Capstone project-wk 3 (combining 1-3)
blashill4
4220wk3assignmentrubric.htmlRubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_4220_Week3_Assignment_Rubric
| Excellent | Proficient | Basic | Needs Improvement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Required Content Identified the quality improvement problem. | Points: Points Range: 9 (6%) - 10 (6.67%) Provided a fully developed quality improvement problem with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 8 (5.33%) - 8 (5.33%) Provided a developed quality improvement problem with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 7 (4.67%) - 7 (4.67%) Provided a minimally-developed quality improvement problem with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (4%) Provided an under-developed quality improvement problem with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: |
| Required Content Stated in measureable terms that reflect quality indicators. | Points: Points Range: 9 (6%) - 10 (6.67%) Provided a fully developed problem stated in measureable terms that reflects quality indicators with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 8 (5.33%) - 8 (5.33%) Provided a developed quality improvement problem stated in measureable terms with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 7 (4.67%) - 7 (4.67%) Provided a minimally-developed quality improvement problem stated in measureable terms with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (4%) Provided an under-developed quality improvement problem that was not stated in measureable with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: |
| Required Content Provided the rationale for selecting the practice problem including the importance in improving patient outcomes. | Points: Points Range: 18 (12%) - 20 (13.33%) Provided a fully developed rationale for the quality improvement problem with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 16 (10.67%) - 17 (11.33%) Provided a developed rationale for the quality improvement problem with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 14 (9.33%) - 15 (10%) Provided a minimally-developed rationale for the quality improvement problem with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 13 (8.67%) Provided an under-developed rationale for the quality improvement problem with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: |
| Required Content Synthesize the findings from the analysis of evidence that support the practice problem. | Points: Points Range: 36 (24%) - 40 (26.67%) Provided a fully developed synthesis of findings from the analysis of evidence. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 32 (21.33%) - 35 (23.33%) Provided a developed synthesis of the findings from the analysis of evidence. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 28 (18.67%) - 31 (20.67%) Provided a minimally-developed synthesis of the findings with limited analysis of the evidence. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 27 (18%) Provided an under-developed synthesis with little or no analysis of the evidence. Feedback: |
| Required Content Applied a quality improvement process to the practice problem. | Points: Points Range: 23 (15.33%) - 25 (16.67%) Provided a fully developed discussion of the selected quality improvement process with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 20 (13.33%) - 22 (14.67%) Provided a developed discussion of the selected quality improvement process with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 18 (12%) - 19 (12.67%) Provided a minimally-developed discussion of the selected quality improvement process with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 17 (11.33%) Provided an under-developed discussion of the selected quality improvement process with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: |
| Required Content Chose a specific quality improvement tool that will be used throughout the project. | Points: Points Range: 14 (9.33%) - 15 (10%) Provided a fully developed discussion of the selected quality improvement tool with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 12 (8%) - 13 (8.67%) Provided a developed discussion of the selected quality improvement tool with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 11 (7.33%) - 11 (7.33%) Provided a minimally-developed discussion of the selected quality improvement tool with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 10 (6.67%) Provided an under-developed discussion of the selected quality improvement tool with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback: |
| Academic Writing Expectations (AWE 4) Capstone Level Displays sentence and paragraph level skills: Constructs simple, complex and compound sentences. Writes without spelling, grammatical or syntax errors. Writes without sentence fragments or run on sentences.Uses punctuation appropriately. Writes appropriate introductions and conclusions. Demonstrates essay level skills: Cohesion and flow by using transition sentences. Precision, clarity and academic tone. Awareness of discipline specific audience. Displays academic expression: Scholarly voice: evidence of the Provider's own ideas with a well-organized presentation of evidence. Synthesizes resources by using own words. Limits use of quotes appropriately (no more than one short, unique quote). Uses evidence from course learning resources, scholarly resources and seeks additional resources to support content as required in the assignment. Minimum of five references are required. | Points: Points Range: 14 (9.33%) - 15 (10%) Demonstrates fully developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Displays academic expression through fully developed use of evidence from multiple sources to support content. Meets the 4000 Capstone level with no writing issues and exceeds the minimum reference requirement. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 12 (8%) - 13 (8.67%) Demonstrates developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Displays academic expression through developed use of evidence from most sources to support content. Meets the 4000 Capstone level with minimal writing issues and exceeds the minimum reference requirement. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 11 (7.33%) - 11 (7.33%) Demonstrates minimally-developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Beginning to display academic expression through minimally-developed use of evidence from some sources to support content. Minimally meets the 4000 Capstone level with several writing issues and meets the minimum reference requirement. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 10 (6.67%) Demonstrates limited sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Does not display academic expression, has limited use of evidence with few or no sources to support the content. Does not meet the 4000 Capstone level of writing and does not meet the minimum reference requirement. Feedback: |
| APA Formatting: cover page, title of paper on second page, level headings, Times New Roman 12 font, 1" margins, and page numbers. APA References: Uses in-text citations appropriately and format correctly. Paraphrases to avoid plagiarizing the source. Reference list is in alphabetical order, hanging indent, double spaced in format. Each specific entry contains all information required by APA format including author, year of publication, title of publication, pages, DOI, website, as appropriate. | Points: Points Range: 14 (9.33%) - 15 (10%) Demonstrates fully developed APA formatting and referencing requirements with no formatting errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 12 (8%) - 13 (8.67%) Demonstrates developed APA formatting and referencing requirements with minimal formatting errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 11 (7.33%) - 11 (7.33%) Demonstrates minimally-developed APA formatting and referencing requirements with several formatting errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 10 (6.67%) Demonstrates limited APA formatting and referencing requirements with multiple formatting errors. Feedback: |
