A Review on microalgae and Bacteria for municipality wastewater Treatment
TITLE PAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents TITLE PAGE 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 LIST OF FIGURES 5 LIST OF TABLES 6 LIST OF EQUATIONS 7 Abstract 8 1.0. Introduction 9 2.0. Microalgae harvesting method 10 2.1. Common harvesting technology 10 2.1.1. Centrifugation 10 2.1.2. Sedimentation 11 2.1.3. Flocculation 11 2.1.4. Flotation 13 2.1.5. Filtration 14 2.2. New Emerging Microalgae Biomass Harvesting Techniques 15 2.2.1. Flocculation using magnetic microparticles 16 2.2.2. Flocculation by natural biopolymer 17 2.2.3. Electrical approach 18 3.0. Extraction and Analysis of Lipid from Microalgae Biomass 20 3.1. Lipid extraction 21 3.1.1. Mechanical extraction 21 3.1.2. Chemical/solvent extraction 23 3.1.3. New emerging green solvents systems and process intensification techniques for lipids extraction from microalgae 25 4.0. Heterogeneous transesterification catalysts 29 4.1. Solid Bases Transesterification 33 4.2. Solid Acids Transesterification 35 4.3. Heterogeneous transesterification of algae oil 36 5.0. Reactors 44 5.1. Influence of reactor design and operating conditions 44 6.0. Conclusions 51 References 54
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Flowsheet for biodiesel production from microalgae. Some intensified process techniques highlighted may reduce some downstream steps as it would render the dewatering step unneeded. i.e. MAE – Microwave assisted extraction (MAE), Enzyme assisted extraction (EAE), Ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE), Surfactant assisted extraction 27
Figure 3: Diagram of membrane reactors for producing biodiesel in transesterification reaction through (a) Solid acid catalyst and (b) base catalysts. 49
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Performance comparison of flotation techniques 14
Table 2: Performance comparison of filtration methods 15
Table 3: Performance of flocculation using biopolymer 17
Table 4: performance comparisons for microalgae biomass harvesting by various electrical methods operated in just 1 hour 19
Table 5: Reported catalyst used for heterogenous transesterification reaction on various feedstocks 30
Table 6: The effect of calcination temperature on the performance of WO 3 /ZrO 2 catalyst (Jothiramalingam & Wang, 2009). 39
Table 7: Literature review on biodiesel production via heterogenous catalyst 41
LIST OF EQUATIONS
Equation 1: Chemical equation showing production of biodiesel from any bio oil 32
Abstract
The dwindling rate of our fossil fuel reserves and general believe of major contribution of CO2 emissions which is linked to the climate change due to the burning of such carbon sources in engines either for locomotion or power generation have geared both the academic and industrial research towards the new routes for renewable and sustainable fuels. However, microalgae as one of the third-generation biomass feedstock has recently been proven to be one of the best option considered employable for biodiesel production. But one of the crucial challenges not yet explicitly attended to is the method of harvesting, lipids extraction and heterogenous catalyst for transesterification reaction for oil conversion to biodiesel. Herein. we reported several techniques for microalgae biomass harvesting, both the conventional and new emerging ones, as this helps in building ideas for improvement in the field. We also present a critical review on the work done on areas of lipid extraction from microalgae biomass and its conversion to biodiesel through heterogenous catalysis. it covers the progress made in this fields from the last decade, available systems for heterogenous catalysis, mechanism of the reactions and optimal process conditions. Lastly, we discuss on the reactors employed in the transesterification, effects of reactors design and way forward.
1.0. Introduction
In our world, today, the demand for energy is on the increase. Fossil fuel reserves are running out. The persistent fluctuation and increase in price of fossil fuels and its adverse effect on the ecosystem through the emission of greenhouse gases makes it imperative that we seek alternative, sustainable and more environmental friendly energy source. The demand for safe alternative sources of energy such as biofuel is more pressing than ever before. Top on the list of such sustainable renewable energy is the feedstock energy source. A good source of feedstock energy is the Microalgae commonly referred to as the third-generation feedstock (Patrícya et al., 2014; Wawrik & Harriman, 2010). Various bio-products, such as biofuel and bio-hydrogen can be manufactured from Microalgae. Microalgae also have higher biomass yield and lower carbon footprint requirement compared to other plants (Besson & Guiraud, 2013; Farooq et al., 2015).
In making microalgae based biofuel production commercially available and economically viable, the challenge of what method to use in harvesting microalgae and lipid extraction must be taken into consideration. Most harvesting methods can be capital intensive, uneconomical, and produce some level of environmental pollution. Harvesting microalgae can require as high as 20-30% of total biomass production budget (Grima et al., 2003; Mata et al., 2010; Verma et al., 2010) or 50% of the cost of producing biofuel (Muradov et al., 2015).
Also, it has been proposed that world usage of biodiesel could increase to two or three times in most part of the globe by year 2020 and numerous influencing factors have not been fully addressed. Bio-oils or oils as the origin implies contains a key compound called triglyceride esters
which when react with any monohydric alcohol (i.e. methanol) would form a group of compounds called mono-alkyl esters i.e. biodiesel. However, scientist around the world suggested the use of lower monohydricalcohols (i.e. CH3OH to C3H8O), without any explicit justification of which gives the best performance and requirements in terms of its viscosity as specified by ASTM or related international agencies. Similarly, finding the best catalyst and optimized operating reaction conditions is of a great challenge to biofuel industries. Homogenous catalysis offers faster biodiesel production with even moderate reaction conditions, but faced with recovery or separation problem after the transesterification process.
These above highlighted challenges have triggered scientists at both industries and academics to seek alternative means, while emphasizing on the feedstock flexibility, and green catalytic systems. Lately, both microalgae and microalgae emerged as a better option for the biodiesel feedstock. Also, some green catalyst discussed herein emerged as a better candidate heterogenous catalysis for the transesterification process. We therefore present a critical review in these areas and lastly, the reactors involved.
2.0. Microalgae harvesting method
Show et al., (2015) inferred in their work that, when considering a preferred harvesting procedure two important issues must first be determined; the attributes of the microalgae considered and the condition of their growth. The efficiency of any harvesting method chosen will depend largely on the specie of microalgae, size of the microalgae, its morphology and composition of the medium employed. Some harvesting techniques commonly used are centrifugation, flocculation, filtration and sedimentation.
2.1. Common harvesting technology
2.1.1. Centrifugation
Centrifugation is the application of a centrifugal force of higher intensity than the gravitational force to increase the rate of separation a suspension. Common centrifugation methods include Solid-bowl decanter, nozzle-type centrifuge, Hydro-cyclone, and solid ejecting disc (Milledge & Heaven, 2013). The challenge with the methods above despite their efficiency at harvesting majority of the microalgae cell types are high energy, capital and operational cost required to carry them out (requirement) (Grima et al., 2003; Milledge & Heaven, 2013; Yuan et al., 2009).Centrifugation can harvest averagely between 12-25% of microalgae biomass with an energy consumption of 50-75kW (Milledge & Heaven, 2013). The only justification for this high cost and large amount of energy is that sufficient biofuel of over 90% of the microalgae biomass must be harvested.
2.1.2. Sedimentation
Sedimentation is the process by which solids are separated from liquids by capitalizing on differences in the density of the solids to obtain an effluent of clear liquid (Milledge & Heaven, 2013). Most wastewater treatment facilities use sedimentation for sludge treatment. Sedimentation is the most cost effective and least complicated method for harvesting microalgae biomass, especially heavy microalgae suspensions. Two difficulty with using sedimentation for microalgae biomass harvesting is that for solids with little difference in their densities the process can be excruciatingly slow and the dry solids concentration of microalgae biomass that can be harvested is about 0.5-3% (Grima et al., 2003; Milledge & Heaven, 2013; Yuan et al., 2009).
Golueke & Oswald, (1965) reported that using alum as a coagulant in a flocculation-sedimentation process an of 85% microalgae biomass harvest was achieved.
2.1.3. Flocculation
Flocculation seldom used alone but in conjunction with other methods (Brennan et al., 2010) such as coagulation-flocculation and flotation-flocculation. Flocculation through aggregation improves particle size of microalgae suspension and speeds up rate of suspension settling (Mata et al., 2010; Milledge & Heaven, 2013). Auto-flocculation, physical flocculation, bio-flocculation and physio-chemical flocculation are four types of flocculation commonly in use.
Auto-flocculation usually cuts the flow of carbon dioxide (CO2) to the microalgae system when the pH of the culture is above 9, therefore the microalgae flocculate on its own (Vandamme et al., 2013). Although auto-flocculation can be a slow, unreliable process and also requires the presence of calcium and magnesium ions many researchers have published results of up to 90% microalgae recovery harvest (Baya et al., 2016; Gerardo et al., 2015; Milledge & Heaven, 2013; Ras et al., 2011).
Bio-flocculation is a technique in which microorganism are used in the treatment of wastewater. Such microorganisms include fungi and bacteria (Gerardo et al., 2015; Vandamme et al., 2013). Bio-flocculation is a technique yet to be fully comprehended but it is well documented that it improves the abilities of microalgae to form in suspension (Salim et al., 2011; Zhou et al., 2013). Zhou et al., (2013) reported almost 100% success harvesting microalgae cells of Chlorella vulgaris UMN235 by employing palletization-assisted bio-flocculaton. Their further recommended in their study that adding 20g/L glucose and of spores in BG-11 medium is desirable for palletization. Two locally isolated fungi being used as bio-flocculants are; Aspergillus sp. UMN F01 and Aspergillus sp. UMN F02. More so, a bio-flocculant from Bacillus licheniformis CGMCC 2876 was discovered to be an excellent harvester with 96% efficiency. This level of efficiency results from reduction in the negative charge of Desmodesmus sp. to about zero surface charge (Ndikubwimana et al., 2015). From the findings of the studies above, it can be clearly seen that bio-flocculation in conjunction with other techniques such as flotation and electrical approach can be used to solve the challenge of high quantity of bio-flocculants and time required to efficiently harvest high amount of microalgae using bio-flocculation.
2.1.4. Flotation
Microalgae have low densities; this characteristic can be explored during harvesting using flotation method (Gerardo et al., 2015; Show et al., 2015). Air bubbles enhance the movement of microalgae particles upwards. Microalgae cells become hydrophobic when surfactant or coagulants are added into the system. Addition of surfactant or coagulants expands the mass transfer between the air and microalgae particles improving particles separation (Gerardo et al., 2015; Uduman et al., 2010). Some readily available surfactants in use are aluminum sulfate (Al2(SO4)3), iron (III) sulfate (Fe2(SO4)3), cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), chitosan, and iron (III) chloride (FeCl3). High efficiency harvesting rates between 70 and 99% of microalgae biomass by flotation has been reported in some studies (Aulenbach et al., 2010; Barrut et al., 2012; Coward et al., 2014; Show et al., 2015). Flotation harvesting method requires low initial equipment cost and shorter period compared to others (Gerardo et al., 2015; Show et al., 2015).
The choice of surfactants and its effect on reusability of culture and biofuel manufacturing has only been reported by few researchers as of today. Recent studies have shown an increase in the production of biomass and support for the growth of C. vulgaris – an outstanding discovery using iron (III) chloride (FeCl3) (Farooq et al., 2015). The challenge with this process is that ferric acid which is a residue of the iron (III) chloride has a negative impact on the oxidative stability of biodiesel, upon completion of the harvesting process it has to be separated from the biomass.
It is worthy of mention that studies by Farooq et al., (2015); Kim et al., (2011); Kim et al., (2013) have implied that cytotoxicity from residual alum from the alum used as surfactant inhibits the growth of microalgae. Hence the effect of surfactants need to be properly studied and understood before harvesting microalgae to be used for production of biofuel and culture recyclability.
Other flotation techniques have been reported. Some of these are; dispersed air, micro-flotation, foam flotation, dissolved air, vacuum gas, electro-flotation, and ozone flotation. A comparison of these techniques is displayed in Table 1.
Table 1: Performance comparison of flotation techniques
|
Flotation Techniques |
Strains |
Harvesting efficiency (%) |
References |
|
Foam flotation |
Tetraselmis sp. |
93 |
(Garg et al., 2014) |
|
|
Chlorella sp |
NR |
(Coward et al., 2014) |
|
Microflotation |
Dunaliella salina |
99 |
(Hanotu et al., 2012) |
|
Vacuum gas |
Mixed culture |
23 |
(Barrut et al., 2012) |
|
Dissolved air |
Mixed culture |
90 |
(Phoochinda & White, 2003) |
|
|
C. zofingiensis |
91 |
(X. Zhang et al., 2014) |
|
Column flotation |
Chlorella sp |
90 |
(Liu et al., 2006) |
|
Flocculation flotation |
C. vulgaris |
93 |
(Lei et al., 2015) |
|
Dispersed air |
Spirulina platensis |
80 |
(Kim et al., 2005) |
|
Electro-flotation |
Mixed culture |
NR |
(Sandbank, 1979) |
|
Ozone flotation |
Microcystis |
90 |
(Benoufella et al., 1994) |
*NR – Not reported
2.1.5. Filtration
Filtration is the separation of a solid-liquid mixture of microalgae using a semi-permeable membrane with small pores that allow the passage of the liquid but retains the solid microalgae (Gerardo et al., 2015; Show et al., 2015). Microalgae with low density such as Chlamydomonas sp., Chlorella sp. and Scenedesmus sp. can easy have their biomass harvested using filtration method (Gerardo et al., 2015; Rickman et al., 2012; Show et al., 2015). One problem with filtration however is that clogging and fouling brought by settled cells that can reduce the solid content due to low volumes of liquid that is able to pass through the filter used (Huang et al., 2012; Show et al., 2015).
Two filtration setups are common, which are; the dead-end and the tangential flow. Dead-end setup made up of cartridge filtration, horizontal filter press, belt filter and vacuum drum filter are carried out in batch modes. These methods can harvest 5-37% mean solid content. Cross-flow filtration which is an alternative name for tangential flow filtration was created to overcome the challenge of fouling and decrease the accumulation of cake layer such that the filtration time is accelerated (Gerardo et al., 2015). Shear movement (Morineau-Thomas et al., 2002; Nurra et al., 2014), back-flushing (Baerdemaeker et al., 2013), supplementation of coagulant (Hwang et al., 2013), and alteration of membrane surface (Baerdemaeker et al., 2013) have been reported by many studies as ways of minimizing membrane fouling. Table 2 is a summary of the outcome obtained from using each filtration method in microalgae biomass harvesting.
Table 2: Performance comparison of filtration methods
|
Filtration Techniques |
Strains |
Harvesting efficiency (%) |
References |
|
Vacuum filter |
Coelastrum sp. |
NR |
|
|
Belt filter |
Mixed culture |
NR |
(Grima et al., 2003) |
|
Ultrafiltration |
Scenedesmus quadricauda |
NR |
(Zhang et al., 2010) |
|
|
Chlorella sp. |
94 |
(Hwang et al., 2013) |
|
Deep-bed filtration |
Mixed culture |
NR |
|
|
Vacuum filter |
Spirulina sp. |
NR |
(Goh, 1986) |
|
Ultrafiltration |
Dunaliella sp. |
99 |
(Mixson et al., 2014) |
*NR – Not reported
2.2. New Emerging Microalgae Biomass Harvesting Techniques
Many scientific studies have been carried out to enhance microalgae biomass harvesting, which include reducing the energy requirement and operational cost.
Recent approaches being developed to harvest microalgae biomass include flocculation employing magnetic microparticles (Seo et al., 2015; Vergini et al., 2015), flocculation using natural biopolymer (Banerjee et al., 2014; Rahul et al., 2015), sedimentation involving polymers (Zheng et al., 2015), magnetic membrane filtration (Bilad et al., 2013) as well as electrical approaches which includes electro-coagulation-filtration (ECF) (Gao et al., 2010) and electrochemical harvesting (ECH) (Misra et al., 2015).
2.2.1. Flocculation using magnetic microparticles
Seo et al., (2015) examined four different magnetic particles, namely pure copper, iron (III) nitrate nonahydrate, copper/carbon composite and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). Vergini et al., (2016) also examined the application of iron oxide magnetic microparticles (IOMPs). Both studies reported microalgae biomass harvesting using flocculation with the various magnetic particles aforementioned (Seo et al., 2015; Vergini et al., 2015). By using various methods and different materials these magnetic particles can be coated. Some coating methods are polyol method, sol-gel processing, thermal reduction, and spray pyrolysis (Athanassiou et al., 2006; Grouchko et al., 2009; Yan et al., 2007; Yanhui et al., 2009; Jacob et al., 2006; Jung et al., 2011; Li & Liu, 2009; Li et al., 2011; Qian et al., 2012; Wang & Asefa, 2010; Xu et al., 2003).
