Need to revise this paper(attached) the TII Plagiarism report needs to go below 10%. Being able to articulate theories is important for an educational leader. It is also important to apply theories in our relationships with stakeholders in the education

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00%

3 Satisfactory 79.00%

4 Good 87.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

70.0 %Content

20.0 %Outline at Least Two Theories for Effective Parent and Family Involvement in K-12 Learning Environments

At least two theories for effective parent and family involvement in K-12 learning environments are not present.

At least two theories for effective parent and family involvement in K-12 learning environments are outlined and present, but incomplete. Discussion is barely evident.

At least two theories for effective parent and family involvement in K-12 learning environments are outlined and clearly presented. Discussion is perfunctory.

At least two theories for effective parent and family involvement in K-12 learning environments are outlined and clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Research is from original sources.

At least two theories for effective parent and family involvement in K-12 learning environments are outlined and clearly presented. Discussion is thorough. Research is from scholarly, current sources.

20.0 %Evaluate the Effectiveness of Each Theory as Applied in the K-12 Learning Environment

The effectiveness of each theory as applied in the K-12 learning environment is not present.

The effectiveness of each theory as applied in the K-12 learning environment is present, but incomplete. Discussion is barely evident. One or more elements is missing and/or an included source(s) is not scholarly research or topic-related.

The effectiveness of each theory as applied in the K-12 learning environment is presented. Discussion is perfunctory. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one reference is questionable.

The effectiveness of each theory as applied in the K-12 learning environment is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from reputable professional sources.

The effectiveness of each theory as applied in the K-12 learning environment is clearly presented. Discussion is thorough. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources.

15.0 %Discuss How at Least Two Organizations, at the State, Local, Regional, or Federal Level, That Support or Organize Parent and Family Involvement Use the Theories Outlined

A discussion of how at least two organizations, at the state, local, regional, or federal level, that support or organize parent and family involvement use the theories outlined is not present.

A discussion of how at least two organizations, at the state, local, regional, or federal level, that support or organize parent and family involvement use the theories outlined is present, but incomplete. Discussion is barely evident. One or more elements is missing and/or an included source(s) is not scholarly research or topic-related.

A discussion of how at least two organizations, at the state, local, regional, or federal level, that support or organize parent and family involvement use the theories outlined is presented. Discussion is perfunctory. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one reference is questionable.

A discussion of how at least two organizations, at the state, local, regional, or federal level, that support or organize parent and family involvement use the theories outlined is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from reputable professional sources.

A discussion of how at least two organizations, at the state, local, regional, or federal level, that support or organize parent and family involvement use the theories outlined is clearly presented. Discussion is thorough. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources.

15.0 %Suggest Ways An Educational Leader Can Use These Organizations to Further the Collaborative Effort in the K-12 Educational System

Suggested ways an educational leader can use these organizations to further the collaborative effort in the K-12 educational system is not present.

Suggested ways an educational leader can use these organizations to further the collaborative effort in the K-12 educational system is present, but incomplete. Discussion is barely evident. One or more elements is missing and/or an included source(s) is not scholarly research or topic-related.

Suggested ways an educational leader can use these organizations to further the collaborative effort in the K-12 educational system is presented. Discussion is perfunctory. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one reference is questionable.

Suggested ways an educational leader can use these organizations to further the collaborative effort in the K-12 educational system is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from reputable professional sources.

Suggested ways an educational leader can use these organizations to further the collaborative effort in the K-12 educational system is clearly presented. Discussion is thorough. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage