Key Assignment Draft In addition to the Business Intelligence Development Plan template including section headings (project outline), you should submit a Data Classification and Visualization Assessment section of 4–5 pages that includes the following fo

Table of Contents Business Intelligence Justification 3 Introduction 3 General Business Environment for the Throat Cleanser Ltd 3 Problems Associated with Decision Making 4 Business Pressure-Responses Support Model in Organizational Response 5 Quantitative and Qualitative Impact of the Response 6 Importance of Business Intelligence Problem-Solving and Decision Support 6 Business Performance Plan……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7 Business Performance Methodologies………………………………………………………………………………………………..12 Data Classification And Visualization Assessment…………………………………………………………………………….17 Data-Mining Methods and Processes……………………………………………………………………………………………….18 References 19

For this Business Intelligence Development Plan, we are going to use a hypothetical company, Throat Cleanser Ltd. Throat Cleanser Ltd is a registered company that deals with the production of soft drinks. Business Intelligence (BI) is an essential concept in an organization. It comprises of infrastructure and tools, applications and competent practices that make it easier to access and analyze the organization’s information with the intention of improving and optimizing performance and decisions. The analyzed data is then presented as simplified information to aid the organization’s top officials on making the right business decisions. In other words, BI includes technologies and strategies employed by the organization to analyze the business’s data. Finally, business intelligence justification is a broad concept which aims to verify the importance of using the concept of business intelligence in an organization to reduce the problems associated with decision making.

The entire enterprise environment for Throat Cleanser Ltd Company is divided into two categories. That is macro and microenvironment. The macro environment involves legal, economic, technological, political and social factors which affect the business externally. On the other hand, internal factors affecting the business (microenvironment) include motivational factors, workplace environment, and workers relations. The company is equipped with modern manufacturing equipment and types of machinery which aid in the efficient productions of commodities which competes successfully with products from other established firms.

Additionally, the US government has a stable political system and good social environment making it easier for the Throat Cleanser Ltd Company to conduct its business operations without any significant interference. The United States government has a lot of legal processes that are hindering the company from setting its branches across the US states.

Additionally, the company has a stable workforce union who always avail their support to the management and other stakeholders. Workers are divided into several departments or subgroups with each department having a team leader whose role is to coordinate the activities of fellow workers. The team leader is also charged with the responsibility of ensuring that workers relationships good. The working environment is spacious at the same time workers have a spacious restroom and secure parking lot ( Elia Kacapyr and Frank Musgrave‎ , 2012).

In the recent past, the organization has been having some problems when it comes to the process of decision making. There are several adverse factors connected to decision making that are present in the organization. Some of the problems include the halo effect, the loner threat, ego depletion, overconfidence, the no follow up threat and emotionally driven decisions. The no follows up threat is problem-related to Throat Cleanser Ltd Company’s decision-making process. These are several decisions that the organization officials make but fail to follow up with them to ascertain whether the objectives were fully met.

Moreover, the loner threat is a problem that arises in the organization due to decisions being made by only one individual at various levels of production. Emotionally driven decisions involve making decisions when provoked or angry. The halo effect, on the other hand, focusses mainly on relying on decisions of one person that the management like the most despite looking at their negative characteristics. Ego depletion is brought up by overworking workers at various production units and then allowing them to make decisions when they are mentally or physically drained. Lastly, overconfidence is the last problem related to the decision-making process at the Throat Cleanser Ltd Company. Some employees overestimate themselves thus making decisions they should not be part of.

This model has three components which include actions taken (responses), pressure arising from business climate and computerized support. The business pressure component deals with analyzing the results from the business climate thus identifying the problems affecting the firm. The Responses to counter the six problems connected to the decision-making process can be fully solved by using this model effectively. The problem is analyzed, and then appropriate measures are taken to prevent the escalation of the risk. Measures taken include forming a team of competent leaders to make decisions, reduce overworking effect on workers, do away with the problem of overconfidence and eliminating emotionally driven decisions among other problems. The computerized support smoothen the process of monitoring the business environment thus improving the response actions. The objective of the computerized support is to monitor how employees operate and interact with one another, how decisions are made and who are the persons implementing the decisions in the wrong or correct way. The computerized support helps to record all activities happening in the organization; therefore, the management can learn what to do next after observing the response rate on the actions taken to eliminate the six problems identified earlier (Turban, 2011).

The qualitative impacts of the six problems on managerial decision making refer to damages that affect the reputation of the company. These damages are difficult to evaluate since they are not tangible like in the case with quantitative damages affecting the organization due to the six problems identified earlier. The qualitative impact can result in loss of customer’s trust in the company’s product. If the six problems are not addressed on time, this will in turn result financial loses when customers start to shift to competing firms’ products. Lose in revenue, production units, payment of salaries to nonworking/idle workers are all quantitative impacts of managerial decision-making problems (Scholz, 2002).

