WAQP Week 7 Assignment 2

profileMs90
55626632_Prospectus_Jones_M.docx

PhD Prospectus Form

Students | Complete your doctoral prospectus within this form. Write your responses in the white spaces using a scholarly tone and include in-text citations and APA reference entries, where appropriate. You can click on underlined terms and headings for descriptions, resource links, and examples located in the Appendix. For additional prospectus information and resources, refer to the Doctoral Research Coach. Complete the Research Design Alignment Table within this form using the information from earlier sections and self-assess your research design alignment. Submit this completed form into MyDR for formal evaluation and feedback when your committee chair indicates that you are ready to do so.

Student’s Name | Montoya Jones Student ID | A01171796

Program and Specialization * | Forensics Psychology with a specialization in Crisis Response Submission Date | 12/12/2024

*Remember that your study focus must be within the realm of your program and specialization area.

Evaluators Only | Complete this section and provide feedback on responses and rubric scores in the form where noted.

Committee Chairperson Name: Overall Assessment: Choose score.

Second Committee Member Name: Overall Assessment: Choose score.

PhD Program Director: Overall Assessment: Choose score.

Rubric Standard | Complete > Does the prospectus contain all the required elements? Refer to the annotated outline to see the required parts of the Dissertation Prospectus document.

Note. Please complete following the directions provided, using the stem sentences, and referring to the examples in the appendix.

Title

Provide a concise (aim for 15 words or fewer) working title for this study. Include the main topic, variables/concepts under investigation, and the relationship between them. A title should be fully explanatory when standing alone and include the most critical key words.

Understanding Compassion Fatigue in Law Enforcement First Responders: A Qualitative Study

Supporting Literature

The first step in developing your prospectus is to search the literature related to the general area you want to investigate (see social problem below). In your review of recent, empirical literature, what keywords did you search and in what databases?

The keywords and databases searched included Compassion fatigue, Law enforcement, Police officers, first responders, Secondary traumatic stress, Burnout, Emotional exhaustion, Vicarious trauma, Occupational stress, Trauma exposure, Psychological resilience, Organizational support, Coping strategies, Mental health in policing. The databases include PsycINFO, Criminal Justice Abstracts, SAGE Journals, JSTOR, ProQuest Criminal Justice Database, Scopus, EBSCO Criminal Justice Abstracts, and National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS).

Provide at least 10 brief summaries of recent, scholarly (peer-reviewed) articles that support/justify a current and relevant problem in your discipline or professional field. Source(s) supporting your framework should be included. Include the complete, APA reference entry, followed by (a) an in-text citation; (b) what was studied; (c) what was found; and (d) why this research is important in relation to your study. This evidence provides the justification for your research problem.

Blumberg, D. M., Papazoglou, K., & Schlosser, M. D. (2020). Organizational solutions to the moral risks of policing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 7461. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207461

(a) (Blumberg et al., 2020)

(b) The study examined the moral risks faced by law enforcement professionals, including moral distress, moral injury, ethical exhaustion, compassion fatigue, and lapses in ethical decision-making. The authors propose organizational strategies for police agencies to better address these risks, focusing on prevention efforts in recruitment, training, supervision, and promotion, as well as intervention approaches for affected officers.

(c) The authors found that organizational strategies such as ethical training, peer support, and leadership development can mitigate moral risks and compassion fatigue.

(d) This research is important as it provides potential organizational strategies that could be explored to mitigate compassion fatigue's impact in law enforcement.

Bosma, L. J., & Henning, S. L. (2022). Compassion fatigue among officers. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/compassion-fatigue-among-officers

(a) (Bosma & Henning, 2022)

(b) This article reviews the literature on compassion fatigue in law enforcement, focusing on its behavioral outcomes and implications for counseling. The study examines risk factors, symptoms, and treatment measures for compassion fatigue among police officers, highlighting the importance of early intervention, workplace support, and counseling programs. The research emphasizes the need for collaboration between mental health professionals and law enforcement agencies to implement effective strategies for preventing and treating compassion fatigue, ultimately improving officer well-being and job performance.

(c) The study revealed that law enforcement officers suffer from compassion fatigue due to prolonged exposure to traumatic events and emphasized the need for organizational mental health resources.

(d) The research is critical as it highlights the importance of institutional responses to officer wellbeing.

Burnett, M. E., Sheard, I., & St Clair-Thompson, H. (2020). The prevalence of compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction and perceived stress, and their relationships with mental toughness, individual differences and number of self-care actions in a UK police force. Police Practice and Research, 21(4), 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2019.1617144

(a) (Burnett et al., 2020)

(b) This study examines compassion fatigue, satisfaction, and stress in UK police, finding 20% experience negative outcomes. It identifies shift work, mental toughness, personality, and self-care as key predictors of well-being, suggesting ways to improve psychological health in law enforcement.

(c) Results showed significant relationships between compassion fatigue, mental toughness, and self-care actions.

(d) This research is relevant as it provides insights into individual factors that may influence compassion fatigue, which could inform exploration of how officers manage this issue.

Carroll, J. J., Mital, S., Wolff, J., Noonan, R. K., Martinez, P., Podolsky, M. C., Green, T. C. (2020). Knowledge, preparedness, and compassion fatigue among law enforcement officers who respond to opioid overdose. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 217, 108257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108257

(a) (Carroll et al., 2020)

(b) This study examines patrol officers' knowledge of Good Samaritan Laws (GSLs), experiences with overdose (OD) response, and perspectives on opioid OD prevention and response strategies. The research surveyed 2,829 officers, finding that while most knew if their state had a GSL, only 26% correctly understood its limited immunity provisions.

