Biographical research paper
Review Reviewed Work(s): Writer in Exile/Writer in Revolt: Critical Perspectives on Carlos Bulosan by JEFFREY ARELLANO CABUSAO Review by: Leo Angelo Nery Source: Philippine Studies: Historical & Ethnographic Viewpoints, Vol. 65, No. 4, Hegemony and History Textbooks: Archive of Colonial Spies Filipina–GI Intimacies (dec 2017), pp. 519-523 Published by: Ateneo de Manila University Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26621980 Accessed: 22-03-2021 05:08 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Ateneo de Manila University is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Philippine Studies: Historical & Ethnographic Viewpoints
This content downloaded from 192.195.225.71 on Mon, 22 Mar 2021 05:08:13 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
JEFFREY ARELLANO CABUSAO, ED.
Writer in Exile/Writer in Revolt: Critical Perspectives on Carlos Bulosan Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2016.378 pages.
"Occupation: Writer . . . Estate: One typewriter, a twenty-year old [sic]
suit, worn out socks; Finances: Zero; Beneficiary: His people" (xix). Thus
read Carlos Bulosan's obituary, which was published in the Daily People's
World in 1956. Penned by his friend and fellow unionist Chris Mensalvas,
the tribute is a brief but poignant summation of Bulosan's contribution not
just to Philippine literature but also to social movements both in the US
and the Philippines. However, although Bulosan's place in literature and
history is beyond dispute, interpreting his work (and his life) has been a site
of contestation for the past sixty years. Early literary criticism of Bulosan's
writings was dominated by formalist readings until in the 1970s, under the
repressive but radicalizing conditions of martial law, Bulosan and his work
were liberated from "promiscuous sentimentalism" (xxi) and reimagined as
products of the struggle against repressive and exploitative colonial relations
between the US and the Philippines. Post-martial-law scholarship on
Bulosan has since branched out to include, among other lenses, gender,
migration, transnationalism, and culture; recent events, such as the
resurgence of authoritarianism, ultranationalism, and the intensification
of racial and gender discrimination, have made Bulosan's experience as a
Filipino exile in the US contemporary once more. The task, however, is to
reintroduce Bulosan to a new generation of aspiring scholars, activists, and
social scientists, without disregarding the more than half-century of scholarly
work that Bulosan has inspired.
Introducing new scholars and readers to the history of Bulosan scholarship
is Jeffrey Arellano Cabusao's primary objective in his compendium Writer
in Exile/Writer in Revolt: Critical Perspectives on Carlos Bulosan. It is not
simply a collection of Bulosan-inspired works, but also a historical narrative
of Bulosan criticism as well as an exposition on the appropriate methodology
in reading Bulosan's life and works. Affirming E. San Juan Jr.'s perspective
that Bulosan should always be viewed in light of his emancipatory vision
and project, Cabusao aims to contribute toward "historicizing, decentering,
BOOK REVIEWS 519
This content downloaded from 192.195.225.71 on Mon, 22 Mar 2021 05:08:13 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
and renewing Bulosan criticism" (xix). By positing that "the formation of
the critical reception of Bulosan's art parallels the formation of Bulosan's
literary imagination" (xvii), Cabusao firmly asserts that an appreciation of Bulosan's work must also include the historico-material conditions that
provided Bulosan an ethico-political vision geared toward the liberation of
oppressed peoples, an interpretation that in 1972 San Juan introduced in
his pioneering work, Carlos Bulosan and the Imagination of Class Struggle
(University of the Philippines Press).
The book is composed of twenty works on Bulosan, curated in a manner
that parallels the emergence of Bulosan's social, political, and literary views.
Part I, "Bulosan's Voice: Listening to the Manong Generation," serves as
a starting point both for Bulosan's literary journey and the maturation of
Bulosan criticism. Part II, "Location of Exile: Creating an Alter/native
Filipino Literary Practice," situates Bulosan within Filipino and Third
World writing through literary criticism produced by his texts America is
in the Heart (1946) and The Laughter o f My Father (1944). Part III, "The
Writer as Worker: Broadening the Bulosan Canon," charts Bulosan's
growing commitment to the utilization of literature as an instrument of
social change, which coincided with his increased literary production from
the Great Depression to the Cold War period. The concluding section,
"Collective Memory and Revolt: Becoming Filipino—Becoming Free," is a
collection of articles that provides a unifying thread for Bulosan scholarship.
