please write a journal stating The ideal entry will document planning (what skill do I need to work on and how will I improve now) – action (here is how I put my plan into action in a specific situation) – reflection (how did it go and how will I continue

profileMichelle_Michy
20181122062217journal_rubric_1.docx

The ideal entry will document planning (what skill do I need to work on and how will I improve now) – action (here is how I put my plan into action in a specific situation) –

reflection (how did it go and how will I continue to improve).

​These journals need to be about a specific crucial conversation that you have had within a few days of the entry and one that you go into with a purpose/plan for and try to use crucial conversation tactics​

Journal Rubric

Journal Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduce Situation

5.0 pts

Full Marks: Succinct and articulate statement of a meaningful situation and what you hoped to achieve. How you have struggled with similar situations in the past, and how you would like to handle such situations. Clear action plan.

2.0 pts

Fair: Decent identification of a situation, but weak connections to past and future goals and growth. Situation lacks depth or importance. Poorly developed plan.

0.0 pts

No Marks: Insufficient discussion of the situation, and little to no justification for investing in the situation. Trivial situation. No plan for action.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponse to Situation

10.0 pts

Full Marks:Outstanding but succinct description of how important situation unfolded; Insightful description of how you handled the situation and how you felt, as well as how the other party/parties responded and likely felt. Digs into important outcomes of situation (surface level and deeper)

4.0 pts

Fair: Sufficient description of the situation, but largely surface level description with little insight. Some important aspects of the situation may have been overlooked.

0.0 pts

No Marks: Insufficient understanding of the situation and underlying problems. No critical thinking demonstrated and many important aspects of the situation were overlooked.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection & Growth

10.0 pts

Full Marks: Clear and insightful reflection on what went well and not so well in the situation. Strong connection to “G” step of critical thinking. Demonstrates personal growth and plan for future growth.

4.0 pts

Fair: Summarizes situation and outcome. Some evidence of growth and fuzzy goals for future. Demonstrates some heuristic thinking or mental traps.

0.0 pts

No Marks: Superficial treatment of situation; Little evidence of growth or goals for future growth. Obvious mental traps.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 25.0