(c) Findings indicated that officers with higher knowledge and preparedness reported lower levels of compassion fatigue.

(d) This research is important as it highlights a specific context (opioid response) where compassion fatigue occurs, which could inform exploration of various experiences of compassion fatigue.

Davies, L. E., Brooks, M., & Braithwaite, E. C. (2023). Compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, and burnout, and their associations with anxiety and depression in UK police officers: A mixed method analysis. The Police Journal, 96(3), 509-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X221106107

(a) (Davies et al., 2023)

(b) This study investigates the relationships between professional quality of life variables (compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, and burnout) and mental health outcomes in UK police officers. The research combines a quantitative survey with qualitative interviews to provide a comprehensive understanding of these issues. The authors aim to inform decision-making on strategies to build and maintain psychological wellbeing among police personnel.

(c) Results showed significant associations between these factors, with qualitative data revealing themes of workload, lack of support, and exposure to trauma.

(d) This research is relevant as it uses a mixed-method approach, providing both quantitative and qualitative insights that could inform qualitative study design in this area.

Denk-Florea, C. B., Gancz, B., Gomoiu, A., Ingram, M., Moreton, R., & Pollick, F. (2020). Understanding and supporting law enforcement professionals working with distressing material: Findings from a qualitative study. PLOS ONE, 15(11), e0242808. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242808

(a) (Denk-Florea et al., 2020)

(b) This study examines the experiences of law enforcement personnel working with distressing materials, particularly child sexual abuse content. The research involved semi-structured interviews with 22 law enforcement professionals in England, UK. The study aims to identify factors impacting officers' resilience and provide recommendations for fostering resilience in organizations where employees are exposed to distressing content.

(c) Findings revealed various coping strategies and the importance of organizational support in managing emotional impact.

(d) This qualitative research is directly relevant to the study of compassion fatigue, providing insights into officers' experiences and coping strategies, as well as organizational response.

Gomes, G. P., Ribeiro, N., & Gomes, D. R. (2022). The impact of burnout on police officers' performance and turnover intention: The moderating role of compassion satisfaction. Administrative Sciences, 12(3), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030092

(a) (Gomes et al., 2022)

(b) This study examines the impact of burnout on performance and turnover intention among Portuguese police officers, while also investigating the moderating role of compassion satisfaction. The study aims to provide insights for better understanding burnout in police officers and offer practical recommendations for addressing this issue in law enforcement organizations.

(c) Results showed that burnout negatively affects performance and increases turnover intention, with compassion satisfaction moderating these relationships.

(d) This research is important as it highlights the interplay between burnout which is related to compassion fatigue and job outcomes, which could inform exploration of organizational impacts.

Grant, H. B., Lavery, C. F., & DeCarlo, J. (2019). An exploratory study of police officers: Low compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2793. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02793

(a) (Grant et al., 2019)

(b) This study investigates compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction among U.S. urban police officers, addressing a gap in research on these phenomena in law enforcement. The study aims to compare officers' levels of compassion fatigue and satisfaction to the general population and explore the relationships between these factors in the context of policing.

(c) Findings indicated that organizational stressors and exposure to traumatic events contribute to compassion fatigue.

(d) This research provides a foundation for understanding factors contributing to compassion fatigue, which is directly relevant to research questions in this area.

Papazoglou, K., Marans, S., Keesee, T., & Chopko, B. (2020). Police compassion fatigue. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 1-9. https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/police-compassion-fatigue

(a) (Papazoglou et al., 2020)

(b) This article examines compassion fatigue among police officers, its impact on their well-being and job performance, and the importance of compassion satisfaction as a protective factor. The authors discuss the unique challenges officers face when dealing with traumatic incidents and victims, and how prolonged exposure can lead to emotional detachment or numbness. They recommend that law enforcement agencies implement measures to support officers and prevent or mitigate the negative effects of compassion fatigue, while promoting compassion satisfaction to improve officer well-being and community relations.

(c) The authors identified various factors contributing to compassion fatigue and suggested organizational and individual strategies for mitigation.

(d) This research provides a comprehensive overview of compassion fatigue in policing, which can help frame studies and inform potential organizational strategies to explore.

Russo, C., Aukhojee, P., Tuttle, B. M., Johnson, O., Davies, M., Chopko, B. A., & Papazoglou, K. (2020). Compassion fatigue & burnout. In K. Papazoglou (Ed.), Power: Police Officer Wellness, Ethics, and Resilience (pp. 97-115). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817872-0.00007-0

(a) (Russo et al., 2020)

(b) This chapter examines compassion fatigue and burnout among police officers, exploring their definitions, negative impacts, and relationships with PTSD. The authors discuss the stigma surrounding mental health issues in law enforcement and the maladaptive coping strategies often employed by officers. They highlight the importance of compassion satisfaction and adaptive coping strategies in preventing and reversing the effects of compassion fatigue and burnout, emphasizing the need for holistic approaches to support officers' well-being and job performance.

(c) The authors discussed various factors contributing to these issues and potential interventions.

(d) This research provides theoretical background on compassion fatigue in law enforcement, which can help frame studies and inform interview questions.