Required Content Identified the quality improvement problem.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 9 (6%) - 10 (6.67%) Provided a fully developed quality improvement problem with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. Proficient 8 (5.33%) - 8 (5.33%) Provided a developed quality improvement problem with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Basic 7 (4.67%) - 7 (4.67%) Provided a minimally-developed quality improvement problem with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 6 (4%) Provided an under-developed quality improvement problem with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:Required Content Stated in measureable terms that reflect quality indicators.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 9 (6%) - 10 (6.67%) Provided a fully developed problem stated in measureable terms that reflects quality indicators with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. Proficient 8 (5.33%) - 8 (5.33%) Provided a developed quality improvement problem stated in measureable terms with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Basic 7 (4.67%) - 7 (4.67%) Provided a minimally-developed quality improvement problem stated in measureable terms with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 6 (4%) Provided an under-developed quality improvement problem that was not stated in measureable with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:Required Content Provided the rationale for selecting the practice problem including the importance in improving patient outcomes.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 18 (12%) - 20 (13.33%) Provided a fully developed rationale for the quality improvement problem with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. Proficient 16 (10.67%) - 17 (11.33%) Provided a developed rationale for the quality improvement problem with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Basic 14 (9.33%) - 15 (10%) Provided a minimally-developed rationale for the quality improvement problem with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 13 (8.67%) Provided an under-developed rationale for the quality improvement problem with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:Required Content Synthesize the findings from the analysis of evidence that support the practice problem.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 36 (24%) - 40 (26.67%) Provided a fully developed synthesis of findings from the analysis of evidence. Proficient 32 (21.33%) - 35 (23.33%) Provided a developed synthesis of the findings from the analysis of evidence. Basic 28 (18.67%) - 31 (20.67%) Provided a minimally-developed synthesis of the findings with limited analysis of the evidence. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 27 (18%) Provided an under-developed synthesis with little or no analysis of the evidence. Feedback:Required Content Applied a quality improvement process to the practice problem.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 23 (15.33%) - 25 (16.67%) Provided a fully developed discussion of the selected quality improvement process with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Proficient 20 (13.33%) - 22 (14.67%) Provided a developed discussion of the selected quality improvement process with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Basic 18 (12%) - 19 (12.67%) Provided a minimally-developed discussion of the selected quality improvement process with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 17 (11.33%) Provided an under-developed discussion of the selected quality improvement process with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:Required Content Chose a specific quality improvement tool that will be used throughout the project.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 14 (9.33%) - 15 (10%) Provided a fully developed discussion of the selected quality improvement tool with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Proficient 12 (8%) - 13 (8.67%) Provided a developed discussion of the selected quality improvement tool with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Basic 11 (7.33%) - 11 (7.33%) Provided a minimally-developed discussion of the selected quality improvement tool with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 10 (6.67%) Provided an under-developed discussion of the selected quality improvement tool with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:Academic Writing Expectations (AWE 4) Capstone Level Displays sentence and paragraph level skills: Constructs simple, complex and compound sentences. Writes without spelling, grammatical or syntax errors. Writes without sentence fragments or run on sentences.Uses punctuation appropriately. Writes appropriate introductions and conclusions. Demonstrates essay level skills: Cohesion and flow by using transition sentences. Precision, clarity and academic tone. Awareness of discipline specific audience. Displays academic expression: Scholarly voice: evidence of the Provider's own ideas with a well-organized presentation of evidence. Synthesizes resources by using own words. Limits use of quotes appropriately (no more than one short, unique quote). Uses evidence from course learning resources, scholarly resources and seeks additional resources to support content as required in the assignment. Minimum of five references are required.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 14 (9.33%) - 15 (10%) Demonstrates fully developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Displays academic expression through fully developed use of evidence from multiple sources to support content. Meets the 4000 Capstone level with no writing issues and exceeds the minimum reference requirement. Proficient 12 (8%) - 13 (8.67%) Demonstrates developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Displays academic expression through developed use of evidence from most sources to support content. Meets the 4000 Capstone level with minimal writing issues and exceeds the minimum reference requirement. Basic 11 (7.33%) - 11 (7.33%) Demonstrates minimally-developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Beginning to display academic expression through minimally-developed use of evidence from some sources to support content. Minimally meets the 4000 Capstone level with several writing issues and meets the minimum reference requirement. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 10 (6.67%) Demonstrates limited sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Does not display academic expression, has limited use of evidence with few or no sources to support the content. Does not meet the 4000 Capstone level of writing and does not meet the minimum reference requirement. Feedback:APA Formatting: cover page, title of paper on second page, level headings, Times New Roman 12 font, 1" margins, and page numbers. APA References: Uses in-text citations appropriately and format correctly. Paraphrases to avoid plagiarizing the source. Reference list is in alphabetical order, hanging indent, double spaced in format. Each specific entry contains all information required by APA format including author, year of publication, title of publication, pages, DOI, website, as appropriate.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 14 (9.33%) - 15 (10%) Demonstrates fully developed APA formatting and referencing requirements with no formatting errors. Proficient 12 (8%) - 13 (8.67%) Demonstrates developed APA formatting and referencing requirements with minimal formatting errors. Basic 11 (7.33%) - 11 (7.33%) Demonstrates minimally-developed APA formatting and referencing requirements with several formatting errors. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 10 (6.67%) Demonstrates limited APA formatting and referencing requirements with multiple formatting errors. Feedback:| Total Points: 150 |
|---|
Name: NURS_4220_Week3_Assignment_Rubric