A 99% harvesting efficiency of Chlorella sp. KR-1 was achieved by Seo et al., (2015) using polyvinyl-pyrrolidone (PVP) and iron nitrate with 0.8 () ratio at 10mg/mL. Vergini et al., (2015) on their part reported a 91% efficiency in harvesting D. tertiolecta using iron oxide magnetic microparticles (IOMPs) during 5 min of harvesting. The harvesting procedure was carried out for a certain period using cylindrical neodymium magnets (NdFeb) as an external magnetic field. Judging from the reports by Seo et al., (2015) and Vergini et al., (2015), a conclusion can be reached; that flocculation using magnetic particles brings about cost effectiveness, as far as the magnetic microparticles can achieve full functionality via one-step synthesis.
It is worthy of note that harvesting efficiency is affected by the dose of each particular magnetic flocculant. Vergini et al., (2015) reported a minimal increase of 16% when the concentration if IOMPs changed from 6.2mg/L (75%) at the beginning to 62mg/L (91%). Furthermore, Seo et al., (2015) in their study reported that increasing the dose of PVP/Fe (0.33) while reducing the ratio had resulted in reduced harvesting efficiency (31.4%).
2.2.2. Flocculation by natural biopolymer
Biopolymers are organic flocculants manufactured by microalgae, bacteria, and plants haven undergone the process of cationization using (3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyl) trimethylammonium chloride (HPTAC). Polymeric substances which are a kind of organic flocculant when linked with different colloidal particles to produce floc formation have been described as efficient harvesters. An optimized dosage of 60mg/L of cationic inulin resulted in 88.61% harvesting efficiency within 15 min was reported by Rahul et al., (2015) while harvesting isolated Botryococcus sp., this study further showed that cationic inulin is a potent flocculant.
In another study by Banerjee et al., (2014), the potency of cationic cassia gum to harvest Chlamydomonas sp. CRP7 and Chlorella sp. CB4 was reported. An harvesting efficiency of 93% was reported for Chlamydomonas sp CRP7 within 15 min when a 80 mg/L optimized flocculant dosage was used. On the other hand, the harvesting efficiency for Chlorella sp. CB4 was 92% within 30 min of introducing a 35 mg/L dosage of optimized flocculant. Finally, these studies showed a similar trend when the flocculant efficiency increased and the chlorophyll content decreased. Table 3 contains a summary of the performance of flocculation using biopolymer.
Table 3: Performance of flocculation using biopolymer
|
Biopolymer |
Strains |
Optimum concentration (g/L) |
Harvesting efficiency (%) |
References |
|
bCatinic cassia gum |
Chlorella sp. CB4 |
0.035 |
92 |
(Banerjee et al., 2014) |
|
aCatinic cassia gum |
Chlamydomonas sp. CRP7 |
0.08 |
93 |
(Banerjee et al., 2014) |
|
aCatinic inulin |
Botryococcus sp. |
0.06 |
88.61 |
(Rahul et al., 2015) |
a – run time = 15 min, b – run time = 30min
2.2.3. Electrical approach
Various researchers have worked on the use of electric approach in biomass harvesting. Methods such as electro-coagulation-filtration (ECF) (Syafaini et al., 2017), magnetically induced membrane filtration (MMV) (Bilad et al., 2013) and electrochemical using non-sacrificial electrodes (Misra et al., 2015) have been studied. The electrical approach for biomass harvesting is environmentally friendly, not restrained to certain microalgae species only, safe, and cost effective.
A comparative study on the treatment of water containing microalgae using aluminium and iron electrodes by Gao et al., (2010) in an electro-coagulation-filtration (ECF) system reported that aluminum electrodes performed better than the iron electrode for harvesting. Micro-cystis aeruginosa, as seen in their harvesting efficiencies which was about 100% for aluminum and 78.9% for iron. The study further showed that increasing operating time resulted in increased harvesting efficiency. Gao et al., (2010) also studied the impact of initial pH on the harvesting efficiency, the best efficiency was observed for pH values between 4 and 7 where efficiency of 100% was observed. The alkaline broth resulted in the lowest percentage efficiency. As the initial pH values increased from 8 to 9, and then 10, the harvesting efficiency reduced from 99% to 90% and then 87.2% respectively.
To improve the shear-rates at the liquid-membrane interface membrane vibrating system was used. From the result of polyvinyldene fluoride (PVDF) at two different porosities of 9% and 12% w/w, PVDF-12 presented a greater efficiency for harvesting Phaeodactylum tricornutum and C. vulgaris, which was higher than 97% (Bilad et al., 2013). Reduced harvesting efficiency was observed when using PVDF-9, this was suspected to be a result of the shortcoming of the membrane itself.
Misra et al., (2015) reported the use of electrochemical method in the harvesting of Scenedesmus obliqus FR75119.1 using carbon plates. This study was interested on the effects of applied current, initial pH and electrolyte addition. When a current of 1.5 A was supplied for half an hour, the electrochemical harvesting (ECH) attained 55.4% efficiency. This finding was in consonance with that by Gao et al., (2010) in which the harvesting efficiency relied on the applied current and conductivity of the broth. Adding electrolytes, for instance sodium chloride (NaCl) would increase conductivity and reduce power consumption (S. Gao et al., 2010). The highest harvesting efficiency reported was 83% when 6 g/L of NaCl was added. The study further buttressed the report that initial pH within the acidic range for example pH 5 produced the highest harvesting efficiency of 73% while initial pH in the alkaline region between7–9 had produced a lower harvesting efficiency in the ECH system.
From the aforementioned studies, it can be concluded for the electrical method, the alkaline broth had the worst performance and that addition of electrolyte was vital in making the process economically sustainable. Table 4 shows a summary for performance comparisons for microalgae biomass harvesting by various electrical methods.
Table 4: performance comparisons for microalgae biomass harvesting by various electrical methods operated in just 1 hour
|
Electrical approach |
Strains |
Initial pH |
Harvesting efficiency (%) |
References |
|
Electrochemical harvesting |
Scenedesmus obliqus |
9 |
65 |
(Misra et al., 2015) |
|
|
|
7 |
66 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
73 |
|
|
Electro-coagulation-floatation |
Microcystis aeruginosa |
10 |
87 |
(S. Gao et al., 2010) |
|
|
|
9 |
90 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
99 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0. Extraction and Analysis of Lipid from Microalgae Biomass
Lipids are a major component of microalgae. Microalgae can contain between 2-60% lipids out of its total dry weight depending on the condition of growth and the type of specie being examined. Lipids extracted from microalgae have attracted major interest for their fatty acids and triglycerides which can be converted into alcohol esters through esterification. The oils derived through this process are called ester fuels, when blended with diesel stocks these oils have produced efficiency of about 30% without degrading engine performance (Razzak et al., 2013). A group of researchers have successfully demonstrated a modified engine that can run on 100% of these fuels (Xu et al., 2008).
Microalgae serve as special chemical production sites using the instrument of photosynthesis. After over four decades of studying these microorganisms, they finally displayed their abilities to produce different varieties of complex compounds and fossil fuels. The extraction of fatty acids from microalgae or lipid synthesis which usually results in hydrocarbons with 16 to 22 carbon chain length requires that oxygen be available (Hu et al., 2008). Lipid content and distribution in the cell are affected by some elements, some of which are; (a) CO2 concentration (b) temperature (c) intensity of light, (d) the nutrient concentration and (e) the relative proportion of salt - salinity.
In algae, carbon compounds such as triglycerides-which are nonpolar lipids act as reservoirs of energy. However, the function of cell and chloroplast membrane formation is that of two polar lipids - phospholipids and glycolipids which are found inside the cell (Razzak et al., 2013). In as much as biodiesels can be manufactured from conversion of polar lipids, conventionally the non-polar triglycerides such as feedstocks are still the favored option.
Therefore, non-polar lipids remain the most important algal product of interest. The conditions under which an algae grows during the growth phase will determine greatly the lipid concentration and productivity (Razzak et al., 2013). The total lipid content can differ between species beginning at 4.5% for very low and 80% for very high (Xu et al., 2008).
3.1. Lipid extraction
We can not emphasize enough the fact that lipid extraction from microalga to be used as biofuel is not only a strenuous process, but it is both energy intensive and cost demanding. To convert microalgae into diesel fuel that research into better ways for the extraction from dry biomass of lipids and further refining is pivotal. The challenge here is that the specific condition to achieve this is yet to be fully laid out (Chisti, 2007, 2008).
To extract lipid from biological cell, chemical means, physical means or a combination of both means are employed. Cell disruption is mostly needed for releasing lipid and sugar contents within the cells of microalgae, to be used in the production of biodiesel and ethanol. Mechanical cell disruption can lead to extraction of an immense amount of lipid from microalga when accompanied by chemical solvent extraction. Furthermore, literatures have reported other mechanical processes which include: freezing, bead milling, osmotic shock, homogenization, high pressure, sonication. Also alkali and organic solvent extraction which is a chemical procedure was also advanced. (Chisti, 2007, 2008; Razzak et al., 2013).
3.1.1. Mechanical extraction
When a dense suspension of microalgae or other organisms is vigorously stirred together with the purpose of extracting the lipid in the mills cell disruption occurs. Cell disruption could happen to the suspended cells when they come into contact with energetic glass beads with powerful crushing ability during stirring. Hopkins (Razzak et al., 2013) reported that vigorous agitation by several small sized glass beads or ceramic beads was observed while mixing the cells and the beads. A bead mill is a simple arrangement of an enclosed grinding chamber having at its center a shaft that rotates. The discs fixed to the shaft transfer energy of motion to the tiny beads within the enclosure, bringing about a collision between them. The chamber contains a sieve or a slot in the direction of the rotating shaft through which the beads cannot pass. The beads accelerate radially, creating streams with varying speed and establishing high-tangential forces. The suspension is channeled into the grinding column through an external pump.
Recently, the use of ultrasound for disrupting microcell has increased just as that used during microalgae as well as microbial processes. Assuming perfect conditions, such an arrangement can generate strong ultrasonic wave pressures in the liquid media it transverse leading to the creation of tiny bubbles. When these bubbles increase in size they generate cavitation when they collapse and generate huge violent shock waves of energy breaking cell wall membrane (Samarasinghe et al., 2012). Converti et al., (2009) demonstrated that ultrasound can be used (mod. UP100H, Hielscher, Teltow, Germany). Converti et al., (2009) achieved total extraction of the microalgae fatty components by a combined use of ultrasound along with chloroform/methanol. the microalga of Scenesdesmus almeriensis contains lutein Cerón et al., (2008) were successful at extracting the lutein from it. The authors also experimented with three methods of disrupting a cell viz-a-viz (a) bead mill (with ceramic beads of 28 mm diameter, rotation speed of 120 rpm and, 2L volume), (b) mortar with pestle (125mL volume), (c) a combination between them and (d) ultrasound (Pselecta Ultasons unit). They reported the preferred option as the use of bead mill with alumina as disintegrating agent, among the treatments tested with regards to industrial use in the ratio 1:1 w/w for 5 min.
Another study into lipid extraction was carried out by Neto et al., (2013) the cell disruption step was carried out using sonication bath pretreatment, after which vortex mixing was done and solvent extraction was performed using n-hexane. Neto et al., (2013) verified that increased lipid extraction using this method was obtained from the alga biomass when compared with the regular solvent extraction using hexane. These authors put forward the hypothesis that extraction time and solvent consumption were reduced when ultrasound was used to assist the process of lipid extraction because the solvent had greater penetration of the cell arrangement (Mercer & Armenta, 2011).
Similar to other studied microbial cells, microalga can be hardened by freezing using liquid nitrogen or the method of freeze dryer. Frozen microalgae become brittle and easy to crush simply by the crushing action of the mortar and pestle. Low temperatures make ice crystals abrasive. Gouveia et al., (2007) in their own study, extracted lipids by freezing the microalga and then crushing mechanically, which was preceded by supercritical CO2 extraction. Firstly, the microalgae were manually crushed then moderately mixed with dry ice. The mixture was then crushed totally with the help of a disk vibratory mill (NV-TEMA, Labor-Scheibenschwingmuhle, type T100, 0.75 kW, 1000 V/min).
Zheng et al., (2011) extracted lipids by using C vulgaris sp. The authors compared different processes through which lipids can be extracted. Some of the methods examined included (a) grinding in liquid nitrogen, (b) quartz and grinding under dehydrated condition, (c) quartz sand grinding under wet conditions, (d) enzymatic lysis by snailase, (e) bead milling, (f) ultrasonication, (g) enzymatic lysis by cellulose, (h) microwaves, and (i) enzymatic lysis by lysozyme. Grinding in liquid nitrogen required a minimum of 2 min.
3.1.2. Chemical/solvent extraction
Using solvent to extract oil usually comes after the algae cells have been mechanically disrupted and can be carried out through a two-solvent system. Mechanical disruption takes place a lot in the Lab setting, such disruption can be done by the process proposed by Bilgh and Dyer. This process entails the use of a chloroform/water/methanol method of extraction for accessing cell lipids. Non-polar (chloroform) and polar (methanol) two solvent systems are used for fractional lipid extraction from the cells. A major upside to solvent extractions is that it allows for high lipid harvest which can be refined further or used in its raw state.
(Dote et al., 1994) studied how efficiently the algal cells of B. braunii could be converted into liquid fuels through liquefaction. Algal cells (~30 g) were charged to the autoclave while utilizing a catalyst (sodium carbonate) or not, 20 mL of distilled water was added to enable proper stirring because the amount of algal cells was inadequate to allow for proper stirring. The autoclave was later charged with nitrogen at 2 MPa after purging it using nitrogen, and then heated after sealing it in an electric furnace.
Supercritical CO2 is also usable as a solvent in the extraction of lipids from microalgae. Some of the liquid and gas are held back due to the Supercritical CO2. Supercritical fluid extraction offers a ‘natural and ecofriendly’ option towards extracting product. This process is increasingly seen as an alternative to the usual techniques used for separation. It is an easier, faster and more reliable method. Also, the process utilizes less organic solvents, thereby reducing cost and harm. Supercritical CO2 presents some special attributes as a solvent. It is not harmful (Halim et al., 2012). Hence, Supercritical CO2 can be used as an appropriate solvent for extracting lipid from microalgae C vulgaris, as clearly shown by (Gouveia et al., 2007; Mendesa et al., 2003). It was successfully demonstrated that microalgae that has been mechanically crushed delivered higher extraction yields using supercritical CO2 compared to others (Razzak et al., 2013).
3.1.3. New emerging green solvents systems and process intensification techniques for lipids extraction from microalgae
A major setback for the commercial viability of algae-based fuels is the cost required for the process. In the process of producing biodiesel from microalgae a lot of difficulties is encountered; lipid extraction is one of such challenge, lipid extraction does not just require a significant quantity of energy and time but also causes environmental contamination due to the toxic solvents used. Furthermore, the quality of the lipid content maybe reduced by unwanted compounds such as chlorophyll dissolved in it as a result of the conventional solvents used during lipid extraction. To overcome this problem, green solvents and process intensification methods/techniques (green extraction technologies) promise improvements in the characteristics of energy reduction, eco-friendliness, non-toxicity and efficient lipid extraction. Hence, this section examines the prospects of green solvents and extraction techniques that may enhance the commercial viability of biodiesel production.
Lipid extraction from microalgae is conventionally carried out by Folch et al. or Bligh and Dyer (Jeevan et al., 2017) after which lipid quantification through gravimetric estimation of lipid content is done. Folch et al. devised an easy method for extracting total lipids from animal tissues. However, the success of this method depends on the availability of mineral salts in the crude extract and use of large amount of solvent. If mineral salts are not present, majority of the acidic lipids are lost during the washing step.
