IFSM 310 – Stage 4 Assignment – Due Sunday
Stage 4 Course: IFSM 310 6980 Software and Hardware Infrastructure Concepts (2215)
/ 5
/ 15
Criteria Far Above Standards
Above Standards
Meets Standards
Below Standards
Well Below Standards
Criterion Score
Introduction
Changes in
Existing IT
Infrastructur
e to Use
IaaS
5 points
5 Points A clear and
effective
introduction is
provided.
4 points
4 Points An
appropriate
introduction is
included.
3.5 points
3.5 Points An
introduction is
provided.
3 points
3 Points The
introduction
may be
incomplete or
inaccurate.
0 points
0-2 Points No
introduction
provided.
15 points
13-15 Points Explanation of
changes in
existing
infrastructure
at the original
and two
remote
locations to
use the IaaS is
clear,
complete,
derived from
the Case
Study, and
demonstrates
sophisticated
level of
analysis and
critical
thinking.
13 points
12-13 Points Explanation of
changes in
existing
infrastructure
at the original
and two
remote
locations to
use the IaaS is
accurate,
derived from
the Case
Study, and
demonstrates
analysis and
critical
thinking.
11 points
10-11 Points Explanation of
changes in
existing
infrastructure
at the original
and two
remote
locations to
use the IaaS is
derived from
the Case
Study, and
demonstrates
adequate level
of analysis and
critical
thinking.
9 points
9 Points Explanation of
changes in
existing
infrastructure
at the original
and two
remote
locations to
use the IaaS is
incomplete or
not related to
Case Study.
0 points
0-8 Points Explanation of
changes in
existing
infrastructure
at the original
and two
remote
locations to
use the IaaS is
not included,
or is very
incomplete or
incorrect.
Paragraph
Lato (Recom…
19px
/ 15
/ 15
Criteria Far Above Standards
Above Standards
Meets Standards
Below Standards
Well Below Standards
Criterion Score
Graphical
Representati
on
List of
Communicat
ions
Protocols
15 points
13-15 Points The graphical
diagram is
complete,
clear, logical,
labeled, and
appropriate to
the Case
Study,
includes the
components
and locations
listed in step
2, and
demonstrates
sophisticated
analysis and
critical
thinking.
13 points
12-13 Points The graphical
diagram is
clear, logical,
labeled, and
appropriate to
the Case
Study and
includes the
components
and locations
listed in step
2, and
demonstrates
a clear
understanding
of the course
concepts.
11 points
10-11 Points The graphical
diagram is
labeled and
appropriate to
the Case
Study and
includes most
of the
components
and locations
listed in step
2.
9 points
9 Points The graphical
diagram may
be lacking in
completeness
and/or clarity
and/or logic;
may not be
labeled or
appropriate to
the Case
Study and may
not include
the
components
or locations
listed in step
2.
0 points
0-8 Points No graphical
diagram is
included, or
minimal effort
demonstrated.
15 points
13-15 Points List of
communicatio
ns protocols is
complete,
accurate,
appropriate to
the diagram,
and
demonstrates
sophisticated
level of
analysis and
critical
thinking.
13 points
12-13 Points List of
communicatio
ns protocols is
accurate,
appropriate to
the diagram,
and
demonstrates
analysis and
critical
thinking.
11 points
10-11 Points List of
communicatio
ns protocols is
provided,
relates to the
diagram, and
demonstrates
adequate level
of analysis and
critical
thinking.
9 points
9 Points List of
communicatio
ns protocols is
incomplete or
not related to
the diagram.
0 points
0-8 Points List of
communicatio
ns protocols is
not included,
or is very
incomplete or
incorrect.
/ 15
/ 15
Criteria Far Above Standards
Above Standards
Meets Standards
Below Standards
Well Below Standards
Criterion Score
Explanation
of Layered
Architecture
and Its
Benefits
Explanation
of TCP
Model
15 points
13-15 Points Explanation of
a layered
architecture
and its
benefits is
clear,
complete, and
demonstrates
sophisticated
level of
analysis and
critical
thinking.
13 points
12-13 Points Explanation of
a layered
architecture
and its
benefits is
clear and
demonstrates
analysis and
critical
thinking.
11 points
10-11 Points Explanation of
a layered
architecture
and its
benefits is
provided and
demonstrates
adequate level
of analysis and
critical
thinking.
9 points
9 Points Explanation of
a layered
architecture
and its
benefits is
incomplete or
inaccurate.
0 points
0-8 Points Explanation of
a layered
architecture
and its
benefits is not
included, or is
very
incomplete or
incorrect.
15 points
13-15 Points Explanation of
the 4 layer
TCP model
and how it
applies to the
ERP and IaaS
is clear,
complete, and
demonstrates
sophisticated
level of
analysis and
critical
thinking.
13 points
12-13 Points Explanation of
the 4 layer
TCP model
and how it
applies to the
ERP and IaaS
is clear and
demonstrates
analysis and
critical
thinking.
11 points
10-11 Points Explanation of
the 4 layer
TCP model
and how it
applies to the
ERP and IaaS
is provided
and
demonstrates
adequate level
of analysis and
critical
thinking.
9 points
9 Points Explanation of
the 4 layer
TCP model
and how it
applies to the
ERP and IaaS
is incomplete
or inaccurate.
0 points
0-8 Points Explanation of
the 4 layer
TCP model
and how it
applies to the
ERP and IaaS
is not
included, or is
very
incomplete or
incorrect.
/ 15
/ 5
Criteria Far Above Standards
Above Standards
Meets Standards
Below Standards
Well Below Standards
Criterion Score
Applying
the TCP
Model to a
Packet
Format
15 points
13-15 Points The
application of
the TCP model
to a packet is
clear,
complete, and
demonstrates
sophisticated
level of
analysis and
critical
thinking.
13 points
12-13 Points The
application of
the TCP model
to a packet is
clear and
demonstrates
analysis and
critical
thinking.
11 points
10-11 Points The
application of
the TCP model
to a packet is
provided and
demonstrates
adequate level
of analysis and
critical
thinking.
9 points
9 Points The
application of
the TCP model
to a packet is
incomplete or
inaccurate.
0 points
0-8 Points The
application of
the TCP model
to a packet is
not included,
or is very
incomplete or
incorrect.
5 points
5 Points Submission
reflects
effective
organization
and
sophisticated
writing;
follows
instructions
provided; uses
correct
structure,
grammar, and
spelling;
presented in a
professional
format using
Word; any
references are
incorporated
and cited
using APA
format.
4 points
4 Points Submission
reflects
effective
organization
and clear
writing;
follows
instructions
provided; uses
correct
structure,
grammar, and
spelling;
presented in a
professional
format using
Word; any
references are
properly
incorporated
and cited
using APA
format.
3.5 points
3.5 Points Submission is
adequate, is
somewhat
organized,
follows
instructions
provided; cont
ains minimal
grammar
and/or spelling
errors; is in
Word format;
any references
are
incorporated
and cited
using APA
format.
3 points
3 Points Submission is
not well
organized,
and/or does
not follow
instructions
provided;
and/or
contains
grammar
and/or spelling
errors; and/or
is not in Word;
references
may not be
properly cited
using APA
format.
0 points
0-2 Points Document is
extremely
poorly written
and does not
convey the
information.
Total / 100
Overall Score
Far Above
Standards 90 points minimum
Above
Standards 80 points
minimum
Meets
Standards 70 points
minimum
Below
Standards 60 points
minimum
Well Below
Standards 0 points minimum