Blood Bank questions
N E W M E T H O D S A N D A P P R O A C H E S
When blood transfusion medicine becomes complicated due to
interference by monoclonal antibody therapy
Marlies Oostendorp,1 Jeroen J. Lammerts van Bueren,2 Parul Doshi,3 Imran Khan,3
Tahamtan Ahmadi,3 Paul W.H.I. Parren,2,4 Wouter W. van Solinge,1 and Karen M.K. De Vooght1
BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) are
increasingly integrated in the standard of care. The
notion that therapeutic MoAbs can interfere with clinical
laboratory tests is an emerging concern that requires
immediate recognition and the development of
appropriate solutions. Here, we describe that treatment
of multiple myeloma patients with daratumumab, a novel
anti-CD38 MoAb, resulted in false-positive indirect
antiglobulin tests (IATs) for all patients for 2 to 6 months
after infusion. This precluded the correct identification of
irregular blood group antibodies for patients requiring
blood transfusion.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The IAT was
performed using three- and 11-donor-cell panels.
Interference of daratumumab and three other anti-CD38
MoAbs was studied using fresh-frozen plasma spiked
with different MoAb concentrations. Additionally it was
tested whether two potentially neutralizing agents, anti-
idiotype antibody and recombinant soluble CD38
(sCD38) extracellular domain, were able to inhibit the
interference.
RESULTS: The CD38 MoAbs caused agglutination in
the IAT in a dose-dependent manner. Addition of an
excess of anti-idiotype antibodies or sCD38 protein to the
test abrogated CD38 MoAb interference and successfully
restored irregular antibody screening and identification.
DISCUSSION: CD38 MoAb therapy causes false-
positive results in the IAT. The reliability of the test could
be restored by adding a neutralizing agent against the
CD38 MoAb to the patient’s plasma. This study
emphasizes that during drug development, targeted
therapeutics should be investigated for potential
interference with laboratory tests. Clinical laboratories
should be informed when patients receive MoAb
treatments and matched laboratory tests to prevent
interference should be employed.
D rug interference is a well-known phenomenon
in laboratory medicine, 1
but can be different
for each drug and each analytical method. For
many drugs, interference with laboratory tests
is unknown and is often discovered by chance, for exam-
ple, when unexpected laboratory results are found which
cannot be explained by the patient’s condition.
Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) represent a novel
class of therapeutics, which are increasingly used in a
variety of pathologic conditions, including solid tumors,
leukemia, infections, and cardiovascular and inflamma-
tory diseases.2 An important advantage of MoAbs is their
specific targeting. Since many laboratory tests are also
based on specific antibody–antigen interactions, possible
MoAb interference in laboratory medicine is considered
an increasing problem. For example, several MoAbs (sil-
tuximab, rituximab, infliximab, cetuximab, trastuzumab,
bevacizumab, adalimumab, and ofatumumab) were previ-
ously shown to generate false-positive results in serum
protein and immunofixation electrophoresis, tests that are
ABBREVIATIONS: MM 5 multiple myeloma; sCD38 5
soluble CD38; VSB 5 veronal saline buffer.
From the 1 Department of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology,
University Medical Center Utrecht, and 2 Genmab, Utrecht,
The Netherlands; the 3Janssen R&D LLC, Spring House
(Ambler), Pennsylvania; and the Department of
Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, 4 Leiden University
Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
This study was funded by Genmab.
Address reprint requests to: Karen M.K. de Vooght, Depart-
ment of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medi-
cal Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The
Netherlands; e-mail: [email protected].
Received for publication August 9, 2014; revision received
March 25, 2015; and accepted April 5, 2015.
doi:10.1111/trf.13150
VC 2015 AABB
TRANSFUSION 2015;55;1555–1562
Volume 55, June 2015 TRANSFUSION 1555
used for diagnosis and follow-up of patients with multiple
myeloma (MM) or Waldenstr€om’s macroglobulinemia.3,4
In a Phase I and II trial with daratumumab, a novel
IgG1j anti-CD38 MoAb which effectively targets and kills
human MM cells,5-7 we observed an unexpected interfer-
ence in routine laboratory tests used in blood transfusion
medicine. All patients receiving daratumumab showed
false-positive indirect antiglobulin tests (IATs), used for
the detection of irregular blood group antibodies.
Although this might only appear to be a clinical laboratory
problem, the interference seriously complicated the selec-
tion of suitable blood products for transfusion for these
patients and was therefore further investigated. Solutions
to prevent MoAb interference were investigated and impli-
cations for patient safety are discussed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Additional methods descriptions are provided in the Sup-
porting Information, available in the online version of this
paper.
Study characteristics
MM patients (single center n 5 11, male/female 5 7/4,
age 58 6 9 years) were enrolled in a Phase I and II safety
and dose escalation study with daratumumab (HuMax-
CD38, Genmab A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark; Clinical Trial
Identifier NCT00574288, http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/
NCT00574288). The clinical trial was approved by the
institutional ethics committee and written informed con-
sent was obtained from all patients.
Patients received a low dose of daratumumab 1 day
before the first full dose of 8 to 16 mg/kg. Three weeks
after the first full dose, patients received another dose.
The next day, 8 to 16 mg/kg daratumumab was given in a
weekly interval for 8 weeks. Peak daratumumab concen-
trations in serum were more than 100 mg/mL for all patients (range, 110-438 mg/mL). As the multicenter trial is still ongoing, follow-up times for patients regarding the
data on required blood transfusions are variable.
(In)direct antiglobulin testing
To investigate the ability of daratumumab to induce in
vitro red blood cell (RBC) agglutination, fresh-frozen
plasma (FFP) was spiked with 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, and 10.0 mg/ mL daratumumab. IAT was subsequently performed in
the low-ionic-strength solution (LISS) gel column aggluti-
nation technique with anti-IgG present in the gel matrix,
using a three-cell Surgiscreen panel or an 11-cell Resolve
C panel, both containing 0.8% donor RBC suspensions (all
reagents from Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ). As
a control, the IAT was repeated with RBCs from MM
patients not receiving daratumumab. For the direct anti-
globulin test (DAT), a 0.8% suspension of the patient’s
own RBCs was made in LISS diluent (Bio-Rad, Hercules,
CA). This was subsequently tested in the LISS/Coombs gel
column technique (Bio-Rad), containing polyspecific anti-
IgG and anti-C3d within the gel matrix. Autocontrol
experiments were performed in the LISS gel agglutination
column technique, by mixing a 0.8% suspension of the
patient’s own RBCs with the patient’s plasma. All aggluti-
nation strengths were graded from 0 to 41 (0 5 no aggluti-
nation; 0.51 5 very weak agglutination; 11 5 weak
agglutination; 21 5 agglutination; 31 5 strong agglutina-
tion; 41 5 very strong agglutination).
Antibody elution from RBCs
Antibodies were recovered from RBCs by acid elution
using an elution kit (Gamma Elu Kit II, Immucor Inc.,
Norcross, GA) according to the manufacturer’s instruc-
tions. In brief, RBCs were washed four times with wash
buffer as provided by the manufacturer. Next, washed
RBCs were incubated with the eluate solution for approxi-
mately 30 seconds at room temperature. After centrifuga-
tion and correction of the pH to 6.4 to 7.6, the obtained
eluate was used in an IAT as described earlier.
