PUBLIC HEALTH

2PROTJECTCHAETERPART-2.docx

Home >Applied Sciences homework help >PUBLIC HEALTH

Project Charter Part 2

Overview

Continuing to draw from the gap, need, or opportunity for improvement identified in the leadership interview, complete Part 2 of the Project Charter Template begun in Unit 5.

Instructions

The following instructions correspond to the assignment scoring guide criteria. Part 2 of the project charter should:

1. Summarize the proposed project.

· Describe who, what, when, and where in a concise manner.

· Include the estimated project duration and budget if applicable.

· Align the project purpose with at least one strategic priority identified in the leadership interview, including rationale for change.

· Justify the business case for the project.

· Speculate as to the impact on people, processes, or systems.

2. Explain the objective evidence to support the need for the proposed project.

· Provide contextual information identified during the leadership interview.

· Include available local, regional, and national data as empirical evidence of the need for change and cite sources appropriately in APA format.

3. Justify choice of three SMART objectives related to the proposed project.

4. Summarize what the project will and will not address (project scope).

5. Summarize the project deliverables, including milestones.

· Identify the high-level "products" to be created, such as an improved process, employee manual, or formal policy.

· Include a timetable with daily, weekly, and monthly milestones.

6. Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

Additional Requirements

· Written communication: Write clearly, accurately, and professionally, incorporating sources appropriately.

· Length of paper: Complete all fields of Project Charter Template Part 2. Be concise while making sure to include all required information.

· Resources: Include sources where appropriate within the template.

· APA format: Cite your sources using current APA format.

· Font and font size: Times Roman, 12 points.

· .THIS ASSIGNMENT SHOULD BE DONE WITH CAREFUL UNDERSTAND

PLEASE FULL IN ALL COLUMS CORRECTLY

Be sure to include at least six APA-formatted citation (in-text plus full reference).

· Write from Public health perspective

· No plagiarism for consideration

Example assignment: You may use the assignment example, linked in the Resources, to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like

INTRUCTOR FEEDBACK

Please carefully FOLLOW the Scoring Guide for ways to improve ON this Project Charter PART 2

· Project Charter Part 2 Scoring Guide

Criteria	Non-performance	Basic	Proficient	Distinguished
Summarize the proposed project. 17%	Does not summarize the proposed project.	Summarizes the proposed project but overlooks key information.	Summarizes the proposed project.	Summarizes the proposed project and provides clear, professional information and expectations for change.
Explain the objective evidence to substantiate the need for the proposed project. 17%	Does not explain the objective evidence to substantiate the need for the proposed project.	Explains the objective evidence to substantiate the need for the proposed project but explanation lacks detail or is missing key information.	Explains the objective evidence to substantiate the need for the proposed project.	Explains the objective evidence to substantiate the need for the proposed project. Articulates a clear vision for change that anticipates stakeholder concerns and acknowledges potential risks.
Justify choice of three SMART objectives related to the proposed project. 17%	Does not justify choice of three SMART objectives related to the proposed project	Explains but does not justify choice of three SMART objectives related to the proposed project.	Justifies choice of three SMART objectives related to the proposed project.	Justifies choice of three SMART objectives related to the proposed project using clear, concise reasoning that demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the selected issue.
Summarize what the project will and will not address. 17%	Does not summarize what the project will and will not address.	Identifies but does not summarize what the project will and will not address.	Summarizes what the project will and will not address.	Summarizes what the project will and will not address. Articulates clear goals or outcomes and considers potential risks. .
Summarize the project deliverables, including milestones. 16%	Does not summarize the project deliverables, including milestones.	Identifies but does not summarize the project deliverables, including milestones.	Summarizes the project deliverables, including milestones.	Summarizes the project deliverables, including milestones. Draws well-reasoned conclusions and articulates underlying assumptions and uncertainties.
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards. 16%	Does not convey purpose in an appropriate tone and style. Does not incorporate supporting evidence nor adhere to organizational, professional, or scholarly writing standards.	Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to organizational, professional, or scholarly writing standards.	Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.	Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting.