| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| PCN-610 | PCN-610-O500 | Benchmark - Treatment Plan Completion and Essay (Obj. 5.2 and 5.4) | 110.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| DSM/ ICD Diagnosis C1.5: Assess a client and provide a justifiable diagnosis. | 20.0% | Does not provide a DSM/ICD diagnosis. | Provides a DSM/ ICD diagnosis, but the diagnosis is missing key elements necessary for creating an effective treatment plan. | Provides an accurate DSM/ICD diagnosis, but inadequately provides citations. | Provides an accurate DSM/ICD diagnosis that fully and correctly cites the DSM/ICD. | Provides an accurate DSM/ICD diagnosis that fully and correctly cites the DSM/ICD. Clearly illustrates the connection between the primary, diagnosis, specifiers, and psychosocial stressors. |
| Mental Health, Medical, Legal, and Substance Use Issues | 15.0% | Does not describe how to address any mental health, medical, legal, and substance use issues that the client exhibits. | Describes how to address any mental health, medical, legal, and substance use issues that the client exhibits in the case study, but the information provided is inaccurate or vague. | Briefly describes how to address any mental health, medical, legal, and substance use issues that the client exhibits. | Thoroughly describes how to address any mental health, medical, legal, and substance use issues that the client exhibits and provides examples to support the information provided. | Thoroughly describes how to address any mental health, medical, legal, and substance use issues that the client exhibits and provides examples and scholarly references to support the information provided. |
| Treatment Plan | 20.0% | Does not create a treatment plan. | Creates a treatment plan, but the plan is missing one of the four main components (description of the problem, goals, objectives, and interventions). | Creates a treatment plan that includes all four main components, and incorporates the client's strengths and support system, but is missing key diagnostic information necessary for inclusion in the treatment plan. | Creates a treatment plan that includes all four main components and incorporates the client's strengths and support system. All key diagnostic information is addressed in the treatment plan. | Creates a treatment plan that includes all four main components and incorporates the client's strengths and support system. All key diagnostic information is addressed in the treatment plan. Illustrates a clear connection between the problem and the goals, objectives and suggested interventions provided. |
| Treatment Theory | 15.0% | Does not indicate a treatment theory. | Indicates a treatment theory, but the rationale for using the theory is vague or irrelevant. | Indicates a treatment theory and provides a basic, but relevant rational for using the theory. | Indicates a treatment theory and provides a thorough, relevant explanation for using the theory. | Indicates a treatment theory and provides a thorough, relevant explanation for using the theory. The rationale provided is supported with scholarly references. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Michelle_Michy
20200210185906rubric_print_format.xlsx
