History Essay
ppt/presentation.xml
ppt/slideMasters/slideMaster1.xml
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slides/slide1.xml
Nasty, Brutish, and Short? The Americas before Columbus Week 2
ppt/slides/slide2.xml
Who are Native Americans?
ppt/slides/slide3.xml
Let’s start with what they are not… The are not a “race” Race is a social construct Many of the most common physical features of Native Americans are also found in East Asians anyway Many people in Native American nations have looked nothing like stereotypes
ppt/slides/slide4.xml
ppt/slides/slide5.xml
They are not a culture or language group either There are several diverse Native American groups with unrelated languages who never considered themselves to be a common people until recently. This will be a very important point for understanding Latin American history
ppt/slides/slide6.xml
They are not “Tribal” Why are Indians considered “tribal” and not these Scots?
ppt/slides/slide7.xml
They were not “stone age,” they had some metals and were not all like stone age Europeans Stone age European village Native American “stone age” city
ppt/slides/slide8.xml
So why do we use the term “Native American”/Indian/Indigenous? What did all Native Americans have in common that is useful for understanding Latin American history?
ppt/slides/slide9.xml
They were all cut off from the rest of the world (save for a brief encounter with Vikings), and often from each other . This means…. No guns, germs, or steel (or draft animals)! Until the Columbian Exchange Lots of plants though!
ppt/slides/slide10.xml
All natives had to contend with unfavorable geography that stifled communication and agriculture North-south axis, lack of navigable rivers and plenty of foreboding mountains pose problems Europe shared technology, animals, crops, and germs with Africans and Asians, whom they were aware of. Aztecs and Incas had no idea of each other’s existence, despite being relatively close. Imagine what would have happened if Native Americans could have easily shared developments with each other.
ppt/slides/slide11.xml
Crops, animals, and tech either can’t spread throughout the Americas or they take a looong time. The rest of the world gets a head start. Copper smelting doesn’t get to Mexico until just before the Conquest
ppt/slides/slide12.xml
All of these challenges meant that three kinds of Native American societies co-existed in 1491 (Europe had only sedentary cultures) Non-sedentary (“hunter gatherers,” nomadic; note: they didn’t have horses until after colonization! ) Semi-sedentary (farm for part of the year, then move, then move back next year) Sedentary (farm year-round, live in settled towns, cities, or villages, form “empires” like us ) These are responses to environments, not “stages of development.” None are necessarily better than the others.
ppt/slides/slide13.xml
The non- sedentaries Lack agriculture (they live in places with poor land and plentiful game) Lack towns/cities/states Lack writing or records Often on the move chasing game
ppt/slides/slide14.xml
Their lifestyle has several advantages No authorities or hierarchies Chiefs are only temporary Relative equality (wealth/gender) More play less work And most importantly…
ppt/slides/slide15.xml
They’re hard as hell to conquer and kill Both indigenous and European empires have a hard time subduing them. Can’t conquer a people that have no settlements to conquer. Even today they exist in the Amazon. Europeans usually avoided them.
ppt/slides/slide16.xml
Examples: Amazonian peoples, Mapuches , “ Chichimecs ”
ppt/slides/slide17.xml
The semi-sedentaries Just like it sounds, they stay in one place for a while then move Rely on agriculture at least part of the year More inequality than non- sedentaries , lots of gender division, but women still have a good deal of power
ppt/slides/slide18.xml
They generally practice swidden agriculture (slash-and-burn) This means they can’t stay in one site year-round.
ppt/slides/slide19.xml
Examples Taínos Powhatans Puebloans* *also sedentary for part of their history, just like Mayans
ppt/slides/slide20.xml
Sedentary Natives, aka “The Great Empires” Not the “greatest” except in size – just a response to different environmental conditions Heavily stratified society with different classes, some rich others poor Completely dependent on permanent agriculture, lived in the same settlements year round. Very few domesticated animals (like all other Natives before 1492).
ppt/slides/slide21.xml
Only 2 sedentary civilizations Aztecs and Mesoamericans, but not Mayans* (*at the time of conquest) Inca and Andean peoples
ppt/slides/slide22.xml
Sedentary civilizations dependent completely on agriculture Maize (Corn), beans, squash etc. grown on chinampas in Mesoamerica All that plus potatoes and manioc/cassava/yuca with the Incas and Andeans on terraced agriculture
ppt/slides/slide23.xml
All this farming creates HUGE populations, along with wealth and class differences (just like in Eurasia and Africa). Gender roles are perhaps less rigid, than in Europe but still strict Nobles Commoners
ppt/slides/slide24.xml
Just like in Eurasia/Africa there are kings…
ppt/slides/slide25.xml
And priests…
ppt/slides/slide26.xml
And warriors and armies…
ppt/slides/slide27.xml
And monumental architecture
ppt/slides/slide28.xml
And writing? Codices/ amatl Quipu
ppt/slides/slide29.xml
The (classic!) Maya definitely had writing
ppt/slides/slide30.xml
Some cultures go from sedentary to semi-sedentary Classic era Mayas (sedentary) Semi-sedentary Maya after the “collapse”
ppt/slides/slide31.xml
Same with the Puebloans; it’s not “devolution” or “regression,” it’s about making the most of an environment Sedentary… … to semi-sedentary
ppt/slides/slide32.xml
Mississipians too, remember Cahokia?
ppt/slides/slide33.xml
All 3 kinds of societies had been evolving Cultural change had been going on since Natives first arrived in the Americas up to 20,000 YA. 8k YA agriculture independently invented in Mesoamerica and the Andes Maize developed 1k years later (this is a BIG achievement, not obvious!) Maize (or corn) still doesn’t spread throughout America until 500 AD (again, north-south axis and bad geography)
ppt/slides/slide34.xml
Development of Mesoamerican civilization before the Aztecs Pre-classic: Olmec (1500 – 350 BCE) Classic: Maya (250 BCE – 900 AD) Classic: Teotihuacan 200 BCE – 750 AD
ppt/slides/slide35.xml
Development of Andean civilization before the Inca Norte Chico 3000 – 1800 BCE (pre-ceramic) Chavín (1000 – 200 BCE) Tiwanaku (100 AD – 1000 AD)
ppt/slides/slide36.xml
All 3 kinds made up 25% of the world’s population in 1491, most of them living in sedentary societies All made an impact on the environment, not just sedentaries 50-100 million people in the Americas, 25 mil in Mexico alone Far from a sparse wilderness Instead of criticizing them for being “primitive” we should consider it amazing that they achieved such large populations in spite of their challenges
ppt/slides/slide37.xml
Ok, so why does this matter? How each colony develops depends partly on the kind of Native culture in it. Europeans react differently to each kind, and Natives also respond differently. The type of Native society present in an area is the greatest predictor of how colonization will unfold.
ppt/slides/slide38.xml
Semi- sedentaries meet Europeans first. More exploitable than non- sedentaries , but hard to compel to work, often enslaved Europeans prefer them to non- sedentaries , but still don’t like settling around them so much. They’re a launch pad. As soon as sedentaries are “discovered” Iberians generally leave on conquest expeditions
ppt/slides/slide39.xml
Pizarro and Cortés followed similar trajectories, from semi sedentaries to sedentaries
ppt/slides/slide40.xml
Only wealthy, heavily populated “core”areas develop quickly amongst the sedentaries (Mexico, Peru) Only sedentaries have the population and resources to build wealth quickly Sedentaries are also already used to work
ppt/slides/slide41.xml
Europeans wanted to create an urban environment familiar to them and get rich quick – can only do that with sedentaries Colonial Mexico City Colonial Lima
ppt/slides/slide42.xml
Non- sedentaries aren’t on board with work or hierarchy, they resist, and are generally not useful to Europeans
ppt/slides/slide43.xml
This is why Latin America developed a core-periphery structure Which areas are the cores and which are the peripheries? The cores are wherever the sedentary Indians are (Mexico, Peru) and the periphery is where you have non or semi sedentaries (i.e. everywhere else). Non sedentary Indians population centers tend to be more peripheral, e.g. Amazon, Argentina and Chile.
ppt/slides/slide44.xml
And this is why Spain didn’t settle New England (no sedentaries there) leaving it to the English What if the Pilgrims or the Virginia Company (think John Smith) got to America first? What if the English encountered the Aztecs instead of encountering the Algonquians?
ppt/slides/slide45.xml
ppt/presProps.xml
ppt/viewProps.xml
ppt/theme/theme1.xml
ppt/media/image1.jpeg
ppt/tableStyles.xml
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout1.xml
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout2.xml
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout3.xml
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout4.xml
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout5.xml
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Click to edit Master text styles Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout6.xml
Click to edit Master title style 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout7.xml
1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout8.xml
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Click to edit Master text styles 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout9.xml
Click to edit Master title style Click icon to add picture Click to edit Master text styles 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout10.xml
Click to edit Master title style Click icon to add picture Click to edit Master text styles 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout11.xml
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout12.xml
“ ” Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Click to edit Master text styles 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout13.xml
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout14.xml
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Click to edit Master text styles Click to edit Master text styles Click to edit Master text styles Click to edit Master text styles Click to edit Master text styles 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout15.xml
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Click icon to add picture Click to edit Master text styles Click to edit Master text styles Click icon to add picture Click to edit Master text styles Click to edit Master text styles Click icon to add picture Click to edit Master text styles 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout16.xml
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout17.xml
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1/28/2020 ‹#›
ppt/media/image2.png
ppt/media/image3.png
ppt/media/image4.jpg
ppt/media/image5.png
ppt/media/image6.png
ppt/media/image7.png
ppt/media/image8.png
ppt/media/image9.png
ppt/media/image10.png
ppt/media/image11.jpg
ppt/media/image12.png
ppt/media/image13.png
ppt/media/image14.png
ppt/media/image15.png
ppt/media/image16.png
ppt/media/image17.png
ppt/media/image18.png
ppt/media/image19.png
ppt/media/image20.png
ppt/media/image21.png
ppt/media/image22.png
ppt/media/image23.png
ppt/media/image24.png
ppt/media/image25.png
ppt/media/image26.jpg
ppt/media/image27.png
ppt/media/image28.png
ppt/media/image29.jpg
ppt/media/image30.jpg
ppt/media/image31.png
ppt/media/image32.png
ppt/media/image33.png
ppt/media/image34.png
ppt/media/image35.png
ppt/media/image36.png
ppt/media/image37.jpg
ppt/media/image38.png
ppt/media/image39.png
ppt/media/image40.png
ppt/media/image41.png
ppt/media/image42.png
ppt/media/image43.jpg
ppt/media/image44.jpg
ppt/media/image45.jpg
ppt/media/image46.jpg
ppt/media/image47.png
ppt/media/image48.png
ppt/media/image49.jpg
ppt/media/image50.png
ppt/media/image51.jpg
ppt/media/image52.gif
ppt/media/image53.png
ppt/media/image54.png
ppt/media/image55.png
ppt/media/image56.png
ppt/media/image57.jpg
ppt/media/image58.jpg
ppt/media/image59.png
ppt/media/image60.jpg
ppt/media/image61.png
ppt/media/image62.png
ppt/media/image63.png
ppt/media/image64.png
ppt/media/image65.jpg
ppt/media/image66.png
ppt/media/image67.png
ppt/media/image68.png
ppt/media/image69.jpg
ppt/media/image70.png
ppt/media/image71.png
ppt/media/image72.png
ppt/changesInfos/changesInfo1.xml
ppt/revisionInfo.xml
docProps/core.xml
Nasty, Brutish, and Short? Celso A. Mendoza Celso A. Mendoza 1 2020-01-28T07:24:13Z 2020-01-28T19:52:33Z
docProps/app.xml
54 1444 Microsoft Office PowerPoint Widescreen 119 45 0 0 0 false Fonts Used 4 Theme 1 Slide Titles 45 Arial Century Gothic Wingdings Wingdings 3 Ion Boardroom Nasty, Brutish, and Short? Who are Native Americans? Let’s start with what they are not… The are not a “race” PowerPoint Presentation They are not a culture or language group either They are not “Tribal” They were not “stone age,” they had some metals and were not all like stone age Europeans So why do we use the term “Native American”/Indian/Indigenous? They were all cut off from the rest of the world (save for a brief encounter with Vikings), and often from each other. This means…. All natives had to contend with unfavorable geography that stifled communication and agriculture Crops, animals, and tech either can’t spread throughout the Americas or they take a looong time. The rest of the world gets a head start. Copper smelting doesn’t get to Mexico until just before the Conquest All of these challenges meant that three kinds of Native American societies co-existed in 1491 (Europe had only sedentary cultures) The non-sedentaries Their lifestyle has several advantages They’re hard as hell to conquer and kill Examples: Amazonian peoples, Mapuches, “Chichimecs” The semi-sedentaries They generally practice