QS) 680 7-1 Final Project Milestone Three
2
Project Scope Statement
Project Title: Value-Driven Project and Portfolio Management in the Pharmaceutical Industry
I. Introduction
The focus of this project is to implement a value-driven Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) system within PharmaAdvance Inc. to enhance the alignment of Research and Development (R&D) and operational projects with strategic business objectives. It will include the adoption of PPM tools, development of governance frameworks, training, and change management.
II. Purpose and Justification
The purpose of this project is to optimize how PharmaAdvance selects, prioritizes, and manages its portfolio of project, specifically in R&D, regulatory, and product development. The justification lies in increasing Return on Investment (ROI), reducing time to market for new drugs, and ensuring compliance and transparency in project selection and execution. This supports strategic business goals such as innovation leadership, regulatory compliance, and sustainable growth
III. Scope Description
This project will result in the implementation of a comprehensive PPM framework, including:
· Deployment of a PPM software solution (e.g., Planisware or Clarity PPM)
· Creation of standardized project evaluation criteria
· Integration of risk, cost, and value analysis tools
· Development of dashboards for executive visibility
· Governance model to ensure project alignment with corporate strategy
· Training modules for project and portfolio managers
IV. High-Level Requirements
· Ability to score and rank projects based on business value
· Integration with existing ERP and R&D systems
· User roles and access control functionality
· Real-time analytics and reporting dashboards
· Customizable workflows for different departments.
· Compliance with FDA/E<A and data privacy regulations
V. Boundaries
Included
· Corporate-wide deployment of PPM across R&D, regulatory, and operations
· Software customization and integration
· Change management and training
Excluded
· Full ERP replacement or reengineering
· Legacy project clean-up unless needed for migration
· Changes to regulatory submission processes outside of portfolio selection
VI. Strategy
The project team will follow a phased Agile-Waterfall hybrid methodology. The initial planning and requirements phases will use a waterfall approach, followed by iterative deployments and testing of the PPM tool. Stakeholder engagement, training, and change management will run in parallel. A project governance committee will oversee progress
7. Acceptance Criteria
· All critical users have access to the PPM system with role-appropriate permissions
· Minimum 90% of active projects rated using the new value-based model
· Portfolio dashboards are available and populated with live data
· Users complete training and score ≥80% on post-training assessments
· All integrations tested and approved by IT and business units
· All critical users have access to the PPM system with role-appropriate permissions
· Minimum 90% of active projects rated using the new value-based model
· Portfolio dashboards are available and populated with live data
· Users complete training and score ≥80% on post-training assessments
· All integrations tested and approved by IT and business units
VIII. Constraints
· Limited availability of SME (subject matter expert) resources.
· Budget cap of $1.2 million for development and implementation.
· Completion deadline of 12 months from project start.
· System must support multi-sites, multi-phase clinical trials
IX. Assumptions
· Leadership will support change and resource allocation
· All business units will participate in the training
· Current project data is complete enough for migration
· Regulatory requirements will remain stable during implementation
· Chosen software will be compatible with existing infrastructure
X. Cost Estimate
|
Cost Category |
Estimated Cost (USD) |
|
Framework Design & Consulting |
$250,000 |
|
Software Customization/Tools |
$400,000 |
|
Training and Change Management |
$150,000 |
|
Pilot Implementation |
$200,000 |
|
Contingency (10%) |
$120,000 |
|
Total Estimated Cost |
$1,120,000 |
XI. Cost/Benefit Analysis
Costs:
· Total estimated cost: $1.12 million.
· Opportunity cost due to resource reallocation during pilot.
Benefits:
· Improved project success rate by 15–25%.
· Faster time-to-market could yield millions in early revenue.
· Better resource allocation resulting in cost savings across portfolios.
· Enhanced ability to prioritize high-impact, high-value projects.
· Long-term strategic alignment reducing project redundancy and failure.
Conclusion: The long-term financial and strategic benefits significantly outweigh the implementation cost, making this project a high-value investment for sustainable portfolio growth in a competitive pharmaceutical environment.
Phase II
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS): Value-Driven Project and Portfolio Management
|
WBS Code |
Task Name |
Description |
|
1.0 |
Project Initiation |
Prepare for project launch and define scope |
|
1.1 |
Define Project Charter |
Document goals, stakeholders, objectives |
|
1.2 |
Identify Stakeholders |
List internal and external project stakeholders |
|
1.3 |
Conduct Kickoff Meeting |
Launch project and align team expectations |
|
2.0 |
Planning Phase |
Develop detailed project plans and gather requirements |
|
2.1 |
Gather Business Requirements |
Interview departments and capture needs |
|
2.2 |
Define Evaluation Criteria |
Create value-based scoring model for project prioritization |
|
2.3 |
Develop Governance Framework |
Establish decision rights and approval flow |
|
3.0 |
Tool Selection and Implementation |
Select and configure the PPM software |
|
3.1 |
Evaluate Vendors |
Compare PPM tools (e.g., Planisware, Clarity, etc.) |
|
3.2 |
Select Software Vendor |
Finalize contract and licensing agreement |
|
3.3 |
Configure and Customize Tool |
Tailor workflows, roles, and integrations |
|
4.0 |
Integration and Testing |
Integrate PPM tool with existing systems and validate functionality |
|
4.1 |
Integrate with ERP and R&D Systems |
Link with Oracle/SAP and legacy databases |
|
4.2 |
Conduct System Testing |
Perform user acceptance testing (UAT) and resolve bugs |
|
4.3 |
Validate Compliance Requirements |
Ensure system meets regulatory and data privacy requirements |
|
5.0 |
Training and Change Management |
Prepare users and manage adoption |
|
5.1 |
Develop Training Materials |
Create guides, manuals, and training content |
|
5.2 |
Conduct User Training Sessions |
Train end-users, PMs, and executives |
|
5.3 |
Implement Change Management Strategy |
Communicate benefits, manage resistance, and reinforce adoption |
|
6.0 |
Go-Live and Transition |
Launch the solution and transition to operational support |
|
6.1 |
System Go-Live |
Launch PPM tool across departments |
|
6.2 |
Post-Go-Live Support |
Provide immediate support and troubleshooting for users |
|
6.3 |
Final Project Review and Closure |
Document lessons learned, archive files, and officially close the project |
References
Heldman, K. (2021). PMP project management professional exam study guide (10th ed.). Wiley. Kerzner, H. (2022). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and
controlling (13th ed.). Wiley.