As stated earlier, BI includes technologies and strategies employed by organizations for the purpose of analyzing data of any business while on the other hand, the business intelligence justification is a broad concept which aims at verifying the importance of using the concept of business intelligence in an organization to reduce the problems connected to decision making. Business intelligence can be utilized to support decision making and problem-solving at the Throat Cleanser organization through the process of using dititized support tools such as CCTV and record keeping programs that aid in keeping track of report and exit time for workers, performance score index for each unit and appropriate use of assigned resources. All the recorded data are then analyzed, and the performance score is released based on the magnitude of the six problems affecting the firm. Close supervision of workers and development plan is later set to help in making the firm meet its objectives without much tension from the external and internal environment (St-Onge, S., Morin, D., Bellehumeur, M., & Dupuis, F., 2009).

Business Performance Planning

Throat Cleanser Limited Company requires a business performance plan to set corporate goals and enhance the performance of the organization. Performance management is critical as it provides accountability, feedback, and documentation for performance outcomes. In particular business performance, management or planning denotes the act of setting company goals, monitoring methods integrated to attain preset goals, thereby developing strategies and policies for managers to achieve such goals effectively (Rastislaw & Petra, 2016). Throat Cleanser Ltd will collect and analyze data regarding the organization to determine the impact resulting from managerial changes on performance thus transforming such changes to assist in creating a more practical process of operation. In order for the company to strategize its performance and operation to enhance productivity, Throat Cleanser Ltd will integrate various processes of strategic planning by identifying the vision, mission, objectives, and core values of the company. Therefore, the management team will evaluate whether the business performance plan aligns with the critical components of the strategic planning of the organization. Strategizing will involve the process through which the company will achieve its goals and objectives. Specific ones will include target, brainstorming, and focused discussions to reach an agreement (Rastislaw & Petra, 2016).

Planning aspect will focus on employees considering that business performance plans are primarily associated with workers of an organization. The company will redirect their effort to performance planning processes undertaken by employees to achieve performance. In particular, the management team will focus on creating a performance plan draft by establishing the standard level of performance as well as analyzing the current level of performance. The team will then evaluate the employee’s current performance and set target goals for the desired level of performance (Sosiawani, Ramli, & Mustafa, 2015). Furthermore, specifics regarding the performance below the standard level will be articulated and communicated to all employees. Upon development of a draft plan, the team will then review the plan with the aim of eliminating bias against the employee. Therefore, the management team will ensure that the performance plan is clearly stated and well-substantiated. The next step will be the implementation of the plan by meeting with employees to discuss the plan and expectations. The meeting will focus on demonstrating the commitment of the management team to the process of performance management projects (Sosiawani, Ramli, & Mustafa, 2015).

Monitoring will also be critical to enhance information consolidation. The process focuses on collecting and analyzing data thereby developing strategic policies in doing the business operation as well as meeting employee needs to enhance job satisfaction. Monitoring incorporated with evaluation assesses performance projects by establishing a connection between the past, present, and the future. The next step will be managerial adjustment whereby the leaders of the project will decide types of the changes and measures that should be integrated to achieve profitability and efficiency. The changes will be documented and communicated to team members through the process of feedback and coaching. It is critical to provide regular feedback on the process of performance thereby motivating and mobilizing team members to work towards the preset goals and objectives effectively.

Throat Cleaners Limited will integrate SWOT Analysis framework in conducting a current situation analysis of the organization. In particular, the management team will adapt the tool during the process of strategic planning in order to analyze the current situation of the organization. The internal and external environment will be identified and analyzed to determine the competitive advantage of the company. Specifically, the internal environment will encompass the strengths and weaknesses that tend to impact the current market position and future risks. For instance, the management team will decide on the objective of the SWOT analysis which is business performance planning. The management team will then research and analyze the significant strengths of the organization by acquiring information from the clients, business partners, and staff as well as conducting market research. Furthermore, the organization will also analyze its weaknesses in order to integrate possible measures or transform its weaknesses into strengths of the company. Moreover, analysis of the company’s opportunities and threats will be evaluated thereby identifying primary competitors in the industry. Upon effective completion of the current situation analysis of the organization, the strategic planning managers will then develop priorities from the SWOT Analysis.

The organization will integrate a planning horizon of five years to complete the planning cycle thereby ensuring the development of effective strategic plans. Planning horizon refers to a period undertaken by management to follow all the appropriate stages of organizational and strategic planning in order to achieve preset goals. Throat cleansers will prefer a five year period which will provide ample time for the analysis of uncertainties and risks as well as the environment in which the firm operates (Woodruff, 2019). The management team will also conduct an environmental scan encompassing the external factors affecting the operation and performance of the organization. In particular, the firm will integrate PESTEL Analysis considering that the internal environment will be assessed during the situation analysis phase. PESTEL comprise all the external factors that impact the performance and productivity of a firm. Specific ones include political, economic, social, Technological, and environmental. The framework is used in analyzing and monitoring macro environmental factors. The political factors are the force experienced when the government intervenes in business performance through tax policy, trade regulations, labor laws, and environmental laws (Woodruff, 2019).