swidden agriculture (slash-and-burn) This means they can’t stay in one site year-round. Examples Sedentary Natives, aka “The Great Empires” Only 2 sedentary civilizations Sedentary civilizations dependent completely on agriculture All this farming creates HUGE populations, along with wealth and class differences (just like in Eurasia and Africa). Gender roles are perhaps less rigid, than in Europe but still strict Just like in Eurasia/Africa there are kings… And priests… And warriors and armies… And monumental architecture And writing? The (classic!) Maya definitely had writing Some cultures go from sedentary to semi-sedentary Same with the Puebloans; it’s not “devolution” or “regression,” it’s about making the most of an environment Mississipians too, remember Cahokia? All 3 kinds of societies had been evolving Development of Mesoamerican civilization before the Aztecs Development of Andean civilization before the Inca All 3 kinds made up 25% of the world’s population in 1491, most of them living in sedentary societies Ok, so why does this matter? Semi-sedentaries meet Europeans first. More exploitable than non-sedentaries, but hard to compel to work, often enslaved Pizarro and Cortés followed similar trajectories, from semi sedentaries to sedentaries Only wealthy, heavily populated “core”areas develop quickly amongst the sedentaries (Mexico, Peru) Europeans wanted to create an urban environment familiar to them and get rich quick – can only do that with sedentaries Non-sedentaries aren’t on board with work or hierarchy, they resist, and are generally not useful to Europeans This is why Latin America developed a core-periphery structure And this is why Spain didn’t settle New England (no sedentaries there) leaving it to the English PowerPoint Presentation false false false 16.0000
_rels/.rels
ppt/_rels/presentation.xml.rels
ppt/slideMasters/_rels/slideMaster1.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide1.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide2.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide3.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide4.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide5.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide6.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide7.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide8.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide9.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide10.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide11.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide12.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide13.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide14.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide15.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide16.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide17.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide18.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide19.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide20.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide21.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide22.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide23.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide24.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide25.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide26.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide27.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide28.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide29.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide30.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide31.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide32.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide33.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide34.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide35.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide36.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide37.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide38.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide39.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide40.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide41.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide42.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide43.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide44.xml.rels
ppt/slides/_rels/slide45.xml.rels
ppt/theme/_rels/theme1.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout1.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout2.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout3.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout4.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout5.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout6.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout7.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout8.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout9.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout10.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout11.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout12.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout13.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout14.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout15.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout16.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout17.xml.rels
[Content_Types].xml