But still shows risk for falling between the gaps. · Shy with adults but talks with a few students. · Needs more practice on a task especially reading than given during usual core reading time · Small group works best for her.
|
|
Pre-Assessment of Reading Performance |
||
|
QRI Data: Record information obtained from implementation of the QRI for each student including literacy strengths and areas of need. |
||
|
Student 1: |
Student 2: |
Student 3: |
|
DEVELOPMENT READING ASSESSMENT · First grade students aim to be on a level 4 or higher the previous student reads on a AA which is lowest level in the DRA kits. · Another assessment the students were giving was called EasyCBM, this measures the students sounds, and letter recognition. The student scored on a kindergarten level for this assessment.
|
DEVELOPMENT READING ASSESSMENT · First grade students aim to be on a level 4 or higher the previous student reads on an AA which is lowest level in the DRA kits. · Another assessment the students were giving was called EasyCBM, this measures the students sounds, and letter recognition. The student scored on a kindergarten level for this assessment.
|
DEVELOPMENT READING ASSESSMENT · First grade students aim to be on a level 4 or higher the previous student reads on an AA which is lowest level in the DRA kits. · Another assessment the students were giving was called EasyCBM, this measures the students sounds, and letter recognition. The student scored on a kindergarten level for this assessment.
|
© 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
© 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.