Stancel, K., Russo, C., Koskelainen, M., Papazoglou, K., & Tuttle, B. M. (2019). Police moral injury, compassion fatigue, and compassion satisfaction: A brief report. Salus Journal, 7(1), 42-57. https://doaj.org/article/ec5e9e76284b4e529aa65e203b239e70

(a) (Stancel et al., 2019)

(b) This study investigates the relationships between compassion fatigue, moral injury, and compassion satisfaction among Finnish police officers. The researchers surveyed 454 officers from the National Police of Finland to examine how compassion fatigue and moral injury affect officers' compassion satisfaction. The authors provide clinical and practical recommendations to reduce the impact of compassion fatigue and moral injury while enhancing compassion satisfaction in law enforcement.

(c) Findings indicated significant relationships between these constructs, highlighting the complex nature of emotional experiences in policing.

(d) This research is important as it introduces the concept of moral injury in relation to compassion fatigue, which could provide additional depth to the exploration of officers' experiences.

Rubric Standard | Justified > Is evidence presented that this problem is significant to the discipline and/or professional field? The prospectus should provide relevant statistics and evidence, documentable discrepancies, and other scholarly facts that point to the significance and urgency of the problem.

Problem

What was the social problem that prompted you to search the literature to find out more? Write in complete sentences using a scholarly tone.

The situation or issue that prompted me to search the literature is growing concern over the mental health and well-being of law enforcement first responders in dealing with traumatic incidents. The potential impact of compassion fatigue on officer performance necessitates a deeper understanding of this phenomenon.

Now that you have read and summarized some of the recent literature to understand your problem, and given what other researchers are exploring, what meaningful gap have you identified that your study will address? (What have others not yet explored about this problem that you will contribute with your study?)

Although researchers have investigated this issue, the topic has not been explored in this way: While quantitative studies have established the prevalence and correlates of compassion fatigue in law enforcement, there is limited in-depth qualitative research examining officers' personal experiences with compassion fatigue and its perceived impact on job performance. This gap in the literature limits the understanding of how to effectively address compassion fatigue at both individual and organizational levels (Burnett et al., 2020; Davies et al., 2023).

References

Burnett, M. E., Sheard, I., & St Clair-Thompson, H. (2020). The prevalence of compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction and perceived stress, and their relationships with mental toughness, individual differences and number of self-care actions in a UK police force. Police Practice and Research, 21(4), 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2019.1617144

Davies, L. E., Brooks, M., & Braithwaite, E. C. (2023). Compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, and burnout, and their associations with anxiety and depression in UK police officers: A mixed method analysis. The Police Journal, 96(3), 509-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X221106107

Based on all of the above information (social problem, literature review, gap), in one sentence, what is your research problem ?

The specific research problem that will be addressed through this study is the limited understanding of law enforcement first responders' lived experiences with compassion fatigue and its perceived effects on their job performance.

Rubric Standard | Meaningful > Has a meaningful problem and gap in the research literature been identified? In other words, is addressing this problem the logical next step, given the previous exploratory and confirmatory research (or lack thereof) on this topic? It is not acceptable to simply replicate previous research for a Ph.D. degree.

Rubric Standard | Original > Does this project have potential to make an original contribution? The problem must be an authentic "puzzle" that needs solving, not merely a topic that the researcher finds interesting. Addressing the problem should result in an original contribution to the field or discipline.

Purpose

To address your stated research problem, what is the purpose of your study? Will you describe, compare, explore, examine, etc.? Complete the purpose sentence below and be sure to clarify your variables/concepts of interest.

The purpose of this Qualitative study is to explore the lived experiences of law enforcement first responders regarding compassion fatigue and their perception of its impact on their job performance. This study aims to investigate two primary concepts: (1) the manifestation of compassion fatigue in law enforcement officers' professional and personal lives and (2) the perceived impact on their job performance.

Framework (Conceptual or Theoretical)

What theory(ies) and/or concept(s) support (frame) your study and who are the original authors? Provide an in-text citation with your response, and the complete APA reference entry with summary in the Supporting Literature section.

The theories and/or concepts that ground this study include the Compassion Fatigue Resilience Model (CFRM) developed by Figley and Figley (2017), which provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the development, progression, and mitigation of compassion fatigue in helping professionals, including law enforcement officers. The CFRM consists of eight interconnected components: exposure to suffering, empathic ability, empathic concern, empathic response, residual compassion stress, traumatic memories, other life demands, and compassion fatigue resilience. These components collectively address the degree of contact with traumatized individuals, the helper's capacity to recognize and respond to others' pain, the stress resulting from such exposure, the impact of traumatic memories, external stressors, and the ability to cope with the challenges of helping without succumbing to compassion fatigue (Figley & Figley, 2017)

References

Figley, C. R., & Figley, K. R. (2017). Compassion fatigue resilience. The Oxford handbook of compassion science, 387-398.

How do these theories and/or concepts relate to your research problem, purpose, and the nature of your study?

The logical connections between the framework presented and the nature of my study include the following:

1. The CFRM's multifaceted approach aligns with the study's qualitative nature, allowing for an in-depth exploration of law enforcement officers' lived experiences with compassion fatigue. Each component of the model provides a lens through which to examine officers' personal narratives, ensuring a holistic understanding of their experiences.

2. The CFRM's inclusion of both contributing factors such as exposure to suffering, and empathic ability and protective elements such as compassion fatigue resilience corresponds with the study's aim to understand not only the challenges officers face but also potential impact on job performance.

3. Integration of Personal and Professional Contexts: By incorporating elements such as “Other Life Demands” alongside work-related factors, the CFRM supports the study's goal of examining how both personal and professional aspects influence officers' experiences of compassion fatigue.

4. The model's components, particularly “Empathic Response” and “Residual Compassion Stress,” provide a framework for exploring how compassion fatigue may affect officers' job performance, addressing a key aspect of the research problem.

5. While the CFRM was developed through quantitative methods, its comprehensive nature makes it well-suited for guiding qualitative inquiry. This alignment supports the study's goal of addressing the identified gap in qualitative research on compassion fatigue in law enforcement.

Rubric Standard | Grounded > Is the problem framed to enable the researcher to either build upon or counter the previously published findings on the topic? For most fields, grounding involves articulating the problem within the context of a theoretical base or conceptual framework. Although many approaches can ground a study in the scientific literature, the essential requirement is that the problem is framed such that the new findings will have implications for the previous findings.

Research Question(s) and Hypotheses (if applicable)

List the question(s) that you plan to use to address the research problem. Your question(s) must align with your study purpose and include the variables and/or concepts and how they will be examined.

1. What is the lived experience of compassion fatigue among law enforcement first responders?

2. What is the essence of how compassion fatigue manifests in the lived experience of law enforcement officers' daily work?

3. How do law enforcement officers deal with compassion fatigue?

Nature of the Study

What systematic approach/method and research design do you plan to use to address your research question(s)?

To address the research questions in this Qualitative study, the specific research design will include a phenomenological approach.

Reference entry for the work on which this research design is based:

Johnson, A. (2023). The lived experiences of 911 dispatchers with compassion fatigue: An interpretive phenomenology [Doctoral dissertation, Old Dominion University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://doi.org/10.25777/5m83-pm64

For your planned research design, what type of data will you need and what data collection instruments will provide it?

For my planned research design, I will need qualitative data in the form of detailed narratives and personal accounts from law enforcement officers about their experiences with compassion fatigue and its perceived impact on their job performance. The data collection instruments include semi-structured interviews and focus groups.

What data sources and analysis do you plan to use to answer your research question(s)?

The primary data source will be active-duty law enforcement officers from various agencies, backgrounds, and experience levels. This will include both male and female officers, as well as individuals from diverse racial and ethnic groups to ensure a comprehensive representation of experiences. Participants will be selected using purposive sampling to ensure they have experienced the phenomenon of compassion fatigue and can provide rich, relevant information. The analysis will entail various steps including transcription, phenomenological analysis, coding, peer review, and member checking.

What limitations, challenges, and/or barriers might you need to address while conducting this study (e.g., access to participants, access to data, requirements for storing data, separation of roles or other ethical considerations, instrumentation fees, etc.)?

1. Access to participants: Obtaining permission from law enforcement agencies to interview their officers may be challenging due to the sensitive nature of the topic and potential concerns about organizational reputation.

2. Participant willingness: Officers may be hesitant to discuss personal experiences related to compassion fatigue due to stigma, fear of professional consequences, or concerns about appearing vulnerable.

3. Confidentiality and data storage: Ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of participants' responses will be crucial. This will require secure data storage methods, including encrypted digital files and locked physical storage for any paper documents. Anonymization procedures will be necessary to protect participants' identities.

4. Ethical considerations: The study will need to address potential psychological risks to participants when discussing potentially traumatic experiences. This may require having mental health resources available for participants if needed.

5. Time constraints: Coordinating interviews and focus groups with officers who often work irregular shifts may present scheduling challenges, potentially extending the data collection phase.

6. Potential for data saturation issues: If the experiences shared are too similar, it may be challenging to reach true data saturation, potentially limiting the depth of insights.

7. Resource limitations: Conducting in-depth interviews and focus groups, along with their subsequent transcription and analysis, can be time-consuming and potentially costly.

Rubric Standard | Feasible > Can a systematic method of inquiry be used to address the problem; and does the approach have the potential to address the problem while considering potential risks and burdens placed on research participants? The tentative methodology demonstrates that the researcher has considered the options for inquiry and has selected an approach that has potential to address the problem.

Significance

How will your study address the meaningful, discipline-specific issue that you identified and therefore contribute to your field, discipline, professional practice, etc. contributing to positive social change?

This study is significant in that it will contribute to understanding the lived experiences of law enforcement first responders dealing with compassion fatigue, which can inform both individual and organizational interventions. By exploring officers' personal narratives and coping strategies, the findings can help develop more effective support systems and training programs to mitigate the impact of compassion fatigue. This research has practical implications for law enforcement agencies seeking to improve officer wellbeing and job performance while reducing turnover and burnout. The study can drive positive social change by promoting better mental health support for law enforcement professionals, which in turn may lead to improved police-community relations. When officers are better equipped to manage compassion fatigue, they are more likely to maintain empathy and professional effectiveness in their interactions with the public. Additionally, insights from this research could inform policy changes regarding mental health resources and organizational support systems in law enforcement agencies.

Rubric Standard | Impact > Does this project have potential to affect positive social change? As described in the Significance section, the anticipated findings have potential to support the mission of Walden University to promote positive social change.

Rubric Standard | Objective > Is the topic approached in an objective manner? The framing of the problem should not reveal bias or present a foregone conclusion. Even if the researcher has a strong opinion on the expected findings, the researcher must maximize scholarly objectivity by framing the problem in the context of a systematic inquiry that permits multiple possible conclusions.

Partner Site Masking Self-Check

Walden capstones typically mask the identity of the partner organization. The methodological and ethical reasons for this practice as well as criteria for exceptions are outlined here (link to posted guidance).

☒ Check here to confirm that you will mask the identity of the organization in the final capstone that you publish in ProQuest.

