4012 dis 2
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Terrorism and Homeland Security, 9e
CHAPTER 2 Jonathan R. White
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Learning Objectives, Part 1 • Explain the value of practical criminology for
law enforcement and security forces. • List the differences between terrorists and
ordinary criminals. • Explain the importance of radicalization and
alienation. • Summarize two recent case studies of
radicalization. • Describe the opposing views about prison
radicalization. 2
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Learning Objectives, Part 2 • Summarize the controversy regarding the
use of the concept of radicalization. • Identify three different types of terrorism. • Define lone wolf terrorism. • Explain the ways small and large groups
use terrorism. • Describe the manner in which guerrillas
and insurgents use terrorism.
3
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Criminology • Criminology as applied to terrorism looks
at prevention and apprehension. • Terrorists commit crimes as they struggle
for a cause; they sets them apart from ordinary street criminals.
• As first responders, law enforcement personnel must recognize the differences between typical criminal behavior and terrorist activity.
4
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Practical Behavioral Differences
Terrorists 1. Focus their actions toward a
goal 2. Are dedicated to a cause 3. Rarely cooperate with
officials because they do not wish to betray their cause
4. Tend to attack 5. Strike against targets after
careful planning 6. Prepare for and rehearse
their operations
Criminals 1. Are unfocused 2. Are not devoted to crime as a
philosophy 3. Will make deals to avoid
punishment 4. Usually run when confronted
with force 5. Strike when the opportunity
to do so is present 6. Rarely train for crime
5
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Radicalization and Alienation • As with other areas of terrorism, the areas
of radicalization and alienation are fraught with differing views and suggestions for research.
• Researchers will obtain more fruitful results by examining militant ideology and finding the concepts that are shown to attract followers.
6
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Research Criticized The idea that research in radicalization and alienation will produce valuable knowledge is debated.
– No general consensus about the definition of radicalization.
• Term is utilized in a variety of different contexts.
Suggested that more beneficial results would be gained through the examination of militant ideology and concepts that attract followers.
7
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Research in Group Processes A number of researchers believe members of terrorist groups go through decision- making processes as they are being radicalized.
– The general knowledge of radicalization is incomplete.
8
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Path and Routes • Horgan believes researchers should
search for the “routes to terrorism.” • Horgan is concerned with:
– The psychological processes that lead people to terrorist groups.
– The issues that keep them in the group. – The support for people who want to leave.
9
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Sageman’s Model Radicalization is a six-step framework.
– Alienated young man – Meets other alienated young men and form
bond – Groups gravitate toward religion – Religion interpreted in militant terms – Militant group meets terrorist contact – Militants join terrorists as a group decision
10
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Cases of Radicalization Individual cases in the U.S.:
– Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab • Destroy a Northwest airliner as it entered American
airspace. – James W. von Brunn
• Shooting in the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C.
– Omar Hammami – Muslim father and Christian mother – identity conflict
• His identity conflict ended when he embraced a violent, intolerant form of Islam to become a commander in Al Shabaab.
11
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Commonalities in Radicalization Using previous three individuals – several common forms of behavior.
– First all three men all came from well-to-do, middle- class environments.
• The New York Times reports that most international attacks against the U.S. in the 21st Century have come from well- educated terrorists from the middle class.
– Second, all three men became deeply angered and filled with moral indignation.
• Alienated from mainstream thought as they expressed anger, and they sought to address their situations by doing something meaningful.
– Lastly, there was some type of event that triggered their final decision to take violent action.
12
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Individual Radicalization Evidence suggests radicalization is not always a group process.
– At the least, it involves individual reflection whether a group plays a role or not.
Research indicates individual psychological and sociological factors create the framework for interpreting reality.
13
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Groups in Prison • Recent reports suggest that groups are
being radicalized in prison. • A leader often targets selected prisoners
or dominates new inmates using intimidation to force them until they join the group. – Mark Hamm maintains recruitment is similar
to procedures used by street gangs.
14
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Questioning Prison Radicalization
• Many terrorists have been in prison, but there is scant evidence that they were radicalized within the walls.
• Exposure to radical theology was the most common denominator in their decision to engage in violence.
• Terrorists should be separated from the general population to eliminate their influence.
15
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Rejecting the Term • Some scholars question the value of the term. • Others vehemently reject it. • From the perspective of practical criminology,
some practitioners believe that research in radicalization and alienation will produce valuable knowledge.
• Neither scholars nor practitioners are quite sure about the meaning of radicalization.
16
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Models of Terrorism • Three models represent general trends
from 1945 to the present: (1) Lone Wolf, (2) Small group, (3) Tactics of insurgencies and guerrilla movements
• Models help to explain the evolution and practice of contemporary terrorism.
• They embody the philosophy behind particular types of terrorist movements.
17
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Lone Wolf, Part 1 Religion helps to produce the lone-wolf avenger:
– A person who has a particular ideology but isn’t part of a group
An individual lone-wolf avenger needs to find some type of justification for his or her actions, and religion provides the perfect path.
18
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Lone Wolf, Part 2 Lone-wolf avengers have a special, narcissistic relationship with their deities.
– They create a god in their own image. – They become the ultimate loners—they are
the most difficult type of terrorist to deter or detain.
19
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Small Group Terrorism • The model for modern urban terrorism
was intellectually championed by Frantz Fanon.
• He produced two works as a result of his Algerian experiences: – The Wretched of the Earth (1982) – A Dying Colonialism (1965)
20
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Frantz Fanon, Part 1 • Western powers have dehumanized non-
Western people by destroying their cultures and replacing them with Western values.
• Decolonization was destined to be a violent process.
• Achieving freedom was inherently violent.
21
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Frantz Fanon, Part 2 • Guerrilla warfare and individual acts of
terrorism as tools of revolution. • Fanon argued that terrorism should not be
used against the native population in general.
• His proposed two targets for terrorism: – White settlers – Native middle class
22
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Carlos Marighella • Brazilian legislator • Nationalistic Communist Party leader • Revolutionary terrorist • Designed practical guides for terrorism
that have been employed for more than 40 years
• Wanted to move violence from the countryside to the city
23
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Guerrilla Warfare • The Cuban Revolution popularized
guerrilla warfare throughout the world. • Guerrilla revolutions based on the Cuban
experience are typified by three phases: – Phase one begins with isolated groups. – Phase two merges groups into guerrilla
columns. – Phase three brings columns together in a
conventional army.
24
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Insurgency, Part 1 • Focus on insurgency due to a small group
of officers who began looking at military failures during the Vietnam War
• Impossible to fight insurgencies with military tactics designed for terrorism or guerilla war
25
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Insurgency, Part 2 • At the end of the Cold War, various
insurgencies began growing in the vacuums left by the superpowers.
• Technology and weapons helped many insurgencies grow.
• New political atmosphere made the rise of organizations like al Qaeda possible.
26
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Chapter Take-Aways • Theories of terrorism are important, but law
enforcement, intelligence, and military forces are also served by developing a practical understanding of the type of terrorism they are facing.
• Radicalization is the process of adopting violent extremist views and acting them out with terrorist actions. Many social scientists believe this is caused by alienation.
• Three types of terrorism involve lone wolves, small groups, and large groups. Lone wolf violence seems to be increasing and some groups encourage it.
27