Economic factors have a substantial impact on the performance of a business. Throat Cleansers will focus on identifying and analyzing inflation rates, exchange rates, economic growth, and disposable income of consumers. The assessment aims to facilitate the integration of appropriate strategies and policies in order to enhance competitive advantage. On the other hand, social factors define the cultural and social characteristics of the market and environment in which the organization undertakes its business operations. The company will focus on identifying the traits and preferences of employees regarding the consumption of soft drinks (Woodruff, 2019). Specific aspects of socio-cultural factors will comprise age distribution, population growth, career attitudes, and health awareness. Technological factors that will be evaluated encompass innovative ways of producing goods and services that are cost-effective, creative strategies for product distribution integration of advanced technology in communicating with the target markets. The environmental factors will include corporate social responsibility to produce environment-friendly goods. Lastly, the legal factors include equal opportunities, health and safety, consumer rights and laws, and advertising standards (Woodruff, 2019).

Specific critical success factors will comprise new product development, proper distribution, and effective advertising. The management team will focus on developing high-quality products to attract more clients and retain loyal customers. Furthermore, the strategic managers will develop strategies that will focus on creating a good relationship with the customers and the production of goods incongruence with the organization’s quality values and mission ideologies (Reh, 2019). Upon identification of critical success factors, the strategic managers will conduct a gap analysis by defining the current performance of the company and the desired level of performance thereby incorporating the identified critical success factors in bridging the gap identified. The management team will then create a strategic vision by ensuring that it is a realistic, credible, and attractive future for the achievement of company goals. The project team will apply six steps in developing a business strategy which will comprise a collection of data regarding the performance of the company, developing a vision and mission statements, identifying strategic objectives, developing action plans, and finally, performance management processes to ensure effective implementation of the strategic plan (Reh, 2019).

In conclusion, the team will then identify and establish goals and objectives by determining the progress of the performance and strategic planning process, identifying priorities, defining SMART Goals. The team determines the role of team members and employees in attaining the goals and objectives. Lastly, the team monitors and reviews the whole process of strategic planning to determine the success of the implementation process.

Business Performance Methodologies

Abstract

In the 21st century, businessmen and women have realized that money invested into companies is useless if the time spent working cannot be fully accounted for. In recognition of this discovery, methodologies for measuring business performance have been formulated in consideration of factors such as activities within and outside an organization, financial input and marketing practices. These methodologies go along with Key Performance Indicators, and when used strategically, they can be used to determine the state of a company and help performance managers adjust or improve their working environments.

Introduction

Whenever business performance measurement is considered to be all efforts invested in realizing business objectives or goals, the wonder is directed towards which method to employ and which standards to utilize when measuring business performance. In cutthroat business environments, strategic management is used to come up with thorough measurement criteria for measuring business performance ((Aracioğlu et al, 2013). Efficient and productive utilization of resources within a company is product of strategically using the right business performance measurement methods. This paper will expound on methodologies of measuring business performance and how Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) under each methodology can be used to improve business performance of a hypothetical company, Klitz Movers (a shipment company).

Measuring performance: The accounting Perspective

Measuring performance by looking into accounting is, and has been a traditional backbone of quantitatively measuring performance in most organizations. Recently though, there has been outstanding focus on using measures that are not financial. A huge deal of performance management happens using specified performance indicators that are not calculated in fiscal terms (Neely, 2004). Though there has been significant neglect on developing and improving business measurement through accounting records, the rise of Economic Value Added (EVA) as a means of measuring an organization`s performance has placed new emphasis on financial performance.

Accounting performance is important in several ways. To begin with, financial measures of performance can be used like tools of financial management to compliment organizational targets. Secondly, efficient financial functionalism is among the main aims of any organization. Thirdly, financial measure of performance is a means for encouragement and assurance in the company and can therefore provide a way for the company to manage certain processes through codified input and output of financial statements.

Under the accounting perspective, a financial metrics will be one strategy that can be used to measure the performance of Klitz Movers. Gross and net profit margins will be analyzed to find out how much the company has achieved. Other financial metrics will include looking at whether different regions are meeting their set shipment targets, comparing actual revenue and projected revenue, and also calculating the cost of total shipments made and looking at the profit margin.