☐ If you perceive that your partner organization’s identity would be impossible to mask or if there is a strong rationale for naming the organization in your capstone, please check this box so that your Program Director can review your request for an exception. If granted, that exception must be confirmed by the IRB during the ethics review process. The IRB will also ensure that your consent form(s) and/or site agreement(s) permit naming the organization.

Research Design Alignment Table

Hover over bold font for Instructions and click links for resources. |

Instructions | Quantitative Example Table | Qualitative Example Table

Research Design Alignment Table Video Tutorial (YouTube) | Doctoral Research Design Alignment Appointments or Office Hours

Research

Problem, Purpose, and Framework

Research Question(s), Method, & Design

Types of Data to be Collected and Data Collection

Instruments

Data

Sources

Data

Analysis

Problem: The specific research problem is that there is a limited understanding of law enforcement first responders' lived experiences with compassion fatigue and its perceived effects on their job performance.

Purpose: The purpose of this qualitative study is to explore the lived experiences of law enforcement first responders regarding compassion fatigue and their perception of its impact on their job performance.

Framework: The theories

and/or concepts that ground this study include Figley’s (2017) Compassion Fatigue Resilience Model

RQ1: What is the lived experience of compassion fatigue among law enforcement first responders?

Method: Qualitative

Design: phenomenological approach.

Detailed narratives

Focus Groups

The data will be analyzed using thematic coding to identify patterns and themes within the participant narratives. This will involve organizing the data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and producing the final analysis. The process will include reading through transcripts multiple times to ensure familiarity with the data, coding meaningful segments, and grouping codes into broader themes that capture the essence of participants' experiences.

RQ2: What is the essence of how compassion fatigue manifests in the lived experience of law enforcement officers' daily work?

Method: Qualitative

Design: phenomenological approach.

Personal accounts

Semi-structured interviews

The data will be analyzed using thematic coding to identify patterns and themes within the participant narratives. This will involve organizing the data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and producing the final analysis. The process will include reading through transcripts multiple times to ensure familiarity with the data, coding meaningful segments, and grouping codes into broader themes that capture the essence of participants' experiences.

RQ3: 3. How do law enforcement officers deal with compassion fatigue?

Method: Qualitative

Design: phenomenological approach.

Personal accounts

Semi-structured interviews

The data will be analyzed using thematic coding to identify patterns and themes within the participant narratives. This will involve organizing the data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and producing the final analysis. The process will include reading through transcripts multiple times to ensure familiarity with the data, coding meaningful segments, and grouping codes into broader themes that capture the essence of participants' experiences.

Note. The information in the first column must align with all rows, and each individual RQ row must show alignment across the columns for that row.

Once your Research Design Alignment Table is completed, reflect on your design alignment. Ask yourself:

1. Is there a logical progression from the research problem to the purpose of the study?

2. Does the identified framework ground the investigation into the stated problem?

3. Do the problem, purpose, and framework in the left-hand column align with the RQ(s) (all rows)?

4. Does each RQ address the problem and align with the purpose of the study?

5. Does the information across each individual row match/align with the RQ listed for that row?

· By row, will the variables listed address the RQ?

· By row, will the analysis address the RQ?

· By row, can the analysis be completed with the data points that will be collected?

Rubric Standard | Aligned > Do the various aspects of the prospectus align overall? The nature of the study should align with the problem, research questions, and tentative approaches to inquiry.

Appendix

The Doctoral Prospectus

The Doctoral Prospectus is a brief document that provides preliminary information about your dissertation research and is used in two ways:

· It serves as the tentative plan for developing the proposal and is evaluated to ensure doctoral-level work (e.g., feasibility, alignment, etc.).

· It provides information used to assign the committee University Research Reviewer.

Prospectus milestone approval from the committee chair, second committee member, and a program-level designee is required for you to move forward and work on your proposal. The plan is subject to change, and parts of your research design may need to be adjusted after you complete your exhaustive review of the literature during proposal development.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Title

Titles should be concise (aim for 15 words or fewer), be a statement, not a question, and no colons please. The title should indicate the main topic and the variables/concepts under study and the relationship between them. A title should be fully explanatory when standing alone and include the most critical key words (a searchable statement of what the manuscript contains). Avoid words that serve no purpose (such as methods, results, a study of..., or investigation of...), use full terms (avoid abbreviations), and capitalize any word of four or more letters, and all parts of a verb. For more information, see the F&S Checklist.

Quantitative (QN) Example

Differences in the Quality of Problem Statements Written Throughout the Capstone

Qualitative (QL) Example

How Online Doctoral Students Develop a Dissertation Problem Statement

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Background Literature

Probably the most important step in the research process is searching recent, peer-reviewed literature and reading articles related to the general area you want to investigate. The area is based on an identified social problem. As you read and learn, you will narrow your focus. This is how you will identify a discipline-specific research problem.

[ Note: Scholarly, empirical articles and how to find them.]

First, you’ll need to determine your search terms or keywords and the databases you should search. As you conduct your search of the literature, stay organized by keeping a search log.

Search Log Example

Database

Search Terms

Results

Notes

Education Source

online doctoral program completion; limited to peer reviewed, 2016-present

1175

Search too broad; Narrow by using multiple terms

ERIC

online doctoral program completion AND ABD; limited to peer reviewed, 2016-present

13

Much better; Several relevant articles found

Etc.

