Please read the attached and let me know if you have any questions. Get started! its due in 5 hours and I still need to submit! Thank you!
CLAS 1140
Paper 2 assignment
Bread and Circuses Paper Assignment 2: Emperors and the Games
Due: Wednesday, 12/4, via the Canvas Dropbox before 11:59 p.m. While there will be a small grace period for papers that come in very promptly after the deadline, a paper that is not in Dropbox by early the next morning will be penalized unless you opt to use your late pass—see syllabus. To use your late pass, please email your recitation section leader before the paper deadline.
How long: 1–2 pages, double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman (or other reasonable font), 1-inch margins. No title pages, please.
How much of my grade?: 13%
Outside sources: No research involving secondary sources is required or expected for this paper (should your paper involve a secondary source for some reason, the citation style is up to you. Chicago is conventional in Classics, but you will see examples for just about every major citation style). You are free to talk to each other about your paper, but any ideas you take from someone else have to be acknowledged. Even if you do not make use of actual ideas, a note if you discussed your paper extensively with one of your classmates is good scholarly form. The originality checker (Turnitin) is on for this assignment. For penalties for academic dishonesty, see syllabus.
Background:
We have now spent a considerable amount of time on the role of the Games in Roman society. A particular topic of interest to us has been the various ways in which politicians put entertainment to use. We have seen cases that worked out well (for example, Augustus’ mock naval battle, which was a spectacular success), things that worked out badly (most notably Caligula’s arena of horrors), and events that are ambiguous to assess (for example, Pompey’s Theater).
The masses in Rome loved the Games, but events were expensive to put on, required constant innovation to give the people something new, and any mistakes could have significant consequences for the reputation of the editor. Almost all politicians in the Roman world had to decide carefully how much effort and money they wanted to devote to arena spectacles. The issue was especially acute for emperors: there was a considerable pressure for the city of Rome to have the biggest and best games and for them to be sponsored by the emperor.
Your assignment:
You may assume that your emperor lives at a time after the major historical figures we have studied, so any primary source would count. You are concerned purely with the city of Rome and have the following venues available to you: the Colosseum, the Circus Maximus (chariot racing and other large-scale displays), the Tiber, the Theater of Pompey, and temporary stages in any other venue you can think of (e.g., the Forum). Because of the short length of the paper, if you are proposing to put on Games, I recommend that you concentrate on what you would do with one event/one venue.
Your assignment can either take the form of a “Dear Emperor” letter or an “If I were in this situation, I would recommend [x]” paper. First person statements are unavoidable and this is not quite a conventional paper. Feel free to adopt a more casual style to go with that (keeping in mind that you are advising an emperor!). Nevertheless, the assignment shares a lot of the elements of a traditional paper, most notably:
1. You need to make a clear recommendation. In traditional paper terms, this is your thesis.
2. Your recommendation needs to be rhetorically effective, which means that your paper should have a discernable introduction, body, and conclusion.
3. There needs to be explicit engagement with two or more Roman primary sources studied in this class. In other words, your understanding of how this emperor should best deal with the pressure to put on spectacles should be clearly based in the material that you have studied in this course.
Please note: There is a provision in the grading guidelines that any proposal that you make needs to be somewhat realistic. If you have questions about whether a certain technology (or animal or such) crucial to your plans is available in Rome, please ask! Likewise, if you are uncertain of what counts as a primary source (most texts and images that we have looked at do), ask!
In terms of grading, there are a total of 20 points available for this assignment, divided up as follows:
Basic parameters of the assignment (4 points)
|
Requirement |
Max. points possible |
|
Your assignment is of an appropriate length |
1 point |
|
You make a clear recommendation to the emperor |
1 point |
|
You refer to at least two primary sources studied in this course |
2 points |
Your advice to the emperor (12 points)
|
Requirement |
Max. points possible |
|
There is an introductory statement clearly indicating your recommendation (i.e., your thesis) |
2 points |
|
You accurately and effectively use at least two primary sources studied in this course to support your recommendation |
6 points |
|
Your recommendation is plausible/realistic |
2 points |
|
There is a conclusion that sums up the paper |
2 points |
Mechanics (4 points)
|
Requirement |
Max. points possible |
|
Your paper is largely free of spelling and grammatical errors |
2 points |
|
Your paper is logically organized into paragraphs |
2 points |
Tips:
· As with the first paper, this assignment has a pretty rigid prescribed structure: an introduction that clearly states your recommendation, a body (consisting of a suitable number of paragraphs—this will vary from paper to paper) that shows how you came to your recommendation, and a clear conclusion. Again, the reason for this rigid structure is found in the need for consistent grading. In addition, despite the somewhat creative prompt, this format gives you another opportunity to practice the most foundational template for a humanities paper.
· Be very careful to show clearly how your chosen primary sources support your argument (and that your chosen sources are actually primary sources). As with the first paper, you do not need to be comprehensive and explain absolutely everything that could be relevant about your source. One or two strong points per source will do very well.
· If it disrupts the flow of your argument to say things like “As is clear from Suetonius’ Life of Caligula…” in the body of your paper, just put a footnote referencing the source that you are using and then go something like “Caligula did [X] and that was a bad idea because [Y]” in the body of your paper. Don’t worry about a citation format (there is a guide for how to cite ancient sources in the “Resources” folder on Canvas, but that is a “would be nice” not a “required” for a course like this), but be clear what your source is.
· The assignment asks for at least two primary sources. It is perfectly possible to write an excellent paper with two, so more is not necessarily better. Make sure you give yourself enough room to refer to specific details in your source and to analyze it (i.e., show how it supports your argument). It is therefore unlikely that most people will have more than two or three sources.
· As you look for primary sources, don’t forget the stuff from relatively early on in the course: the riot in the amphitheater at Pompeii (Recitation 1), Spartacus (Recitation 3), and the big handout on entertainment and morals (Recitation 5) may all prove useful to you. And that is just scratching the surface.
· If you find yourself a few lines onto the third page, do not worry about it. If you are well above and cannot figure out what to cut, please talk to your recitation section leader for advice.
· If you have any questions/problems, please talk to your recitation section leader or your professor. Because of the size of the class, we will not be able to read drafts, but we are happy to discuss your ideas or help with any specific problems that you have. Please note that these conversations will be optimally productive if they happen well in advance of the deadline.
· If you are apprehensive about the mechanics of writing for a humanities class, the writing center ( https://www.colorado.edu/pwr/writing-center ) can be a fruitful (and free!) resource to work with this semester. Check their website for drop-in hours and appointment information.
1