4MAT Review - The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work
LIFC 602 4-Mat Review Grading Rubric (Based on 150 point total)
|
Criteria |
Advanced 92-100 (A- to A): Satisfies criteria w/ excellence |
Proficient 84-91 (B- to B+): Satisfies Criteria |
Developing 76-90 (C- to C+): Satisfies most criteria |
Below Expectations 74-75 (F to D+): Does not satisfy criteria |
Not Present |
Points Earned |
|
|
Content: 70% = 105 pts |
|||||
|
Summary |
28-30 pts. · The summary is an exceptional, concise, tightly worded, in-depth, insightful précis of the core concepts of the entire book. · 400-500 word count has been met
|
26-27 pts. 1. The summary is a concise, tightly worded, in-depth, insightful précis of most of the core concepts of the entire book. · 400-500 word count has been met
|
23-25 pts. · The summary section needs to be organized and developed more fully. · The summary needs to demonstrate a familiarity with the entire book. |
1-22 pts. · The summary was poorly written and did not demonstrate a familiarity with the entire book. |
0 points |
|
|
Concrete Response |
23-25 pts. · Response in first person voice relates in an exceptional manner how the specific content of this book connected to an experience in your own life. · 250- 300 word count has been met |
21-22 pts. 1. Response in first person voice adequately relates how the content of this book connected to an experience in your own life. 1. 250- 300 word count has been met |
19-20 pts. 1. Response needs to relate a personal life experience 1. Life experience needs to be connected to the content of the book. · Word count was not met |
1-18 pts. · Reponse lacked a personal life experience and/ or connection to the content of the book. · Word count was not met |
0 points |
|
|
Reflection
|
23-25 pts. · Analysis reflects exceptional level of critical thinking and interaction with the main ideas presented in the book. · The concise critque contains at least 2 of the following: -questions about the content or structure of the book, -critcisms, strengths, weaknesses
· 250- 300 word count is met
|
21-22 pts. 1. Analysis reflects a high level of critical thinking and interaction with the main ideas presented in the book. 1. The concise critque contains at least 1 of the following: -questions about the content or structure of the book, -critcisms, strengths, weaknesses
1. 250-300 word count has been met
|
19-20 pts.
1. Analysis reflects moderate level of critical thinking and adequate interaction with the main ideas presented in the book. 1. The critque needs to include at least 1 of the following: -questions about the content or structure of the book, -critcisms, strengths, weaknesses 1. 250-300 word count has not been met
|
1-18 pts. 1. Analysis reflects an inadequate level of critical thinking and interaction with the main ideas presented in the book.
|
0 points |
|
|
Application |
23-25 pts. 1. A precise, exceptional summary of your action steps based on core points of the book is stated. 1. There is a description of how main ideas in the book will affect your coaching and personal life. 1. 250- 300 word count has been met
|
21-22 pts. 1. A precise summary of your action steps based on core points of the book is stated. 1. There is a description of how main ideas in the book will affect your coaching and/or personal life 1. 250- 300 word count has been met
|
19-20 pts.
1. A more complete summary of the actions steps that you will take in your professional and personal life is needed.
|
1-18 pts. 1. Action steps are needed. |
|
|
|
|
Structure: 30% = 45 pts |
|||||
|
Organization |
23-25 pts. · All required elements are included and presented with strong headings and organizational clarity. · There are clear transitions between paragraphs and sections. · The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. · The paper meets the page length requirement. |
21-22 pts. · All required elements are included and organized. · There are transitions between paragraphs and sections. · The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. · The paper meets the page length requirement. |
19-20 pts. · Most required elements are included and are mostly organized. Most paragraphs and sections have transitions. · The logical treatment of the topic needs improvement. · The paper may not meet the page length requirement. |
1-18 pts. · Few or no required elements are included. Few or no transitions exist between paragraphs and sections. · There may not be a logical treatment of the topic. · The paper needs to meet the page length requirement. |
0 points |
|
|
Style |
19-20 pts. · The paper properly uses current APA style and DCCC Professional Writing Guidelines. · Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted correctly. · The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. · There are very few spelling and grammar errors. |
17-18 pts. · The paper consistently uses current APA style and DCCC Professional Writing Guidelines with few or no exceptions. · Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted with few or no errors. · The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. · There are few spelling and grammar errors. |
15-16 pts. · The paper inconsistently uses APA style and DCCC Professional Writing Guidelines. · Headings, in-text citations, and references are inconsistently formatted. · The paper does not consistently reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. · There are spelling and grammar errors. |
· The paper erroneously uses or does not use APA style and DCCC Professional Writing Guidelines. · Headings, in-text citations, and references are erroneously formatted or not present. · The paper needs to reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. · There are spelling and grammar errors. |
0 points |
|
|
Total |
|
|
||||
|
|
Instructor’s comments: |
LIFC
602
4
-
M
AT
R
EVIEW
G
RADING
R
UBRIC
(B
ASED ON
1
50
POINT TOTAL
)
Criteria
Advanced 92
-
100 (A
-
to A)
:
Satisfies criteria w/ excellence
Proficient 84
-
91
(B
-
to B+)
:
Satisfies Criteria
Developing
76
-
90 (C
-
to
C+)
:
Satisfies most criteria
Below Expectations
74
-
75
(F to D+)
:
Does not satisfy criteria
Not
Present
Points
Earned
Content: 70% = 105
pts
Summary
28
-
30
pts
.
