Warehouse Efficiency Why is it important for businesses to utilize their warehouse space effectively? Requirement: 1-2 Page, Double Space, Minimum 1 Reference, APA Citation, Use Credible sources, see attached Module background, follow grading rubric.
Rubric Assessment
Top of Form
|
|
Rubric Name: MBA/MSHRM/MSL Discussion Grading Rubric - Timeliness v1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria |
Level 4 - Excellent |
Level 3 - Proficient |
Level 2 - Developing |
Level 1 - Emerging |
|
Quality of Initial Posting (first discussion only) |
4 points Initial posting reveals a clear understanding of all aspects of the threaded discussion question; uses factual and relevant information; and demonstrates full development of concepts. |
3 points Initial posting demonstrates legitimate reflection and answers most aspects of the threaded discussion question; full development of concepts is not evidenced. |
2 points Initial posting demonstrates some reflection and answers some aspects of the threaded discussion question; Limited development of concepts is evident. |
1 point Initial posting was not on topic; the response was unrelated to threaded discussion question; and post demonstrated only superficial thought and poor preparation. |
|
Quality of Responses to Classmates |
6 points Responded to the required number of students and to the professor, if appropriate, for every discussion. Demonstrated analysis of others’ posts; extends meaningful discussions by building on previous peer posts and offering alternative perspectives. |
5 points Responded to almost all of the required students and to the professor, if appropriate, for every discussion. Provided comments and new information to other posts; not all responses promote further discussion of the topic. |
4 points Responded to some students and to the professor, if appropriate, for every discussion. Little depth in response; agreed or acknowledged one other classmate’s initial posting. |
3 points Did not respond to any student or the professor. |
|
Reference to Supporting Readings/Information Literacy |
3 points Refers to and properly cites either course and/or outside readings in both initial posting and responses to peers. |
2 points Refers to and properly cites course and/or outside reading in initial posting only. |
1 point Makes some reference to assigned readings with some citations or cites questionable sources. |
0 points Makes no reference to assigned readings without citations or cites questionable sources. |
|
Critical Thinking |
4 points Demonstrates mastery conceptualizing the problem; viewpoints and assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated; and conclusions are logically presented with appropriate rationale. |
3 points Demonstrates considerable proficiency conceptualizing the problem; viewpoints and assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated; and conclusions are presented with necessary rationale. |
2 points Demonstrates partial proficiency conceptualizing the problem; viewpoints and assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated; and conclusions are somewhat consistent with the analysis and findings. |
1 point Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency conceptualizing the problem; viewpoints and assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated; and conclusions are either absent or poorly conceived and supported. |
|
Timeliness |
3 points Initial post occurs in a timely manner (1 – 3 days into module) allowing ample time for classmates to respond and engage. |
2 points Initial post occurs later (4 – 5 days into module) allowing limited time for classmates to respond and engage. |
1 point Initial post occurs substantially late (6-7 days into module) allowing minimal to no time for classmates to respond and engage. |
0 points Initial post occurs after the first week of the module. |
|
Overall Score |
Level 4 18 or more |
Level 3 16 or more |
Level 2 14 or more |
Level 1 0 or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1