14-Paragraphs

profileJohn.Quality
3-pdfs-1-question.zip

Changing Coalitions and Coping.pdf

questions.docx

Why Does This Always Happen?

1. In the Miami office, they talk about how the accounts the company brings in needs to be spread out more evenly and there should be a better way of doing this. Wouldn’t the account being brought in be based on the person and there own networking which allows them to have more clients then one another or are the accounts that do come in from higher up and randomly disturbed?

2. throughout their investigation it appears that everyone is very close in the Miami branch, and it seems as though this is causing everyone to not voice their real unadulterated opinion, in fear that it may hurt someones feelings. however, there are ways to communicate without being confrontational. instead simply trying to do whats best for the company and the work within the company. so why would they not hold a sort of meeting or seminar to teach the staff and employees more efficient communication strategies?

3. There definitely seems to be a communication issue between the employees at the Miami office. I noticed that there is a large gad within technology of the leaders of the Miami office. Perhaps they need to look into different options to help get everyone on the same communication systems via updated technology? 

4. The Miami office seems to be very tight-knit, which leads to a phenomenon known as "Group Think". This causes members of said group to be unwilling to voice concerns, eg. Matt and Sara, as well as going with the general consensus even if they have opposing views. What actions can the CEO take to take advantage of the closeness of said colleagues, yet eliminating the disadvantages of groupthink?

5. When they were conducting their investigation at the Miami office, it seemed as though the team there had a problem with confronting one another with their concerns.  Matt and Sara did not seem to be talking about their concerns about each other.  My question to that is: why don't the CEO's schedule a meeting for Sara and Matt to have a session where they talk face to face?

6. Is the closeness of the Miami office preventing those working there from fully understanding the situation? Are they blinded by their own biases? 

Where Do We Go From Here?

1. In the article, there is a lot of tension between the three employees, mainly Trish and Phil. Since Marshall is new to the company, it seems like he is trying to have a better understanding of how to do things or learning the "ins and outs" of things. But there is a problem in the culture where Phil is demonstrating an individualistic and "lone wolf" characteristics. Where does Phil cross the line where it comes detrimental to the company rather than just a relationship with his peers?

2. From the perspective of Phil and Trish, they would probably want management to figure out who is right in their actions. However, what responsibility does management have in this incident? I do not think that management views the circumstances of their argument as seriously as Phil and Trish do. However, I do think that management would agree that this is a waste of time and they both acted unprofessional, as they both represent the company. My question is "what is managements responsibility to fix this situation going forward?" Personally I think that management should make known that they are both at the same position and do not have a right to make the decisions that they have made when they sent their email. This should have been addressed in my opinion and a lot of issues would have been resolved. Sometimes in the workplace it is difficult to communicate to someone if they think they have authority over you when they do not. I would like to know what everyone else thinks? What is management responsibility in this case, do they even have one?

3. Phil's Attitude during work and toward his other coworkers (Trish and Marshall) seem to have created a negative effect on the company. Phil and Trish have the same position yet he disrespects Trish because she is a woman and is younger than him. Even when they have been working at the company for almost the same time he believes he has more authority towards Trish. Do you think that Phil's attitude and decision making has caused other members of the company to act the same as him? Why or why not?

4. While trying to gain support from multiple people, Phil, Trish, and Marshall included multiple outsiders on the negative email thread. How do you think this makes the outsiders view the company and those employees? Do you think that they might view the company in a different light?

Changing Coalitions and Coping?

1. Gadgets was very successful when they  had Nancy and Randy running the office, then they gave the CEO over to Benny.  Benny got fired due to his actions. After that he hired another guy named Martin, who later left for personal reasons.  Now that Randy is back into office, how do you think he can work with the younger and newer managers?

2. Benny found that many of his employees were “goofing around” and were not serious about their jobs. He then ended up firing Gloria who was the human resource manager since all he saw her do was help with social support for the employees and not actually doing her core job functions. Do you think that was the right way for Benny to go by firing her? Or do you think he should’ve gone a different way of handling the situation? 