By claiming that the process of remembering Bulosan is linked to the
preservation of the collective memory of Filipinos as "subjects in revolt"
(xxvii), Cabusao reaffirms simultaneously Bulosan's historical significance
and his relevance in the contemporary period, as the conditions of racial
and national subordination are not just present, but have also intensified over the recent decades.
In addition to serving as a repository of rare and/or out-of-print works,
Writer in Exile/Writer in Revolt is also an attempt at establishing a canon for
Bulosan criticism, as most of the articles featured in the compendium either
contributed to or defined the direction of scholarship on Bulosan. Cabusao
pays homage to San Juan's pioneering efforts in challenging tropes that
negated the "proletarian aesthetics" and the complexity of representations
of exile in Bulosan literature. San Juan's three essays, "The Achievement
of Carlos Bulosan," "Carlos Bulosan: The Poetics and the Necessity of
520 PSHEV 65, NO. 4 (2017)
This content downloaded from 192.195.225.71 on Mon, 22 Mar 2021 05:08:13 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Revolution," and "Carlos Bulosan: Critique and Revolution," encapsulate
the history of radical reengagement with Bulosan. By challenging the
immigration assimilationist paradigm that castrated the emancipatory
message of Bulosan's writings, and by situating Bulosan in the context of
the social and literary movements against US-Philippine colonial and
neocolonial relations, San Juan proposes that the central theme of Bulosan's
works was the "unfolding struggle for Filipino national sovereignty" (xviii).
Dolores Feria's "Filipino Writers in Exile," which anticipated San
Juan's shift toward a historical materialist reading of Bulosan, contributes
in elucidating the experience of exile, especially Bulosan's paradox of exile
that "those who went away never succeeded in escaping from themselves,
and those who stayed at home never found themselves" (40). The essays
of Delfin Tolentino ("Satire in The Laughter of My Father"), L. M. Grow
("The Laughter of My Father: A Survival Kit"), and Marilyn Alquizola and
Lane Ryo Hirabayashi ("The Laughter of My Father: Adding Feminist and
Class Perspectives to the 'Casebook of Resistance'") challenge the comic
misrepresentation of the Bulosan satire; after all, Bulosan said he was not "a
laughing man, [but] an angry man" (82). Odette Taverna's "Remembering
Carlos Bulosan: An Interview with Josephine Patrick" is a valuable text,
especially as a primary source, since Patrick's recollections are one of the few
first-hand accounts that prove Bulosan's life can never be divorced from the
anticolonial and antiracial discrimination struggles of his milieu. Although
the reprinting of these articles and other scholarly works in Parts II and
III may seem redundant given their availability in online repositories and
journals, Cabusao makes them more accessible given that articles such as
Grows are often blocked by paywalls and subscription fees.
Although the primary objective of the book is to introduce (and
reproduce) pivotal articles on Bulosan, Writer in Exile/Writer in Revolt also
provides new material that can serve as starting points for new research
and reengagement with Bulosan's life and art for the contemporary period.
Kenneth Bauzon's "Identity and Humanity in the Age of Corporate
Globalization: A Review Essay" and Michael Viola's "Filipino American Hip
Hop and Class Consciousness: Renewing the Spirit of Bulosan" assert that
Bulosan is still relevant in contemporary times, given the need for collective
struggle and resistance amid the onslaught of neoliberalism, racial tensions,
economic exploitation, and wars of aggression. "The Bulosan Files: Another
BOOK REVIEWS 521
This content downloaded from 192.195.225.71 on Mon, 22 Mar 2021 05:08:13 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Layer in an Ongoing Dialogue," a written dialogue between Alquizola,
Hirobayashi, and Arellano, highlights opportunities for new research on
Bulosan. Recently released archival materials such the Federal Bureau of
Investigation's surveillance of Bulosan reveal additional layers on Bulosan's
life, his generation's engagement with coercive US state instruments, and
the consequences of their struggle against neocolonialism in the US and the
Philippines.
The primary sources found in the appendix are as valuable as the
articles selected for inclusion in this volume. The appendix contains rare
photographs of Bulosan and his works and selected sections of the J952
Yearbook of the Local 37 of the International Longshoremen's and Warehouse
Men's Union, which Bulosan edited. The editorial of the J 952 Yearbook as
well as the articles "To Whom It May Concern" and "Terrorism Rides in the
Philippines" provide a glimpse of Bulosan and his generations perspectives
on social justice and equality along class and racial lines. As Bulosan declared,
the union did "not discriminate against sex, race or national origin," and the
"unconditional unity of all workers [was the] only weapon against the evil
designs of imperialist butchers and other profiteers of death" (326-27).
