BE VERY KEEN ON INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE YOU START HANDLING THE PAPER and REVIEW VERY KEENLY

profileMichelle_Michy
3.pdf

Prepared by: H Thong

© 2016 UNSW Foundation Studies, UNSW Global Pty Ltd. Sydney 2052 Australia.

The original material prepared is copyright protected. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or

review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission.

UNSW Foundation Studies

2016 B/B+ Semester 2

Unit 3:

Choice of Business Structure

Lecturer: Hui Thong

Business Law

Unit 3: Choice of Business Structure

Overview

Unincorporated business organisations Sole trader Partnership

Incorporated business structures Company Concept of separate legal entity Concept of corporate veil Lifting of the corporate veil

2016 B/B+

2

Introduction

2016 B/B+

Starting a business

Consider a variety of questions

Main question: Which business structure to adopt?

3

Choice of Business Structures

2016 B/B+

Numerous forms of structures available, including:

Sole Trader

Partnership

Company

4

Choice of Business Structures

Unincorporated

Sole trader Partnership

Incorporated

Limited company

Private

(Pty Ltd)

Public

(Ltd)

Unlimited company

No liability company

2016 B/B+

5

Choice of Business Structures

2016 B/B+

Main grounds relevant to selecting the most appropriate choice of business structure:

Purpose, nature and objectives

Formalities and cost

Finance

Management and control

Taxation advantages

Extent of liability

Privacy and confidentiality

6

Sole Trader7

2016 B/B+

Sole Trader

A person carrying on a business as an independent individual

Easy to establish and run

Owns and has full control of the business

No disclosure requirements

Access to limited resources/finance

Risk of personal liability

Liable for payment of tax

2016 B/B+

8

Partnership9

2016 B/B+

Partnership

2016 B/B+

Exists between persons carrying on a business in common with a view to profit. Governed by Partnership Act

Maximum of 20 partners

Easy to establish

Partners may provide an ongoing source of funds

Control is divided between partners

Not a separate legal entity (See Slide 14)

Risk of personal/joint liability

Income splitting

No disclosure requirements

10

Company11

2016 B/B+

Company

2016 B/B+

An association of persons who satisfy Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for registration

Formalities: Created through the process of registration (incorporation)

Separate legal entity (See Slide 14)

Members of a limited company have limited liability

Management is separated from ownership

Taxed at a flat rate

12

Proprietary and Public Companies

Maximum 50 shareholders

Most suitable for use by a small business

Restricted fundraising ability

Less regulatory burdens than public companies

Financial secrecy for small proprietary companies

May be listed on ASX

Raise funds from the public

Subject to financial disclosure and more regulation

2016 B/B+

Proprietary company Public company

13

Legal Effects of Incorporation

Upon the incorporation of a company, it becomes a separate legal entity, separate from its members and controllers

2016 B/B+

14

Company as a Separate Legal Entity

2016 B/B+

Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22

Facts

Mr Salomon:

major shareholder, director and secured creditor

borrowed money from Mr Broderip, lent it to the company

Company’s business failed; value of assets were insufficient to pay both Mr Salomon and company’s other creditors

15

Company as a Separate Legal Entity

2016 B/B+

Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22

Issue

Was Mr Salomon personally liable for debt owed to Broderip?

Held

No. Upon the incorporation of a company, it becomes a separate legal entity from its founders, directors, members and controllers

16

Corporation Veil

The artificial screen that separates legal identity of company from its members/directors

2016 B/B+

17

Lifting the Corporate Veil

Courts are prepared to lift/pierce (disregard) the corporate veil in special and limited circumstances

Courts may look behind the corporate veil to determine why the company was formed

2016 B/B+

18

Lifting the Corporate Veil

Avoidance of legal obligation

Attempts by the owner to deliberately use the company to avoid legal/contractual obligations undertaken by them

Corporate veil lifted to enforce legal/contractual obligations

2016 B/B+

19

Lifting the Corporate Veil

2016 B/B+

20

Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne [1933] 1 Ch 935

Facts

Horne signed an employment contract with GMC promising not to take its customers when he leaves GMC

Horne resigned and set up a company which targeted GMC’s customers

Lifting the Corporate Veil

2016 B/B+

21

Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne [1933] 1 Ch 935

Held

Horne misused the corporate personality to avoid obligations under his employment contract when he left GMC

Corporate veil lifted

Lifting the Corporate Veil

Effects of lifting the corporate veil

No distinction between identity of company and identities of owners/directors

Forces personal liability for debts of company onto owners/directors

2016 B/B+

22

End of Lecture

Students must:

Read prescribed reading for Unit 3 (Choice of Business Structure)

Attempt Tutorial Exercises BEFORE going to Tutorial in Week 4

2016 B/B+

23