On the other hand, Bligh and Dyer devised a fast lipid extraction technique for estimating the lipid composition of frozen fish tissue. This method works only for tissues with 80% water content, and the efficiency rely on the constancy of chloroform, methanol and water proportions according to the water content of the tissue. Chloroform and methanol are not just toxic and flammable but can also endanger our health and environment. These solvents reduce the quality of the final product by dissolving unwanted compounds (chlorophyll) during the extraction procedure (Archanaa et al., 2010). When this occurs, the quality of the lipid does not only drop but the biorefinery goal of a more cost friendly process is greatly hampered. Moreover, it goes without saying that for biodiesel production, preference has to be given to saponifiable lipids, which after transesterification are modified into fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) and not the whole lipids (Meng et al., 2009). Hence, those solvent systems for lipid extraction that can be sustained, non-toxic and improve lipid content yield without interference of non-lipid compounds should be looked into (Brennan et al., 2010).
The importance of green solvent in the lipid extraction process has been discussed above. Furthermore, some new ‘green or process intensification techniques’ that encourage time and energy reduction, lower usage of solvent, reduction in the down-stream processing steps are vital for making the process viable. These techniques simplify the process and make it cost effective. For example, during biomass extraction the drying step could be skipped by using wet algae biomass extraction. In like vain, transesterification which is used for ester and glycerol production besides biodiesel process of wet algae biomass may prevent not just the dewatering and drying steps but also the lipid extraction process (in situ transesterification). The possibilities of green solvents and process intensification technologies and their influence can be compared with a traditional process for extraction and transesterification to biodiesel (Figure 1).
In-situ transesterification
Other fuels
Chemicals
Conversion
Separation of biodiesel and glycerol / FAME purification
Biodiesel
Glycerol
Transesterification
Cell disruption
Extraction i.e., MAE, SAE, UAE, EAE
Mechanical processing
Grinding
Drying/freeze drying
Wet biomass
Dry biomass
Harvesting
Cultivation of Microalgae
Figure 1: Flowsheet for biodiesel production from microalgae. Some intensified process techniques highlighted may reduce some downstream steps as it would render the dewatering step unneeded. i.e. MAE – Microwave assisted extraction (MAE), Enzyme assisted extraction (EAE), Ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE), Surfactant assisted extraction
3.2. Lipid analysis
Fluorophores are plants that exhibit fluorescence when light of a certain wavelength falls on it when in a non-polar environment. Nile Red is an example of such a plant and it causes lipid droplets in algal cells to fluorescents. Keith et al., (1987) determined the non-polar lipid content in algal cells using Nile Red dye. The authors using acetone with a concentration of 1 μg/mL examined Cell cultures previously stained with Nile Red. The total lipids in Amphora coffeaeformis, Navicula sp., Tropidoneis sp., and Chlorella sp were gravimetrically determined by the average peak fluorescence as measured by a spectrofluorometer.
For detection and characterizing the fatty acids (PAs) levels of biodiesel, different analytical techniques are available. There are also diverse techniques for quantifying fatty acid levels (PAs) in biodiesel. Gas chromatography (GC) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) are two analytical methods often used for analyzing fatty acids and triglycerides. In comparing these methods chromatographic analysis alone should not be the focus but focus should also be placed on sample preparation. Although fatty acid analysis using HPLC has been on the increase in the past 10 years, the most used method still remains GC (Shantha et al., 1992). When complex mixtures that cut across a broad molecular range are analyzed gas chromatography-flame ionization detection {GC-FID} along with this standard technique has been very effective and fast (Carelli et al., 1997). Zuo et al., (2013) have exemplified that separation, quantification and analysis by GC can be very well carried out using fatty acids without the need for derivatization. However, while analyzing using GC, to improve the volatility and separation of the substances; derivatization of fatty acids can be carried out. This will also reduce tailings. The technology behind GC has seen recent improvements among which is the columns having bonded phases that give special separation opportunities reduced phase bleeding. However, derivatization can be used for situations requiring improved sensitivity. In recent studies separation and analysis of geometric isomers have been done using GC as well as for positional isomers. For diagnostic fragmentation of saturated and unsaturated AAS mass spectrometry (MS) has been proven as a potent technique. It is therefore worthy of note that GC and MS detection can be used together. MS can also be used for the analysis of branching positions in Pas (William, 1998).
Otsuka & Morimura, (1966) showed the change in lipid composition over different cell growth stages of synchronously grown cultures of Chlorella ellipsoidea. Using a silicic acid column chromatography was preceded by a methanol/ethanol/ether lipid extraction. Acid methyl ester fractions, after separation of polar and non-polar individual fatty acids were then obtained. These authors examined growing cultured cells at different stages. A change in the relative distribution of polar and non-polar fatty acids at every next growth stage was seen by the fatty acid profile.
The kind of lipid, hydrocarbon and other complex oils produced by microalgae depends on its specie (Banerjee et al., 2002). Fatty acids in algae were discovered to be abundant in oleic acid (C18:1) and palmitic acid (C16:1). During cell division oleic acid is utilized for both cells under light and in the dark, this suggests that oleic acid in triglycerides contribute largely to the energy requirement for cell division.
4.0. Heterogeneous transesterification catalysts
Several researches were carried out and reported in other to explore the reactions of wide range of heterogeneous substance with the aim of mitigating the diverse challenges experienced when using homogeneous bases and liquid acids as alcoholysis catalysts (Choudhury et al., 2014; Dias et al., 2012; Kazemian et al., 2013). Presented in Table 5 is the list of various solid acids and bases reported from researchers as biodiesel producing catalysts. As shown in the table, ZrO2, MoO2, Al2O3, Si2O3, heteropoly acids and zeolite materials are catalysts categorized as solid acids (Anderson et al., 2009; Choudhury et al., 2014; Chouhan & Sarma, 2011; Dias et al., 2012; Kazemian et al., 2013; Martín & Grossmann, 2012). Having both Brønsted and Lewis acid sites was the bases for charactering the above-mentioned materials, which decides their reactivity in transesterification reactions. Shape selectivities could also affect the activities of zeolites and heteropoly acids. Materials with multi-dimensional pore structure stand a better chance in the formation of alkyl esters without necessarily cracking. Alternatively, solid bases mainly consist of oxides of common metals, carbonates and basic zeolites. However, in biodiesel production, the most important active sites in these materials are the basic sites.
Table 5: Reported catalyst used for heterogenous transesterification reaction on various feedstocks
|
|
Catalyst |
Feedstock |
Reaction operating conditions |
Performance |
References |
||||
|
|
|
|
Temp (0F) |
Catalyst loading wt% |
Time (hr) |
Methanol :oil |
Yield (%) |
Conv. (%) |
|
|
Solid Acids Heterogenous Catalysis |
WO3/ZrO2 |
Waste cooking oil |
167 |
- |
20 |
19:1 |
- |
85 |
( Park et al., 2010) |
|
|
Zeolite Y (Y756) |
|
860 |
- |
0.37 |
6:1 |
27 |
NR |
(Brito et al., 2007) |
|
|
Starch/Carbon-based |
|
176 |
10 |
8 |
30:1 |
92 |
|
(Lou et al., 2008) |
|
|
H3PW12O40.6H2O |
|
149 |
4 |
14 |
70:1 |
87 |
|
(Cao et al., 2008) |
|
|
ZrO7H0.2PW12O40-ZrHPW |
|
|
2 |
8 |
20:1 |
99 |
|
(Zhang et al., 2010) |
|
|
Zs/Si |
|
392 |
3 |
5 |
18:1 |
98 |
|
(Jacobson et al., 2008) |
|
|
SO42-/TiO2-SiO2 |
|
|
|
4 |
9:1 |
90 |
|
(Peng et al., 2008) |
|
|
SO42-/SnO2-SiO2 |
|
302 |
|
3 |
15:1 |
92 |
|
(Lam et al., 2009) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Bases Heterogenous Catalysis |
CaMnO3 |
animal fat |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
NR |
(Dias et al., 2012) |
|
|
Calcined waste coral fragment-CaO |
Palm oil, Soybean oil, Rice bran oil, waste cooking oil |
- |
- |
2 |
- |
98 |
|
(Roschat et al., 2012) |
|
|
KF/CaO |
Chinese tallow seed oil |
149 |
- |
2.5 |
12:1 |
97 |
|
(Wen et al., 2010) |
|
|
KNO3/CaO |
Rape oil |
149 |
1 |
3 |
6:1 |
98 |
|
(Encinara et al., 2010) |
|
|
CaO/ZnO |
Ethyl butyrate |
140 |
1.3 |
2 |
12:1 |
90 |
|
(Alba-Rubio et al., 2010) |
|
|
Li/MgO |
Soybean oil |
140 |
9 |
2 |
12:1 |
94 |
NR |
(Wen et al., 2010) |
|
|
Kl/Mg-Al |
|
158 |
5 |
8 |
20:1 |
90 |
|
(Tantirungrotechai et al., 2010) |
|
|
CaO/SiO3 |
|
140 |
5 |
8 |
16:1 |
95 |
|
(Samart et al., 2010) |
|
|
Na2SiO3 |
|
|
3 |
1 |
8:1 |
100 |
|
(Guo et al., 2010) |
|
|
PzOH/SiO2 |
|
167 |
4 |
12 |
60:1 |
90 |
|
(Kim et al., 2011) |
|
|
Mg-Al-hydrotalcite |
|
446 |
5 |
1 |
13:1 |
|
|
(Cristina et al., 2010) |
|
|
|
Sunflower oil |
140 |
2 |
24 |
12:1 |
50 |
|
(Campo et al., 2010) |
|
|
|
Jatropha curcas oil |
113 |
1 |
1.5 |
4:1 |
95 |
|
(Deng et al., 2011) |
|
|
CaO/Fe3O4 |
|
158 |
2 |
1.33 |
15:1 |
95 |
|
(Liu et al., 2010) |
|
|
CaMgO |
|
149 |
4 |
6 |
|
80 |
NR |
(Taufiq-Yap et al., 2011) |
|
|
CaZnO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MgO-KOH |
Mutton fat |
|
4 |
0.33 |
22:1 |
- |
98 |
(Mutreja et al., 2011) |
|
|
Dolomite |
Canola oil |
154 |
3 |
3 |
6:1 |
92 |
NR |
(Ilgen, 2011) |
|
|
|
Palm oil |
140 |
6 |
3 |
30:1 |
98 |
|
(Ngamcharussrivichai et al., 2010) |
|
|
Calcined mollusk & egg shell-CaO |
|
|
10 |
2 |
18:1 |
90 |
|
(Viriya-empikul et al., 2010) |
|
|
Calcined egg shell-CaO |
|
149 |
1.5 |
2 |
12:1 |
98 |
|
(Cho & Seo, 2010) |
|
|
KF/Ca-Al-hydrotalcite |
|
|
5 |
5 |
|
|
|
(Gao et al., 2010) |
|
|
CaO/Al2O3 |
|
148 |
- |
5 |
|
99 |
|
(Zabeti et al., 2010) |
|
|
Calcined CaCO3-CaO |
|
140 |
- |
1 |
15:1 |
94 |
|
(Yoosuk et al., 2010) |
|
|
CaO |
|
|
7 |
0.75 |
|
96 |
|
(Yoosuk et al., 2010b) |
|
|
|
Sunflower oil |
176 |
1 |
5.5 |
6:1 |
91 |
|
(Verziu et al., 2011) |
|
|
|
|
167 |
- |
0.75 |
4:1 |
80 |
|
(Vujicic et al., 2010) |
|
|
|
Waste cooking oil |
149 |
0.9 |
1 |
12:1 |
66 |
|
(Kouzu et al., 2017) |
|
|
K3PO4 |
|
140 |
4 |
2 |
6:1 |
97 |
|
(Guan et al., 2009) |
|
|
Oil palm ash |
|
|
5.4 |
0.5 |
18:1 |
72 |
|
(Chin et al., 2009) |
|
|
Calcined snail shell-CaO |
|
|
2 |
8 |
6:1 |
87 |
99.6 |
(Birla et al., 2012) |
In the heterogeneous catalysis, though regarding if solid basic or acidic catalyst is employed, a number of factors such as amount of catalyst, degree of mixing or stirring, the on stream reaction time, oil/alcohol content, transesterification temperature and purity index of the feedstock has to be appropriately considered. Anderson et al., (2009) studied the distribution of the active material over the catalyst support which is believed to have influences on the activity of BaO/Al2O3 in alcoholysis, the author confirmed that higher distributions have higher activity. To avoid handling difficulties, temperature close to boiling point of monohydric alcohol should be selected. More so, in other to have a complete conversion adequate reaction time needs to be provided (for example 1-3 hours). It is also important to monitor the extent of catalyst/reactants interaction therefore moderate mixing is very necessary, because the reaction would be very slow if the mixing rate is low, meanwhile the reaction may be difficult to handle as well as side reactions will be experienced when the mixing rate is high. However, oils with lesser percentage of fatty acids (such as algae oil with less than 1% fatty acid) are most desirable because the key impurities in majority of oils are the free fatty acids.
The equilibrium process through which methanol (monohydric-alcohol) and triglyceride ester (bio-oil) reacts in ratio 3:1 to give a mole of glycerol and an equal amount of mono-alkyl esters (biodiesel) is known as transesterification (Equation 1).
+
Glycerol
3
Methanol
Triglyceride
Catalyst
3
Methyl acetate (Biodiesel)
+
Equation 1: Chemical equation showing production of biodiesel from any bio oil
This reaction proceeds in three successive phases, each consisting of the production of biodiesel (mono-alkyl ester) and initiating alcoholic -OH group into the triglyceride ester chain. Hence, at the last phase of the reaction, glycerol would be produced. However, the ratio required of monohydric-alcohol to oil should be within 4:1 and 12:1 in other to speed up the reaction and generate more biodiesel within the shortest possible time. Furthermore, negative effect on the total biodiesel generated may be created as well as reduction in the general production of biodiesel as such the reaction may shift backwards all of which are as a result of values below the above-mentioned ratio. Nevertheless, at higher ratios, greater challenges may be posed as a result of the removal of excess alcohol. Other critical factors such as the degree of stirring and reaction temperature are greatly importance. Thus, to guarantee adequate interaction between reactants and catalyst particles sufficient stirring is necessary (Anderson et al., 2009; Chouhan & Sarma, 2011; Liu et al., 2008; Lotero et al., 2005; Ma et al., 2008). However, as for the reaction temperature, it must be close to the boiling point of that of monohydric alcohol, because slow reactions are favoured by lower temperatures, while handling difficulties is created by much higher temperatures.
4.1. Solid Bases Transesterification
More often than none, reactions that involve heterogeneous bases proceed via reactions of either the Brønsted or the Lewis basic sites of the catalyst generally with ether ethanol or methanol (monohydric alcohol). Hence, biodiesel is produced when the alkoxide mixture generated reacts with TAG (triglyceride - C55H98O6) ester in the oil and also yields glycerin in the next steps (Equation 2).
+
+
Equation 2: Reaction mechanism of transesterification via base catalyst (denoted Y) in the equation.
The mode of action is Eley-Rideal type, but the extend of its basicity greatly determines on the speed of the reaction. An alkoxide group (RO-) is formed and H+ removed when the alcohol preferentially interacts with the basic sites, been the key active component which attacks the triglyceride ester at the intermediate phases. The formation of alkoxide species depends on strength the basic sites (i.e. the higher the strength of the basic sites, the more favored the production of the alkoxide species and vice versa). In the same way, cleavage and glycerol formation is favoured by stronger basicity and subsequently enhancing the overall rate of reaction.
Solid basic catalysts i.e. zeolites, ZnO, CuO or other oxides of first row transition metals, compounds from group 2A elements and basic polymers (Table 5), particularly the oxides i.e. Calcium oxide, Magnesium oxide, strontium oxide, Barium oxide etc., and carbonates which is more prominent for example Calcium carbonate, Magnesium carbonate, Strontium carbonate and Barium carbonate, have been focus of research in the area of heterogenous catalysis for transesterification. Their basicity is associated with metal-oxygen ion pairs (i.e. M2+ -O2-) and varies in the order Ba > Sr > Ca > Mg for the oxides. As such these catalytic materials are easy to prepare, because they are inexpensive and showed low corrosion properties. The transesterification reaction of these heterogeneous base catalysts is determined by the severity of calcinations step which is a very important factor. The conversion gets reduced at high calcinations temperatures as a result decrease in active catalyst surface. For example, only 18% conversion yield was achieved in 8 hours of reactions for a sample of MgO calcined at 600OC. Meanwhile, at optimum conditions; lower calcination temperatures, the methanol/oil content being 12:1 and 5.0 wt % catalyst 92% high conversion yield was achieved (Chouhan & Sarma, 2011). This was also noticed over CaO. On the other hand, after repeated cycles of applications, the latter catalyst caused reusability problems.
