Week 4 assignments.

profilelanaden1989
5111WA4-rubric.pdf

BUS 5111 Unit 4 Written Assignment (with calculations) Rubric

Criterion No Proficiency Limited Proficiency Emerging

Proficiency Proficient Advanced

Weight

(%)

Provides correct

values for

computations.

Less than half of

the values

accurately

provided.

Approximately half of

the values accurately

provided.

Most values accurately

provided.

Almost all values are

accurately provided.

All values provided

accurately. 30%

Score 0 4 6 8 10

Explains approach to the problem

Does not explain

approach to the

problem.

Explains approach to

the problem but

explanation is unclear

or incorrect.

Explains approach to

the problem but

explanation is vague.

Includes a narrative

that clearly explains

approach to the

problem.

Includes narrative

that clearly explains

approach to the

problem and provides

supporting details

and examples.

20%

Score 0 4 6 8 10

Explains the difference between a yield that is based on cost, as opposed to one that is based on current market value. The explanation discusses the different uses of both.

No table is

provided.

Explanation of the

differences between a

yield that is based on

cost rather than

current market value is

not accurate and little

or no explanation of

the different uses of

both exists.

Explains the difference

between a yield that is

based on cost rather

than current market

value. The explanation

is brief or vague but

different uses of both

is addressed.

Explains the

difference between a

yield that is based on

cost rather than

current market value.

The explanation

discussed the

different uses of

both.

Explains the

difference between a

yield that is based on

cost rather than

current market value

displaying in-depth

knowledge of the

topic. The

explanation discusses

the different uses of

20%

both and is supported

with details and

examples.

Score 0 4 6 8 10

Provides answers to

the case study

questions

(conclusion) with a

recommendation

Does not provide

answers to the

case study and

does not provide

a

recommendation.

Answers the case study

questions but most of

the answers are

inaccurate.

Recommendation is

not present or is not

applicable.

Answers the case

study questions but

some answers are

brief or inaccurate.

Provides a

recommendation

based on the answers

to the questions.

Clearly answers the

case study questions

and provides a clear

and accurate

recommendation.

Answers the case

study questions

displaying in depth

knowledge of the

topic and includes

citations. Provides

clear, accurate, and

detailed

recommendation.

10%

Score 0 4 6 8 10

Writing Clarity and

Quality

Writing is unclear.

Grammar and

spelling mistakes

are numerous.

Writing is clear but not

concise. Style is

inappropriate (e.g., too

casual). Some spelling

and grammar errors

are apparent.

Writing is clear but not

completely in a

professional style. Few

spelling or grammar

errors detected.

Writing is clear,

concise, and

professional. Minimal

spelling and

grammatical issues.

Writing is clear,

concise, and

professional. The

writing follows a

logical flow. No

spelling or

grammatical errors

are present.

10%

Score 0 4 6 8 10

APA Formatting

No citations are

listed. Plagiarism

is evident.

Most references are

cited using APA style,

although there are

several errors. The

paper does not

conform to APA

formatting

requirements.

All resources and

references are cited;

however, not using

APA style, or there are

several errors.

Organization of the

paper needs

improvement to be in

APA format.

All resources and

references are cited

using APA style with

a few errors. The

paper mostly follows

APA formatting

requirements.

All resources and

references are

correctly cited using

APA style. The paper

also follows APA

formatting

requirements

10%

Score 0 4 6 8 10

TOTAL 100