·
The
s
ummary is a
n
exceptional,
concise, tightly
worded, in
-
depth, insightful
précis of the core concepts of
the entire book.
·
400
-
500 word count
has been
met
26
-
27
pts.
·
The
s
ummary
is a concise,
tightly worded, in
-
depth,
insightful précis of most of the
core concepts of the entire
book.
·
400
-
500 word count
has been
met
23
-
25
pts.
·
The summary section
needs
to be
organized and
developed more fully.
·
The summary
needs to
demonstrate a fami
liarity
with the entire book
.
1
-
22
pts.
·
The summar
y
was poorly
written
and did not
demonstrate a familiarity
with the entire book.
0 points
Concrete
Re
s
ponse
23
-
25
pts.
·
Response in first person voice
relates
in an exceptional
manner
how the specific
content of this book connected
to an
experience
in your own
life.
·
250
-
300 word count
has been
met
21
-
22
pts.
·
Response in first person voice
adequately
relates how the
content of this book connected
to an experience in your own
life.
·
250
-
300 word count
has been
met
19
-
20 pts.
·
R
esponse
needs to relate
a personal life experience
·
Life
experience needs to
be connected to the content
of the book.
·
Word cou
nt was not
met
1
-
18
pts.
·
Reponse lacked a personal
life
experience and/ or
connection to the content
of the book
.
·
Word count was not met
0 points
Reflection
23
-
25
pts.
·
Analysis reflects exceptional
level of
critical
thinking and
interaction with
the main ideas
presented in the book
.
·
T
he concise critque
contains
at least 2 of the following:
-
questions
about the
content or structure of
the book
,
-
critcisms, strengths,
weaknesses
21
-
22
pts.
·
Analysis reflects
a
high
level
of critical thinking and
interaction with the main ideas
presented in the book.
·
T
he concise critque
contains at
least 1
of the following:
-
questions about the
content or structure of
the book,
-
critcisms, strengths,
weaknesses
19
-
20 pts.
·
Analysis reflects moderat
e
level of critical thinking
and
adequate
interaction
with the main ideas
presented in the book
.
·
T
he critque needs to
include at least 1 of the
following:
-
questions about the
content or structure
1
-
18
pts.
·
Analysis reflects an
inadequate level
of
critical thinking and
interaction with the main
ideas presented in the
book.
0 points
LIFC 602 4-MAT REVIEW GRADING RUBRIC (BASED ON 150 POINT TOTAL)
Criteria
Advanced 92-100 (A- to A):
Satisfies criteria w/ excellence
Proficient 84-91 (B- to B+):
Satisfies Criteria
Developing 76-90 (C- to
C+):
Satisfies most criteria
Below Expectations 74-75
(F to D+):
Does not satisfy criteria
Not
Present
Points
Earned
Content: 70% = 105 pts
Summary
28-30 pts.
The summary is an
exceptional, concise, tightly
worded, in-depth, insightful
précis of the core concepts of
the entire book.
400-500 word count has been
met
26-27 pts.
The summary is a concise,
tightly worded, in-depth,
insightful précis of most of the
core concepts of the entire
book.
400-500 word count has been
met
23-25 pts.
The summary section
needs to be organized and
developed more fully.
The summary needs to
demonstrate a familiarity
with the entire book.
1-22 pts.
The summary was poorly
written and did not
demonstrate a familiarity
with the entire book.
0 points
Concrete
Response
23-25 pts.
Response in first person voice
relates in an exceptional
manner how the specific
content of this book connected
to an experience in your own
life.
250- 300 word count has been
met
21-22 pts.
Response in first person voice
adequately relates how the
content of this book connected
to an experience in your own
life.
250- 300 word count has been
met
19-20 pts.
Response needs to relate
a personal life experience
Life experience needs to
be connected to the content
of the book.
Word count was not
met
1-18 pts.
Reponse lacked a personal
life experience and/ or
connection to the content
of the book.
Word count was not met
0 points
Reflection
23-25 pts.
Analysis reflects exceptional
level of critical thinking and
interaction with the main ideas
presented in the book.
The concise critque contains
at least 2 of the following:
-questions about the
content or structure of
the book,
-critcisms, strengths,
weaknesses
21-22 pts.
Analysis reflects a high level
of critical thinking and
interaction with the main ideas
presented in the book.
The concise critque contains at
least 1 of the following:
-questions about the
content or structure of
the book,
-critcisms, strengths,
weaknesses
19-20 pts.
Analysis reflects moderate
level of critical thinking
and adequate interaction
with the main ideas
presented in the book.
The critque needs to
include at least 1 of the
following:
-questions about the
content or structure
1-18 pts.
Analysis reflects an
inadequate level of
critical thinking and
interaction with the main
ideas presented in the
book.
0 points