Transition elements such as Fe, Ce, Zr and La and Mixed oxides of Ca have also been studied in transesterification. This has resulted to above 95% biodiesel yield. Although, to achieve sufficient shift of the equilibrium position forward, a relatively high ratio of methanol-oil (i.e. 6:1) could be needed. Sufficient transesterification time of about 10 hours’ reaction time may as well be required in addition to these materials. For instance, in 10 hours a CaTiO3 may yields up to 79% of biodiesel, while in the same reaction time (10hrs) CaCeO3 and CaZrO3 yields around 70 and 95% of biodiesel at 60OC using oil/methanol ratio of 1:6. Because of the adequate stability and dispersion properties of Al2O3 out of other support materials, it shows a higher activity and also permits improved interaction between the surface reactants (Anderson et al., 2009; Chouhan & Sarma, 2011; Ma et al., 2008). Basic zeolites and hydrotalcites are gradually more researched and recently more studied. Materials like oxides containing faujasites, zeolites and ETS-10 have basic cations which may be generated through thermal melting of their supported salts. Ion exchange with highly electropositive cations is as well essential in other to the promote transesterification activity. The hydrotalcites (MgeAl) has good basicity except for the dissolution problems that necessitate the materials to be carefully prepared. Co-precipitation preparation methods have thus far shown reliable stability.
4.2. Solid Acids Transesterification
This category consists of catalysts that are more environmentally friendly and sustainable compared to homogeneous catalysts. This catalysts have shown very little or no recycling and corrosion problems. Nevertheless, to achieve better efficiency high porosity systems are needed. The porosity permits sufficient and appropriate adsorption-desorption and diffusion of the products and reactants. Hence, metal oxides or carbonates is less effective compared to acidic zeolites (see Table 5) as such the latter will be more preferable here. In other to address diffusional impediments, their structural and acidity properties should constantly be adjusted thereby enhancing and increasing biodiesel production (Borges et al., 2013; Macario et al., 2008). Nevertheless, selecting the suitable silica alumina ratio alongside modifying the concentration is a difficult task with zeolites. High loading can result in the blockage of the pore systems meanwhile free metals such as Palladium or Platinum results in hydrogenolysis and then, dehydrogenation, as a result obstructing biodiesel production.
The performance rating of organosulphonic acids and sulfated zirconias as materials for transesterification catalysts has been triggered due to several separation and environmental challenges related to sulfuric acid. The SO42- in an unsupported system could effortlessly be lost in the reaction medium and hence acidity decay which causes catalyst deactivation. Thus to solve this problem, it becomes necessary to incorporate porous silica or alumina as support material. ZrO2 generally exists as tetragonal, cubic and monoclinic phases. It is a well known fact that the tetragonal phase exerts greater transesterification activity compared to the other phases, particularly when doped with appropriate amount of amorphous Tungsten trioxide. In few cases, sulfated tin oxide or tungstatedzirconia may be used in place of sulfated zirconia with supported over alumina to achieve a comparable activity (Jothiramalingam & Wang, 2009).
4.3. Heterogeneous transesterification of algae oil
After harvesting, plants extraction of its oil is usually the first followed by other significant step in production of biodiesel (Figure 1). The procedure to be embarked on should be such that will ensures reduction in the cost of extraction cost and at the same time ensures high oil production (Martín & Grossmann, 2012). Chemical and mechanical methods are the basic and popular techniques obtainable for algae today. The chemical methods commonly available include hexane solvent, soxhlet and supercritical fluid extraction while expeller press or ultrasound-assisted is the main available mechanical method. The chemical methods are of great health and safety concern because of the chemical implications meanwhile the mechanical method is energy intensive because drying of the algae is required (Martín & Grossmann, 2012). However, adopting supercritical extraction method is also energy intensive because of the involvement of high pressure equipment used in this method which is usually expensive. Commercially, Origin Oil Company widely applies a single step process. This method entailed chronological steps of harvesting, concentration, and extraction oil from algae. It split the oil, biomass and water in a single step (generally in <1hr). This method does not need initial dewatering of the fresh algae, more so no heavy equipment or chemicals are required. The Cavitation Technologies Inc method is another novel technique. In other to produce cavity bubbles in the solvent the company employed its Nano-based reactor (Oilgae, 2017). For the bubbles near the cell wells to collapse, pulses are generated which breakdown the cell walls to synthesis oils into solvent used for the extraction. Another method which Nano-technologists would find very interesting is the Catilin's method (though still under research and development stage). In other to specially extract and sequester specific fuel-based compounds present in the algal lipid feed, specially developed mesoporous nanoparticles will be used. The T300 catalysts developed by the company will be used to trans-esterify the free fatty acids and triglycerides rich balanced algal oil into biodiesel. The major advantage in this case is that, the technology is potentially very efficient and involved heterogeneous catalyst as such reduces cost, ensures sustainability of the environment, recycling of the catalyst as well as highly purified biodiesel and glycerol (Oilgae, 2017). Osmotic shock and enzymatic extraction are some other methods used for the extraction of oil which are still under investigation, however, the later is considered to be costlier than the hexane extraction technique. The method uses precise enzymes molecules to breakdown the cell walls by a common solvent, thus allowing it to be easier to fractionate the oil.
An estimation of 80,000 liters/acre of algae oil was recently recorded by Demirbas & Demirbas, (2011). These figures more than 30 times the quantity that could be obtained from other feedstocks such as palm oil. They revealed that common species of algae like Schizochytriumsp and Botryococcusbrauni could produce about 77% oil based on dry matter. They also showed in one of their model the oil per hectare yield of 100,000 liters for algae species as compared to just 446 liters for soy plants and 952 liters per hectare for sunflower plants. Furthermore, other scientist such as Vazhappilly & Chen, (1998), Volkman et al., (1989) and Yaguchi et al., (1997)also recorded closer trends. Algae oil is also discovered to contain unsaturated fatty acids for example omega-3's, omega-6, docosahexanoic and ecosapentanoic acids. Interestingly, these compounds can be isolated and used for other commercial purposes, thereby being of economic exploitability advantage (Wen & Chen, 2003).
Transesterification of the oil into biodiesel follows after successfully extracting the oil. Similar conversion techniques used for other vegetable oils are also adopted for use in the conversion algae oils (Campbell, 2008; Demirbas & Demirbas, 2011; Miao et al., 2004; Xu et al., 2006). Algae specie, Chlorella protothecoides was used by Xu et al., (2006) for the production of biodiesel. The cells were removed via agitation together with washing with distilled water before using freeze drying process to dry. Pulverize of powdered cells with mortar will produce the oil after which extraction is done using n-hexane, the optimal parameters include equivalent catalyst concentration (i.e. according to oil weight), methanol/oil ratio (56:1) at temperature of 30 OC, which reduces product density from 0.912 to 0.864 during 4 hours on stream. Recently emphasis is given to the production processes using homogeneous catalysts with several evidences (Hu et al., 2008; Martín & Grossmann, 2012; Martın & Grossmann, 2009; Plata et al., 2010; Santacesaria et al., 2012; Wen et al., 2009). Meanwhile, shifting to the use of heterogeneous materials becomes necessary because the materials’ sensitivity towards fatty acids in the algae oil feed likewise due to low quality glycerol produced. Nevertheless, the two materials could be used in line with Figure 1. With the latter catalysts, lesser energy is needed for the removal of soap and glycerine (i.e. during purification). In the separation process the catalysts are also removed easily and reused. Hence in the nearest future, the current used of homologous methods will be substituted by the heterogeneous process. Acids like Silicotungstic acid (H4SiW12O40), Phosphotungstic acid - PTA (H3PW12O40), CsPW (Cs2.5H0.5PW12O40), Phosphotungstic acid/Zirconia (H3PW12O40/ZrO2) and Phosphotungstic acid/Niobium oxide (H3PW12O40/Nb2O5) are commonly referred to as heteropoly acids, have been recorded to show great tolerance towards free fatty acid concentrations, producing large conversions of biodiesel at ordinary conditions such as that of vegetable oils (Alsalme et al., 2008; Katada et al., 2009; Talebian-Kiakalaieh et al., 2013). This groundbreaking potential can be harness in algae oils which has greater potential. However, under controlled conditions acidic zeolites like H-Beta, H-ZSM-5, H-MOR, H-ETS-10, H-ETS-4 having moderate acidic properties and adequate porosity permits more fast transesterification with limited side reactions interference for the vegetable oils (Borges et al., 2013; Macario et al., 2008) and also for the algae oils. Materials based on WO3/ZrO2 must be used at the right loadings and calcinations. The 15% weight of WO3/ZrO2 calcined at 932 OF is recommended, which gives 95% yield conversion for other oils (see Table 6). Therefore, using comparable preparations algae oil has more yield potentials under similarly constant conditions of the reaction.
Table 6: The effect of calcination temperature on the performance of WO3/ZrO2 catalyst (Jothiramalingam & Wang, 2009).
|
|
|
Conversion (%) |
|
|
Sample |
Calcination temperature (0F) |
15 wt% WO3/ZrO2 |
5 wt% WO3/ZrO2 |
|
1 |
1652 |
17 |
5 |
|
2 |
1292 |
25 |
5 |
|
3 |
1112 |
20 |
10 |
|
4 |
932 |
81 |
95 |
|
5 |
752 |
78 |
93 |
Likewise the heterogeneous bases are materials of great prospect (see Table 7). Mixed oxides with transition metals, oxides of Calcium, Strontium and Magnesium, and supported over silica or alumina were widely investigated for oils other than algae oil and their various properties well evaluated. Similarly, these materials can intensively be exploited for algae oils, hoping to mitigate challenges like thermal instability, dissolution, sintering, and recyclability problems by right parameters choices.
Selecting suitable conditions of reaction and appropriate support materials is key to heterogeneous algae transesterification (Galadima & Muraza, 2014; Krohn et al., 2011; Santacesaria et al., 2012; Umdu et al., 2009) During the conversion of marine microalgae, the properties of aluminum oxide (Al2O3) doped magnesium oxide (MgO) and calcium oxide (CaO) were investigated by Umdu et al., (2009), by controlling the concentration of methanol as well as the quantities of the active materials at 323 K. In their study, they discovered that unsupported calcium oxide and Magnesium oxide activity were negligible, while calcium oxide and aluminum oxide system produced the activity with the most potential, because of higher basic sites concentration and basic strengths. Finally, their conclusion was that just like other vegetable oils, algae could be converted to biodiesel successfully by the use of the named heterogeneous materials at low transesterification temperature. Likewise, there are no unwanted products which needed to be purified. Biodiesel was also generated by the catalysts at low temperatures for some eatable vegetable oils containing common impurities such as free fatty acids. Thus, it means that the materials have strong potentials for algae oils. A new fixed bed continuous reactor system was incorporated by McNeff et al., (2008) using porous titania, alumina and zirconia (including their mixed oxides) as heterogeneous alcoholysis catalysts at high temperature and pressure of 300-450 OC and (2500 psi) respectively, in addition to some feedstocks (such as microalgae, corn and soybean oils). The catalysts were proven very successful, particularly with algae oil Table 7.
Table 7: Literature review on biodiesel production via heterogenous catalyst
|
S/N |
|
Feedstock |
Catalyst |
Yield (%) |
References |
|
1 |
1st Generation |
Soybean oil |
Li/MgO |
94 |
(Borges & Díaz, 2012) |
|
2 |
|
|
ZrO2, TiO2 |
88 |
(McNeff et al., 2008) |
|
3 |
|
Corn oil |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Groundnut oil |
BaO/Al2O3 |
80 |
(Anderson et al., 2009) |
|
5 |
|
Cotton seed oil |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Palm oil |
CaO/ Al2O3 |
99 |
(Ramachandran et al., 2013) |
|
7 |
|
Mutton fat |
MgO/KOH |
98 |
(Mutreja et al., 2011) |
|
8 |
|
Sunflower oil |
ZrO2/La2O3 |
85 |
(Ramachandran et al., 2013) |
|
9 |
|
|
Na-X zeolite |
84 |
(Musyoka et al. 2012) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
2nd Generation |
Yellow horn |
Cs2.5H0.5PW12O40 |
96 |
(Ramachandran et al., 2013) |
|
11 |
|
Waste cooking oil |
MgO/ TiO2 |
92 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Zeolite Y (Y756) |
85 |
(Lam et al., 2010) |
|
13 |
|
|
H3PW12O40.6H2O |
87 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
K3PO4 |
97 |
|
|
15 |
|
Chinese tallow seed oil |
KF/CaO |
|
(Borges & Díaz, 2012) |
|
16 |
|
Jatropha curcas oil |
CaO/Fe3O4 |
95 |
|
|
17 |
|
Croton megalocarpus oil |
SnO2SO4/ZrO2 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Algae oil |
ZrO2, TiO2 |
90 |
(McNeff et al., 2008) |
|
19 |
|
|
NiO, MoO3/ Al2O3 |
99 |
(Sani et al., 2013) |
|
20 |
|
|
Pt-SAPO-11 |
83 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
NiO, MoO3/H-ZSM-5 |
98 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
Microporous TiO2 |
95 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
Niobium oxide (HY-340) |
94 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
H-beta Zeolite |
100 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
Amberlst-15 |
98.5 |
(Dong et al., 2013) |
|
|
3rd Generation |
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
Microalgae's lipid |
Modified Al2O3 |
98 |
(Umdu et al., 2009) |
|
27 |
|
|
Modified TiO2 |
96 |
(Chouhan & Sarma, 2011) |
|
28 |
|
|
Porous TiO2 microsphere |
|
|
Under constant conditions percentage yields of biodiesel gotten from; algae was 90.2%, corn was 88.3% and soybean oils was 88.1%. More so, economical analysis of the process revealed that it was less expensive compared with the conventional homogeneous options. However, they encountered limited interference because of the fatty acids. The reusability of the catalysts is also made possible because of their thermal stability. For the sake of increasing the biodiesel yield and reduce the fatty acids interference experienced with few heterogeneous base catalysts, some scientists (Dong et al., 2013), have recently introduced two steps in situ process. This process consists of a pre-esterification of the algae oil before the base-catalyzed transesterification. It could permit 98% recovery of the biodiesel, which is greater than the values obtained by a single-step catalytic in situ process. The reusability potential Amberlyst-15 (a heterogeneous material) was studied by Dong et al., (2013), where it was repeatedly employed eight times without activity decay. Up to 30% weight increases in ester yield is caused by catalyst loading, above this, its concentration does not affect the activities of transesterification. In the contrast, biodiesel production is negatively affected as a result of increase in methanol to algae oil ratio, with an optimal yield of 20%. The technology could serve as a more cost effective, environmentally sustainable method because of the optimal biodiesel produced and recyclable catalyst. Heterogeneous solid acids like NiO-MoO3/Al2O3, Pt-SAPO-11, NiOeMoO3/H-ZSM-5 and microporous TiO2 has recently been reported by (Sani et al., 2013) as being efficiently used for microalgae oil. In general, the conversions were within the range of 83 and 99% (see Table 7), these materials displaced great prospect for lower commercial and industrial cost of production compared with the homogenous system in addition the remarkable stability of catalysts and lack of reusability problems or corrosion. Many researchers (Giannakopoulou et al., 2010; Hara, 2010; Lim & Teong, 2010; MacArio & Giordano, 2013; Peng-lim et al., 2013; Perego & Millini, 2013; Rathore & Madras, 2007; Serrano et al., 2013; Sharma et al., 2011; Verma et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2013) generally believed that the best future method for the production of biodiesel from algae or similar non-edible feedstock would be by heterogeneous catalysis. However, researchers need to integrate economic aspects with science, technology and policy issues in their studies so as to identify the technical and economical feasibility of this method.