3. The success of Gadget's was strongly built on a foundation dedicated, reliable, and passionate employees who required clear transparency from Randy and Nancy. During the transition period of Randy and Nancy's retirement, could the owners have incorporated input from team members to help select an appropriate CEO?

4. Throughout reading the case, it was made apparent that the organizational culture of Gadgets was a very strong "family culture" where everyone worked together in every aspect and peopled trusted in others with work and personal lives. When Randy and Nancy were retiring and looking for a new CEO, do you believe that instead of just looking at someone who was trained highly in accounting and finance, they should have looked deeper into how they relate with co-workers, their ethical views and also their personality for a family cultured workplace? Or even though it did not work out with Benny, picking a numbers based CEO was the right decision?

Where Do We Go From Here.pdf

Why Does This Always Happen.pdf

Website Case 2

Why Does This Always Happen?

Philip Salem

Rosalie Garza* was waiting to meet her friends at Old Ebbitt Grill,one of Washington’s oldest restaurants. She was the 58-year-old CEO of Hill Country Marketing, and this lunch would include discus- sion of a personnel matter. The friends at lunch included Ruth Castro, 52, head of the Texas region, headquartered in Dallas, and Patrice Carmady, 51, manager of the southeast region. Rosalie’s two oldest friends, Laura Welch and Paula Sanchez, would also be at the lunch. When Rosalie became a manager in the 1970s, they were two of her first hires. These two still acted as senior account executives at the branch office now located in San Antonio. But both Rosalie and Ruth regularly consulted them about company matters. Laura and Paula had completed an investigation, at Patrice’s request, about low-per- forming employees in the southeast region. The leather padded chairs and Victorian glass of the restaurant seemed like a sharp contrast to a discussion of employee performance.

Hill Country Marketing began as a small firm in San Antonio, Texas, after World War II. Its founding member, Linda Adams, turned over management of the firm in the mid-1970s and resigned from any official duties shortly thereafter. The consequent changes in man- agement followed the growth of the company. Rosalie succeeded Linda and moved the headquarters to Washington, DC. The com- pany now had four regions over the country’s largest 15 states and several branch offices within each region.

1

The Wall Street Journal attributed the firm’s growth to three things. First, the firm had been very sensitive to its clients. When there were problems, the firm compromised other factors to ensure a satisfied customer. Second, the firm had been innovative. The responsibilities of the account managers changed accordingly to include participating in problem-solving groups to create new marketing plans. Because Hill Country was one of the first companies to use digital technology, it was prepared for e-commerce and experienced the most rapid growth over the last 15 years. Finally, employees liked working for Hill Country Marketing. People were friendly and respectful of one another. Growth brought its own challenges, however.

Rosalie always cleared her desk before she left, stuffing her slim laptop, cell phone, and PDA into a briefcase that looked as if it were a medium-sized shoulder purse. As she turned to leave, Rosalie looked up from her desk and glanced at a postcard she had tacked to her bul- letin board. The sentence “Every day do at least one thing that scares you” was displayed in white print on a black background. It was a stark reminder of the beginnings of Hill Country Marketing. Just a few years ago, Linda Adams, the founder of the firm, had given the postcard to Rosalie as a gift. Now retired, Linda had been visiting the Holocaust Museum, and she had dropped by unexpectedly to look over the renovated Washington offices and visit old friends. “Rosalie,” Linda began, “not only does every CEO need to be reminded of this, but every person—period. You can get too cozy and forget that life doesn’t mean much without risks.” Rosalie liked the postcard because it reminded her not to get too cozy. She had just shut down her lap- top and was thinking of the card again as Paula and Laura walked into the restaurant.

When everyone finally arrived, Rosalie would facilitate the lun- cheon discussion about the “Miami situation” and any other related topics. Of course, she would make the final decisions if needed. What was troubling her was that this matter had reached her desk, and that she had had to send Paula and Laura to investigate.

The Situation

Management of the Miami branch office wrestled with a com- mon personnel problem. Matt Sanders, a senior account manager, was not performing. For five years, he had not recruited any new cli- ents nor had he created or even suggested any new marketing plans.