Agglutination with other CD38 antibodies
To test whether in vitro RBC agglutination is a class-
specific issue, three other CD38 antibodies were pro-
duced: Clones 38SB19, MOR03087, and Ab79. Clones
38SB19 and MOR03087 represent surrogates for the anti-
CD38 SAR650984 (humanized) and MOR202 (human),
respectively. Clone Ab79 is a human anti-CD38 in preclini-
cal development. The heavy- and light-chain sequences of
38SB19, MOR03087, and Ab79 were obtained from patent
applications WO 2008/047242, WO 2012/041800, and WO
2012/092612, respectively, and cloned into mammalian
expression plasmids containing human j and c1 constant regions. The antibodies were generated by transient trans-
fection in HEK293 cells as described by Vink and col-
leagues. 8
IAT was performed using FFP spiked with 0.01,
0.1, 1.0, and 10.0 mg/mL antibodies, as described above.
Preventing MoAb interference using anti-idiotype
antibodies and soluble CD38
The prevention of anti-CD38 MoAb interference was stud-
ied by repeating the indirect antiglobulin experiment using
FFP spiked with 10.0 mg/mL daratumumab and adding a neutralizing daratumumab anti-idiotype antibody (see
below) at five and 10 times the daratumumab concentra-
tion. The anti-idiotype antibody was also tested using
plasma of MM patients participating in the current trial
(i.e., daratumumab present in vivo and not added in vitro).
The performance of the anti-idiotype antibody was
further investigated by spiking plasma of a patient
with known irregular antibodies (anti-E and anti-K) with
10 mg/mL daratumumab or the combination of
OOSTENDORP ET AL.
1556 TRANSFUSION Volume 55, June 2015
daratumumab and a five- or 10-fold excess of anti-
idiotype antibody. Antibody identification experiments
were subsequently performed using an 11-cell screening
panel.
Recombinant soluble CD38 (sCD38) was investigated
as another potential solution to prevent MoAb interfer-
ence (see below). To this extent, sCD38 was added to
plasma spiked with 10 mg/mL daratumumab or 38SB19 in 10- and 20-fold higher concentrations (concentration dif-
ference with anti-idiotype antibody due to the mono- and
bivalent binding capacity of sCD38 and anti-idiotype,
respectively). Hereafter, standard IATs were performed
using a 3-cell screening panel. The effect of sCD38 was
subsequently evaluated using plasma of a patient with
known anti-K spiked with daratumumab.
Generation of the daratumumab anti-idiotype
antibody
Anti-idiotype antibodies against daratumumab were
generated by BioGenes (Berlin, Germany). Briefly, 8-
week-old female BALB/C mice (Charles River Laborato-
ries, Sulzfeld, Germany) were immunized with daratu-
mumab. After isolation of mouse splenocytes and fusion
with SP2/0 mouse myeloma cells (DSMZ, Braunschweig,
Germany), the resulting hybridomas were tested for
binding to daratumumab by an enzyme-linked immuno-
sorbent assay (ELISA). Binding to the human MoAb
HuMab-KLH, a human IgG1 antibody directed against
mariculture keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), was
used in the ELISA for negative selection. 9
Positive clones
were selected and stable antibody-producing clones
were generated by two rounds of limiting dilution clon-
ing. The generated anti-daratumumab clones were
tested for their potential to block daratumumab binding
to CD38-expressing cells. Anti-idiotype Clone 5-3-9 of
the mouse IgG1j subclass was selected for its potency
to block the interaction between daratumumab and
CD38.
Cloning, expression, and purification of sCD38
The sCD38 was generated by transient transfection in
HEK293 cells as described by de Weers and colleagues.5 A
construct similar to the previously described pEE13.4-
HACD38 was made synthetically and was fully codon
optimized (GeneArt, Regensburg, Germany), replacing the
HA tag encoding part by a His tag (HHHHHH) encoding
part. The construct was cloned in pEE13.4 and named
pEE13.4HisCD38. Plasmid DNA was transiently trans-
fected in HEK293F cells using 293fectin (both Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA). Proteins were purified from culture super-
natant by chromatography (BD Talon, BD Biosciences,
Palo Alto, CA), and their appropriate molecular weights
were confirmed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Antibody-induced complement-dependent
cytotoxicity of human RBCs
The assay was performed with whole blood from three
healthy donors collected in heparin tubes. The number of
RBCs was determined after counting in the presence of try-
pan blue, after which the RBCs were washed with RPMI
1640. Finally, the RBCs were diluted to 1 3 10 8
cells/mL in
veronal saline buffer (VSB11, Lonza, Basel, Switzerland).
