Milestone One: Scenario Selection In Module One, you will review the Final Project Rubric and, in a paragraph, state which scenario you will use for your final project. Explain your reasons for choosing this scenario and identify what you think will be mo

JUS 455 Final Project: Case Study Ethical Analysis

Overview If you are going to work at any position in the criminal justice system, you will be faced with ethical dilemmas. This is a f act that you cannot change or control. What you can control is how you react to those situations. One wrong reaction could cost you your career. In today’s society, our actions are constantly being monitored. Now more than ever, justice workers’ actions are being called into question. While you are expected to do the righ t thing when others are watching, the true test of character is what you do when no one is watching. In the final assessment, you will play the role of criminal justice worker depicted in one of the three scenarios below. You will use the skills gained in this course to properly identify the legal dilemma(s), identify the facts relevant to each dilemma, and describe the course of action you would take and why. Additionally, you will identify what personal values you may call upon in making a decision, what duties you have based on the situation, a nd whether or not those values and duties are in conflict. This assessment addresses the following course outcomes:

 Analyze changes in society for determining their impact on ethics in law enforcement  Analyze moral foundations for their impact on ethics in the United States

 Assess the role of society for its impact on creating or changing laws

 Assess ethical boundaries of a criminal justice employee for determining an effective course of action when confronted with e thical dilemmas The project is supported by three formative milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules One, Two, and Five. The final paper will be submitted in Module Seven. Scenario #1 Joe is a corrections officer in a juvenile detention center and works on a unit housing 15 offenders, many of whom suffer from mental health problems. Joe has worked there for about two months. He feels comfortable with his job and has been accepted by the other staff members. He has not had any significant problems with the juveniles and is ge nerally enjoying his work. It is lunchtime on Monday, and Joe is in the dining room supervising the juveniles as they eat. At one table sit six juveniles, o ne of whom is a 17-year-old named Brian, whom Joe thinks has a mental disability. Brian is displaying offensive behavior that is so bad that Joe cannot eat his own meal. Brian keeps adding ketchup in vast quantities to every dish, then slurping it from the plate. Brian uses his hands instead of a fork. Brian talks with h is mouth full, causing him to spi t his food across the table in front of the other juveniles. Joe can see that the other juveniles are repulsed by Brian’s behavior and a re getting upset by his actions.

2

Joe is surprised to see his coworker and mentor Darren suddenly get up from where he i s seated, go over to Brian, grab him by his shirt, and move him away from the table. Darren takes Brian off to the kitchen and returns with a large mixing bowl. In front of everyone, Darren tell s Brian to scrape out what is left of his meal into the large bowl. Darren then takes Brian to the center of the dining room floor, puts the bowl of food on the floor, and tells him to ea t. Darren tells Brian that he has disgusting manners, and if he is going to act like an animal while eating, he may as well get dow n on the floor like a dog and eat from his bowl. Darren tells Brian to stay on the floor and lick his bowl clean, like the animal that he is. The other juveniles are visibly upset at what Darren has done. Joe does not do or say anything to Darren while this is going on, though he is taken aback by his coworker’s actions. Later, Darren explains to Joe and other staff who were present that the reason he acted this way was to shock Brian into understanding that his table manners were inappropriate. Darren thought if he used “tough love” on Brian that he would be less likely to act that way in the future. Scenario #2 You are working the midnight shift as a police officer. You receive a call to respond to a one-car accident where the car left the roadway and impacted with a tree. Upon your arrival, you see the badly damaged car up against the tree. There are no skid marks apparent and no witnesses around. You approach the car and find the apparent driver behind the wheel. You immediately recognize the driver to be the mayor of your town. You immediately notice signs that the mayor is impaired by alcohol, including the smell of an alcoholic beverage coming from his breath, the slurring of his speech, and the lethargy he is exhibiting. The mayor tells you that he swerved to avoid a dog, lost control and hit the tree. The mayor is not injured. When you ask the mayor if he has consumed alc ohol, he tells you that he was at retirement dinner and only had one glass of wine. The mayor asks you to just complete an accident report and give him a ride home. You question him further, telling him you are concerned that he was driving while impaired. The mayor tells you that he is not im paired and not to worry about anything because you never actually saw him driving. The mayor goes on to tell you that he will not say anything to anyone, and he lets you know that he has a lot of influence with what goes on at the police station, and that he has had his eye on you as an up-and-comer. You know that you could just complete an accident report identifying the cause of the accident as swerving to avoid an animal in the roadway. If you do not tell anyone that the mayor was drinking and he does not tell anyone, what is the worst that could happen? Scenario #3 You are a new officer. An armed robbery takes place on your route where the store clerk has been stabbed and you respond with numerous other, more experienced officers. At the scene, you and another experienced officer find a car parked in an odd manner, adjacent to the store that got robbed. One officer reviews the surveillance footage and is able to broadcast a description of the suspect. You run the license plate on the car you found and learn that the owner matches the general description of the suspect. Additionally, you learn that the registered owner of the car only lives a couple of blocks away. You and the more experienced officer respond to this address to attempt to locate the car owner and see if they were involved. When you get to the apartment of the registered owner, you notice that the lights are on within the apartment and you can hear noises coming from within. No one responds to your knocks on the door. You radio this information into the shift commander, and ask permission to kick the door in based upon the circumstances. The shift commander radios back that you should not enter, and to secure the apartment until detectives arrive. Your more experienced partner becomes upset and st ates that he is not going to let the detectives make his arrest.

