| BA 3301 Compliance Report Grade Rubric: Scoring Trait Descriptors | No submission or content missing = 0 | Addressed minimally = 7 | Addressed adequately = 13 | Exceptional; very thorough explanation = 15 |
| Rubric by Usnick, revised 2/20/18 |
| Identifies industry regulations and the noncompliant behavior addressed the article | no submission by due dates, or traits were not addressed | uses general descriptions only; name of laws, regulations not given | gives name of specific laws, regulations at issue, specific acts at issue | gives specifics of law, regulations at issue, describes in detail the bad acts, clear explanation of problems |
| Identifies the regulatory agency and the enforcement action(s) taken by the agency | no submission by due dates, or traits were not addressed | agency not identified; enforcement in general terms | agency identified; specific enforcement actions described | agency identified; enforcement actions described in detail |
| Describes target regulations, the enforcement problem(s), and a logical opinion about this industry's risk | no submission by due dates, or traits were not addressed | descriptions of regulations are vague, opinion vague or not discussed | regulations' purpose(s) explained, opinion about regulations brief but clear | gives detailed description of regulations, and clear, grounded opinion given |
| Demonstrates knowledge of GRC, compliance challenges, and regulations' role in today's business environment | no submission by due dates, or traits were not addressed | gives only 1-3 sentences defining GRC, but too brief, too general | gives a short, clear explanation of GRC functions, demonstrates understanding | thorough explanation of each of GRC function, their interrelationships |
| Demonstrates an awareness of the kinds of compliance jobs available in Houston (gave details for a few jobs from career websites) | no submission by due dates, or traits were not addressed | gives only 1-3 job titles, no job descriptions, too brief overall | gives 4 or more job titles with some discussion, demonstrated visit to websites | gives 4 or more job titles, discusses some job function details |
| Follows all directions on document preparation and submission; includes working URL to article | no submission by due dates, or traits were not addressed | no URL given; did not follow all submission directions | URL given; all but one submission requirements followed | gives working URL, and meets all format and submission rules |
| Correct writing mechanics demonstrated | Too many errors: 0 - 3 points | Improvement needed: 4 - 6 points | Acceptable: 7 - 9 points | Superior; or tutor reviewed: 10 |
| Sentence structure, punctuation, subject verb agreement, spelling, word choice | multiple errors impair the message | number, type of errors detracts from the message | few errors, not a significant impact on message | almost error free OR tutor reviewed at least once |
| Total Points Possible = 100 |
tutorthammy
20180220BA3301ComplianceReportGradeRubricRev8.xlsx