Cabusao's rationale for the selection of essays included in this book is
to offer "critical perspectives" on Bulosan scholarship. But glaring are his
omissions, which may be due to the voluminous nature of Bulosan-inspired
texts and copyright issues; still, it is evident that commentaries by Leonard
Casper, PC Morantte, and Joseph Galdon have been excluded, even though
they could provide context to the conflicts within Bulosan scholarship. The
debates between San Juan and his critics, Casper and Galdon, represent
a turning point for Bulosan scholarship, as well as literary criticism and
cultural studies. Because Bulosan scholarship was a site of contestation,
especially during the 1970s, these debates offer a historical perspective on
the emergence of committed scholarship, especially since it occurred during
the repressive conditions of the Marcos regime. The introduction to All the
Conspirators (University of Washington Press, 1998) by Caroline Hau and
Benedict Anderson could also have enriched discussions on Bulosan's literary
vista, but copyright issues and the recency of All the Conspirators might have
contributed to its exclusion.
Writer in Exile/Writer in Revolt fulfills its basic objective, which is to
serve as an introduction to Bulosan, his works, and theoretical perspectives
they have inspired. Despite the exclusion of some works that could have
522 PSHEV 65, NO. 4 (2017)
This content downloaded from 192.195.225.71 on Mon, 22 Mar 2021 05:08:13 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
contributed to an appreciation of the evolution of Bulosan scholarship, this
volume provides readers with an excellent starting point to expand the field
and make it relevant amid contemporary challenges and issues.
Leo Angelo Nery Uepartment or interdisciplinary btuaies, institute or Arts ana sciences
Far Eastern University
MARIA SERENA I. DIOKNO, ED.
Hidden Lives, Concealed Narratives: A History of Leprosy in the Philippines Manila: National Historical Commission of the Philippines, 2016.293 pages.
Leprosy, or Hansen's disease, has attracted scholarly inquiry for a number of
right reasons. For one, scholars can examine the ways by which societies and
regimes of power have made sense of a disease that has caused mass suffering
in different places at different times. While it is now known that the microbe
Mycobacterium leprae causes leprosy, the disease's longevity had allowed
it to gain various cultural meanings in the past, ranging from its Judeo
Christian association with impurity and sin to miasmatic interpretations
to its association with lewd behavior and lack of hygiene—notions that are
general knowledge in the literature. In the Philippines the history of leprosy
has inspired scholarship, from Enrico Azicate's MA thesis, "Medicine in the
Philippines: An Historical Perspective" (University of the Philippines, 1989)
to Warwick Anderson's "Leprosy and Citizenship" (positions 1998:707—
30). Yet, there are more stories to tell. Enriching the literature is the book
Hidden Lives, Concealed Narratives: A History of Leprosy in the Philippines,
commissioned by the National Historical Commission of the Philippines
(NHCP) and edited by Maria Serena Diokno, professor of history at the
University of the Philippines-Diliman and former NHCP chairperson. With
Diokno are esteemed Filipino scholars, mostly historians, who authored the
chapter essays. Marshalling materials that include missionary documents,
travelogues, materia medica, health journals, as well as oral testimonies, the
book retells Philippine history through the lens of the history of leprosy.
Hidden Lives, Concealed Narratives is composed of three parts that are
organized chronologically. Part 1 looks into the precolonial and Spanish
BOOK REVIEWS 523
This content downloaded from 192.195.225.71 on Mon, 22 Mar 2021 05:08:13 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
- Contents
- p. 519
- p. 520
- p. 521
- p. 522
- p. 523
- Issue Table of Contents
- Philippine Studies Historical & Ethnographic Viewpoints, Vol. 65, No. 4 (dec 2017) pp. 415-556
- Front Matter
- Editor's Introduction [pp. 415-416]
- Hegemonic Tool? Nationalism in Philippine History Textbooks, 1900–2000 [pp. 417-450]
- Bonifacio and the Katipunan in the Cuerpo de Vigilancia Archival Collection [pp. 451-483]
- Authorizing Illicit Intimacies Filipina–GI Interracial Relations in the Postwar Philippines [pp. 485-513]
- Book Reviews
- Review: untitled [pp. 515-518]
- Review: untitled [pp. 519-523]
- Review: untitled [pp. 523-526]
- Review: untitled [pp. 526-530]
- Review: untitled [pp. 531-534]
- Review: untitled [pp. 534-537]
- Review: untitled [pp. 537-541]
- Review: untitled [pp. 541-545]
- Review: untitled [pp. 546-550]
- Index [pp. 551-555]
- Back Matter