Evidenced Based- Analyzing articles

3 Pages in length: worth 200 points

**PICOT is not formatted correctly, demonstrates researcher bias and is not measurable. Please see my posts in Week 3 for help. You must revise prior to RUA #2. Please define "bedside teaching". That is very vague. What do you envision? If your intervention is HRRP, please define that in RUA #2.

**Running head should be an abbreviated version of the title. Level one headers are not to be italicized. You cannot begin your paper with a level one header. Write your introduction then use the header. Title should repeat at the top of page 2. Paragraphs require at least three sentences. Paragraphs must be indented. Reference errors. Citation errors.

Using this table to analyze:

The paper will include the following.

1. Clinical question a. Description of problem b. Significance of problem c. Purpose of paper

2. Description of findings a. Summarize basics in the Matrix Table as found in Assignment Documents in e-College. b. Describe i. Concepts ii. Methods used iii. Participants iv. Instruments including reliability and validity v. Answer to “Purpose” question vi. Identify next step for group

3. Conclusion of paper

4. Format a. Correct grammar and spelling b. Use of headings for each section c. Use of APA format (sixth edition) d. Page length: three pages

**Please note that although most of these questions are the same as you addressed in paper 1, the purpose of this paper is different. You can use your work from paper 1 for items 1 and 2 above, including any suggestions for improvement provided as feedback. Item 3 above should be specific to this paper

“The purpose if this paper is to”

Please follow same layout of previous paper but with analytical data for this one. Intro, body, conclusion.

DIRECTIONS AND ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA

Assignment

Criteria

Points % Description

Clinical Question 30

15%

1. Problem is described: What is the focus of your group’s work?

2. Significance of the problem is described: What health outcomes result

from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You

may find support on websites for government or professional

organizations.

3. Purpose of your paper: What will your paper do or describe? “The purpose

of this paper is to . . .”

**Please note that although most of these questions are the same as

you addressed in paper 1, the purpose of this paper is different. You

can use your work from paper 1 for items 1 and 2 above, including

any suggestions for improvement provided as feedback. Item 3 above

should be specific to this paper.

Description of

Findings: Summary

60 30%

Summarize the basics of each article in a matrix table that appears in the

appendix.

Description of Findings:

Description

60 30%

Describe in the body of the paper the following.

• What concepts have been studied?

• What methods have been used?

• Who are the participants or members of the samples?

• What instruments have been used? Did the authors describe the

reliability and validity?

• How do you answer your original “purpose of this paper” question?

Do the findings of the articles provide evidence for your answers? If

so, how? If not, what is still needed to be able to answer your

question?

• What is needed for the next step? Identify two questions that can

help guide the group’s work.

Description of

Findings: Conclusion 20 10%

Conclusion: Review major findings in your paper in a summary paragraph.