Assessment 2 Instructions: Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan

OVERALL COMMENTS

Hi, Perla. I am sorry to see that SafeAssign has identified 66% of your submission of assessment 2 in FPX 4020 has areas almost identical to another student's paper. This is considered plagiarism. Even accidental plagiarism is considered plagiarism at Capella.  

As per Capella policy, I must score this attempt as non-performance and fill out the academic honesty form.  I urge you to review the attached links and to review the SafeAssign score to correct citations prior to submitting an additional assessment.  

Remember that anytime you use the exact words of an author, they must be placed in quotation marks and cited author, year, and page number or paragraph number. I hope this will help in your understanding.  

Your coach and I, all want to support you in your efforts at Capella. I look forward to reading your revisions. Please send me a course message so that I will know that you understand these instructions. I have also attached your coach to this email, please contact them for assistance with this process.  

Dr. Ballantyne 

· Review the Academic Honesty Policy for additional suggestions and recommendations. Maintaining Academic Integrity and Honesty:  https://campus.capella.edu/web/academic-honesty-and-apa/academic-honesty  

· Avoiding Plagiarism:  https://campus.capella.edu/web/academic-honesty-and-apa/avoiding-plagiarism  

· Here's another link for APA and reference citations.  http://www.apastyle.org/learn/quick-guide-on-references.aspx#In-Tex

DOWNLOAD YOUR EVALUATED ASSESSMENT FILE

COMPETENCY 1

Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative. 

CRITERION

Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue or sentinel event pertaining to medication administration.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Applies evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue or sentinel event pertaining to medication administration, detailing how the strategies will address the safety issue or sentinel event pertaining to medication administration.

Proficient

Applies evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue or sentinel event pertaining to medication administration.

Basic

Describes evidence-based and best-practice strategies but their relevance to the safety issue or sentinel event pertaining to medication administration is unclear.

Non-Performance

Does not describe evidence-based and best-practice strategies pertaining to medication administration.

Faculty Comments:

Academic honesty violation. 

CRITERION

Create a viable, evidence-based safety improvement plan for safe medication administration.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Creates a viable, evidence-based safety improvement plan for safe medication administration that makes explicit reference to scholarly or professional resources to support the plan.

Proficient

Creates a viable, evidence-based safety improvement plan for safe medication administration.

Basic

Creates a safety improvement plan for safe medication administration that lacks appropriate, convincing evidence of its viability.

Non-Performance

Does not create a viable, evidence-based safety improvement plan for safe medication administration.

Faculty Comments:

Academic honesty violation. 

COMPETENCY 2

Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.

CRITERION

Analyze the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event pertaining to medication administration in an organization. 

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Analyzes the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event pertaining to medication administration in an organization, noting the degree to which various elements contributed to the safety issue or sentinel event pertaining to medication administration.

Proficient

Analyzes the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event pertaining to medication administration in an organization.

Basic

Identifies the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event pertaining to medication administration in an organization.

Non-Performance

Does not identify the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event pertaining to medication administration in an organization.

Faculty Comments:

Academic honesty violation. 

COMPETENCY 3

Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.

CRITERION

Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a safety improvement plan for safe medication administration.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Identifies existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a safety improvement plan for safe medication administration, prioritizing them according to potential impact.

Proficient

Identifies existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a safety improvement plan for safe medication administration.

Basic

Identifies existing organizational resources, but their relevance and usefulness to quality and safety improvement for safe medication administration are unclear.

Non-Performance

Does not identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a safety improvement plan for safe medication administration.

Faculty Comments:

Academic honesty violation. 

COMPETENCY 4

Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.

CRITERION

Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Organizes content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar or punctuation, word choice, and free of spelling errors.

Proficient

Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Basic

Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Contain errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Non-Performance

Does not organize content for ideas. Lacks logical flow and smooth transitions.

Faculty Comments:

Academic honesty violation. 

CRITERION

Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Exhibits strict and flawless adherence to APA formatting of headings, in-text citations, and references. Quotes and paraphrases correctly.

Proficient

Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Basic

Applies APA formatting to in-text citations, headings and references incorrectly or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes or paraphrasing.

Non-Performance

Does not apply APA formatting to headings, in-text citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly.

Faculty Comments:

Academic honesty violation.