It is however interesting to note that, diesel range hydrocarbons and or gasoline (Harman-Ware et al., 2013; Kiss et al., 2006; Thangalazhy-gopakumare et al., 2012; Tran et al., 2010), animal feeds and fine chemicals including Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil (HVO) can also been produced using algae oil. The most important heterogeneous materials exploited in this regards are solid acid catalysts. Generally, the conversion processes involves cracking, hydrotreating and hydrodeoxygenation (Kiss et al., 2006; Savage et al., 2011). Out of the solid catalysts, the good materials evaluated for cracking reactions includes aluminum oxide (Al2O3), aluminum chloride (AlCl3), calcium oxides (CaO) and magnesium oxide (MgO), SAPO-5, SAPO-11 (Kiss et al., 2006), HZSM5, HBEA and USY. Meanwhile, heterogeneous systems which are mostly used for hydrotreating of bio-oils even at low temperature include NieMo/g-Al2O3, CoMo and NiMo-sulphides and their SiO2-Al2O3 supports though with limited stability challenges. They have interesting properties such as good thermal stability with catalyst poisons resistances in the reaction feed. Primary deoxygenation materials such as Al2O3, SiO2 and zeolites supported Nickel and/or noble metal catalysts can be used to convert fatty acids in the algae oil to liquid hydrocarbons of mostly diesel range.
(Hu et al., 2013), recently pyrolyzed oil gotten from microcystis species (oil-riched blue - green algae) at temperatures ranges of 572-1292OF in a fixed bed reactor. Mostly at optimal temperature of 932OF, the liquid bio-oils generated were discovered contain gasoline and diesel range hydrocarbons at appreciable quantity. C6H6, C6H6O, C7H8O (Cresol), C4H5N, C8H7N, C5H5N, their families and substituted pyrazines were also identified at appreciable concentrations. Other researcher that used different species also had similar outcomes (Choi, Choi, & Park, 2012; Melligan et al., 2011; Miao et al., 2004; H. J. Park et al., 2012).
5.0. Reactors
Commercial industries and producers have suggested several techniques for culturing microalgae. Reviews such as (Chen et al., 2011; Eriksen, 2008; Grobbelaar, 2010; Kumar et al., 2011; Ugwu et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2012) listed the various technological solutions. Some of these methods used include tanks or pools of different type ranging from round ponds with arms that are movable, large open ponds, cascade systems with baffles, race way type ponds (tracks). Furthermore, fermenters (for heterotrophic and mixotrophic cultures), large bags, two stage systems (cultivation in the reactor in an internal system, the system of outside pond with paddle wheel, which enforces growth medium movement and simultaneously aerates the culture) are also employed (Olaizola, 2003)
The ratio of the culture solution volume to the illuminated surface is a key factor to the design of reactors used to grow photosynthetic organisms. The reduction of unwanted consequences of self-shading or limited access to light from one cell to another is achievable through the proper selection of the culture solution irradiated surface (A) and volume (V) ratio. Nevertheless a raise in the values of the ratio of irradiated surface to the volume (A/V) is the parameter that is desirable for photobioreactors (Becker, 2007).
5.1. Influence of reactor design and operating conditions
The design of an innovative chemical reactor in other ease the continuous processing of viscous bio-oils is most likely to affect biodiesel production by commercially exploiting heterogeneous catalysts. Even though a lot of biodiesel production plants of most industries runs in batch mode and at an important scale of B7000 tons per year (Aransiola et al., 2014; Sakai et al., 2009). It becomes very important to employ continuous flow reactors that is heterogeneously catalyzed, so as to prevent the separation cases of homogeneous catalysts and drawbacks of batch mode (particularly raised the capital investment needed to operate at high volumes as well as raised the cost for labor of a start or stop process) (Stamenković, & Veljković, 2014) in addition, also raise the scale of operation ranging from 8000 to 125 000 tons per year (Aransiola et al., 2014; Sakai et al., 2009). Varieties of process engineering solutions have been suggested for use in the continuous esterification of FFAs, as well as the use of fixed bed (Cheng et al., 2012) or microchannel-flow reactors (Kulkarni et al., 2007) pervaporation methods (de la Iglesia et al., 2007) and reactive distillation (Buchaly et al., 2012; Kiss et al., 2008). A depth review of biodiesel production using process intensification methods have been conducted elsewhere (Maddikeri et al., 2012; Qiu et al., 2010).
Chemical conversion and separation steps are combined in a single stage in reactive distillation. As a result, the process flow sheets are made easier, cost of production is reduced, as well as catalyst lifetimes extension by continuously getting rid of water from the system. Nevertheless, the method is only relevant and usable when the pressure and temperature needed for reaction is suitable with that required for the distillation. Kiss et al. used a range of alcohols catalyzed by sulphated zirconia to demonstrate this approach for the esterification of dodecanoic acid (Kiss et al., 2008). However, their reactive distillation was 100% selective, allowed lesser residence times compared to similar flow systems, in addition to this it didn’t need excess alcohol. The fact that it doesn’t need excess alcohol is a key improvement over the majorities of popular conventional biodiesel syntheses in which there is a reversible reaction between the alcohol and triglyceride, hence huge alcohol excesses are usually needed to accomplish full conversion (to ensure economic process viability, the excess alcohol should be separated and re-used after worth).
In other to exploit the full potential of the integrated heterogeneous catalyst, every continuous flow reactor should be appropriately designed, however plug flow is an important characteristic because it allows effective management and monitoring of the product composition, thus minimizes its operational costs, downstream separation processes alongside associated capital investment. The conventional plug flow reactors are poorly designed to lower reactions like TAG transesterification and FFA esterification, given that, specification such as very high length, diameter ratios are required to achieve good mixing, even though they are problematic because of their pumping duties together with large footprints, in addition to the difficulties in controlling and managing it. These difficulties are avoided in Oscillatory Baffled Reactors (OBRs) by oscillating the reaction fluid via orifice plate baffles to realize an effective mixing and plug flow,249 thus decoupling mixing from the net fluid flow in a scalable fashion, allowing long reaction times on an industrial scale, as such applied to homogeneously catalysed biodiesel production (Phan et al., 2012) OBR vortical mixing further provides an efficient, manageable methods of solid particles that are uniformly suspended and was utilized recently to entrain a PrSO3H-SBA-15 mesoporous silica within a glass OBR under an oscillatory flow for the continuous esterification of propanoic, hexanoic, lauric and palmitic acid (Figure 2) (Eze et al., 2013). There is an outstanding semi-quantitative consensus between the kinetics of hexanoic acid esterification in the Oscillatory Baffled Reactors and a conventional stirred batch reactor, in which the important predictor of solid acid activity was recognized to be the length of the fatty acid chain. Constant esterification inside the Oscillatory Baffled Reactors enhanced ester synthesis when compared to the batch operation because of the water by-product is constantly removed from the zone of catalyst reaction, proofing the flexibility of the Oscillatory Baffled Reactors for heterogeneous flow chemistry and key potential roles as a new clean catalytic technology.
No Oscillation
Oscillation
Net flow out
Baffled tube
Net flow in
Oscillation
Sedimentation
Uniform suspension
Upstroke
Down stroke
Figure 2:Flow sheet of an oscillatory baffled reactor and it mixing features. Also illustrating the solid acid catalyst PrSO3H-SBA-15 undergoing no oscillation but sedimentation and or with about 4.5Hz oscillation traped in the baffles. Figures exuracted from (Eze et al., 2013)
In the production of biodiesel by TAG transesterification with methanol phase equilibrium considerations are significant, given that the alcohol and reactant are usually immiscible, while the FAME product is miscible, obstructing retarding reaction and mass transport. More complexity and production cost is added due to the need to separate and purify the product phase, which comprises of a mixture of solid catalyst, unreacted oil, biodiesel and glycerol (Lee et al., 2014). These challenges could be lessened by using membrane reactors (Baroutian et al., 2011; Falahati & Tremblay, 2012; Xu et al., 2014). where the semi-permeable material of which the reactor walls are made is designed to permit the passage of the FAME or glycerol phase, whereas the oil-rich or MeOH emulsion is retained for more reaction. However, a MCM-41 supported p-toluenesulfonic acid catalyst was used by Xu et al., (2014) to pack a ceramic membrane tube for the transesterification of a recirculating soybean oil and methanol feed (Figure 3a). It is worthy of note that membrane reactor produced higher biodiesel compared to a homogeneous p-toluenesulfonic acid catalyst under similar conditions in batch mode (84% against 66%). Furthermore, recycling of catalyst showed just a little reduction of activity, generally at the end of the third cycle with about 92% of original activity. The production of biodiesel was usually a strong function of circulation velocity; meanwhile lower velocities enhanced permeation efficiency, whereas high velocities improved mixing intensity of the reactant. Even though membrane reactors provide efficient transesterification and separation, yet high volumes of catalyst is still required, for instance, 157g of a microporous TiO2/Al2O3 membrane packed with potassium hydroxide is employed by a 202cm3 continuous reactor supported on palm shell activated carbon to increase the quality of methyl esters produced from palm oil (Figure 3b) (Baroutian et al., 2011).
|
(a) Biodiesel Glycerol Circulating pump Mixing vessel Membrane reactor Preheater Methanol Oil Cooler Membrane tube back pressure valve P Catalyst (b) 1. KOH/AC Catalyst 2. TiO2/Al2O3 Membrane 3. Permeate Stream 4. Retentate stream 5. FAME 6. Glycerol 7. Methanol 8. Triglyceride
Figure 3: Diagram of membrane reactors for producing biodiesel in transesterification reaction through (a) Solid acid catalyst and (b) base catalysts. |
Both continuous (Lozano et al., 2011; X. Wang et al., 2011) and batch modes (Lv et al., 2010) has recorded an enzymatic catalyzed biodiesel production. Although, a range of lipase biocatalysts has been developed by nature for the selective production of FAME at low temperature of the reaction, which can withstand high FFA levels (Bajaj et al., 2010) Such biocatalysts are allowed to be employed in continuous mode with low methanol to oil ratios due to immobilisation on solid supports (Watanabe et al., 2000). Nevertheless, long residence times, low biodiesel yields and high enzyme costs are some of the several shortcomings of biocatalysts. More so, some of the enzymes could as well be deactivated by short chain alcohols and the glycerol by-product (Bélafi-Bakó, Kovács, Gubicza, & Hancsók, 2002); however, these problems could be defeated by using organic solvents to extract the glycerol and alcohols, nevertheless it further increase the cost and complexity, as well as weakens the green credentials of biodiesel production. In other to prevent the enzyme fro been denatured, the enzyme has to operate in the presence of water, but for the biodiesel to meet the biodiesel standards of less than 0.05% of water volume; this excess water has to be subsequently removed from the resulting fuel, meanwhile the drying process introduces additional costs. However, using of near-critical (Lee et al., 2013) or supercritical CO2(Cao et al., 2007; Cao et al., 2009) as a reaction medium to decrease enzymatic inhibition by methanol is an alternative approach, thus boost oil solubility and diffusion, as well as aid catalyst/biodiesel separation through simple depressurisation.
Microwaves (Mazubert et al., 2014; Wali et al., 2012) and ultrasound (Gole & Gogate, 2012; Gude & Grant, 2013) have already been investigated by scientist as a way by which heat and mass transfer limitations can be eliminated, as well as reducing the residence time in other to attain a high biodiesel conversions. Gude et al. used ultrasound rather than thermal heating for the transesterification of waste cooking oil (Gude & Grant, 2013) this allows for an efficient heating up to a temperature of 60–65 OC along with reducing the reaction times to 1–2 minutes. A similar observation was made by Chand et al., in which they noticed progress in heat transfer and reaction time when using ultrasonication to soybean oil transesterification (Chand et al., 2010). Although, both groups utilized a homogeneous NaOH catalyst, which hampered the purification of the product. Salamatinia et al. used ulterasound and a heterogeneous catalyst for continuous biodiesel synthesis from palm oil (Salamatinia et al., 2010). While testing BaO and SrO catalysts, ultrasound was discovered to again lower the reaction times and thus the catalyst loadings required to attain less than 95% FAME synthesis.
From the cost analysis of an ultrasonic technique it was suggested that it would be three times cheaper to operate conventionally heated continuous biodiesel reactor rather than an ultrasonic process (Chand et al., 2010). Even at that, the origin of ultrasonic enhancements regarding reaction mixing through cavitation or microstreaming, is still an important topic for debate (Choudhury et al., 2014). However for the transesterification of waste cooking oil, microwaves have been coupled with continuous flow reactors which accelerates the production of biodiesel when compared to conventional thermal heating, thus increases throughput (Wali et al., 2012). Even though few innovative combinations of catalysts obtained from solid waste (eggshell) and microwaves are emerging but up till date large number of microwave studied still focus on homogeneously catalysed processes (Khemthong et al., 2012). However, less catalyst and solvent is require by such microwave systems. Conversely, the limiting factor is the depth of the microwave penetration (Mazubert et al., 2014) that could hamper scale-up from laboratory reactor designs, uncontrolled and irregular heat distribution could lead to ‘hot spots’ and ‘cold spots’ (Gole & Gogate, 2012; Mazubert et al., 2014).
6.0. Conclusions
Many researches revealed rise in price of food and hunger treats to be seriously associated to the continuous use of edible oils either from animal or plant as a source of biodiesel feedstock. Meanwhile, several species of algae can be cultivated having little or no environmental challenges to produce high grade biodiesel using methods such as transesterification and oil extraction which are generally similar to the methods used to cultivate normal edible plants. Interestingly, even salty environments do not prevent its cultivation, due to their ability to utilize CO2 when growing, as such appropriate for environmental management. These properties stated and more will definitely increase their future use and consideration as sustainable feedstocks. The use of heterogeneous catalysts from oxide, zeolites and their derivatives in transesterification is always of great industrial interest and attention. At the end of the transesterification process the solid bases and acids catalysts could be recovered, recycled and reused moreover they are potentially less expensive and to the fatty acids present in the feed they are extremely less sensitive. They usually generate highly purified biodiesel that has remarkable properties of international standard especially when effectively and well constructed. Nevertheless, further studies should be made on the appropriate mechanisms of reaction and the methods by which many of these catalysts can be used to optimize triglyceride esters conversion. In improving biodiesel production and enhancing the adsorption-desorption of the reactants, good dispersion of catalysts particles, optimal temperature and the nature of the active phase or support are prospective advancement in this method. Zeolite catalysts must be customized in a way that the frameworks should have the required basic or acidic properties and porosity. It must be carefully handled to prevent pore blockage that may result to competitive transesterification versus cracking process when doped with metals or oxides.
It is important to also identify less expensive methods of oil extraction and algae cultivation. More so, investigation on more affordable algae species that is highly rich in oil at the same time has faster growth rate in specific environments should be intensified.
Hence, more research should be conducted in other to determine the most suitable heterogeneous catalysts, their mechanism of action(s) and most favorable conditions for their reaction. Oxides and zeolites showed greater prospect in formaldehyde, diols, allyl alcohols, oleifins, methane and hydrogen fuel (liquid and gaseous products) production, and in the production of other liquid hydrocarbons such as diesel and light naphtha. Glycerol carbonate and derived alcohols such as 1, 3-ditert-butoxypropan-2-ol, are other important products with outstanding properties such as combustion improver for diesel fuel. More research should be encouraged with the aim of improving their performance.
The distributed biodiesel production will be facilitated by alternative reactor technologies and process intensification through for example reactive distillation and oscillatory flow reactors. In other for biodiesel to remain an important player in renewable energy sector in this 21st century, it is critical to facilitate and pursue technical advances in both materials chemistry and reactor engineering.
References
1. Alba-Rubio, A., Santamaría-González, J., Mérida-Robles, J., Moreno-Tost, R., Martín-Alonso, D., Jiménez-López, A., & Maireles-Torres, P. (2010). Heterogeneous transesterification processes by using CaO supported on zinc oxide as basic catalysts. Catalysis Today, 149(3–4), 281–287.
2. Alsalme, A., Kozhevnikova, E., & Kozhevnikov, I. (2008). Heteropoly acids as catalysts for liquid-phase esterification and transesterification. Applied Catalysis A: General, 349(1–2), 170–176. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2008.07.027
3. Anderson, Beaton, Galadima, & Wells. (2009). Role of baria dispersion in BaO/Al2O3 catalysts for transesterification. Catalysis Letters, 131(1–2), 213–218. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-009-0051-7
4. Aransiola, Ojumu, Oyekola, Madzimbamuto, & Ikhu-Omoregbe. (2014). A review of current technology for biodiesel production: State of the art. Biomass and Bioenergy, 61, 276–297. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.11.014
5. Archanaa, Moise, S., & Suraishkuma. (2010). Chlorophyll interference in microalgal lipid quantification through the Bligh and Dyer method. Biomass and Bioenergy, 46, 805–808.
6. Athanassiou, Grass, & Stark. (2006). Large-scale production of carbon -coated copper nanoparticles for sensor applications. Nanotechnology, 17(6), 9–11.
