IFSM 310 – Stage 2 Assignment – Due Sunday

Stage 3 Course: IFSM 310 6980 Software and Hardware Infrastructure Concepts (2215)

/ 20

Criteria Far Above Standards

Above Standards

Meets Standards

Below Standards

Well Below Standards

Criterion Score

Component

s for New

(remote)

Locations

20 points

18-20 Points List of

components

for the new

(remote)

locations

includes all

appropriate

hardware,

software,

security

devices,

network

devices,

wired/wireless

devices,

internet, and

databases and

demonstrates

sophisticated

level of

analysis and

critical

thinking.

17 points

16-17 Points List of

components

for the new

(remote)

locations

includes most

of the

necessary

hardware,

software,

security

devices,

network

devices,

wired/wireless

devices,

internet, and

databases, and

demonstrates

analysis and

critical

thinking.

15 points

14-15 Points List of

components

for the new

(remote)

locations

including

hardware,

software,

security

devices,

network

devices,

wired/wireless

devices,

internet, and

databases is

provided and

demonstrates

adequate level

of analysis and

critical

thinking.

13 points

12-13 Points List of

components

for the new

(remote)

locations is

incomplete or

not related to

Case Study.

0 points

0-11 Points List of

components

for the new

(remote)

locations is

not included,

or is very

incomplete or

incorrect. Paragraph

Lato (Recom…

19px

/ 20

/ 20

Criteria Far Above Standards

Above Standards

Meets Standards

Below Standards

Well Below Standards

Criterion Score

Changes in

Existing IT

Infrastructur

e

Explanation

of

Differences

between

Main

Location

and Remote

Locations

20 points

18-20 Points Explanation of

changes in

existing

infrastructure

to

accommodate

the new

locations is

clear,

complete,

derived from

the Case

Study, and

demonstrates

sophisticated

level of

analysis and

critical

thinking.

17 points

16-17 Points Explanation of

changes in

existing

infrastructure

to

accommodate

the new

locations is

accurate,

derived from

the Case

Study, and

demonstrates

analysis and

critical

thinking.

15 points

14-15 Points Explanation of

changes in

existing

infrastructure

to

accommodate

the new

locations is

derived from

the Case

Study, and

demonstrates

adequate level

of analysis and

critical

thinking.

13 points

12-13 Points Explanation of

changes in

existing

infrastructure

to

accommodate

the new

locations is

incomplete or

not related to

Case Study.

0 points

0-11 Points Explanation of

changes in

existing

infrastructure

to

accommodate

the new

locations is

not included,

or is very

incomplete or

incorrect.

20 points

18-20 Points Explanation of

the

differences

between the

IT at the main

location and at

the remote

locations is

clear,

complete,

derived from

the Case

Study, and

demonstrates

sophisticated

level of

analysis and

critical

thinking.

17 points

16-17 Points Explanation of

the

differences

between the

IT at the main

location and at

the remote

locations is

clear, derived

from the Case

Study, and

demonstrates

analysis and

critical

thinking.

15 points

14-15 Points Explanation of

the

differences

between the

IT at the main

location and at

the remote

locations is

derived from

the Case

Study, and

demonstrates

adequate level

of analysis and

critical

thinking.

13 points

12-13 Points Explanation of

the

differences

between the

IT at the main

location and at

the remote

sites is

incomplete or

not related to

the Case

Study.

0 points

0-11 Points Explanation of

the

differences

between the

IT at the main

location and at

the remote

locations is

not included,

or is very

incomplete or

incorrect.

/ 30

/ 10

Criteria Far Above Standards

Above Standards

Meets Standards

Below Standards

Well Below Standards

Criterion Score

Graphical

Representati

on

Format

30 points

27-30 Points The graphical

diagram is

complete,

clear, logical,

labeled, and

appropriate to

the Case

Study,

includes the

components

listed in Part

1, and

demonstrates

sophisticated

analysis and

critical

thinking.

26 points

24-26 Points The graphical

diagram is

clear, logical,

labeled,

appropriate to

the Case

Study and

includes

Explanation

includes the

components

listed in Part

1, and

demonstrates

a clear

understanding

of the course

concepts.

23 points

21-23 Points The graphical

diagram is

labeled and is

appropriate to

the Case

Study and

includes most

of the

components

listed in Part

1.

20 points

18-20 Points The graphical

diagram may

be lacking in

completeness

and/or clarity

and/or logic;

may not be

labeled or

appropriate to

the Case

Study and may

not include

the

components

listed in Part

1.

0 points

0-17 Points No graphical

diagram is

included, or

minimal effort

demonstrated.

10 points

9-10 Points Submission

reflects

effective

organization

and

sophisticated

writing;

follows

instructions

provided; uses

correct

structure,

grammar, and

spelling;

presented in a

professional

format using

Word.

8.5 points

8.5 Points Submission

reflects

effective

organization

and clear

writing;

follows

instructions

provided; uses

correct

structure,

grammar, and

spelling;

presented in a

professional

format using

Word.

7.5 points

7.5 Points Submission is

adequate, is

somewhat

organized,

follows

instructions

provided; cont

ains minimal

grammar

and/or spelling

errors; is in

Word format.

6.5 points

6.5 Points Submission is

not well

organized,

and/or does

not follow

instructions

provided;

and/or

contains

grammar

and/or spelling

errors; and/or

is not in Word.

0 points

0-5 Points Document is

extremely

poorly written

and does not

convey the

information.

Total / 100

Overall Score

Far Above

Standards 90 points minimum

Above

Standards 80 points

minimum

Meets

Standards 70 points

minimum

Below

Standards 60 points

minimum

Well Below

Standards 0 points minimum