3

With that, he kicks the door in and you both enter the apartment and locate the car owner. Ultimately, the officer who observed the suspect on surveillance video comes to the apartment and positively identifies this person as the person who committed the arme d robbery. He is taken into custody. Detectives arrive on scene. Your partner tells the detectives that the door was partially opened and that the suspect eventually came to the do or where he was identified. Your partner also tells the detectives that they may want to get a search warrant as there is a bloodied knife under the mattress in the bedroom. Detectives get a search warrant and do find the knife. Your partner tells you that he will take care of the report. In the report, he document s the story outlined above, including that the suspect ultimately came to the door. He also leaves out the fact that he searched around inside the apartment, findi ng the knife before the detectives got to the scene. The case has proceeded to trial, and you are aware that the defendant’s lawyer has filed a motion to suppress evidence, stating that the police made an illegal entry by kicking their way into the apartment. The prosecutor says there is nothing to worry about because th e report clearly indicates that the door was partially open, and that the defendant willingly opened the door and came out after a short period. What do you do?

Prompt Pick one of the scenarios to address: You should recognize a variety of ethical dilemmas as you read through this case study. Identify each ethical dilemma. Explain what the dilemma is and why it raises an ethical issue. Explain which facts are important to understanding the nature of the issue. What ethical theories would you rely upon in determining how to best handle each situatio n? Identify what personal values you may call upon in making a decision as to how to handle the situation. What duties are involved in the situation, and to who or what is the duty owed? Do the duties conflict at all, and if so, how? Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

I. Ethics and Society Overview a. Describe the impact society has on ethical behavior in law enforcement. Use specific examples to support your claim. b. Determine why it is important that society has a say on ethical expectations within law enforcement. Why is it important for law enforcement to

listen? c. Explain the relationship between society and the development of law. Defend your response with specific examples. d. Assess the importance of society’s role in the development of law. Why is it important for lawmakers to listen? e. Analyze the relationship between morality and ethics within American law enforcement. f. Explain how society’s changing views may impact ethical guidelines within American law enforcement. Defend your response.

Select one (1) of the scenarios and answer the following questions.

II. Scenario Select one (1) of the scenarios and answer the following questions.

a. Identify the ethical dilemma raised by the facts and explain what the ethical dilemma is. b. What makes this dilemma ethical? What ethics does this dilemma challenge? c. Describe the factors that led to the dilemma. How can these factors inform your course of action? d. What implications should be considered when determining your course of action? Why?

4

III. Ethical Theories and Personal Values

a. Identify the ethical theory you would rely upon to address this dilemma, and describe why it would be effective. b. How do you separate personal morals from ethics, and why is this important? c. When is it appropriate to let your morals guide your actions? Why?

IV. Duties

a. Describe your course of action if you were faced with this dilemma. Why would this reaction be appropriate and effective? b. What is your responsibility as a professional in this scenario? Defend your response. c. Does your ethical responsibility take precedence over your personal views? What do you do if the two are conflicting? d. Identify the impact of society’s changing views of acceptable behavior as it applies to a criminal justice practitioner’s duties.

Milestones Milestone One: Scenario Selection In Module One, you will review the Final Project Rubric and, i n a paragraph, state which scenario you will use for your final project. Explain your reasons for choosing this scenario and identify what you think will be most difficult for you with this project. This milestone is graded with the Milestone One Rubric. Milestone Two: Scenario Overview Short Paper In Module Two, you will describe the ethical dilemma chosen to support your final project in a 1–2 page short paper. This milestone is graded with the Milestone Two Rubric. Milestone Three: Theories, Values, and Duties Short Paper In Module Five, you will describe the theories, personal values, and personal responsibilities as it relates to your selected scenario in a 2–3 page short paper. This milestone is graded with the Milestone Three Rubric. Final Submission: Case Study Ethical Analysis In Module Seven, you will submit your final case study ethical analysis. In this final submission, you will identify the issue and explain the proper action that should be taken utilizing the tools gained through this course. Also, you will recommend agency policies to put in place to p revent these ethical dilemmas from arising in the first place. This submission will be graded using the Final Project Rubric (below).