Test antibodies were diluted 23 in VSB11, added to RBCs,
and incubated for 30 minutes at 48C. After being washed
twice with VSB11, cells were resuspended in VSB11 and
active or inactivated normal human serum (inactivated for
30 min at 608C) was added. As a control for 100% lysis, water
was added to the RBCs. Cells were incubated for 1 hour at
378C. Subsequently, free hemoglobin (Hb) was measured in
the supernatant using a Hb assay kit (Abnova, Taipei City,
Taiwan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
RESULTS
Daratumumab infusion causes positive irregular
antibody screening results
Regular blood group serologic testing (i.e., irregular anti-
body screening) is standard of care for all hematologic
patients in the University Medical Center Utrecht, even
when there is no direct clinical need for transfusion. This
is a precautionary measure to allow quick delivery of RBCs
if requested and is performed using direct and IATs. Before
daratumumab treatment, plasma of all patients showed
negative direct and IATs. However, after MoAb infusion,
positive results with generally 21 reactions strengths were
found for the IAT for all patients, suggesting interference
of daratumumab in the antiglobulin test (see Fig. S1, avail-
able as Supporting Information in the online version of
this paper, for a graphical representation on the mecha-
nism of the MoAb interference). Results remained positive
for 2 to 6 months after the last daratumumab infusion and
were not only observed in the gel column technique, but
also in the tube technique using albumin or polyethylene
glycol (not shown). Interestingly the DAT was negative
after infusion for all patients (n 5 11, multiple tests per
patient), indicating that there are no IgGs bound to the
RBCs of daratumumab-treated patients. In addition, the
IAT autocontrol, which tests the agglutination of the
patients’ plasma with their own RBCs, was also negative
for all patients. This implies that daratumumab present in
the patient’s plasma does not induce agglutination of the
patient’s own RBCs in the IAT. These data were confirmed
by the observation that acid eluates prepared from
daratumumab-treated patients’ RBCs did not show any
agglutination with the patients’ own RBCs as well as donor
RBCs (n 5 11). Taken together, these results suggest a
rapid in vivo clearance of a small RBC fraction to which
daratumumab is bound. This is supported by a minor, but
TRANSFUSION COMPLICATED DUE TO MoAb THERAPY
Volume 55, June 2015 TRANSFUSION 1557
clinically nonsignificant, decrease in Hb levels after infu-
sion and an increase in reticulocyte count (Fig. 1).
The ability of daratumumab to indirectly induce RBC
agglutination in vitro was further investigated by repeating
the IAT using FFP spiked with increasing doses of daratu-
mumab. As shown in Table 1, daratumumab induced RBC
agglutination in a dose-dependent manner. No differences
were found in agglutination patterns when using RBCs
from untreated MM patients (Table 1).
False-positive IATs are class-specific for anti-CD38
MoAbs
IAT was repeated with plasma spiked with the humanized
anti-CD38 MoAb 38SB19 and human anti-CD38 MoAbs
MOR03087 and Ab79. Comparable dose-dependent agglu-
tination patterns were found as described for daratumu-
mab (Table 1), which were of the same magnitude for
38SB19 and somewhat weaker for MOR03087 and Ab79
(Table S1, available as Supporting Information in the
online version of this paper). This indicates that the false
positive IAT is not unique for daratumumab, but is a
class-specific problem for anti-CD38.