Example for this Form

The keywords and databases searched included ABD , online doctoral program completion, doctoral capstone completion, online research training, and online learning in the databases Education Source, ERIC, and SAGE Journals, as well as in a multidatabase search.

As you read and evaluate literature, you also need to organize your research. A literature review matrix is one way to help you visualize what has and hasn't been done in your field. It will help you understand the scholarly works related to your area of interest. The importance of organizing and recording your review of literature cannot be overstated. You will refer to your notes as you write, so start on the right track from the beginning!

[ Suggestion: If you keep your search log in an Excel workbook, use the second tab in the same workbook for your literature review matrix.]

For this form, include the complete, APA reference entry and (a) an in-text citation; (b) what they studied; (c) what they found; and (d) why this is important in relation to your study. This evidence provides the justification for your research problem. These sources provide justification that this problem is meaningful to the discipline or professional field. These references should ideally be from the past 5 years. Reference entries related to the framework should be included here, too. [ Note: During proposal development, you will conduct an exhaustive review and synthesize your sources, rather than summarize.]

Example (for one article; at least 10 are required)

Ismail, H. M., Majid, F. A., & Ismail, I. S. (2013). “It’s complicated” relationship: Research students’ perspective on doctoral supervision. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 165–170. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.078

(a) Ismail, Majid, and Ismail (2013); (b) focused on the student experience with supervision while learning to conduct research; (c) found three issues of lack of positive communication, lack of expertise, and power conflicts; and (d) this is important in relation to my study because it may help explain progress on the development of a problem statement in the capstone process.

Rubric Standard | Justified > Is evidence presented that this problem is significant to the discipline and/or professional field?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Problem

Social Problem

The situation or issue being experienced by a population or within your discipline that prompted you to search the literature to find out more is sometimes called a social problem. It is the issue that students see “on the ground” so to speak. The social problem is often what prompts students to think about a topic of interest. Usually such a topic is one that students identify with, sometimes having personally experienced some aspect of the problem as it exists in the world.

Example Social Problem

The issue that prompted me to search the literature is the low completion rate of students in doctoral programs. It is common knowledge in the education discipline that only about half of the students who enter doctoral programs will complete, and the lack of progress is often due to the dissertation process. A search in The Chronicle of Higher Education will result in numerous articles about supporting doctoral students with their capstone research to improve the completion rates of doctoral programs.

Gap

The need to address an identified gap in the research literature must be clear and there must be current relevance to the discipline and area of practice. Keep in mind that a gap in the research is not, in and of itself, a reason to conduct research. The gap relates to the rubric standard: Meaningful.

Example Gap

Although researchers have investigated this issue, there is very little or no literature on the development of problem statements by students in online doctoral programs.

Research Problem

A research problem is a focused topic of concern, a condition to be improved upon, or troubling question that is supported in scholarly literature or theory that you study to understand in more detail, and that can lead to recommendations for resolutions. It is the research problem that drives the rest of the dissertation: the purpose, the research questions, and the methodology.

QN Example of Research Problem

In one sentence, the specific research problem is that it is not known whether the quality of problem statements written by online doctoral students varies over time in the program.

QL Example of Research Problem

In one sentence, the specific research problem is that there is a lack of understanding about how online doctoral students go about developing their research problem statement for their dissertations.

Rubric Standard | Meaningful > Has a meaningful problem and gap in the research literature been identified?

Rubric Standard | Original > Does this project have potential to make an original contribution?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Purpose

To address your stated research problem, what is the purpose of your study? Will you describe, compare, explore, examine, etc.? Be sure to clarify your variables/concepts of interest. For example:

· In quantitative studies, state what needs be studied by describing two or more factors (variables) and a conjectured relationship among them related to the identified gap or problem.

· In qualitative studies, describe the need for increased understanding about the issue to be studied, based on the identified gap or problem.

· In mixed-methods studies, with both quantitative and qualitative aspects, clarify how the two approaches will be used together to inform the study.

QN Example of Purpose

The purpose of this quantitative study is to examine differences in the quality of problem statements written by doctoral students in online programs during the various stages of their doctoral study development.

QL Example of Purpose

The purpose of this qualitative study is to improve the understanding of the process by which doctoral students in online programs arrive at a viable problem statement for their dissertations.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Framework

The framework includes the theories and/or concepts relevant to your topic. Align the framework with the problem, purpose, research questions, and background of your study. This theoretical or conceptual framework is the basis for understanding, designing, and analyzing ways to investigate your research problem (data collection and analysis). Provide the original scholarly literature (citing original authors) on the theory and/or concepts, even if it is more than 5 years old. Please do not cite secondary sources.

Example Theoretical Framework

The theories and/or concepts that ground this study include Perry’s (1970) theory of epistemological development.

Example Conceptual Framework

The theories and/or concepts that ground this study include Perry’s (1970) theory of epistemological development, focusing specifically on the concepts of online learning and the pedagogical challenges associated with online learning and dissertation writing.

Next, explain how these theories and/or concepts relate to your research problem, purpose, and the nature of your study. Your topic/approach should align with the identified framework so that you will either build upon or counter the previously published findings on the topic.

Example Connection for the Theoretical Framework

The logical connections between the framework presented and my study approach include Perry’s theoretical work, which has been used extensively in all aspects of higher education, albeit more frequently with undergraduates than with doctoral students. The approach provides details on cognitive-structural changes that emerge as a result of development and learning.

Example Connection for the Conceptual Framework

The logical connections between the framework presented and my study approach include Perry’s theoretical work, which has been used extensively in all aspects of higher education, albeit more frequently with undergraduates than with doctoral students. Further, subsequent research and application of Perry’s theory offer guidance on ways to facilitate academic development, thus allowing for insight into the pedagogical challenge of the dissertation.