7. Aulenbach, Shammas, Wang, & Marvin. (2010). Algae Removal by Flotation. Environmental Engineering, 12(2010), 363–399. http://doi.org/Doi 10.1007/978-1-60327-133-2_11
8. Baerdemaeker, T. De, Lemmens, B., Dotremont, C., Fret, J., Roef, L., Goiris, K., & Diels, L. (2013). Benchmark study on algae harvesting with backwashable submerged flat panel membranes. Bioresource Technology, 129, 582–591. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.153
9. Bajaj, A., Lohan, P., Jha, P. N., & Mehrotra, R. (2010). Biodiesel production through lipase catalyzed transesterification: An overview. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, 62(1), 9–14. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.09.018
10. Banerjee, C., Ghosh, S., Sen, G., Mishra, S., Shukla, P., & Bandopadhyay, R. (2014). Study of algal biomass harvesting through cationic cassia gum, a natural plant based biopolymer. Bioresource Technology, 151, 6–11. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.035
11. Banerjee, S., Clancy, C., & Crome, I. (2002). Co-existing problems of mental disorder and substance misuse (dual diagnosis). An Information Manual–2002. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists Research Unit.
12. Baroutian, S., Aroua, M., Raman, A. A., & Sulaiman, N. (2011). A packed bed membrane reactor for production of biodiesel using activated carbon supported catalyst. Bioresource Technology, 102(2), 1095–1102. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.076
13. Barrut, B., Blancheton, J.-P., Muller-Feuga, A., René, F., Narváez, C., Champagne, J.-Y., & Grasmick, A. (2012). Separation efficiency of a vacuum gaslift for microalgae harvesting. Bioresource Technology, 128, 235–240. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.056
14. Baya, D. T., Tangou, T. T., Effebi, K. R., Vasel, J. L., Cited, C. S., Baya, M. L. A., … Chemical, E. (2016). Caractérisation des phénomènes d’auto?flocculation, de. Biotechnology Agron. Soc. Envrironment, 18, 75–82.
15. Becker. (2007). Micro algae as a source of protein. Biotechnol Adv, 25, 207–210. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.11.002
16. Bélafi-Bakó, Kovács, Gubicza, & Hancsók. (2002). Enzymatic Biodiesel Production from Sunflower Oil by Candida antarctica Lipase in a Solvent-free System. Biocatalysis and Biotransformation, 20(6), 437–439. http://doi.org/10.1080/1024242021000040855
17. Benoufella, Laplanche, Boisdon, & Bourbigot. (1994). Elimination of microcystis cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) by an ozoflotation process: A pilot plant study. Water Science and Technology, 30(8), 245–257. Retrieved from http://wst.iwaponline.com/content/30/8/245
18. Besson, A., & Guiraud, P. (2013). Bioresource Technology High-pH-induced flocculation – flotation of the hypersaline microalga Dunaliella salina. Bioresource Technology, 147, 464–470. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.053
19. Bilad, Discart, Vandamme, Foubert, Muylaert, & Vankelecom, I. (2013). Harvesting microalgal biomass using a magnetically induced membrane vibration (MMV) system: Filtration performance and energy consumption. Bioresource Technology, 138, 329–338. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.175
20. Birla, A., Singh, B., Upadhyay, & Sharma. (2012). Kinetics studies of synthesis of biodiesel from waste frying oil using a heterogeneous catalyst derived from snail shell. Bioresource Technology, 106, 95–100. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.065
21. Borges, L., Moura, N., Costa, A., Braga, P., Dias, J., Dias, S., … Ghesti, G. (2013). Applied Catalysis A : General Investigation of biodiesel production by HUSY and Ce / HUSY zeolites : Influence of structural and acidity parameters. Applied Catalysis A, General, 450, 114–119. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2012.10.009
22. Borges, & Díaz. (2012). Recent developments on heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production by oil esterification and transesterification reactions : A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2839–2849.
23. Brennan, L., Owende, P., Brennana, L., & Owende, P. (2010). Biofuels from microalgae-A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(2), 557–577. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.009
24. Brito, Borges, & Otero. (2007). Zeolite Y as a heterogeneous catalyst in biodiesel fuel production from used vegetable oil. Energy and Fuels, 21(6), 3280–3283. http://doi.org/10.1021/ef700455r
25. Buchaly, C., Kreis, P., & Górak, A. (2012). N-propyl propionate synthesis via catalytic distillation - Experimental investigation in pilot-scale. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 51(2), 891–899. http://doi.org/10.1021/ie102225t
26. Campbell, M. (2008). Biodiesel : Algae as a Renewable Source for Liquid Fuel. Guelph Engineering Journal, (1), 2–7. http://doi.org/1916-1107
27. Campo, N., Hernández, A., Centeno, B., & Gandía, O. (2010). Synthesis of biodiesel from the methanolysis of sunflower oil using PURAL ® Mg – Al hydrotalcites as catalyst precursors. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 100(1–2), 299–309.
28. Cao, F., Chen, Y., Zhai, F., Li, J., Wang, J., Wang, X., … Zhu, W. (2008). Biodiesel production from high acid value waste frying oil catalyzed by superacid heteropolyacid. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 101(1), 93–100. http://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21879
29. Cao, P., Tremblay, A., Dubé, M., & Morse, K. (2007). Effect of Membrane Pore Size on the Performance of a Membrane Reactor for Biodiesel Production. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 46(1), 52–58. http://doi.org/10.1021/ie060555o
30. Cao, P., Tremblay, A., Dube, M., & Tremblay. (2009). Kinetics of Canola Oil Transesterification in a Membrane Reactor Kinetics of Canola Oil Transesterification in a Membrane Reactor. Society, 48(January), 2533–2541. http://doi.org/10.1021/ie8009796
31. Carelli, A., Brevedan, M. I., & Crapiste, G. (1997). Quantitative determination of phospholipids in sunflower oil. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 74(5), 511–514. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-997-0173-2
32. Cerón, C., Campos, I., Sánchez, J., Acién, F., Molina, E., & Fernández-Sevilla, J. (2008). Recovery of lutein from microalgae biomass: Development of a process for Scenedesmus almeriensis biomass. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56(24), 11761–11766. http://doi.org/10.1021/jf8025875
33. Chand, P., Chintareddy, V. R., Verkade, J., & Grewell, D. (2010). Enhancing biodiesel production from soybean oil using ultrasonics. Energy and Fuels, 24(3), 2010–2015. http://doi.org/10.1021/ef9011752
34. Chen, C. Y., Liu, C. H., Lo, Y. C., & Chang, J. S. (2011). Perspectives on cultivation strategies and photobioreactor designs for photo-fermentative hydrogen production. Bioresource Technology, 102(18), 8484–8492. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.082
35. Cheng, Y., Feng, Y., Ren, Y., Liu, X., Gao, A., He, B., … Li, J. (2012). Comprehensive kinetic studies of acidic oil continuous esterification by cation-exchange resin in fixed bed reactors. Bioresource Technology, 113, 65–72. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.140
36. Chin, Hameed, & Ahmad. (2009). Process optimization for biodiesel production from waste cooking palm oil (Elaeis guineensis) using response surface methodology. Energy Fuels, 23, 1040–1044. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2005.05.014.dc.description.abstract
37. Chisti, Y. (2007). Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnology Advances Volume, 25(3), 294–306. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.02.001
38. Chisti, Y. (2008). Biodiesel from microalgae beats bioethanol. Trends in Biotechnology, 26(3), 126–131.
39. Cho, Y. B., & Seo, G. (2010). High activity of acid-treated quail eggshell catalysts in the transesterification of palm oil with methanol. Bioresource Technology, 101(22), 8515–8519.
40. Choi, H. S., Choi, Y. S., & Park, H. C. (2012). Fast pyrolysis characteristics of lignocellulosic biomass with varying reaction conditions. Renewable Energy, 42, 131–135. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.08.049
41. Choudhury, Chakma, & Moholkar. (2014). Mechanistic insight into sonochemical biodiesel synthesis using heterogeneous base catalyst. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 21(1), 169–181. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.04.010
42. Chouhan, S., & Sarma. (2011). Modern heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(9), 4378–4399. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.112
43. Converti, A., Casazza, A., Ortiz, E., Perego, P., & Borghi, M. Del. (2009). Effect of temperature and nitrogen concentration on the growth and lipid content of Nannochloropsis oculata and Chlorella vulgaris for biodiesel production. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 48(6), 1146–1151.
44. Coward, T., Lee, J., & Caldwell, G. (2014). Harvesting microalgae by CTAB-aided foam flotation increases lipid recovery and improves fatty acid methyl ester characteristics. Biomass and Bioenergy, 67(0), 354–362. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.05.019
45. Cristina, C., Ribeiro, S. N., & Souza, M. (2010). Biodiesel production from soybean oil and methanol using hydrotalcites as catalyst. Fuel Processing Technology, 91(2), 205–210.
46. de la Iglesia, Ó., Mallada, R., Menéndez, M., & Coronas, J. (2007). Continuous zeolite membrane reactor for esterification of ethanol and acetic acid. Chemical Engineering Journal, 131(1–3), 35–39. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2006.12.015
47. Demirbas, A., & Fatih Demirbas. (2011). Importance of algae oil as a source of biodiesel. Energy Conversion and Management, 52(1), 163–170. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.055
48. Deng, X., Fang, Z., Liu, Y., & Yu, C.-L. (2011). Production of biodiesel from Jatropha oil catalyzed by nanosized solid basic catalyst. Energy, 36(2), 777–784.
49. Dias, J., Alvim-Ferraz, M., Almeida, M., Méndez Díaz, J., Polo, M. S., & Utrilla, J. R. (2012). Selection of heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production from animal fat. Fuel, 94, 418–425. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.10.069
50. Dias, J. M., Alvim-Ferraz, M. C. M., Almeida, M. F., Méndez Díaz, J. D., Polo, M. S., & Utrilla, J. R. (2012). Selection of heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production from animal fat. Fuel, 94, 418–425. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.10.069
51. Dong, Wang, Miao, Zheng, & Chen. (2013). Two-step in situ biodiesel production from microalgae with high free fatty acid content. Bioresource Technology, 136, 8–15. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.105
52. Dote, Y., Sawayama, S., Inoue, S., Minowa, T., & Yokoyama, S. ya. (1994). Recovery of liquid fuel from hydrocarbon-rich microalgae by thermochemical liquefaction. Fuel, 73(12), 1855–1857. http://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(94)90211-9
53. Encinara, González, Pardal, & Martínez. (2010). Rape oil transesterification over heterogeneous catalysts. Fuel Processing Technology, 91(11), 1530–1536.
54. Eriksen, N. T. (2008). The technology of microalgal culturing. Biotechnology Letters, 30(9), 1525–1536. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-008-9740-3
55. Eze, V., Phan, A., Pirez, C., Harvey, A., Lee, A., & Wilson, K. (2013). Heterogeneous catalysis in an oscillatory baffled flow reactor. Catalysis Science & Technology, 3(9), 2373. http://doi.org/10.1039/c3cy00282a
56. Falahati, & Tremblay. (2012). The effect of flux and residence time in the production of biodiesel from various feedstocks using a membrane reactor. Fuel, 91(1), 126–133. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.06.019
57. Farooq, W., Moon, M., Ryu, B. gon, Suh, W., Shrivastav, A., Park, M., … Yang, J. W. (2015). Effect of harvesting methods on the reusability of water for cultivation of chlorella vulgaris, its lipid productivity and biodiesel quality. Algal Research, 8, 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2014.12.007
58. Galadima, A., & Muraza, O. (2014). Biodiesel production from algae by using heterogeneous catalysts : A critical review. Energy, 78, 72–83.
59. Gao, L., Teng, G., Xiao, G., & Wei, R. (2010). Biodiesel from palm oil via loading KF / Ca – Al hydrotalcite catalyst. Biomass and Bioenergy, 34(9), 1283–1288.
60. Gao, S., Yang, J., Tian, J., Ma, F., Tu, G., & Du, M. (2010). Electro-coagulation-flotation process for algae removal. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 177(1–3), 336–343. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.037
61. Garg, S., Wang, L., & Schenk, P. (2014). Effective harvesting of low surface-hydrophobicity microalgae by froth flotation. Bioresource Technology, 159, 437–441. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.030
62. Gerardo, M., Hende, V. Den, Vervaeren, H., Coward, T., & Skill, S. (2015). Harvesting of microalgae within a biore fi nery approach : A review of the developments and case studies from pilot-plants. Algal Research Journal, 11, 248–262. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.06.019
63. Giannakopoulou, K., Lukas, M., Vasiliev, A., Brunner, C., & Schnitzer, H. (2010). Conversion of rapeseed cake into bio-fuel in a batch reactor: Effect of catalytic vapor upgrading. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 128(1–3), 126–135. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.08.022
64. Goh, A. (1986). Production of microalgae using pig waste as a substrate. Algal Biomass Technologies1, 235–244.
65. Gole, V., & Gogate, P. (2012). A review on intensification of synthesis of biodiesel from sustainable feed stock using sonochemical reactors. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 53, 1–9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2011.12.008
66. Golueke, & Oswald. (1965). Harvesting and processing sewage-grown planktonic algae. Water Pollution Control Federation, 37(4), 471–498. http://doi.org/10.3417/2008043
67. Gouveia, Nobre, Marcelo, Mrejen, Cardoso, & Palavra. (2007). Functional food oil coloured by pigments extracted from microalgae with supercritical CO 2. Food Chemistry, 101(2), 717–723.
68. Grima, M., Belarbi, Fernández, A., Robles Medina, & Chisti, Y. (2003). Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites: Process options and economics. Biotechnology Advances, 20(7–8), 491–515. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(02)00050-2
69. Grobbelaar, J. (2010). Microalgal biomass production: challenges and realities. Photosynthesis Research, 106(1–2), 135–144. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-010-9573-5
70. Grouchko, M., Kamyshny, A., & Magdassi, S. (2009). Formation of air-stable copper–silver core–shell nanoparticles for inkjet printing. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 19(19), 3057. http://doi.org/10.1039/b821327e
71. Guan, G., Kusakabe, K., & Yamasaki, S. (2009). Tri-potassium phosphate as a solid catalyst for biodiesel production from waste cooking oil. Fuel Processing Technology, 90(4), 520–524.
72. Gude, V. G., & Grant, G. E. (2013). Biodiesel from waste cooking oils via direct sonication. Applied Energy, 109, 135–144. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.002
73. Guo, F., Peng, Z.-G., Dai, J.-Y., & Xiu, Z.-L. (2010). Calcined sodium silicate as solid base catalyst for biodiesel production. Fuel Processing Technology, 91(3), 322–328.
74. Guo, Y., Jiang, B., Chen, J. zhong, & Zhang, S. (2007). A catalytic oxidation approach to coat copper powder with polyaniline. Surface and Coatings Technology, 202(3), 555–558. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.06.062
75. Guo, Y., Yu, X., & Chen, J. (2009). Preparation and oxidation protection of beta-CuSCN coatings for fine copper powder. Corrosion Science, 51(8), 1573–1577. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2009.05.021
76. Halim, R., Danquah, M., & Webley, P. (2012). Extraction of oil from microalgae for biodiesel production: A review. Biotechnology Advances, 30(3), 709–732.
77. Hanotu, J., Bandulasena, H., & Zimmerman, W. (2012). Microflotation performance for algal separation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 109(7), 1663–1673. http://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24449
78. Hara, M. (2010). Biomass conversion by a solid acid catalyst. Energy Environ. Sci., 3, 601–607. http://doi.org/10.1039/b922917e
79. Harman-Ware, A., Morgan, T., Wilson, M., Crocker, M., Zhang, J., Liu, K., … Debolt, S. (2013). Microalgae as a renewable fuel source: Fast pyrolysis of Scenedesmussp. Renewable Energy, 60, 625–632. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.06.016
80. Hu, Q., Sommerfeld, M., Jarvis, E., Ghirardi, M., Posewitz, M., Seibert, M., & Darzins, A. (2008). Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: Perspectives and advances. Plant Journal, 54(4), 621–639. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03492.x
81. Hu, Z., Zheng, Y., Yan, F., Xiao, B., & Liu, S. (2013). Bio-oil production through pyrolysis of blue-green algae blooms (BGAB): Product distribution and bio-oil characterization. Energy, 52, 119–125. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.059
82. Huang, C., Chen, X., Liu, T., Yang, Z., Xiao, Y., Zeng, G., & Sun, X. (2012). Harvesting of Chlorella sp. using hollow fiber ultrafiltration. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 19(5), 1416–1421. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0812-5
83. Hwang, T., Park, S. J., Oh, Y. K., Rashid, N., & Han, J. I. (2013). Harvesting of Chlorella sp. KR-1 using a cross-flow membrane filtration system equipped with an anti-fouling membrane. Bioresource Technology, 139, 379–382. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.149
84. Ilgen, O. (2011). Dolomite as a heterogeneous catalyst for transesterification of canola oil. Fuel Processing Technology, 92(3), 452–455.