Daratumumab can be recovered from donor RBCs
by acid elution
Daratumumab was recovered from donor RBCs incubated
with daratumumab-spiked plasma using acid elution. The
eluate contained sufficient daratumumab to again induce
weak agglutination of donor RBCs in the IAT (Table S2,
available as Supporting Information in the online version
of this paper). The mean daratumumab concentration in
the eluate was 86.8 6 36.7 ng/mL, as measured using an
ELISA. This indicates that daratumumab binding to RBCs
is indeed the cause of RBC agglutination in the IAT.
CD38 shows no age-dependent expression pattern
We investigated whether expression of CD38 depends on
RBC age. Therefore, RBCs were separated into five age
fractions using discontinuous Percoll gradient centrifuga-
tion. All fractions were subsequently used for IAT with
daratumumab-spiked plasma. No differences were
observed in agglutination patterns between the RBC frac-
tions (Table S3, available as Supporting Information in the
Fig. 1. Infusion of daratumumab (dashed vertical lines)
resulted in a small, clinically nonsignificant decrease in Hb
levels (A) and a compensatory rise in reticulocyte count (B).
Adverse events encountered with daratumumab infusion did
not include anemia or hemolysis and patients did not
require blood transfusion.
TABLE 1. RBC agglutination patterns of plasma supplemented with daratumumab (top) and another CD38 antibody 38SB19 (bottom) in the IAT using a three-cell RBC screening panel or RBCs from untreated MM patients
Cell MM patient
Anti-CD38 1 2 3 1 2
Daratumumab (mg/mL) 0.00 – – – – – 0.01 – – – ND ND 0.1 0.51 0.51 0.51 ND ND 1.0 11 11 11 11 21 10 21 21 21 11 21
38SB19 (mg/mL) 0.00 – – – ND ND 0.01 – – – ND ND 0.1 0.51 0.51 0.51 ND ND 1.0 11 11 11 ND ND 10 11 11 11 ND ND
ND 5 not determined.
OOSTENDORP ET AL.
1558 TRANSFUSION Volume 55, June 2015
online version of this paper), although the reticulocyte
fraction could not be clearly evaluated due to the absence
of significant amounts of reticulocytes in healthy adults.
Nevertheless, CD38 expression on RBCs does not appear
to be restricted to certain cellular ages.
Flow cytometry analysis revealed a limited level
of staining by daratumumab of CD38 molecules on
reticulocytes and RBCs (see Fig. S3, available as Support-
ing Information in the online version of this paper), which
corresponds to previously published results.10 It is likely
that CD38 is present on all RBCs, albeit at a different den-
sity per cell. Consequently, only a small number of RBCs
has sufficient CD38 density to allow relevant levels of dar-
atumumab binding, resulting in in vivo clearance or in
vitro interference in the IAT.
Daratumumab-induced RBC depletion is not
caused by complement-mediated lysis
After daratumumab infusion, patients showed a Hb
decrease of approximately 1.6 g/dL (Fig. 1A). In vitro
experiments did not show daratumumab-induced com-
plement-mediated lysis (Fig. 2), suggesting that
complement-mediated lysis is not involved in the clear-
ance of daratumumab-loaded RBCs. We therefore specu-
late that the small daratumumab-loaded RBC fraction
disappears from the circulation by Fc-receptor–mediated
clearance in the spleen. 11
Blocking the interference of CD38 MoAbs in the
IAT
We investigated whether a specific daratumumab anti-
idiotype antibody was able to abrogate daratumumab-
mediated RBC agglutination in the IAT. RBC agglutination
induced by plasma spiked with 10 mg/mL daratumumab was completely blocked using daratumumab anti-
idiotype antibodies at five- and tenfold excess concentra-
tions (Table 2). The anti-idiotype antibody was also tested
using plasma from MM patients who were treated with
daratumumab. Addition of anti-idiotype antibodies in the
laboratory assay prevented agglutination in the IAT (Table
2). In Fig. S2, available as Supporting Information in the
online version of this paper, a graphical representation of
Fig. 2. Daratumumab-mediated complement-dependent
cytotoxicity (CDC) was evaluated in three different donors.
