Week 4 assignments.
BUS 5111 Unit 4 Written Assignment (with calculations) Rubric
Criterion No Proficiency Limited Proficiency Emerging
Proficiency Proficient Advanced
Weight
(%)
Provides correct
values for
computations.
Less than half of
the values
accurately
provided.
Approximately half of
the values accurately
provided.
Most values accurately
provided.
Almost all values are
accurately provided.
All values provided
accurately. 30%
Score 0 4 6 8 10
Explains approach to the problem
Does not explain
approach to the
problem.
Explains approach to
the problem but
explanation is unclear
or incorrect.
Explains approach to
the problem but
explanation is vague.
Includes a narrative
that clearly explains
approach to the
problem.
Includes narrative
that clearly explains
approach to the
problem and provides
supporting details
and examples.
20%
Score 0 4 6 8 10
Explains the difference between a yield that is based on cost, as opposed to one that is based on current market value. The explanation discusses the different uses of both.
No table is
provided.
Explanation of the
differences between a
yield that is based on
cost rather than
current market value is
not accurate and little
or no explanation of
the different uses of
both exists.
Explains the difference
between a yield that is
based on cost rather
than current market
value. The explanation
is brief or vague but
different uses of both
is addressed.
Explains the
difference between a
yield that is based on
cost rather than
current market value.
The explanation
discussed the
different uses of
both.
Explains the
difference between a
yield that is based on
cost rather than
current market value
displaying in-depth
knowledge of the
topic. The
explanation discusses
the different uses of
20%
both and is supported
with details and
examples.
Score 0 4 6 8 10
Provides answers to
the case study
questions
(conclusion) with a
recommendation
Does not provide
answers to the
case study and
does not provide
a
recommendation.
Answers the case study
questions but most of
the answers are
inaccurate.
Recommendation is
not present or is not
applicable.
Answers the case
study questions but
some answers are
brief or inaccurate.
Provides a
recommendation
based on the answers
to the questions.
Clearly answers the
case study questions
and provides a clear
and accurate
recommendation.
Answers the case
study questions
displaying in depth
knowledge of the
topic and includes
citations. Provides
clear, accurate, and
detailed
recommendation.
10%
Score 0 4 6 8 10
Writing Clarity and
Quality
Writing is unclear.
Grammar and
spelling mistakes
are numerous.
Writing is clear but not
concise. Style is
inappropriate (e.g., too
casual). Some spelling
and grammar errors
are apparent.
Writing is clear but not
completely in a
professional style. Few
spelling or grammar
errors detected.
Writing is clear,
concise, and
professional. Minimal
spelling and
grammatical issues.
Writing is clear,
concise, and
professional. The
writing follows a
logical flow. No
spelling or
grammatical errors
are present.
10%
Score 0 4 6 8 10
APA Formatting
No citations are
listed. Plagiarism
is evident.
Most references are
cited using APA style,
although there are
several errors. The
paper does not
conform to APA
formatting
requirements.
All resources and
references are cited;
however, not using
APA style, or there are
several errors.
Organization of the
paper needs
improvement to be in
APA format.
All resources and
references are cited
using APA style with
a few errors. The
paper mostly follows
APA formatting
requirements.
All resources and
references are
correctly cited using
APA style. The paper
also follows APA
formatting
requirements
10%
Score 0 4 6 8 10
TOTAL 100