85. Jacob, Genish, Klein, & Gedanken. (2006). Carbon-coated core shell structured copper and nickel nanoparticles synthesized in an ionic liquid. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 110(36), 17711–17714. http://doi.org/10.1021/jp063842e
86. Jacobson, K., Gopinath, R., Meher, L. C., & Dalai, A. K. (2008). Solid acid catalyzed biodiesel production from waste cooking oil. Applied Catalysis B : Environment, 85(1–2), 86–91.
87. Jeevan Kumar, Vijay Kumar, G., Dash, A., Scholz, P., & Banerjee, R. (2017). Sustainable green solvents and techniques for lipid extraction from microalgae: A review. Algal Research, 21, 138–147. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2016.11.014
88. Jothiramalingam, R., & Wang, M. K. (2009). Review of Recent Developments in Solid Acid, Base, and Enzyme Catalysts (Heterogeneous) for Biodiesel Production via Transesterification. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 48, 6162–6172. http://doi.org/10.1021/ie801872t
89. Jung, Lee, Kang, & Park. (2011). Air-stable silver-coated copper particles of sub-micrometer size. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 364(2), 574–581. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.08.033
90. Katada, N., Hatanaka, T., Ota, M., Yamada, K., Okumura, K., & Niwa, M. (2009). Biodiesel production using heteropoly acid-derived solid acid catalyst H4PNbW11O40/WO3-Nb2O5. Applied Catalysis A: General, 363(1–2), 164–168. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2009.05.012
91. Kazemian, H., Turowec, B., Siddiquee, M., & Rohani, S. (2013). Biodiesel production using cesium modified mesoporous ordered silica as heterogeneous base catalyst. Fuel, 103, 719–724. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.07.058
92. Keith, C., James, G., Scott, W., & Patrik, C. (1987). Fluorometric determination of the neutral lipid content of microalgal cells using Nile Red. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 6, 333–345. http://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7012(87)90019-4
93. Khemthong, Luadthong, Nualpaeng, Changsuwan, Tongprem, Viriya-Empikul, & Faungnawakij. (2012). Industrial eggshell wastes as the heterogeneous catalysts for microwave-assisted biodiesel production. Catalysis Today, 190(1), 112–116. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2011.12.024
94. Kim, D. G., La, H. J., Ahn, C. Y., Park, Y. H., & Oh, H. M. (2011). Harvest of Scenedesmus sp. with bioflocculant and reuse of culture medium for subsequent high-density cultures. Bioresource Technology, 102(3), 3163–3168. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.108
95. Kim, J., Yoo, G., Lee, H., Lim, J., Kim, K., Kim, C. W., … Yang, J. W. (2013). Methods of downstream processing for the production of biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnology Advances, 31(6), 862–876. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.04.006
96. Kim, M. J., Kim, M.-Y., Kwon, Z., & Seo, G. (2011). Transesterification of vegetable oils over a phosphazenium hydroxide catalyst incorporated onto silica. Fuel Processing Technology, 92(1), 126–131.
97. Kim, Choi, Ahn, Park, Park, & Oh, H. M. (2005). Harvesting of Spirulina platensis by cellular flotation and growth stage determination. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 40(3), 190–194. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01654.x
98. Kiss, A. a., Dimian, A., & Rothenberg, G. (2006). Solid Acid Catalysts for Biodiesel Production –-Towards Sustainable Energy. Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis, 348(1–2), 75–81. http://doi.org/10.1002/adsc.200505160
99. Kiss, A. a, Dimian, A., & Rothenberg, G. (2008). Biodiesel by Catalytic Reactive Distillation Powered by Metal Oxides Biodiesel by Catalytic Reactive Distillation Powered by Metal Oxides. Energy & Fuel, 22, 598–604. http://doi.org/10.1021/ef700265y
100. Kouzu, M., Jusuke Hidakad Show, & , Takekazu Kasunob, Masahiko Tajikab, Yoshikazu Sugimotoc, S. Y. (2017). Calcium oxide as a solid base catalyst for transesterification of soybean oil and its application to biodiesel production. Fuel, 2007–2009.
101. Krohn, B., McNeff, C., Yan, B., & Nowlan, D. (2011). Production of algae-based biodiesel using the continuous catalytic Mcgyan process. Bioresource Technology, 102(1), 94–100. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.035
102. Kulkarni, A., Zeyer, K. P., Jacobs, T., & Kienle, A. (2007). Miniaturized systems for homogeneously and heterogeneously catalyzed liquid-phase esterification reaction. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 46(16), 5271–5277. http://doi.org/10.1021/ie060411
103. Kumar, K., Dasgupta, C. N., Nayak, B., Lindblad, P., & Das, D. (2011). Development of suitable photobioreactors for CO2 sequestration addressing global warming using green algae and cyanobacteria. Bioresource Technology, 102(8), 4945–4953. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.054
104. Lam, M. K., Lee, K. T., & Mohamed, A. R. (2009). Sulfated tin oxide as solid superacid catalyst for transesterification of waste cooking oil : An optimization study. Applied Catalysis B:Environmental, 93(1–2), 134–139.
105. Lam, Lee, & Mohamed. (2010). Homogeneous, heterogeneous and enzymatic catalysis for transesterification of high free fatty acid oil (waste cooking oil) to biodiesel: A review. Biotechnology Advances, 28(4), 500–518.
106. Lee, A. F., Bennett, J., Manayil, J., & Wilson, K. (2014). Heterogeneous catalysis for sustainable biodiesel production via esterification and transesterification. Chemical Society Reviews, 43, 7887–7916. http://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00189c
107. Lee, M., Lee, D., Cho, J., Kim, S., & Park, C. (2013). Enzymatic biodiesel synthesis in semi-pilot continuous process in near-critical carbon dioxide. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 171(5), 1118–1127. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0189-z
108. Lei, X., Chen, Y., Shao, Z., Chen, Z., Li, Y., Zhu, H., & Zhang, J. (2015). Effective harvesting of the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris via flocculation – flotation with bioflocculant. Bioresource Technology Volume, 198, 922–925.
109. Li, J., & Liu, C. (2009). Carbon-coated copper nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization and optical properties. New Journal of Chemistry, 33(7), 1474. http://doi.org/10.1039/b906796e
110. Li, J., Liu, C. Y., & Xie, Z. (2011). Synthesis and surface plasmon resonance properties of carbon-coated Cu and Co nanoparticles. Materials Research Bulletin, 46(5), 743–747. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.01.014
111. Lim, S., & Teong, L. K. (2010). Recent trends, opportunities and challenges of biodiesel in Malaysia: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(3), 938–954. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.027
112. Liu, C., Lv, P., Yuan, Z., Yan, F., & Luo, W. (2010). The nanometer magnetic solid base catalyst for production of biodiesel. Renewable Energy, 35(7), 1531–1536.
113. Liu, X., He, H., Wang, Y., Zhu, S., & Piao, X. (2008). Transesterification of soybean oil to biodiesel using CaO as a solid base catalyst. Fuel, 87(2), 216–221. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2007.04.013
114. Liu, Chen, & Ju. (2006). Separation of Algal Cells from Water by Column flotation. Separation Science and Technology, 34(11), 2259–2272. http://doi.org/10.1081/SS-100100771
115. Lotero, E., Liu, Y., Lopez, D., Suwannakarn, K., Bruce, D., & Goodwin, J. (2005). Synthesis of biodiesel via acid catalysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44(14), 5353–5363. http://doi.org/10.1021/ie049157g
116. Lou, W.-Y., Zong, M.-H., & Duan, Z.-Q. (2008). Efficient production of biodiesel from high free fatty acid? containing waste oils using various carbohydrate?derived solid acid catalysts. Bioresource Technology, 99(18), 8752–8758.
117. Lozano, P., Bernal, J., & Vaultier, M. (2011). Towards continuous sustainable processes for enzymatic synthesis of biodiesel in hydrophobic ionic liquids/supercritical carbon dioxide biphasic systems. Fuel, 90(11), 3461–3467. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.06.008
118. Lv, D., Du, W., Zhang, G., & Liu, D. (2010). Mechanism study on NS81006-mediated methanolysis of triglyceride in oil/water biphasic system for biodiesel production. Process Biochemistry, 45(4), 446–450. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2009.10.017
119. Ma, H., Li, S., Wang, B., Wang, R., & Tian, S. (2008). Transesterification of Rapeseed Oil for Synthesizing Biodiesel by K/KOH/??-Al2O3 as Heterogeneous Base Catalyst. JAOCS, Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 85(3), 263–270. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-007-1188-4
120. MacArio, A., & Giordano, G. (2013). Catalytic conversion of renewable sources for biodiesel production: A comparison between biocatalysts and inorganic catalysts. Catalysis Letters, 143(2), 159–168. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-012-0949-3
121. Macario, Moliner, Diaz, Jorda, Corma, & Giordano. (2008). Biodiesel production by immobilized lipase on zeolites and related materials. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 174(B), 1011–1016. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(08)80061-4
122. Maddikeri, G., Pandit, A., & Gogate, P. (2012). Intensi fi cation Approaches for Biodiesel Synthesis from Waste Cooking Oil : A Review. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 51, 14610–14628.
123. Marija, T., Stamenković, O., & Veljković, V. (2014). Cost analysis of simulated base-catalyzed biodiesel production processes. Energy Conversion and Management, 84, 405–413. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.04.044
124. Martín, M., & Grossmann, I. (2012). Simultaneous Optimization and Heat Integration for Biodiesel Production from Cooking Oil and Algae. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 51, 7998–8014.
125. Martın, M., & Grossmann, I. (2009). Optimal Engineered Algae Composition for the Integrated Simultaneous Production of Bioethanol and Biodiesel. IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline), 7(PART 1), 405–410. http://doi.org/10.1002/aic
126. Mata, T., Martins, A., & Caetano, N. (2010). Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(1), 217–232. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.020
127. Mazubert, A., Taylor, C., Aubin, J., & Poux, M. (2014). Key role of temperature monitoring in interpretation of microwave effect on transesterification and esterification reactions for biodiesel production. Bioresource Technology, 161, 270–279. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.011
128. McNeff, C., McNeff, L., Yan, B., Nowlan, D., Rasmussen, M., Gyberg, A., … Hoye, T. (2008). A continuous catalytic system for biodiesel production. Applied Catalysis A: General, 343(1–2), 39–48. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2008.03.019
129. Melligan, Auccaise, Novotny, Leahy, Hayes, & Kwapinski. (2011). Pressurised pyrolysis of Miscanthus using a fixed bed reactor. Bioresource Technology, 102(3), 3466–3470. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.129
130. Mendes, R., Nobre, B., Cardoso, M., Pereira, A., & Palavra, A. (2003). Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of compounds with pharmaceutical importance from microalgae. Inorganica Chimica Acta, 356, 328–334.
131. Meng, X., Yang, J., Xu, X., Zhang, L., Nie, Q., & Xian, M. (2009). Biodiesel production from oleaginous microorganisms. Renewable Energy, 34(1), 1–5.
132. Mercer, P., & Armenta, R. (2011). Developments in oil extraction from microalgae. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 113(5), 539–547. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201000455
133. Miao, X., Wu, Q., & Yang, C. (2004). Fast pyrolysis of microalgae to produce renewable fuels. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 71(2), 855–863. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2003.11.004
134. Milledge, J., & Heaven, S. (2013). A review of the harvesting of micro-algae for biofuel production. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 12(2), 165–178. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-012-9301-z
135. Misra, R., Guldhe, A., Singh, P., Rawat, I., Axel, T., & Bux, F. (2015). Evaluation of operating conditions for sustainable harvesting of microalgal biomass applying electrochemical method using non sacrificial electrodes. Bioresource Technology, 176, 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.014
136. Mixson, Stikeleather, & Simmons. (2014). pH-induced flocculation, indirect electrocoagulation, and hollow fiber filtration techniques for harvesting the saltwater microalga Dunaliella. Journal of Applied Phycology, 26(4), 1701–1709. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10811
137. Morineau-Thomas, Jaouen, & Legentilhomme. (2002). The role of exopolysaccharides in fouling phenomenon during ultrafiltration of microalgae (Chlorella sp. and Porphyridium purpureum): Advantage of a swirling decaying flow. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 25(1), 35–42. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-001-0278-1
138. Muradov, N., Taha, M., Miranda, A., Wrede, D., Kadali, K., Gujar, A., … Mouradov, A. (2015). Fungal-assisted algal flocculation: application in wastewater treatment and biofuel production. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 8(1), 24. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0210-6
139. Musyoka, N., Petrik, L., & Ameer, F. (2012). Novel zeolite Na-X synthesized from fly ash as a heterogeneous catalyst in biodiesel production. Catalysis Today Volume, 190(1), 54–60.
140. Mutreja, V., Singh, S., & Ali, A. (2011). Biodiesel from mutton fat using KOH impregnated MgO as heterogeneous catalysts. Renewable Energy Volume, 36(8), 2253–2258.
141. Ndikubwimana, T., Zeng, X., He, N., Xiao, Z., Xie, Y., Chang, J. S., … Lu, Y. (2015). Microalgae biomass harvesting by bioflocculation-interpretation by classical DLVO theory. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 101, 160–167. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.05.010
142. Neto, A. M. P., Souza, R. A. S. de, Leon?Nino, A. D., Costa, J. D. A. da, Tiburcio, R. S., & Nunes, T. A. (2013). Improvement in microalgae lipid extraction using a sonication- assisted method. Renewable Energy, 55, 525–531.
143. Ngamcharussrivichai, C., Nunthasanti, P., Tanachai, S., & Bunyakiat, K. (2010). Biodiesel production through transesterification over natural calciums. Fuel Processing Technology, 91(11), 1409–1415.
144. Nurra, C., Clavero, E., Salvadó, J., & Torras, C. (2014). Vibrating membrane filtration as improved technology for microalgae dewatering. Bioresource Technology, 157, 247–253. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.115
145. Oilgae. (2017). Algae Oil Extratcion. Retrieved April 1, 2017, from http://www.oilgae.com/algae/oil/extract/%0Aextract.html
146. Olaizola, M. (2003). Commercial development of microalgal biotechnology: From the test tube to the marketplace. Biomolecular Engineering, 20(4–6), 459–466. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-0344(03)00076-5
147. Otsuka, H., & Morimura, Y. (1966). CHANGE OF FATTY ACID COMPOSITION OF CHLORELLA ELLIPSOIDEA DURING ITS CELL CYCLE. Plant Cell Physiology, 7(4), 663–670.
148. Park, H. J., Park, K. H., Jeon, J. K., Kim, J., Ryoo, R., Jeong, K. E., … Park, Y. K. (2012). Production of phenolics and aromatics by pyrolysis of miscanthus. Fuel, 97, 379–384. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.01.075
149. Park, Y.-M., Lee, J. Y., Chung, S.-H., Park, I. S., Lee, S.-Y., Kim, D.-K., … Lee, K.-Y. (2010). Esterification of used vegetable oils using the heterogeneous WO3/ZrO2 catalyst for production of biodiesel. Bioresource Technology Volume, 101(1), S59–S61.
150. Patrícya, A., Souza, F. De, Carantino, M., Colzi, A., Fares, E., Neto, A., … Bezerra, A. (2014). Comparison of pretreatment methods for total lipids extraction from mixed microalgae. Renewable Energy, 63, 762–766.
151. Peng-lim, B., Ganesan, S., Pragas, G., Khairuddean, M., & Efendi, J. (2013). A new heterogeneous acid catalyst for esterification : Optimization using response surface methodology. Energy Conversion and Management, 65, 392–396.
152. Peng, B.-X., Shu, Q., Wang, J.-F., Wang, G.-R., Wang, D.-Z., & Han, M.-H. (2008). Biodiesel production from waste oil feedstocks by solid acid catalysis. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 88(6), 441–447.