Rubric Standard | Grounded > Is the problem framed to enable the researcher to either build upon or counter the previously published findings on the topic?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Research Question(s) and Hypotheses (if applicable)

List the overarching question and/or a series of related questions that are informed by the study purpose, that will be used to address the research problem. A research question informs the research design by providing a foundation for:

· generation of null and alternative hypotheses in quantitative studies,

· questions necessary to build the design structure for qualitative studies, and

· a process by which different methods will work together in mixed-methods studies.

QN Example RQs and Hypotheses

Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, what are the differences in the overall quality of problem statements as students move through the doctoral study stages?

H 01—Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, there are no statistically significant differences in the overall quality of problem statements as students progress through the doctoral study process.

H 1—Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, there are statistically significant differences in the overall quality of problem statements as students progress through the doctoral study process.

QL Example RQ

For students with a high-quality problem statement at the final dissertation stage, what was the process that they used to develop it?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Nature of the Study

Explain the systematic approach/method and research design you plan to use to address your research question(s). Examples of study design are as follows:

· Quantitative—for experimental, quasiexperimental, or nonexperimental designs; treatment-control; repeated measures; causal-comparative; single-subject; predictive studies; or other quantitative approaches

· Qualitative—for basic/generic qualitative design, ethnography, case study, grounded theory, narrative inquiry, phenomenological research, policy analysis, or other qualitative traditions

· Mixed methods, primarily quantitative—for sequential, concurrent, or transformative studies, with the focus on quantitative methods

· Mixed methods, primarily qualitative—for sequential, concurrent, or transformative studies, with the focus on qualitative methods

· Other—for another design, to be specified with a justification provided for its use

QN Example for Nature of the Study

To address the research questions in this quantitative study, the specific research design will include a repeated-measures design (Frankfort-Nachmias & Nachmias, 2008) with objective ratings of student work products examined across time. This quantitative analysis should help pinpoint the amount of growth from the beginning to the end of the project.

Reference entry for the work on which this research design is based:

Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (2008). Research methods in the social sciences cd-rom  spss cd-rom vol 15. (7th ed.). Worth Pub.

QL Example for Nature of the Study

To address the research questions in this qualitative study, the specific research design will include a basic quality study and analysis will follow Saldana’s (2016) descriptive coding process and use first and second cycle coding.

Reference entry for the work on which this research design is based:

Saldaña J. (2016).  The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage.

Then, for your planned research design, present the type of data you will need, and a list of possible data collection instruments that could be used to address the proposed research question(s). At this point, you should have an idea of the type of data needed to address your research question(s). Explain whether you will be collecting primary data (collected by the you, the researcher) or accessing secondary data (preexisting or public data collected by others). Possible secondary data sources, by program, are available on the Office of Research and Doctoral Services website. [ Note. This is your tentative plan, so keep in mind that things might need to be modified during the proposal stage—particularly after you have completed your exhaustive review of the literature.]

Type of Data (From IRB Form A): Interviews, focus groups, questionnaires/surveys that I administer; public records or documents; private records or documents (released by a school, clinic, business, or other entity); observations in public; observation in non-public spaces; other

Data Collection Instruments: Survey or questionnaire that I will create (not for measuring constructs); survey or questionnaire developed by others—provide specific name of instrument; researcher-created interview guide; observation guide, document review guide .

QN Example Type of Data and Data Collection Instruments

For my planned research design, I will need to utilize secondary data (private records released by a school); therefore, I will not be using any data collection instrument.

QL Example Type of Data and Data Collection Instruments

For my planned research design, I will need to recruit both student and faculty participants for individual interviews. Interview protocols will be developed to address the problem and purpose of the study.

Next, provide the data sources and analysis you plan to use to answer your research question(s).

Data Sources: For existing data, list the specific databases that are the data sources; For data the researcher will collect, list the specific criteria for participants and ideas about how you will recruit them.

Data Analysis: For quantitative, provide variables, scales of measurement, and statistical analysis. For qualitative, Provide specific methods for qualitative data analysis.

QN Example for Data Sources and Analysis

I will request access to preexisting/secondary data from the W University’s online doctoral program. The program collects and rates doctoral problem statements written at four key points in a doctoral student’s career: the premise, the prospectus, the proposal, and the final study. The data will be deidentified and contain the scores by stage of program for 300 online doctoral students.

Variables: IV = Time (capstone stage with 4 categories-premise, prospectus, proposal, final study); DV = numeric rating

Scales of Measurement: IV = nominal; DV = interval/ratio

Analysis: one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)

QL Example for Data Sources and Analysis

I will recruit 12 faculty and 12 students from an online forum for doctoral programs. Inclusion criteria for faculty include mentoring at least one dissertation student through graduation, mentoring at least 5 dissertation students overall. Inclusion criteria for students include having a high-quality problem statement and IRB approval, but not past graduation.

The data analysis will follow Saldana’s (2016) descriptive coding process and use first and second cycle coding. Descriptive coding is used to assign labels to words or phrases in the data. First and second cycle coding means that the data are reviewed more than once using one or more types of coding. Codes will be categorized, which means synthesizing the codes into consolidated meaning. Categories will be moved into themes, which are phrases or sentences that describe a process derived from the categories.

