movie review

1

Course N1613 – Integrated Reporting

Coursework assessment – weighting 20%

Your answer must be 750 words in total excluding any abstract, bibliography, or appendices.

Submission Deadline as per Sussex Direct.

2

Question Select the latest integrated report of a company. Pick one of the following 4 capitals - 1) Human capital 2) Natural capital 3) Social and relational Capital 4) Intellectual Capital Analyse the quantitative and qualitative information regarding your chosen capital provided in the integrated report to briefly answer the following questions:

1) How has the company made use of the selected capital (/resource) to carry out its operations and what contributions has the company made to ensure sustainable use of this capital?(250 words)

2) What impact did these contributions to the selected capital (/resource) have on the overall performance of company (including

financial performance)? (500 words)

Further guidance on how you may approach this assessment will be provided in the lectures and workshops. You are required to provide appropriate references to cite the source of the report used for analysis.

3

Marking Criteria

Marks % Range Criteria (all 5 criteria are equally weighted)

Content, knowledge and understanding

Critical thinking, originality, and reflection.

Evidence of Reading Referencing and Bibliography

Presentation, writing style, grammar and spelling

First class

70 – 100

Exceptional knowledge and conceptual understanding of complex issues, and the development and advancement of ideas and practice. i.e. in relation to incorporation of sustainability in value chain processes.

Critical insightful evaluation and synthesis of complex high level of originality and reflection. A high degree of independence of thought and critical judgement.

Knowledge and understanding beyond the essential and desirable readings provided and the lecture and seminar discussions.

Outstanding referencing and bibliography. Evidence of a substantive use of a wide range of learning resources (i.e. draw on multiple relevant sources and refer to them in the list of references).

Outstanding, well-directed presentation, logically and coherently structured. A high degree of originality in writing, with excellent spelling, punctuation and grammar (SPaG).

2.1 60 – 69 Wide knowledge and depth of understanding of complex issues, and the development of ideas and practice.

Critical evaluation and synthesis of complex issues and material which includes an original and reflective approach. A good degree of independence of thought and critical judgement.

Evidence of extensive reading of supplementary sources. Good knowledge and understanding beyond the essential and desirable readings provided and the lecture and seminar discussions.

Comprehensive referencing and bibliography. Evidence of use of a wide range of learning resources (i.e. draw on a range of relevant sources and refer to them in the list of references).

Excellent presentation, logically structured. A good degree of originality in writing, with good spelling, punctuation and grammar (SPaG).

2.2 50 – 59 Appropriate knowledge and depth of understanding of some of the main issues, with some understanding of their development in practice

Some critical evaluation and synthesis of key issues and material. Some degree of independence of thought and critical judgement, although the writing can be descriptive.

Evidence of reading supplementary sources. Knowledge and understanding of the essential and desirable readings provided and some engagement with the lecture and seminar discussions.

Adequate referencing and bibliography.

Orderly presentation, clear structure and acceptable grammar and spelling

4

Your answer must be 750 words (for both parts of the question) in total excluding any abstract, bibliography, or appendices.

Further guidance on how you may approach this assessment will be provided in the lectures and workshops. You are required to provide appropriate references to cite the source of the report used for analysis. The marking criteria presented above is based on the standard marking criteria for Business and Management Undergraduate work a copy of which is provided below.

Assessment notice Students submitting essays and other coursework assessments should be aware that the penalties imposed upon students committing academic misconduct may include obtaining zero marks for the assessment unit, or even more severe penalties. See http://www.sussex.ac.uk/s3/?id=155 for further information. The most common forms of misconduct that are usually detected are plagiarism and personation. To find out more about them – and how to avoid them, see: http://www.sussex.ac.uk/s3/?id=35

3rd class - pass

40 – 49

Basic knowledge and depth of understanding of key issues, principles and concepts.

Some evaluation and synthesis of issues and material.

Limited evidence of reading

Limited referencing and bibliography

Adequate presentation and structure, grammar, spelling and citation

Fail

0 – 39

Limited and/or superficial knowledge of key issues, principles and concepts

Limited evaluation and synthesis of issues and material

Minimal evidence of reading

Inadequate referencing and bibliography

Poor/inadequate presentation and structure, grammar, spelling and citation