153. Perego, C., & Millini, R. (2013). Porous materials in catalysis: challenges for mesoporous materials. Chemical Society Reviews, 42(9), 3956–76. http://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35244c
154. Phan, Harvey, & Eze. (2012). Rapid Production of Biodiesel in Mesoscale Oscillatory Baffled Reactors. Chemical Engineering and Technology, 35(7), 1214–1220. http://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201200031
155. Phoochinda, & White. (2003). Removal of algae using froth flotation. Environmental Technology, 24(1), 87–96. http://doi.org/10.1080/09593330309385539
156. Plata, V., Kafarov, V., & Moreno, N. (2010). Optimization of third generation biofuels production: Biodiesel from microalgae oil by homogeneous transesterification. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 21, 1201–1206. http://doi.org/10.3303/CET1021201
157. Qian, Y., Lu, S., & Gao, F. (2012). Synthesis of copper nanoparticles/carbon spheres and application as a surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrate. Materials Letters, 81, 219–221. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2012.05.018
158. Qiu, Z., Zhao, L., & Weatherley, L. (2010). Process intensification technologies in continuous biodiesel production. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 49(4), 323–330. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2010.03.005
159. Rahul, R., Kumar, S., Jha, U., & Sen, G. (2015). Cationic inulin: A plant based natural biopolymer for algal biomass harvesting. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 72, 868–874. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.09.039
160. Ramachandran, Suganya, Gandhi, N., & Renganathan. (2013). Recent developments for biodiesel production by ultrasonic assist transesterification using different heterogeneous catalyst: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 410–418. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.057
161. Ras, M., Lardon, L., Bruno, S., Bernet, N., & Steyer, J. P. (2011). Experimental study on a coupled process of production and anaerobic digestion of Chlorella vulgaris. Bioresource Technology, 102(1), 200–206. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.146
162. Rathore, V., & Madras, G. (2007). Synthesis of biodiesel from edible and non-edible oils in supercritical alcohols and enzymatic synthesis in supercritical carbon dioxide. Fuel, 86(17–18), 2650–2659. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2007.03.014
163. Razzak, S., Hossain, M., Lucky, R., Bassi, A., & De Lasa, H. (2013). Integrated CO2 capture, wastewater treatment and biofuel production by microalgae culturing - A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, 622–653. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.063
164. Rickman, M., Pellegrino, J., & Davis, R. (2012). Fouling phenomena during membrane filtration of microalgae. Journal of Membrane Science, 423–424, 33–42. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.07.013
165. Roschat, W., Kacha, M., Yoosuk, B., Sudyoadsuk, T., & Promarak, V. (2012). Biodiesel production based on heterogeneous process catalyzed by solid waste coral fragment. Fuel, 98, 194–202. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.04.009
166. Sakai, T., Kawashima, A., & Koshikawa, T. (2009). Economic assessment of batch biodiesel production processes using homogeneous and heterogeneous alkali catalysts. Bioresource Technology, 100(13), 3268–3276. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.010
167. Salamatinia, B., Mootabadi, H., Bhatia, S., & Abdullah, A. Z. (2010). Optimization of ultrasonic-assisted heterogeneous biodiesel production from palm oil: A response surface methodology approach. Fuel Processing Technology, 91(5), 441–448. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.12.002
168. Salim, S., Bosma, R., Vermuë, M., & Wijffels. (2011). Harvesting of microalgae by bio-flocculation. Journal of Applied Phycology, 23(5), 849–855. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-010-9591-x
169. Samarasinghe, N., Fernando, S., Lacey, R., & Faulkner, W. B. (2012). Algal cell rupture using high pressure homogenization as a prelude to oil extraction. Renewable Energy, 48, 300–308.
170. Samart, C., Chaiya, C., & Reubroycharoen, P. (2010). Biodiesel production by methanolysis of soybean oil using calcium supported on mesoporous silica catalyst. Energy Conversion and Management, 51(7), 1428–1431.
171. Sandbank, E. (1979). Harvesting of microalgae from wastewater stabilization pond effluents and their utilization as a fish feed. Israel Institute of Technology.
172. Sani, Y. M., Daud, W. M. A. W., & Abdul Aziz. (2013). Solid acid-catalyzed biodiesel production from microalgal oil - The dual advantage. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 1(3), 113–121. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.04.006
173. Santacesaria, Vicente, M., Serio, D., & Tesser. (2012). Main technologies in biodiesel production : State of the art and future challenges. Catalysis Today, 195, 2–13. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2012.04.057
174. Savage, P., Duan, P., & Savage, P. (2011). Hydrothermal Liquefaction of a Microalga with Heterogeneous Catalysts Hydrothermal Liquefaction of a Microalga with Heterogeneous Catalysts. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 50, 52–61. http://doi.org/10.1021/ie100758s
175. Seo, J. Y., Lee, K., Praveenkumar, R., Kim, B., Lee, S. Y., Oh, Y. K., & Park, S. Bin. (2015). Tri-functionality of Fe3O4-embedded carbon microparticles in microalgae harvesting. Chemical Engineering Journal, 280, 206–214. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.05.122
176. Serrano, Escola, & Pizarro. (2013). Synthesis strategies in the search for hierarchical zeolites. Chemical Society Reviews, 42(9), 4004–4035. http://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35330j
177. Shantha, Decker, & Ustunol. (1992). Conjugated Linoleic Acid Concentration in Processed Cheese. JAOCS, 69(5), 425–428.
178. Sharma, Y., Singh, B., & Korstad, J. (2011). Latest developments on application of heterogenous basic catalysts for an efficient and eco friendly synthesis of biodiesel: A review. Fuel, 90(4), 1309–1324. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.10.015
179. Show, K.-Y., Lee, D.-J., & Mujumdar, A. (2015). Advances and Challenges on Algae Harvesting and Drying. Drying Technology, 33(4), 386–394. http://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2014.948554
180. Syafaini, A., Sobri, M., Haiza, N., & Yasin, M. (2017). Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering Harvesting microalgal biomass and lipid extraction for potential biofuel production : A review. Biochemical Pharmacology, 5(1), 555–563. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.12.016
181. Talebian-Kiakalaieh, A., Amin, N. A. S., Zarei, A., & Noshadi, I. (2013). Transesterification of waste cooking oil by heteropoly acid (HPA) catalyst: Optimization and kinetic model. Applied Energy, 102, 283–292. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.07.018
182. Tantirungrotechai, J., Chotmongkolsap, P., & Pohmakotr, M. (2010). Synthesis, characterization, and activity in transesterification of mesoporous Mg–Al mixed?metal oxides. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 128(1–3), 41–47.
183. Taufiq-Yap, Hussein, L., & Yunus. (2011). Calcium based mixed oxide catalysts for methanolysis of Jatropha curcas oil to biodiesel. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(2), 827–834.
184. Thangalazhy-gopakumar, S., Adhikari, S., & Ayalur, S. (2012). Bioresource Technology Catalytic pyrolysis of green algae for hydrocarbon production using H + ZSM-5 catalyst. Bioresource Technology, 118, 150–157.
185. Tran, Bartlett, Kannangara, Milev, Volk, & Wilson. (2010). Catalytic upgrading of biorefinery oil from micro-algae. Fuel, 89(2), 265–274. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.08.015
186. Uduman, N., Qi, Y., Danquah, M., Forde, G., & Hoadley, A. (2010). Dewatering of microalgal cultures: A major bottleneck to algae-based fuels. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2(1). http://doi.org/10.1063/1.3294480
187. Ugwu, Aoyagi, & Uchiyama. (2008). Photobioreactors for mass cultivation of algae. Bioresource Technology, 99(10), 4021–4028. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.046
188. Umdu, E. S., Tuncer, M., & Seker, E. (2009). Transesterification of Nannochloropsis oculata microalga’s lipid to biodiesel on Al2O3 supported CaO and MgO catalysts. Bioresource Technology, 100(11), 2828–2831. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.027
189. Vandamme, D., Foubert, I., & Muylaert, K. (2013). Flocculation as a low-cost method for harvesting microalgae for bulk biomass production. Trends in Biotechnology, 31(4), 233–239. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.12.005
190. Vazhappilly, & Chen. (1998). Heterotrophic Production Potential of Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids by Microalgae and Algae-like Microorganisms. Botanica Marina, 41(1–6), 553–558. http://doi.org/10.1515/botm.1998.41.1-6.553
191. Vergini, S., Aravantinou, A., & Manariotis, I. (2015). Harvesting of freshwater and marine microalgae by common flocculants and magnetic microparticles. Journal of Applied Phycology, 28(2), 1041–1049. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-015-0662-x
192. Verma, D., Kumar, R., Rana, B., & Sinha, A. K. (2011). Aviation fuel production from lipids by a single-step route using hierarchical mesoporous zeolites. Energy & Environmental Science, 4(5), 1667–1671. http://doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00744G
193. Verma, N. M., Mehrotra, S., Shukla, A., & Mishra, B. N. (2010). Prospective of biodiesel production utilizing microalgae as the cell factories : A comprehensive discussion. Journal of Biotechnology, 9(10), 1402–1411. http://doi.org/10.5897/AJBx09.071
194. Verziu, M., Coman, S., Richards, R., & Parvulescu, V. (2011). Transesterification of vegetable oils over CaO catalysts. Catalysis Today, 167(1), 64–70.
195. Viriya-empikul, Puttasawat, K., Chollacoop, Y., & Faungnawakij. (2010). Waste shells of mollusk and egg as biodiesel production catalysts. Bioresource Technology, 101(10), 3765–3767.
196. Volkman, Jeffrey, Nichols, Rogers, & Garland. (1989). Fatty acid and lipid composition of ten species of microalgae used in mariculture. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 128, 219–240. http://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(89)90029-4
197. Vujicic, Comic, Zarubica, Micic, & Boskovic. (2010). Kinetics of biodiesel synthesis from sunflower oil over CaO heterogeneous catalyst. Fuel, 89, 2054–2061.
198. Wali, Al-Shamma’, Hassan, K., & Cullen. (2012). Online genetic-ANFIS temperature control for advanced microwave biodiesel reactor. Journal of Process Control, 22(7), 1256–1272. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2012.05.013
199. Wang, B., Lan, C., & Horsman, M. (2012). Closed photobioreactors for production of microalgal biomasses. Biotechnology Advances, 30(4), 904–912. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.01.019
200. Wang, X., Liu, X., Zhao, C., Ding, Y., & Xu, P. (2011). Biodiesel production in packed-bed reactors using lipase-nanoparticle biocomposite. Bioresource Technology, 102(10), 6352–6355. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.003
201. Wang, Y., & Asefa, T. (2010). Poly(allylamine)-stabilized colloidal copper nanoparticles: Synthesis, morphology, and their surface-enhanced raman scattering properties. Langmuir, 26(10), 7469–7474. http://doi.org/10.1021/la904199f
202. Watanabe, Shimada, Sugihara, Noda, Fukuda, & Tominaga. (2000). Continuous production of biodiesel fuel from vegetable oil using immobilized Candida antarctica lipase. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, 77(4), 355–360. http://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/s11746-000-0058-9
203. Wawrik, B., & Harriman, B. (2010). Rapid, colorimetric quantification of lipid from algal cultures. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 80(3), 262–266. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.01.016
204. Wen, B., Zhang, J., & Wen, G. (2009). Continuous flow fixed bed biodiesel production from algae oil. In 20036 USA (Ed.), Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society (Vol. 237, p. 1155). 16th St. NW, Washington DC: Amer Chemical SOC.
205. Wen, L., Wang, Y., Hu, S., & Han, H. (2010). Preparation of KF / CaO nanocatalyst and its application in biodiesel production from Chinese tallow seed oil. Fuel, 89(9), 2267–2271.
206. Wen, Z. Y., & Chen, F. (2003). Heterotrophic production of eicosapentaenoic acid by microalgae. Biotechnology Advances, 21(4), 273–294. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(03)00051-X
207. Wen, Z., Yu, X., Tu, S.-T., Yan, J., & Dahlquist, E. (2010). Synthesis of biodiesel from vegetable oil with methanol catalyzed by Li?doped magnesium oxide catalysts. Applied Energy, 87(3), 743–748.
208. William, C. (1998). Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry methods for structural analysis of fatty acids. Lipids, 33(4), 343–353. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-998-0214-x
209. Xu, H., Miao, X., & Wu, Q. (2006). High quality biodiesel production from a microalga Chlorella protothecoides by heterotrophic growth in fermenters. Journal of Biotechnology, 126(4), 499–507. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.05.002
210. Xu, X., Luo, X., Zhuang, H., Li, W., & Zhang, B. (2003). Electroless silver coating on fine copper powder and its effects on oxidation resistance. Materials Letters, 57(24–25), 3987–3991. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(03)00252-0
211. Xu, Z., Yan, X., Pei, L., Luo, Q., & Xu, J. (2008). Changes in fatty acids and sterols during batch growth of Pavlova viridis in photobioreactor. Journal of Applied Phycology, 20(3), 237–243. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10811
212. Xu, Gao, Wang, & Xiao. (2014). Biodiesel production in a membrane reactor using MCM-41 supported solid acid catalyst. Bioresource Technology, 159, 286–291. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84896505368&partnerID=40&md5=76e77d28f11848a59b3f29348245049a
213. Yaguchi, Tanaka, Yokochi, Nakahara, & Higashihara. (1997). Production of high yields of docosahexaenoic acid by Schizochytrium sp. strain SR21. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 74(11), 1431–1434. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-997-0249-z
214. Yoosuk, B., Udomsap, P., Puttasawat, B., & Krasae, P. (2010a). Improving transesterification acitvity of CaO with hydration technique. Bioresource Technology, 101(10), 3784–3786.
215. Yoosuk, B., Udomsap, P., Puttasawat, B., & Krasae, P. (2010b). Modification of calcite by hydration-dehydration method for heterogeneous biodiesel production process: The effects of water on properties and activity. Chemical Engineering Journal, 162(1), 135–141. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.05.013
216. Yuan, Shen, Pei, Wu, & Mao. (2009). Microalgae mass production methods. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 52(4), 1275–1287. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012663213153
217. Zabeti, M., Daud, W. M. A. W., & Aroua, M. K. (2010). Biodiesel production using alumina supported calcium oxide : An optimization study. Fuel Processing Technology, 91(2), 243–248.
218. Zhang, S., Zu, Y.-G., Fu, Y.-J., Luo, M., Zhang, D.-Y., & Efferth, T. (2010). Rapid microwave assisted transesterification of yellow horn oil to biodiesel using a heteropolyacid solid catalyst. Bioresource Technology Volume, 101(3), 931–936.
219. Zhang, X., Hewson, J., Amendola, P., Reynoso, M., Sommerfeld, M., Chen, Y., & Hu, Q. (2014). Critical evaluation and modeling of algal harvesting using dissolved air flotation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 111(12), 2477–2485. http://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25300
220. Zhang, X., Hu, Q., Sommerfeld, M., Puruhito, E., & Chen, Y. (2010). Harvesting algal biomass for biofuels using ultrafiltration membranes. Bioresource Technology, 101(14), 5297–5304. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.007
221. Zhao, C., Brück, T., & Lercher, J. a. (2013). Catalytic deoxygenation of microalgae oil to green hydrocarbons. Green Chemistry, 15(7), 1720. http://doi.org/10.1039/c3gc40558c
222. Zheng, H., Yin, J., Gao, Z., Huang, H., Ji, X., & Dou, C. (2011). Disruption of Chlorella vulgaris Cells for the Release of Biodiesel?Producing Lipids: A Comparison of Grinding, Ultrasonication, Bead Milling, Enzymatic Lysis, and Microwaves. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 164(7), 1215–1224. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12010
223. Zheng, Y., Roberts, M., Kelly, J., Zhang, N., & Walker, T. (2015). Harvesting microalgae using the temperature-activated phase transition of thermoresponsive polymers. Algal Research, 11, 90–94. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.06.006
224. Zhou, W., Min, M., Hu, B., Ma, X., Liu, Y., Wang, Q., … Ruan, R. (2013). Filamentous fungi assisted bio-flocculation: A novel alternative technique for harvesting heterotrophic and autotrophic microalgal cells. Separation and Purification Technology, 107, 158–165. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.01.030
225. Zuo, H. L., Yang, F. Q., Huang, W. H., & Xia, Z. N. (2013). Preparative gas chromatography and its applications. Journal of Chromatographic Science, 51(7), 704–715. http://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bmt040
2