Finally, provide information on limitations, challenges, and/or barriers that may need to be addressed when conducting this study. These may include access to participants, access to data, separation of roles (researcher versus employee), instrumentation fees, etc. If you are thinking about collecting data on a sensitive topic or from a vulnerable population, an early consultation with the Institutional Review Board (IRB; [email protected]) during your prospectus process is recommended to gain ethics guidance that you can incorporate into your subsequent proposal drafts and research planning. [ Note. Find more information on research ethics and potential “red flag” issues on the IRB Guides and FAQs.]

QN Example

A potential barrier when using secondary data is that data access will probably include a partner-site agreement and potentially an external research ethics review (IRB), which may take some additional time. A possible barrier for collecting survey data is difficulty in recruitment of participants. I will attend IRB Office Hours to ask questions about these issues.

QL Example

A potential barrier when collecting primary data include partner site agreement and possible difficulty recruiting participants for interviews. Ensuring clear separation of my role at the institution from my role as researcher may also be a challenge.

Rubric Standard | Feasible > Can a systematic method of inquiry be used to address the problem; and does the approach have the potential to address the problem while considering potential risks and burdens placed on research participants?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Significance

Here you explain how your study addresses the meaningful, discipline-specific issue that you identified and will therefore contribute to your field, discipline, professional practice, etc. contributing to positive social change. Detail how your findings might support professional practice or allow practical application (answer the So what? question).

Example Significance

This study is significant in that it will fill a gap in understanding by focusing specifically on development of problem statements by students in online doctoral programs. The results of this study should aid doctoral committees and academic programs in helping students to succeed in their final projects, thus supporting eventual degree attainment. Education has long been a force for social change by addressing inequities in society. Because a broad range of students attends online institutions, supporting their successful attainment of a terminal degree allows for increased diversity among individuals in key academic and scholarly leadership positions.

Rubric Standard | Impact > Does this project have potential to affect positive social change?

Rubric Standard | Objective > Is the topic approached in an objective manner?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

My Doctoral Research ( MyDR)

If you have not done so already, you should familiarize yourself with the My DR system. The MyDR system was designed to assist you and your committee in navigating your doctoral research journey, from the very beginning through the final approval. The various landing pages in MyDR will track your progress and will serve as a central location for resources to support that progress. There is a process flow tool in which you exchange and store faculty evaluations of and feedback on your work as you progress along that journey.

You will be entered into the MyDR system when both your committee chair and second member nominees are approved by the academic program. At that point, you will be able to access MyDR from the homepage of your dissertation completion course in Blackboard. The first document that you will submit for approval in MyDR will be your prospectus.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

QN Sample Research Design Alignment Table

Research

Problem, Purpose, and Framework

Research Question(s), Method, & Design

Types of Data to be Collected and Data Collection

Instruments

Data

Sources

Data

Analysis

Problem: The specific research problem is that it is not known whether the quality of problem statements written by online doctoral students varies over time in the program.

Purpose: The purpose of this quantitative study is to examine differences in the quality of problem statements written by doctoral students in online programs during the various stages of their doctoral studies.

Framework: The theories and/or concepts that ground this study include Perry’s (1970) theory of epistemological development.

RQ1: Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, what are the differences in the overall quality of problem statements as students move through the doctoral study stages?

Method: Quantitative

Design: A repeated-measures design

I will need to utilize secondary data (private records released by a school); therefore, I will not be using any data collection instrument.

I will request access to preexisting/secondary data from the W University’s online doctoral program. The program collects and rates doctoral problem statements written at four key points in a doctoral student’s career: the premise, the prospectus, the proposal, and the final study. The data will be deidentified and contain the scores by stage of program for 300 online doctoral students.

Variables: IV = Time (capstone stage with 4 categories-premise, prospectus, proposal, final study); DV = numeric rating

Scales of Measurement: IV = nominal; DV = interval/ratio

Analysis: one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)

RQ2:

Method:

Design:

RQ3:

Method:

Design:

QL Sample Research Design Alignment Table

Research

Problem, Purpose, and Framework

Research Question(s), Method, & Design

Types of Data to be Collected and Data Collection

Instruments

Data

Sources

Data

Analysis

Problem: The specific research problem is that there is a lack of understanding about how online doctoral students go about developing their research problem statement for their dissertations.

Purpose: The purpose of this basic qualitative study is to improve the understanding of the process by which doctoral students in online programs arrive at a viable problem statement for their dissertations.

Framework: The theories and/or concepts that ground this study include Perry’s (1970) theory of epistemological development, focusing specifically on the concepts of online learning and the pedagogical challenges associated with online learning and dissertation writing.

RQ1: For students with a high-quality problem statement at the final dissertation stage, what was the process that they used to develop it?

Method: Qualitative

Design: basic qualitative

I will need to recruit both student and faculty participants for individual interviews. Interview protocols will be developed to address the problem and purpose of the study.

I will recruit 12 faculty and 12 students from an online forum for doctoral programs. Inclusion criteria for faculty include mentoring at least one dissertation student through graduation, mentoring at least 5 dissertation students overall. Inclusion criteria for students include having a high-quality problem statement and IRB approval, but not past graduation.

The data analysis will follow Saldañas (2016) descriptive coding process and use first and second cycle coding. Descriptive coding is used to assign labels to words or phrases in the data. First and second cycle coding means that the data are reviewed more than once using one or more types of coding. Codes will be categorized, which means synthesizing the codes into consolidated meaning. Categories will be moved into themes, which are phrases or sentences that describe a process derived from the categories.

RQ2:

Method:

Design:

RQ3:

Method:

Design:

image1.png