No significant Hb release was observed when RBCs were
incubated with daratumumab in the presence of 10% active
normal human serum (NHS), indicating that daratumumab
does not induce complement mediated-lysis of RBCs. Anti-P
was used as positive control for CDC lysis. Water was added
to the RBCs as a control for 100% lysis. Results are expressed
as mean 6 SD, n 5 3. (w) Active NHS; (�) inactivated NHS.
TABLE 2. False-positive irregular antibody screening results can be effectively blocked using the daratumumab anti-idiotype antibody at a five- or 10-fold excess concentration (top). The anti-idiotype antibody also successfully
diminishes positive reactions caused by daratumumab present in plasma of a daratumumab-treated patient (in vivo daratumumab concentration > 200 mg/mL; middle). sCD38 extracellular domain protein (sCD38) efficiently prevents
the interference of both daratumumab and 38SB19 (bottom)
Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3
Plasma 1 10 mg/mL dara 11 11 11 Plasma 1 10 mg/mL dara 1 53 anti-idiotype – – – Plasma 1 10 mg/mL dara 1 103 anti-idiotype – – – Plasma 1 10 mg/mL dara, corrected for dilution 11 11 11
Dara patient plasma (>200 mg/mL dara) 21 21 21 Dara patient plasma 1 53 anti-idiotype – – –
Plasma 1 10 mg/mL dara 11 11 11 Plasma 1 10 mg/mL dara 1 103 sCD38 – – – Plasma 1 10 mg/mL dara 1 203 sCD38 – – – Plasma 1 10 mg/mL dara, corrected for dilution 11 11 11 Plasma 1 10 mg/mL 38SB19 11 11 11 Plasma 1 10 mg/mL 38SB19 1 103 sCD38 – – – Plasma 1 10 mg/mL 38SB19 1 203 sCD38 – – – Plasma 1 10 mg/mL 38SB19, corrected for dilution 11 11 11
TRANSFUSION COMPLICATED DUE TO MoAb THERAPY
Volume 55, June 2015 TRANSFUSION 1559
the mechanism by which anti-idiotype antibodies prevent
daratumumab-induced RBC agglutination is provided.
Next, the performance of the anti-idiotype antibody
was tested using daratumumab-spiked plasma from a
randomly selected subject with known anti-E and anti-K
antibodies. As expected, daratumumab caused agglutina-
tion of all RBC suspensions of the 11-cell identification
panel and the donor’s own RBCs (Table 3). Adding the
anti-idiotype antibody in a fivefold excess concentration
resulted in the original agglutination pattern (i.e., without
daratumumab), typical for the presence of anti-E and
anti-K (Table 3). This indicates that the anti-idiotype anti-
body does not interfere with the binding of clinically rele-
vant irregular antibodies and allows correct irregular
antibody identification.
As an alternative to a daratumumab-specific anti-
idiotype antibody, sCD38 extracellular domain protein
(sCD38) was tested as a generic solution to prevent inter-
ference by anti-CD38 MoAbs. As shown in Table 2, sCD38
can be successfully applied to block interference by dara-
tumumab as well as 38SB19. sCD38 also allowed correct
identification of known irregular antibodies in plasma
spiked with daratumumab (not shown). sCD38 therefore
provides a generic solution to prevent false-positive indi-
rect antiglobulin results caused by anti-CD38 MoAbs.