2 ✦ Case Studies For Organizational Communication

Over the period, there was an increase in complaints from his clients, and he was spending increasing amounts of time away from work tending to personal matters. The junior staff had become hostile.

Sara Bartles, manager of the department, had been a successful account manager. She was also a well-known author and trainer who mentore d junior employe es. She had dealt successfully with employee problems before by using the communication techniques she advocated in her training. She tried to deal with Matt by giving him positive feedback, encouraging him to improve rather than describing any of the negative feelings of the other staff.

“I don’t know what more to do,” she would later tell Paula. “My senior account managers suggested private meetings with Matt to get him going. I did that. I even designed smaller projects for him, ones that were easily doable, to help him feel better about himself and to empower him.”

All efforts failed. In fact, Matt later told Laura, “Sara was singling me out. Everyone knew that. I was being punished.”

The behaviors normally associated with effective interpersonal communication backfired. The entire situation became a crisis when Matt, who had been receiving poor evaluations from the rest of the staff and customers, actually asked Patrice Carmady, the southeast region’s manager, for a raise.

Patrice consulted with Sara. Then Patrice called Rosalie. Rosalie was concerned enough to talk to Ruth, who had been Patrice’s man- ager in San Antonio. Finally, Patrice, Ruth, and Rosalie met in Wash- ington. They had met before in similar situations. Why does this always happen? How can it change? They decided to send Laura and Paula, respected by all involved, to investigate the situation.

The Investigation

When Laura and Paula arrived in Miami, Sara was there to greet them. She rushed them off to a happy hour attended by most of the account executives and part of the staff. Matt was not there.

“Say, didn’t you hire Matt?” one of the account executives asked Paula.

“Not exactly—I did interview Matt for this job, and I did recom- mend him,” said Paula.

“He might have been fine then, but he’s a drag on the system now,” said another employee.

Website Case 2 ✦ Why Does This Always Happen? 3

“What ticks me off is that he gets the same raises—not commis- sions or bonuses—but the same raises that the rest of us get,” added another.

“It’s not Sara, either,” said another. “What is she supposed to do if Patrice gives her only so much for raises?”

“Paula and I will have a chance to talk to all of you later this week,” said Laura, ending the discussion of Matt during happy hour.

The next day, Laura and Paula attended the morning staff meet- ing. Sara distributed account information about the last month and discussed initiatives for the week. Matt seemed disinterested.

Toward the end of the meeting, Sam Marshall, one of the account mangers, voiced his concerns. “How the hell are we assigning accounts to account managers these days, anyway? I’m sick and tired of my account list. My clients are happy with us, but they haven’t really bought anything new or bigger in a decade. Shouldn’t the accounts be distrib- uted more equally?” There were requests for data, a short discussion, and agreement to consider the matter next week. The meeting ended on time, with nearly everyone laughing and joking. Most people con- gratulated Sam on his victory and hurried off to meet clients.

After the meeting, Laura interviewed Matt. Matt had one of the larger offices in the company. Laura noticed off to the side a com- puter table with a very old computer on it. The main desk was wide and leather padded, with an executive leather padded chair. The desktop was crowded with family pictures and several pictures of the Hill Country account managers at their annual picnics. “Do they even make those anymore?” Laura asked as she motioned to the computer and chuckled.

“It does what I need it to do,” Matt responded with a laugh. “It might even be one of the hand-me-downs from when you all started the company,” Matt added. “We all know those stories about you all—taking chances, trying new things and all. Things were rougher then.”

After telling one or two stories about his family, Matt finally focused on the issues he knew were at the top of Laura’s agenda. Matt claimed Sara was out to get him. When Laura presented the data over the last year showing the downturn in Matt’s performance, Matt claimed the numbers actually showed an upswing, considering economic conditions and problems in the office.

