2 assignments- 400words and
Topic: Working in Teams and Quality Improvement Tools. This weeks reading is chapter 26,27. Please follow the same rubric i sent you before for the reflection paper. Both assignments are due Fri noon, then i will send you few more.
Directions: Each Reflection-in-Action Entry should be at least 400 words in length Discuss and reflect on the topic in terms of:
a. How the content and assignments met the course objective(s)?
b. Provide examples of actual or potential applications of the course week’s course concepts.
c. Successes or challenges that you had for the week in terms of the course content.
rading Rubric:
|
Criteria |
Superior |
Above Average |
Competent
|
Below Standard |
Far Below Standard |
|
|
95-100 |
87-94 |
84-86 |
73-83 |
<72 |
|
Introduction/ Objective
|
Objective is precise, knowledgeable, significant, and distinguished from alternate or opposing options. |
Objective is precise and knowledgeable. |
Objective is acceptable. |
Objective may be unclear or irrelevant. |
Objective is missing. |
|
Scope/ Evidence
|
Skillfully arranges evidence to set up premise of the issue. Persuasively builds the case with supportive evidence. Elaborates on all key points of the issue. |
Clearly sets up premise of the issue. Persuasively builds the case. Covers key points of the issue. |
Sets up premise of issue. Sufficiently persuasive to the case. Adequate development of key issues.
|
Poorly sets up the premise of the issue Minimally persuasive to the case. Poor development of key issues. |
No premise set up. Not persuasive to the case. Absence of key issues. |
|
Analysis
|
Skillful recommendations and/or specific action. Suggested action is reasonable. |
Clear recommendations and/or specific action. Suggested action is reasonable. |
Sufficient recommendations and/or specific action. Suggested action is reasonable. |
Vague about specific action. Action minimally reasonable.
|
Absence of specific action. Action completely unreasonable. |
|
Conclusion
|
Conclusion is precise, knowledgeable, significant, and distinguished from alternate or opposing options. Skillfully implicates impact on nursing practice, patient safety and healthcare quality. |
Conclusion is precise knowledgeable and significant. Clearly states impact on nursing practice, patient safety and healthcare quality. |
Conclusion is appropriate. Provides a basic explanation of the impact on nursing practice, patient safety and healthcare quality. |
Conclusion may be unclear or irrelevant. Vague references regarding impact.. |
Conclusion and/or impact is missing |
|
Integration Of Knowledge
|
Demonstrates understanding and applies concepts learned in the course at a superior level. Concepts are integrated into insights. Provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas. |
Demonstrates understanding and applies concepts learned in the course. Conclusions are supported in reflection. |
Demonstrates, for the most part, understanding and applies concepts learned in the course. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported. |
Demonstrates, to a certain extent, understanding and applies some concepts learned in the course. |
Does not demonstrate s full understanding of concepts learned in the course. |
|
Writing Style, Formatting and Conventions
|
Appropriate references that support opinions and recommendations. Exceptional writing with no grammar, APA or spelling errors |
Appropriate references that support opinions and recommendations. Excellent writing with 1-3 grammar, APA or spelling errors |
Appropriate references that support opinions and recommendations. Sufficient writing with 4-6, APA or spelling errors |
Minimal references and support for opinion on policy and recommendations for changes. 7-10 APA/Grammar and/or spelling errors. |
Opinions and recommendations not well supported, >10 APA/Grammar and /or spelling errors |