DISCUSSION
Present findings
MoAbs are a rapidly expanding class of drugs with
increasing clinical applications. The possible interference
of such therapeutics in laboratory testing, however, is
often poorly investigated. Here, we describe that infusion
of the monoclonal anti-CD38 daratumumab causes a
false-positive result in the IAT used in blood transfusion
medicine. We found that a small fraction of RBCs express
a low level of CD38 molecules per cell, which appears
unrelated to RBC age. In all patients, daratumumab infu-
sion resulted in a mild and temporal decrease in Hb,
accompanied by an increase in reticulocyte count, with-
out resulting in clinically relevant anemia (Fig. 1). We
speculate that this decrease in Hb is likely not due to
complement-mediated lysis (Fig. 2), but due to Fc-
receptor–mediated clearance in the spleen. 11
It was fur-
thermore observed that anti-CD38 MoAb interference in
the IAT is not specific for daratumumab, as comparable
dose-dependent interference was also observed for three
additional anti-CD38.
Clinical perspective
The use of daratumumab leads to in vitro RBC agglutina-
tion and thereby to false-positive results in the IAT, which
is used to detect irregular antibodies. Although this may
appear only a clinical laboratory problem, there are
important consequences for blood transfusion medicine,
as the presence of irregular antibodies to clinically rele-
vant blood groups cannot be ruled out using the standard
tests. This concern should be recognized when patients
require a blood transfusion. In Phase I and II trials in
which 10 of 78 MM patients treated with daratumumab
worldwide required transfusion, no major transfusion-
related events were observed. It should be noted that
these transfusions were not directly related to the small
Hb decrease caused by daratumumab, but were due to
the underlying hematologic malignancy or a completely
unrelated condition or therapy (e.g., hip replacement sur-
gery). All patients were required to undergo blood typing
before being treated with daratumumab. In addition,
potential mitigation strategies are under development,
that can be implemented across blood banks globally to
prevent any potential blood transfusion problems, two of
which (i.e., the anti-idiotype antibody and sCD38) are
described in the present work.
Mitigation strategies
Different scenarios on how to cope with MoAb interference
can be envisioned depending on the clinical condition of
the patient. During acute, life-threatening situations non–
cross-matched blood group O D– RBCs can be transfused
as this product is suitable for any combination of the ABO
and D blood types. This strategy, that doesn’t take the
potential presence of alloantibodies into account, is identi-
cal for patients not receiving MoAb therapy. In elective sit-
uations, extensive typing and matching for clinically
TABLE 3. RBC agglutination patterns of an 11-cell identification panel with plasma from a patient with known irregular antibodies against blood groups E and K and spiked with daratumumab. Cells 3 and 6 of the identification panel were E1 and Cells 2 and 7 were K1. Adding a fivefold excess daratumumab anti-idiotype antibody recovers
the original agglutination pattern and allows correct identification of the known irregular antibodies
Cell
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Autocontrol
Plasma – 31 31 – – 21 31 – – – – – Plasma 1 dara 11 31 31 0.51 11 31 31 11 11 11 21 21 Plasma 1 dara 1
anti-idiotype – 31 31 – – 21 31 – – – – –
OOSTENDORP ET AL.
1560 TRANSFUSION Volume 55, June 2015
relevant blood group antigens (i.e., D, C, c, E, and e and
Kell, Kidd, Duffy, and MNS antigens) can be performed.
Although this strategy prevents mismatching for the most
common blood groups and also prevents development of
irregular antibodies against these blood groups, it has sev-
eral disadvantages. First, it is very time-consuming. Sec-
ond, only a limited number of matching donors will be
available, likely resulting in shortage of compatible blood
products if the blood loss is too extensive. Third, and most
importantly, the presence of other irregular antibodies still
cannot be excluded due the positive cross-matching results
caused by the anti-CD38 MoAb. Although posttransfusion
alloimmunization occurs in only 2% to 3% of the general
population,12 the incidence increases to approximately 9%
in patients with hematologic malignancies.13 Alloantibod-
ies can be directed against any of over 300 different blood
groups and can cause (delayed) hemolytic transfusion
reactions if they remain undetected. This risk can be easily
avoided if the MoAb interference is blocked during labora-
tory testing.
