International law take home exam, The exam is attached, all the instructions are attached below you just have to key word the questions, If u take anything from the slides make sure you add the chapter and slide number, also there is 4 short questions at

profileMichelle_Michy
20190415202143chpt_15_enforcement.pptx

Enforcement

Chpt 15 Cassese

15.1 Traditional Law

Under the traditional law system, what was enforcement of IL like? Was there centralized authority etc?

No central authority

Self-help system….aggrieved State must take matters into their own hands and decide how they wish to enforce breaches of IL

“even when a State resorted to armed force in order to react to a wrongful behavior by another state, no prior exhaustion of peaceful remedies was requested; much less was the State required to wait for a third party to pronounce on whether international law had actually been broken.”

Traditional law has not entirely been superseded

15.1.2 Traditional Law

Traditionally, what types of enforcement measure are available to aggrieved States?

Forcible Intervention

Reprisals

War

15.1.3 Forcible Intervention

How is forcible intervention defined?

Threat or use of force used to compel another State to do something in the interest of the intervening State

What types of forms can forcible intervention take?

Military occupation, naval demonstrations, naval blockade, embargo (seizure of ships belonging to other State or its nationals), armed intervention

15.1.3 Forcible Intervention

Describe with Caroline incident

US aiding Canadian Rebels against Britain

US used Caroline (ship) to take supplies and soldiers from US to Canada

Britain attacked Caroline, killed shipmates, set on fire and sent towards Niagra Falls

What excuse did Britain give for their attack?

Britain had violated US sovereignty due to their fundamental right of ‘self-defense and self-preservation’

15.1.3 Forcible Intervention

As a result US Secretary of State Daniel Webster 1837 had this to say about preemptive attack?

argued preemptive attack is justified only in circumstances that are “instant, overwhelming, leaving no choice of means and moment for deliberation. Preemptive War has legal sanction…Preventative War has none…preventative war is indistinguishable from aggression.”

15.1.4 Reprisals

What is a reprisal?

Acts or actions which are violations of IL, but because they are a reaction to a delinquent State they become lawful

Used to impel the delinquent State to stop the wrongdoing, or to punish (or both)

Can be peaceful or through military

15.1.4 Reprisals

Can you describe the Naulilaa case?

2 German officers killed in Angola by Portuguese….Germany retaliated by authorizing German troops to destroy Portuguese posts and kill their soldiers in Angola

What was the question at the heart of this case?

Was Germany’s reprisal legal?

15.1.4 Reprisals

What did the Special Arbitral Tribunal determine as guidelines for proper reprisals?

1) Comprise acts that would normally be illegal, but are lawful bc they are responses to international delinquency

2) must be limited by considerations of humanity

3) must not be excessive

4) they must be preceded by a request for peaceful settlement

5) must attempt to demand reparation, and avoid new offenses….not escalate tensions

Were the German reprisals proper or unjust?

Unjust

Why, they violate number 3, 4, 5

15.1.5 War

Until 1919 States could engage in War whenever they considered fitting

Pursue National Interest

Reaction to IL wrong

*States cloaked interest in IL wrong

League of Nations 1919

Kellogg-Brand Pact 1928

Customary law against aggression started to develop

15.2 New Trends following the first World War

How is this different in the modern period?

Article 2.4 of UN Charter—against threat or use of force, required to handle disputes peacefully

Can only use force in exceptional circumstances

Self-defense of State or nationals abroad

15.3 Enforcement of International Rules in Modern International Law

Because of the ban on force, what is the predominant enforcement measure used by States?

Reprisals

Presently, because force is banned, we often call reprisals countermeasures

15.3.1 Countermeasures

What conditions must be met for the use of countermeasures?

1) Injured state cannot use countermeasures immediately following wrongdoing, must first request wrongdoing to cease and request reparations

2) IF the wrongdoing does not end, or reparations are not paid, then the injured State must endeavor to make negotiations

Peaceful settlement of disputes

***NOT until all this is tried in good faith can countermeasures be taken

15.3.1 Countermeasures

What are some limitations on the use of countermeasures?

1) State have duty to refrain from threat or use of force

2) countermeasures cannot disregard IL on human rights; consequences cannot befall all the innocent people

3) CM may not disregard norms of jus cogens

4) CM cannot breach rights of third party States

Is the US Helms Burton Act 1996 a legal countermeasure?

5) CM must be in proportion to wrong

15.3.1 Countermeasures

What about in cases of aggravated responsibility? What kind of countermeasures are usually taken in these cases?

economic sanctions

15.3.2 Can national courts enforce international rules?

Can national courts enforce international rules? By a) denying legal domestic recognition to acts performed by foreign States contrary to IL, or b) in the event of a breach of IL the y make decisions on behalf of their nationals?

Depends

Conflict: sovereign equality of States and respect of IL—additionally court procedures may endager peace

15.4 Retortion

What is retortion?

Retaliatory act by which a State responds, by an unfriendly act NOT amounting to a violation of IL

Retortion: should be proportionate; must end when the unfair or unfriendly act ceases

Examples?

breaking off of diplomatic relations; non-recognition of acts of law-breaking States; withholding economic assistance; discontinuance or reduction of trade or investments; curtail of migration from the offending State; heaving duties on goods from offending State; require visas for entry etc

15.5.1-2 Collective Enforcement (sanctions properly so called)

How is collective enforcement used?

By international organizations for gross breaches of IL

Sanctions often prescribed/authorized/ordered

Problem?

Often hurt vulnerable populations