5

Final Project Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your case study ethical analysis needs to be 6–8 pages in length, using 12-point Times New Roman font and following APA guidelines.

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Overview:

Ethical Behavior

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and

draws connecti ons between s oci etal trends and changes i n l aw enforcement ethi cs

Des cri bes the i mpact of s oci ety on

ethi cal behavi or i n l aw enforcement and s upports cl ai m wi th s peci fi c exampl es

Des cri bes the i mpact of s oci ety on

ethi cal behavi or i n l aw enforcement, but does not s upport cl ai ms wi th s peci fi c

exampl es

Does not des cri be the i mpact of

s oci ety on ethi cal behavi or i n l aw enforcement

5.7

Overview: Ethical Expectations

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and i s s upported wi th s peci fi c exampl es

Determi nes why i t i s i mportant for s oci ety to have a s ay i n ethi cal expectati ons wi thi n l aw enforcement, and es tabl i s hes why

l aw enforcement agenci es s houl d l i s ten

Determi nes why i t i s i mportant for s oci ety to have a s ay i n ethi cal expectati ons wi thi n l aw enforcement, but does not

es tabl i s h why l aw enforcement agenci es s houl d l i s ten

Does not determi ne why i t i s i mportant for s oci ety to have a s ay i n ethi cal expectati ons wi thi n l aw enforcement

5.7

Overview: Development

of Law

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and ci tes s chol arly res earch i n defens e of cl ai ms

Expl ai ns the rel ati ons hi p between s oci ety and the devel opment of l aw, and defends res pons e wi th

s peci fi c exampl es

Expl ai ns the rel ati ons hi p between s oci ety and the devel opment of l aw, but does not defend

res pons e wi th s peci fi c exampl es

Does not expl ai n the rel ati ons hip between s oci ety and the devel opment of l aw

5.7

Overview: Society’s Role

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and i s s upported wi th s peci fi c exampl es

As s es s es the i mportance of s oci ety’s rol e i n the devel opment of l aw, and i ncl udes why i t i s i mportant for l awmakers to l i s ten

As s es s es the i mportance of s oci ety’s rol e i n the devel opment of l aw, but does not i ncl ude why i t i s i mportant for l awmakers to

l i s ten

Does not as s es s the i mportance of s oci ety’s rol e i n the devel opment of l aw

5.7

Overview: Morality and

Ethics

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and s upports cl ai ms wi th s peci fic exampl es

Anal yzes the rel ati ons hi p between moral i ty and ethi cs wi thi n Ameri can l aw enforcement

Anal yzes the rel ati ons hi p between moral i ty and ethi cs , but anal ys is i s not s peci fi c to Ameri can l aw

enforcement

Does not anal yze the rel ati ons hip between moral i ty and ethi cs

5.7

Overview:

Changing Views

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and

s upports res pons e wi th s peci fi c exampl es

Expl ai ns the i mpact of s oci ety’s

changi ng vi ews on ethi cal gui del i nes wi thi n Ameri can l aw enforcement and defends

res pons e

Expl ai ns the i mpact of s oci ety’s

changi ng vi ews on ethi cal gui del i nes wi thi n Ameri can l aw enforcement, but does not defend

res pons e

Does not expl ai n the i mpact of

s oci ety’s changi ng vi ews on ethi cal gui del i nes wi thi n Ameri can l aw enforcement

5.7

Scenario:

Ethical Dilemma

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and i s

wel l qual i fi ed wi th concrete exampl es

Identi fi es the ethi cal di l emma

rai s ed by the facts , and expl ai ns what the ethi cal di l emma i s

Identi fi es the ethi cal di l emma

rai s ed by the facts , but does not expl ai n what the ethi cal di l emma i s

Does not i denti fy the ethi cal

di l emma rai s ed by the facts

5.7

6

Scenario: Ethical

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and demons trates a nuanced

unders tandi ng of ethi cal i mpl i cations

Determi nes what makes the di l emma ethi cal and what ethi cs i t

chal l enges

Determi nes what makes the di l emma ethi cal , but does not

addres s what ethi cs i t chal l enges

Does not determi ne what makes the di l emma ethi cal

5.7

Scenario: Factors

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and des cri bes s peci fi c i ns tances where factors can i nform the cours e of

acti on

Des cri bes factors that l ed to the di l emma, and how factors can i nform a cours e of acti on

