Post Conference Conversation
|
Observation #: |
Date |
Observer: |
|
First Name of Teacher Observed: XXXXXXXXXXXXX |
Subject: |
Grade Level: |
|
#1 Context for Observation |
|
|
|
#2 Pre-Conference |
|||||
|
2a. Focus of pre-conference
Which criteria may be evident during the observation?
How can the instructional framework be used to support this teacher? |
Focus Criterion :
|
||||
|
Standard |
|
||||
|
Learning Target |
|
||||
|
Students’ work samples that show current skill level and teacher explanation of progress to be made towards target. |
|
||||
|
Evidence that will show if students met learning target. |
|
||||
|
2b. Supervisory Behaviors during pre-conference (Indicate number of times used) |
Listening |
Clarifying |
Encouraging |
Reflecting |
Presenting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Problem Solving |
Negotiating |
Directing |
Standardizing |
Reinforcing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2c. Insights from Pre-conference |
|
|
#3 Environment for Observation |
||
|
3a. Tools selected for use during observation (attach observation tool) |
Qualitative |
Quantitative |
|
|
|
|
|
3b. Evidence of students learning (or not learning): |
Student work shows evidence of understanding, not just recall. Evidence? |
|
|
|
Students are engaged in activities to develop understanding and create personal meaning through reflection. Evidence? |
|
|
|
Students apply knowledge in real-world contexts. Evidence? |
|
|
|
Students are engaged in active participation, exploration, and research. Evidence? |
|
|
|
Teachers utilize the diverse experiences of students to build effective learning experiences. Evidence? |
|
|
|
Assessment tasks allow students to exhibit higher-order thinking. Evidence? |
|
|
|
Students are presented with a challenging curriculum designed to develop depth of understanding. Evidence? |
|
|
3c. Describe the learning environment of the classroom |
Diverse learners were accommodated? Evidence: |
|
|
|
Students worked independently or collaboratively? Evidence: |
|
|
|
Classroom was positive, “warm”, safe, and conducive to learning? Evidence: |
|
|
|
Teacher used variety of questioning strategies? Evidence |
|
|
|
Teacher expected high performance from all students? Evidence: |
|
|
3d. Insights from Observation |
|
|
|
|
Did the lesson align with the Standard and support state goals (skills, knowledge, thinking, and applications)? Yes/No, Comments? |
|
|
#4 Analysis of Data and Preparing for Post Conference: (must have data to support conference) |
||||
|
Data Analysis and Plan for Post Conference |
|
|||
|
4a. Type of Conference |
Directive |
Directive Informational |
Collaborative |
Nondirective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4b. “Pluses” |
|
|||
|
4b. “Areas of Focus” |
|
|||
|
4c. Plan for Post Conference What are possible entry questions to a growth conversation? |
|
|
#5 Post Conference |
|||||
|
5a. Focus |
|
||||
|
Was target met? What evidence was there of student learning? |
|
||||
|
5b. Supervisory Behaviors used during Post Conference |
Listening |
Clarifying |
Encouraging |
Reflecting |
Presenting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Problem Solving |
Negotiating |
Directing |
Standardizing |
Reinforcing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5c. Highlights of Post Conference |
|
||||
|
5d. Follow-up Plan (next steps) |
|
||||
|
Additional resources teacher will access: |
|
|
#6 Reflection |
|
|
6a. What did you learn? Reference the intent of TPEP, the essential beliefs that drive the process, relationships and roles, critically important elements of the process |
|
|
6b. What will you do differently in the future? |
|
|
6c. How did the instructional framework support growth conversations? |
|
|
Discuss rater agreement between you and your mentor principal |
|
|
Discuss the self-assessment of this teacher |
|
|
Discuss the goal setting of this teacher |
|
|
List types of artifacts/evidence used in this teacher’s evaluation |
|
|
Reflect on the final evaluation conference with this teacher |
|