“This is the first time I’ve seen those numbers,” said Matt. “Sara’s just jealous because she knows how close I am to the rest of the staff,”

4 ✦ Case Studies For Organizational Communication

he argued. “Everyone else knows I’m doing well. Why would the staff have recommended me to mentor new employees?”

Laura then went to talk with Sam. Sam had the same office furni- ture but a more contemporary computer configuration. It was not the latest, however. There were fewer pictures on the desk, but there were the same company picnic photos. Laura looked more closely at the company photos, hoping she might learn how close Sam was to Matt. “Everyone seems so happy in these photos—does everyone go to the picnics?” Laura asked Sam. “Everyone,” said Sam. “It’s like a family picnic, and we have a blast.”

Sam became more serious when he talked about Matt. “Matt’s a good guy. He’s great to have around here. He always has good things to say about everyone. I know he has been having some problems lately, but we all have problems from time to time.”

Sam recognized Matt’s poor performance, but he thought a nega- tive evaluation of Matt might lead to other problems on the staff. No one had ever confronted Matt directly, as far as he knew, but others had said things to Sara about Matt.

“We don’t want to hurt Matt’s feelings—it would be like hurting your brother,” said Sam. “We sure don’t want those kinds of confron- tations to be business as usual around here.”

“Does anyone ever mention this lack of confrontation?” asked Laura.

“That would just cause conflict, and we don’t have conflict here,” said Sam coolly.

Meanwhile, Paula went to talk with Sara. When Paula arrived at Sara’s office, Sara’s administrative assistant told her that Sara was run- ning a bit late, but Paula could wait in Sara’s office. Paula noted how comfortable the office seemed, not realizing it was similar to the other offices. When Paula met with the executives in Washington, DC, she even commented on how the leather padded chairs at the restaurant were almost as comfortable as the one in the Miami office. There was no computer visible in the room, and only a picture of Sara’s family was on her desk. She did not notice the company pho- tos on the wall at first, but later she would discover they were the same photos others had. Also on the wall were photos of employees hugging Sara as they were giving her some token of appreciation.

Sara began the meeting by noting that Sam’s outburst during the meeting was not normal. “We try to deal with the facts,” she said. “Besides, nothing is going to change—Sam won his battle, and we will

Website Case 2 ✦ Why Does This Always Happen? 5

go through the motions of a review. The whole thing will be over by next month.”

Laura noticed that when anyone spoke during the meeting, no one else challenged their opinion. People either ignored the com- ments or simply voiced their own unquestioned opinions. Was this because Laura and Paula were there?

“We’re family here, and everyone is happy,” Sara said reassur- ingly. “Everything is under control, except for Matt.”

Laura asked Sara whether she had ever directly confronted Matt with his performance data. Sara said she had initially encouraged Matt, but at their last meeting together she had confronted him.

“When I told him his work had been slipping, Matt denied any loss of performance. Then he said, ‘I’ve heard enough of this, and I’m not talking about this anymore.’ And he stormed out of the room.”

Sara blamed this last meeting for the current tension. Sara said she had not discussed this with Matt again, although she had invited him to meet again. Sara also had avoided discussing this with other staff for fear of the damage it would do to her image and the image of the Miami unit. Eventually, she had to discuss the matter with Patrice, which ultimately led to Paula being sent to Miami.

The remaining interviews followed similar patterns. One other thing emerged across the interviews. “We haven’t been running smoothly since this whole thing blew up—glad the top brass sent some grease,” said one employee. “We need you here because we can’t keep performing like this,” said another. Perhaps the most com- mon remark was “I hope you can work this thing out between Sara and Matt.” Communication about the situation was sufficiently ambiguous to allow everyone to perceive most actions as reinforcing their own positions, even though the positions were contradictory. Everyone was right.

As Rosalie Garza listened to the report, she had the uneasy feel- ing that she had heard all this before. Although this situation involved a particular sequence of events occurring in the Miami branch office, the situation seemed similar to situations in other branch offices in some odd ways. “Why does this always happen?” she thought. What could she do about the Miami office? What “always happens”? Can it be prevented? How? ✦

6 ✦ Case Studies For Organizational Communication