20190406231027remedies_1_.ppt

Remedies

|

|

__________________|_____________________

| |

EQUITY COMMON

(Court directs a person LAW

To do or refrain from doing (Court determin-

Something) ation of legal

| Rights & award

| Of damages)

| |

Injunction Replevin

_________ |

| | Ejectment

Mandatory prohibitory |

| Damages

Mandamus 1)compensatory

| 2)punitive

Specific 3)nominal

performance 4)liquidated

| |

Reformation |

| |

Rescission |

| |

________________ _________________

| |

Declaratory judgment

restitution

Common law Remedies

  • Determination of legal rights &Damages
  • Purpose
  • Tort=put ∏in the same financial condition as before the injury
  • Contract=put ∏ in the SAME condition as if the contract had been preformed
  • Determination of legal rights:
  • Declaratory judgment (court declares a law or official behavior to violate the Const. or a law)—can be equity
  • Action to quiet title (determine who owns property)
  • Ejectment (remove a person from real property)
  • Replevin (Recover personal property unlawfully in the hands of another)

Common law Remedies

  • Damages:
  • Compensatory (to compensate for injury)
  • Punitive (for specific or general deterrence)
  • Nominal (a trivial amount where no loss can be proven)
  • Liquidated (contract parties agree in advance to an amount if a breach occurs)

Damages: general principles

  • 1) No speculative damages
  • 2) damages are typically limited to those REASONABLY FORESEEABLE by the ∆.
  • Book example—a contract for deliverance of goods to open a new business. If ∏ sues for lost good will due to failure to open the store; If ∆ didn’t know it was for a store opening, those damages would not be recoverable (not foreseeable by ∆.
  • 3) future profits are difficult to establish
  • 4)rule of mitigation
  • ∏ has a legal duty to take reasonable steps to minimize damage
  • Prevents recovery for damages that are foreseeable and could have been avoided.
  • 5) ∏ has the burden of proof (preponderance of evidence) to document monetary loss

Damages: general principles

  • GENERAL DAMAGES
  • The natural & necessary result of the injury Those foreseeable)
  • Do not need to be listed in the pleadings (complaint) but DO need to be substantiated at trial
  • Battery=unauthorized touch=general $$=pain & suffering, mental anguish
  • Special Damages
  • Unnatural damages (special) that arise from an injury (those not foreseeable)
  • Need to be included in the complaint and documented at trial
  • Battery= hospital expenses, loss of earnings, diminished ability to work

Damages: general principles

  • Benefit rule
  • Where ∆’s misconduct causes both injury to the∏ but also confers some benefit, ∏’s damage award will be reduced by the amount of the benefit
  • Macomber v. Dillman

Punitive damages

  • Awarded to deter the behavior that led to the injury
  • Specific deterrence= to deter the specific ∆
  • General deterrence=to deter the ∆ and all similar in the ∆’s class (all auto mfgrs.)
  • No punies for
  • Breach of contract
  • Normal or gross negligence
  • Have to get to willful & wanton conduct for punies

The exercise of reasonable care

Simple negligence, failure to exercise reasonable care

Affirmative defenses=contributory & comparative negligence as well as assumption of risk.

Gross negligence, reckless disregard for consequences to the safety and property of others=criminal negligence but not punies

An awareness that behavior could cause harm & decision to continue

Willful & wanton behavior (intentional, deliberate, purposeful, malicious (ill will) punies no contributory defense p.275

More Punitive damages

  • Punitive damages are generally created by the legislature
  • Antitrust, environment, securities fraud or violation, insurance where co. wrongfully refuses to pay, wrongful discharge on race or sex=compensatory, punies & equity (reinstatement)
  • Wilen v. Falkenstein

Other damages

  • 1) Hedonic damages
  • Loss of enjoyment of life
  • As opposed to loss of limb, or money
  • Loss of consortium
  • Loss of friendship
  • Exonerated prisoners
  • Sep. 11th recovery fund
  • Most states recognize this kind of damages but some do not.
  • The controversy is about how to establish them
  • Some states allow expert testimony but most do not
  • Some include it in pain & suffering