Measuring performance: The marketing

Perspective

Marketing is a very significant part of a company since it is the component that gets potential customers or clients on the know. Measuring its performance should therefore be taken seriously by managers and other stakeholders. People or groups with an interest in investing in a company mostly ask for marketing performances of firms prior to engaging in other activities (Mavrinac &Siesfeld, 1997). Unfortunately, accessing information on marketing is an uphill task because marketing performance is determined by external and mainly uncontrolled groups of people. Marketing is the link between parties outside of the company and people within the company. However, due to this barrier between the outside and inside, marketing output is lagging and subject to influences that make cause-and-effect linkages impossible or difficult.

Good marketing measuring practices include market predisposition, customer gratification, customer allegiance and brand value. Market orientation refers to systematically collecting data, analyzing it and using of the information gathered to measure performance. Customer satisfaction should be measured through surveys on customer experiences by use of things such as simple yes or no questionnaire. Knowing how satisfied customers are help performance managers come up with ways to improve services. Customer loyalty can be measured by looking at how many new customers return to a company for more products or services. The conversion rate of new customers to loyal ones should be used be used as a means of measuring performance.

In the marketing perspective of measuring business performance, the Customer Satisfaction and Retention is one classic KPI the company can employ by, say, including customer satisfaction scores, asking customers to rate shipment services out of 10 and then keeping records. This can help rate the effectiveness of the company. Calculating quantity of customers the Klits Movers has made and shed off then working out the difference is also another Key Performance Indicator that can help identify the direction the company is taking. Another KPI that can be used on the marketing perspective is Net Promoter Score (NPS).

Measuring performance: The operations Perspective

Most companies use balanced scorecards to report on packages. Data analysis in the 21st century has become central to every institution, be it schools or businesses. By far, analyzing information on company activities is the best way a company can be able to measure performance. Rather than account for cost incurred, the best way to measure business performance and also enhance is by accounting for time (Rylková, 2015). Companies have been forced to keep up with the ever-changing wheel of time as new ways to tackle old problems come up. Data is playing an integral part of determining the direction companies take because a close analysis of operational information can reveal where performance needs to be improved.

Measuring performance according to operations is effective because performance managers can easily identify which activities contribute more to the growth of the company. The manager can also recommend which operations need to be increased or done for long depending on which brings in more revenue. In other words, measuring performance using the operations perspective can enable the manager of a company set targets that are achievable in a faster and more effective way.

Under the operations perspective of performance measurement, KPIs on operational metrics can be looked at. One is Internal Promotions versus External Hires, which involves the ratio of workers at Klitz that qualify for promotions against total external hires. Another KPI is the Salary Competitory Ratio (SCR) which should be employed in evaluating the competitive compensational alternatives. The ratio is realized by division of mean company wage by the mean salary by rival companies or by other shipments companies.

Data Classification and Visualization Assessment

Data-Mining Methods and Processes

References Elia Kacapyr and Frank Musgrave‎ . (2012). Barron's AP Microeconomics/Macroeconomics. Barron's Educational Series, Inc. O. C. Ferrell and John Fraedrich. (1990). Business Ethics: Ethical-Decision Making & Cases. CENGAGE Learning. Scholz, R. W. (2002). Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge. London: Sage Publications Inc. St-Onge, S., Morin, D., Bellehumeur, M., & Dupuis, F. (2009). Managers' motivation to evaluate Subordinate performance. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 4(3), 273-293. Turban, E. (2011). Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems. Pearson Education International. Rastislaw, R., & Petra, L. (2016, September). Strategic Performance Management System and Corporate Sustainability Concept-Specific Parameters in Slovak Enterprises. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(3), 107-124. doi: 10.7441/joc.2016.03.07 Reh, J. (2019, January 7). Understanding Critical Success Factors and Indicators in Business. Retrieved 2019, from The Balance Career: https://www.thebalancecareers.com/critical-success-factors-in-business-2275171 Sosiawani, I., Ramli, A., & Mustafa, M. (2015). Strategic Planning and Firm Performance: A Proposed Framework. International Academic Research Journal of Business and Technology, 1(2), 201-2017. Retrieved 2019, from http://www.iarjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/IBTC2015-p201-207.pdf Woodruff, J. (2019, January 28). Reasons to Use SWOT and PESTLE Analysis. Retrieved 2019, from Chron: https://smallbusiness.chron.com/reason-use-swot-pestle-analysis-40810.html Aracioğlu B., Zalluhoğlu A et al (2013). A Study on Performance Measurement. Strategic Management Perspective. A Seafood Company, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 99 (1), pp. 1026-1034 Mavrinac, S. and Siesfeld, T. (1997). An exploratory investigation of investors’ information needs and value priorities. Measures that matter. Working paper, Ivey School of Business. Pp.23 University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. Rylková , Žaneta (2015). Measurement of business performance in relation to competitors vol 7, Issue 2. Pp 7