Des cri bes factors that l ed to the di l emma, but does not addres s how factors can i nform a cours e

of acti on

Does not des cri be factors that l ed to the di l emma

5.7

Scenario: Implications

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and s upports res pons e wi th s peci fi c exampl es

Identi fi es i mpl i cati ons that s houl d be cons i dered when determi ni ng a cours e of acti on, and defends res pons e

Identi fi es i mpl i cati ons that s houl d be cons i dered when determi ni ng a cours e of acti on, but does not defend res pons e

Does not i denti fy i mpl i cations that s houl d be cons i dered when determi ni ng a cours e of acti on

5.7

Ethical Theories and

Personal Values: Ethical Theory

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and

s upports cl ai ms wi th s chol arly s ources

Identi fi es ethi cal theory to

addres s di l emma, and des cri bes why i t woul d be effecti ve

Identi fi es ethi cal theory to

addres s di l emma, but does not des cri be why i t woul d be effecti ve

Does not i denti fy ethi cal theory to

addres s di l emma

5.7

Ethical Theories and Personal Values:

Personal Morals

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and provi des s peci fi c exampl es

Determi nes how to s eparate pers onal moral s from ethi cs , and

es tabl i s hes i mportance of s eparati on

Determi nes how to s eparate pers onal moral s from ethi cs , but

does not es tabl i s h i mportance of s eparati on

Does not determi ne how to s eparate pers onal moral s from

ethi cs

5.7

Ethical Theories and Personal Values:

Actions

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and provi des s peci fi c rel evant s cenari os to s upport cl ai ms

Determi nes when i t i s appropri ate to l et moral s gui de acti ons , and defends cl ai ms

Determi nes when i t i s appropri ate to l et moral s gui de acti ons , but does not defend cl ai ms

Does not determi ne when i t i s appropri ate to l et moral s gui de acti ons

5.7

Duties: Course of Action

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and cl ai ms are wel l qual i fied

Des cri bes cours e of acti on and why reacti on woul d be appropri ate and effecti ve

Des cri bes cours e of acti on but does not des cri be why reacti on woul d be appropri ate and

effecti ve

Does not des cri be cours e of acti on 5.7

Duties:

Responsibility

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and

s upports res pons e wi th s peci fi c exampl es from s cenari o

Determi nes res pons i bi lity as a

profes s i onal i n the s cenari o, and defends res pons e

Determi nes res pons i bi lity as a

profes s i onal i n the s cenari o, but does not defend res pons e

Does not determi ne the

res pons i bi lity of a profes s i onal i n the s cenari o

5.7

Duties: Precedence

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and s ol uti ons are rel evant and

pl aus i ble

Es tabl i s hes i f ethi cal res pons ibility takes precedence over pers onal

vi ews , and how to addres s them i f they are confl i cti ng

Es tabl i s hes i f ethi cal res pons ibility takes precedence over pers onal

vi ews , but does not es tabl i s h how to addres s them i f they are confl i cti ng

Does not es tabl i s h i f ethi cal res pons i bi lity takes precedence

over pers onal vi ews

5.7

7

Duties: Changing Views

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and s upports cl ai ms wi th a real -worl d

exampl e

Identi fi es the i mpact of s oci ety’s changi ng vi ews of acceptabl e

behavi or, and addres s es how i t appl i es to a cri mi nal justi ce practi ti oner’s duti es

Identi fi es the i mpact of s oci ety’s changi ng vi ews of acceptabl e

behavi or, but does not addres s how i t appl i es to a cri mi nal justi ce practi ti oner’s duti es

Does not i denti fy the i mpact of s oci ety’s changi ng vi ews of

acceptabl e behavi or

5.7

Articulation of Response

Submi s s i on i s free of errors rel ated to ci tati ons , grammar,

s pel l i ng, s yntax, and organi zati on and i s pres ented i n a profes s i onal and eas y-to-read format

Submi s s i on has no major errors rel ated to ci tati ons , grammar,

s pel l i ng, s yntax, or organi zati on

Submi s s i on has major errors rel ated to ci tati ons , grammar,

s pel l i ng, s yntax, or organi zati on that negati vel y i mpact readabi l ity and arti cul ati on of mai n i deas

Submi s s i on has criti cal errors rel ated to ci tati ons , grammar,

s pel l i ng, s yntax, or organi zati on that prevent unders tandi ng of i deas

3.1

Earned Total 100%