Other damages continued

  • Nominal Damages= A token sum of money where there has been a breach of a duty but no identifiable harm
  • Trespass
  • General Sheron
  • Liquidated damages
  • Those agreed to in a contract or $$ deposited against future damages (rental deposit)
  • Courts are suspicious
  • Not allowed if amount is to deter a breach rather than compensate for a loss.
  • Ok if damages are difficult to calculate or uncertain
  • Parties agree in advance
  • Amount is reasonable given the loss
  • End of chapter scenario # 2 p.246

Common law remedies for other than $$damages(determination of legal rights)

  • 1) declaratory judgment
  • Judicial determination of legal rights. Declare a statute unconstitutional (accompanied by request for an injunction)
  • Some states consider it an equity remedy
  • Action to quiet title
  • Judicial determination of rightful ownership of real property
  • Ejectment
  • Action to remove one from real property
  • Replevin
  • Action to recover personal property in the wrongful possession of another

Equity Remedies

  • 1) only available where payment of $$ damages will not make the ∏ whole
  • Never available where money damages makes the ∏ whole
  • Never tried to a jury (judge acts as a court of conscience)
  • Today, most trial courts of general jurisdiction have both common law & equity jurisdiction
  • Not unusual to ask for both a common law remedy & an equity remedy. Common law case can go to a jury but equity will be decided by judge.

injunctions

  • Mandatory
  • Compels one to act (writ of mandamus)
  • Prohibitory
  • Prohibits one from acting
  • 3 different injunctions
  • “Permanent”
  • After a full adversary hearing—can be dissolved or modified—if a law is declared unconstitutional there must be an injunction to stop enforcement of it.
  • Preliminary
  • Notice & hearing but not a full adversary hearing (testimony but no compulsory witnesses or cross). Typically to preserve status quo until a trial determines legal rights (Definus v. odegaard)
  • TRO
  • Ex parte=only one side. No notice and no hearing, typically domestic violence cases and stalking cases

Proofs for injunctions

  • 1) permanent
  • Because it is a full civil trial—preponderance of evidence
  • Tom Brady v. The NFL; injunction to stop the owners lock out and declaratory judgment (trial, April 6, 2011)
  • 2) preliminary
  • A)probable success on merits and/or irreparable harm (the greater the harm, the less likelihood of success necessary)

OR

  • B) serious legal issues are raised & balance tips in movant’s favor
  • Harper v. Poway Sch. Dist
  • 3)TRO
  • A)irreparable harm to moving party & no time for a hearing
  • B)balance
  • Uncompensatable harm to ∆
  • Harm to ∏ if not granted

Recission & reformation

  • Recission
  • Contract law only
  • Contract made via deception or mistake
  • If granted, Court cancels the contract
  • Reformation
  • Contract fails to accurately express the intent of the parties via mistake or bad language
  • Court rewrites the contract
  • DOT v. Ronlee, Inc.

Equitable Maxims

  • Short statements that epitomize an equity principle. Some follow
  • 1) clean hands doctrine
  • 2) equity will not enforce a one-sided contract
  • 3) for every wrong, there is a remedy
  • 4) equity won’t tolerate unfair delay (Latches)
  • Campbell Soup v. Wentz Bros.
  • N.Y. Giants v. L.A. Chargers
  • Archie Sparro and the horse Kerro
  • Blach v. Hillel Torah North Suburban school
  • Isbell v. Brighton Area Schools

restitution

  • To return property in possession of ∆ to the ∏.
  • Can be either equity or common law
  • Equity=∆ returns the property to ∏
  • Common law (replevin) sometimes property is not returnable– return of $$ rather than property
  • Amount is determined by ∆’s gain rather than ∏’s loss
  • ∆ takes ∏’s car worth $4,000 and sells it for $8,000, ∆ will be forced to forfeit $8,000 to ∏
  • Iacomini v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.

Remedies

|

|

__________________|_____________________

| |

EQUITY COMMON

(Court directs a person LAW

To do or refrain from doing (Court determin-

Something) ation of legal

| Rights & award

| Of damages)

| |

Injunction Replevin

_________ |

| | Ejectment

Mandatory prohibitory |

| Damages

Mandamus 1)compensatory

| 2)punitive

Specific 3)nominal

performance 4)liquidated

| |

Reformation |

| |

Rescission |

| |

________________ _________________

| |

Declaratory judgment

restitution