Intervention Presentation and Capstone Video Reflection

Dr. Michael L. Jones

RUBRICS

CRITERIA 1

Assess the contribution of an intervention to patient, family, or group satisfaction and quality of life.COMPETENCY

Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.

NON_PERFORMANCEDoes not assess the contribution of an intervention to patient, family, or group satisfaction and quality of life.BASICAttempts to assess the contribution of an intervention to patient, family, or group satisfaction and quality of life based on unfounded assumptions.PROFICIENTAssesses the contribution of an intervention to patient, family, or group satisfaction and quality of life.DISTINGUISHEDAssesses the contribution of an intervention to patient, family, or group satisfaction and quality of life. The assessment is fair, unbiased, and supported by feedback from the patient, family, or group.

COMMENTS:

I see that you began to explain your assessment, but this section was a bit unclear. I did not see enough discussion of how evidence was used to guide your interventions.  This decreased clarity of your presentation. How did your outcomes compare to your initial predictions?  This is needed for a higher performance score.

CRITERIA 2

Describe one's use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and implement a capstone project.COMPETENCY

Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence.

NON_PERFORMANCEDoes not describe one’s planning and implementation of a capstone project.BASICAttempts to describe one’s planning and implementation of a capstone project.PROFICIENTDescribes one's use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and implement a capstone project.DISTINGUISHEDSuccinctly describes one's use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and implement a capstone project. Project planning and implementation clearly reflect the influence of evidence-based practice.

COMMENTS:

I liked that you attempted to discuss how EBP, and peer reviewed literature was utilized within the capstone project. This section of the presentation lacked clarity due to lack of a connection to improved outcomes. The connection to literature also needs to be addressed more fully. Are there authors you might cite who could provide supporting evidence from the literature, to strengthen this section? This is needed for a higher performance score.

CRITERIA 3

Assess the degree to which one successfully leveraged health care technology in a capstone project to improve outcomes or communication with a patient, family, or group.COMPETENCY

Apply health information and patient care technology to improve patient and systems outcomes.

NON_PERFORMANCEDoes not describe how one used health care technology in a capstone project.BASICAttempts to describe how one used health care technology in a capstone project.PROFICIENTAssesses the degree to which one successfully leveraged health care technology in a capstone project to improve outcomes or communication with a patient, family, or group.DISTINGUISHEDPresents an articulate assessment of the degree to which one successfully leveraged health care technology in a capstone project to improve outcomes or communication with a patient, family, or group. Offers keen insight into prospective improvements in health care technology use.

COMMENTS:

I did not see how you described how one used health care technology in a capstone project.

CRITERIA 4

Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of one’s capstone project, as well as any contributions the project made to policy development.COMPETENCY

Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care.

NON_PERFORMANCEDoes not describe health policies that influenced the planning and implementation of one’s capstone project and any contributions the project made to policy development.BASICAttempts to describe health policies that influenced the planning and implementation of one’s capstone project and any contributions the project made to policy development.PROFICIENTExplains how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of one’s capstone project, as well as any contributions the project made to policy development.DISTINGUISHEDPresents an articulate assessment of how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of one’s capstone project, as well as on any contributions the project made to policy development. Offers keen insight into the baccalaureate-prepared nurse's role in policy implementation and development.

COMMENTS:

I did not see this area of the scoring guide addressed in the video reflection. I recommend always keeping your scoring guide rubric close by as you complete your video reflection so that no criterion will be overlooked.

CRITERIA 5

Explain whether capstone project outcomes matched one's initial predictions and documents the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form. Document the completion of nine hours of practicum time.COMPETENCY

Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient safety, and reduce the cost of care.

NON_PERFORMANCEDoes not describe capstone project outcomes and does not document the completion of nine practicum hours in Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form.BASICAttempts to describe capstone project outcomes and/or does not document the completion of nine practicum hours in Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form.PROFICIENTExplain whether capstone project outcomes matched one's initial predictions and documents the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form. Documents the completion of nine hours of practicum time.DISTINGUISHEDProvides an articulate and perceptive explanation of whether capstone project outcomes matched one's initial predictions. Exhibits clear insight into the generalizability and best-practice potential of the intervention. Documents the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form. Documents the completion of nine hours of practicum time.

COMMENTS:

Thank you for attempting to describe your capstone project outcomes. Tell me more about how your outcomes matched your initial predictions. Please remember to document the completion of nine practicum hours.

CRITERIA 6

Assess one’s personal and professional growth throughout a capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program.COMPETENCY

Integrate professional standards and values into practice.

NON_PERFORMANCEDoes not summarize one’s personal and professional growth throughout a capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program.BASICSummarizes one’s personal and professional growth throughout a capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program.PROFICIENTAssesses one’s personal and professional growth throughout a capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program.DISTINGUISHEDObjectively assesses one’s personal and professional growth throughout a capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program. Provides a comprehensive and detailed retrospective of one’s overall performance and growth.

COMMENTS:

You assessed your personal and professional growth throughout a capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program. Tell me more about your overall performance and growth.

CRITERIA 7

Communicate professionally in a clear and well-organized video.COMPETENCY

Integrate professional standards and values into practice.

NON_PERFORMANCEDoes not communicate in a video.BASICCommunicates in a video. Content delivery is hesitant, unclear, or read from a script.PROFICIENTCommunicates professionally in a clear and well-organized video.DISTINGUISHEDCommunicates professionally in a clear and well-organized video. Content delivery is focused, smooth, and well-rehearsed. Information sources are credited appropriately.

COMMENTS:

You communicated professionally and clearly in your video. Might you have resources to support your observations?

SUPPLEMENTAL FEEDBACK