signature question

Homework1

4aJeremyBusinessDecision-MakingPaperGradingGuide.docx

Home >Mathematics homework help >Statistics homework help >signature question

Business Decision Making Project – Part 2 Grading Guide

QNT/351 Version 6

University of Phoenix: School of Business

Business Decision Making Project – Part 3 Grading Guide

QNT/351 Version 6

Quantitative Analysis for Business

Copyright

University of Phoenix® is a registered trademark of Apollo Group, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.

Microsoft®, Windows®, and Windows NT® are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. All other company and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Use of these marks is not intended to imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation.

Edited in accordance with University of Phoenix® editorial standards and practices.

Individual Assignment: Business Decision Making Project – Part 3

Purpose of Assignment

This assignment aims to help students connect the topics learned in the course. They will then apply them to an opportunity at a familiar company, or another business alternative. This paper was updated and amended in Weeks 3 and 4.

Resources Required

Grading Guide

*Content*	Met	Partially Met	Not Met	Comments:
The student did not actually collect any data but thought hypothetically.				Not graded.
The student developed an analysis of 1,050 words.				Not graded. Word count is not used but relied on substantive responses.
The student consistently used the same business opportunity and research variable throughout the paper.			-10	Not graded unless this requirement was unmet. General information.
The student identified the company's name and description where they work or with which they are familiar. A pseudonym was used.			X	Not in this paper.
The student described a business opportunity at that company and explained why the business opportunity is essential.			X	Not in this paper.
The student identified a variable within the opportunity that could measure the project’s progression.			X	Not in this paper.
The student described the method(s) for collecting a suitable sample for the variable.			X	Not in this paper.
The student analyzed how they would know if the data collection method would generate valid and reliable data.			X	Not in this paper.
Identified the descriptive statistics, numerical and graphical measures that might be best for summarizing the data. The student Analyzed the role probability might play.		5		Good job on this elaboration. What is missing is relevance.
		*Total Available*	*Total Earned*
		60	0/60

Writing Guidelines	Met	Partially Met	Not Met	Comments:
Organization
The tone is appropriate to the content and assignment.
The introduction provides a enough background on the topic and previews major points.			X	An introduction was not provided
Paragraph transitions are present, logical, and maintain the flow throughout the paper.
The conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper, and reviews the major points.		X		The conclusion was a continuation of Graphical Measures.
Mechanics
The paper - including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page - is consistent with APA formatting guidelines and meets course-level requirements.
Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page.	X			Excellent work on this. Better than most students at this education level.
Sentences are complete, clear, and concise.
Rules of grammar and usage are followed including spelling and punctuation.
		Total Available	Total Earned
		20	20/20

Assignment Total

20/80

Additional comments: