Using feedback from your professor and classmates, revise Part 1 and develop the solution and identify the advantages of the solution. Note: The disadvantages or challenges with your answers will be in Part 3. Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in whi
Michelle_Michy
20170814161828eng215_appendix_a_peer_review_feedback_form__sapp.docx|
|
ENG 215 – Appendix A: Peer Review Feedback Form 1 |
|
Appendix A: Peer Review Feedback Form 1 |
|
|
Reviewer’s Name: _Katrina Rodriguez |
Date: __August 12, 2017 |
|
Writer’s Assigned #: Corinthia_Sapp2 |
|
|
Course:___ENG 215_ |
Section:__ |
Assignment 3: Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists
Peer reviews should provide feedback to a peer on the criteria expected in the paper. Follow these instructions:
1) Receive a classmate’s paper from your professor (in class if on-ground; by e-mail if online).
2) Copy the Peer Review Feedback Form from the Appendix.
3) Comment on all criteria, noting strengths and / or areas for improvement on the feedback form.
4) Provide completed Peer Review Feedback Form and classmate’s paper to your professor.
Note: On-ground students should submit the feedback form and paper to the professor during the class meeting in which the paper is reviewed; online students should submit the feedback form and paper to the professor via the Assignment Tab in the course shell.
|
Criteria |
+ Strengths |
Comments < Areas for Improvement |
|
1. Provide an appropriate title and an interesting opening paragraph to appeal to your stated audience (appeal with logic, ethics, or emotion). |
Introduction paragraph grabs reader attention and makes them wonder what the paper is going to be about |
|
|
2. Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. (With revised thesis statement.) |
|
Thesis statement was not clearly stated. |
|
3. Describe the history and status of the issue and provide an overview of the problem(s) that need to be addressed. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
History and status of issue was stated |
|
|
4. Explain the first problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1- 2) paragraphs. |
An issue was presented. |
|
|
5. Explain the second problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
|
Could have presented more detail on issue to made it clearer to understand. Couldn’t tell if there were different issues or the same one presented but in a different way. |
|
6. Explain the third problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
|
Could have presented more detail on issue to made it clearer to understand. Couldn’t tell if there were different issues or the same one presented but in a different way. |
|
7. Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences throughout the paper. |
Paper was easy to read with words used |
|
|
8. Provide a concluding paragraph that summarizes the stated problems and promises a solution. |
|
No direct solution was given |
|
9. Develop a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion |
Paper was constructed coherently |
|
|
10. Support claims with at least three (3) quality, relevant references. Use credible, academic sources available through Strayer University’s Resource Center. |
Sources were cited |
|
|
11. Other |
Overall I felt it was a good paper with a few minor grammar errors |
|
