Pick a position in the Texas Government and write a paper on that position. Describe the role, explain what does this person does and the sources of this person’s power (i.e. Texas Constitution or another law or bill), who does this person share power wi
GOVT Paper Rubric (TOTAL: 100 points):
Criteria Early Thinker Beginning Thinker Practicing Thinker Advancing Thinker Points
Control of
Syntax &
Mechanics (WC)
Paper Format
2 points
Wrote less than 3 pages for
the actual body of the paper.
Did not use APA template.
Template has more than 4
formatting errors (i.e. uses
incorrect margin
specifications, multiple
spaces between paragraphs
to lengthen paper, centers
entire paper).
5 points
Wrote between 3-5 full
pages for the actual body of
the paper.
Used APA Template, and
has less than 4 formatting
errors.
8 points
Wrote between 3- 5 full pages
for the actual body of the
paper.
Used APA Template and has
less than 2 formatting errors.
10 points
Wrote between 3-5 full pages for
the actual body of the paper.
Used APA Template.
Template has no formatting
errors: correct title page, fonts,
margins, double-spacing, no
spacing errors, correct header,
title page, and reference page.
10
Control of
Syntax &
Mechanics (WC)
Grammar,
Spelling,
Punctuation, and
Capitalization
2 points Student does not use correct grammar, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. Multiple errors found in submitted assignment.
5 points Student assignment contains some incorrect grammar, spelling punctuation, and capitalization.
8 points
Student assignment contains
few instances of incorrect
grammar, spelling,
punctuation, and capitalization.
10 points
Student uses correct grammar,
spelling, punctuation, and
capitalization.
10
Introduction
Context &
Purpose of
Writing (WC)
Student’s
Position (CT)
Topic Selection
(SR/I&S)
1 point
Specific position is not
stated in the introduction.
Omits introductory
paragraph.
2 points
In the introductory
paragraph, specific position
is not clearly stated or the
thesis or is too simplistic –
attempt was made but it is
very hard to tell what student
is going to write about in
paper.
3 points
In the introductory paragraph
the paper overview is clear but
it does not fully take into
account the complexities of the
issues / topic that will be
discussed.
5 points
In the introductory paragraph,
specific position is stated and
information is given that
demonstrates the student has
taken into account the
complexities of the issues.
5
Paper Contents
Explanation of
Issues (CT)
Existing
10 points
Varieties of perspectives are
not presented or the
presentation is inaccurate.
20 points
Varieties of perspectives are
acknowledged and accurate,
but presentation is shallow
30 points
Varieties of perspectives are
acknowledged, but details are
not fully presented.
40 points
Variety of perspectives are
acknowledged and presented
accurately with full, detailed
40
Knowledge,
Research &
Views Included
(SR/I&S)
Analysis
(SR/I&S)
Content
Development
(WC)
Design Process
(SR/I&S)
Few concepts and
explanations addressed in a
context-rich manner.
Paper exceeds more than
30% direct quotes.
Topic viewpoints and issues
are stated without
clarification.
Little analysis to compare
and contrast primary and
secondary source
information. Sources are
not used to their full
capability.
Sources are not placed in a
logical place in the paper to
show thorough analysis – a
more thoughtful presentation
of sources would have
shown better analysis and
understanding.
and simplistic.
Some key concepts and
explanations are addressed
in a somewhat organized,
context-rich manner.
Paper contains no more
than 30% direct quotes.
Topic viewpoints and issues
are stated but descriptions
are ambiguous and vague.
Some analysis to compare
and contrast primary and
secondary source
information. Sources could
be used in a more effective
manner.
Most key concepts and
explanations are addressed in
an organized, context-rich
manner.
Paper contains no more than
20% direct quotes.
Topic viewpoints and issues
are stated and defined so that
understanding is not seriously
impeded by omissions.
Adequate analysis to compare
and contrast primary and
secondary source information.
Sources are properly replied
upon, placed, and used.
information.
Key concepts and explanations
are addressed in a
comprehensive, organized,
context-rich manner.
Paper contains no more than
20% direct quotes.
Topic viewpoints and issues are
clearly stated and defined with all
relevant information necessary
for full understanding.
Complete analysis to compare
and contrast primary and
secondary source information.
Conclusion (CT,
SR/I&S)
Limitations &
Implications
(SR/I&S)
Influence of
Context &
Assumptions
(CT)
1 point
Poor summary of
information.
Conclusion is inconsistently
tied to the information
presented.
2 points
Shallow summary of
information.
Conclusion is tied to
information presented but
does not elaborate to tie in
information presentation in
paper to show
understanding of material.
3 points
Good summary of information.
Conclusion is logical and
related to paper, but is weakly
tied to evidence presented in
the paper.
5 points
Excellent summary of
information.
Conclusion and related
outcomes are logical and reflect
student’s informed evaluation of
information based on evidence
and perspectives included in the
paper.
5
Evidence (CT,
WC)
References
5 points
Complete, accurate APA
citations for a minimum of 2
sources that meet
assignment criteria.
Less than 70% of the in-text
citations are complete and
accurate.
10 points
Complete, accurate APA
citations for a minimum of 3
sources that meet
assignment criteria.
70% of the in-text citations
are complete and accurate.
20 points
Complete, accurate APA
citations for a minimum of 4
sources that meet assignment
criteria.
80% of the in-text citations are
complete and accurate.
30 points
Complete, accurate APA
citations for a minimum of 4
sources that meet assignment
criteria.
All in-text citations are complete
and accurate.
30
Total 100