advamce crime theory

profileismails95
2PublicHealthandCrime.pptx

(2) Public Health and the Study of Crime Prevention

CJ 420 Advanced Theory and Policy

Dr. Spencer

The Public Health Model

Public Health Model

Public health – promotes and protects the health of ppl and the communities where they live, learn, work and play

Aims to PREVENT health problems

Promotes wellness by encouraging healthy bx

Vaccinations

Healthier workplaces

Improvements in hygiene and nutrition

Reductions in tobacco use

In public health, this means examining causes of disease, illness and injury

Problems in the natural and physical environments

Problems in the bx of individuals

Problems in how individuals interact with each other

This helps develop strategies to eliminate the causes or weaken their impact

Harm Reduction

Two examples of public health harm reduction include:

Smallpox vaccine

Polio vaccine

Both led to eradication of these diseases

Public recognizes that not all harms can be eliminated – need to limit their negative impact

A good example of this is the reduction of tobacco use

Public education on the dangers of tobacco use

Raising cigarette taxes

Warning labels

Reduced smoking from more than 2 in 5 adults to almost 1 in 5 adults today

Harm reduction approach has prevented many cases of lung cancer, heart disease, and other health problems arising from tobacco use

Public Health and Crime Prevention

During the 1970s and 1980s public health experts turned their attention to violent crime

During the 1980s

homicide killed more than 20,000 Americans annually

Robberies numbered 1.4 m

Aggravated assaults number 1.8 m

Public health experts labeled violent crime a major health problem

Goal was to prevent violent crime

Led researchers to examine causes and ways to address it

Began to devote more time to evidence based prevention

The Three Level of Public Health and Crime Prevention

Primary prevention

Attempt to prevent the problem altogether

Address features of the social, physical, and natural environments that generate these problems

Poverty, joblessness, racial segregation, dilapidation in urban neighborhoods, male socialization

Many ppl commit crime bc they live in criminogenic conditions

Secondary prevention

Focuses on bx that puts ppl at greater risk for committing crime of becoming victims of crime

Focuses on things that put children at greater risk for becoming delinquent – developmental experiences

Tertiary prevention

Offenders are the focus

Arrest, imprisonment

Examines changes sin criminal justice practices and policies to more effectively prevent crime

6

Studying Crime and Crime Prevention

Terminology

Sound research is needed to determine the causes of crime and assess the actual or potential effectiveness of various crime prevention strategies

Variables – any factor that can very from one person to another

Gender, age, income, criminal involvement

Ecological variables – differ from one geographic unit to another

Crime rates, education level, gun ownership, incarceration rates

Independent variable – effects or influences another variable

Dependent variable – is affected by the independent variable

Survey Research

Most popular method in CJ

Involves questionnaires administered to respondents

Self report survey – ask respondent how often they have committed particular offenses

Usually given to teens

Relationship with parents, grades, school activities, views about schooling, involvement with any delinquent friends

National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) – ask households about experiences with victimization

Strengths

Can ask many questions

Can randomize sample

Allows the responses to represent the answers of the population that the sample represents

Can then generalize results to the larger population

Can be easily analyzed with software like SPSS – quantitative analysis

Weaknesses

Qs are often shallow

Not strong for assessing causation

Casual Order

Many variables will be correlated, but proving causality is trickier

“Correlation does not equal causation”

Suppose we find an association bt the quality if parental relationships and the extent of juvenile delinquency

Respondents with worse relationships are more likely to be delinquency

How do we know which variable is affecting which?

Could also be that they are reciprocal – each impacting the other

In cross-sectional studies cannot easy tell the causal order

Assess ppl at one point in time

Longitudinal studies – study the same ppl over time

Spuriousness

Exists when two variables are associated but only bc a third variable (antecedent variable) is affecting each of those two variables

Example: there is an association bt eating ice cream and crime rates

Antecedent variable is likely warm weather

Take the example on the prior slide bt relationships and delinquency:

Low income families are more likely to have strained relationships bt parent and teen (due to stress)

Family income could be impacting both the parental relationship and delinquency

When analyzing survey data, one way to test for spuriousness is to control statistically for all possible antecedent variables

It is still possible though for unknown antecedents to play a role

Spuriousness often cannot be completely ruled out

Sometimes though a variable cannot have antecedent variables

Age, gender, race

Qualitative Research

This type of research does not involve numerical data

1. field research – observing ppl in their natural settings

2. interviewing individuals one on one at length about their views, bx and/or perceptions regarding one or more topics

This type of research is less common in CJ

Offenders may not want ppl to observe or interview them

This type of research can provide valuable information on the causes and dynamics of criminal bx that aides in developing crime prevention strategies

Bc it does not use random samples – it often cannot be generalized beyond those observed/interviewed

Experimental Research

Very common in PS, less so in CJ

Can rule out issues of casual order and spuriousness

Have an experimental group and a control group

Subjects are ideally randomly assigned to the groups – rules out spuriousness

Also shows that the experiential variable occurs before the outcome

He gold standard of research is the randomized experiment

The reason we do not see this much in CJ is due to public safety issues

We are seeing it more often in crime prevention studies, esp. with policing

Again, if it does not rely on a random sample, it cannot be generalized

Evaluation Research

Assesses the efficacy of a policy or program by comparing outcomes before and after the implementation of the policy or program

Often studies recidivism

Important to remember that other factors could still be playing a role