We developed two solutions to overcome the interfer-
ence of anti-CD38 MoAbs in the IAT. First, a specific neu-
tralizing anti-idiotype antibody, a reagent that is usually
generated during drug development programs, can be
employed and, second, the recombinant sCD38 extracel-
lular domain, which could provide a generic solution to
attenuate the interference of anti-CD38. Both approaches
resulted in abrogation of the interference of anti-CD38 in
the IAT, without interfering with irregular antibody detec-
tion. It is therefore recommended that national reference
laboratories for blood transfusion medicine are provided
with these reagents, to allow safe and timely blood trans-
fusion for patients receiving anti-CD38 MoAb therapy. In
addition, patients may carry a blood transfusion card indi-
cating that they receive anti-CD38 MoAb therapy.
MoAb interference in other clinical laboratory tests
The described interference with blood group serologic
testing represents an example of the type of interactions
that may occur between biologics present in the patient’s
serum and specific tests in the clinical laboratory. Such
interference may occur more often with the increasing
use of MoAb therapies and may apply to a wide variety of
laboratory tests, as also previously demonstrated for sev-
eral MoAbs in serum protein and immunofixation electro-
phoresis.3 Specifically, potential interference with
laboratory tests that are based on selective antibody–anti-
gen interactions, similar to the ones targeted by the thera-
peutic molecule, should be investigated during drug
development. A close interaction between the researchers,
clinicians, and clinical laboratory experts is therefore
critical.
In conclusion, the potential interference of MoAb
therapeutics with laboratory tests is considered an
increasing problem due to their increasing clinical use. As
described here, interference of anti-CD38 MoAbs in the
IAT may delay or even prevent the selection of suitable
blood products for transfusion. Proper solutions, like the
two solutions presented in this work, should therefore be
developed in concordance with the development of the
MoAb therapeutic, to allow for convenient and correct
laboratory testing and to ensure patient safety. As these
solutions are to be used for patient follow-up during
MoAb treatment, we suggest an extension of the definition
of companion diagnostics, to also include these specific
reagents which prevent inference of MoAbs in laboratory
testing. Finally, as the type of interference of the therapeu-
tic with clinical laboratory testing is not always predict-
able, it is advised that clinical laboratories should always
be informed when patients are treated with biologics.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Gerdien Walbeek and Brigitte van Oirschot
(Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, UMC
Utrecht, The Netherlands) for performing the blood group sero-
logic testing and the Percoll age separation of RBCs, respectively.
MO, JJLvB, PWHIP, WWvS, and KMKdV were responsible for writ-
ing the manuscript; literature search; figure design; study design;
data collection, analysis, and interpretation; and final approval of
manuscript. PD, IK, and TA were responsible for writing the
manuscript, data interpretation, and final approval of
manuscript.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
MO, WWvS, and KMKdV have disclosed no conflicts of interests.
JJLvB and PWHIP are employees of Genmab, own Genmab war-
rants and/or stock, and are listed as inventors on daratumumab
patent applications owned by Genmab. Genmab funded this
study. PD, IK, and TA are employees of Janssen. Janssen has an
exclusive worldwide daratumumab license and development
agreement from Genmab.
REFERENCES
1. Young D. Effects of drugs on clinical laboratory tests. 5th ed.
Washington, DC: AACC Press; 2000.
2. Ruuls SR, Lammerts van Bueren JJ, van de Winkel JG, et al.
Novel human antibody therapeutics: the age of the Umabs.
Biotechnol J 2008;3:1157-71.
3. Genzen JR, Kawaguchi KR, Furman RR. Detection of a
monoclonal antibody therapy (ofatumumab) by serum pro-
tein and immunofixation electrophoresis. Br J Haematol
2011;155:123-5.
4. McCudden CR, Voorhees PM, Hainsworth SA, et al. Interfer-
ence of monoclonal antibody therapies with serum protein
electrophoresis tests. Clin Chem 2010;56:1897-9.
TRANSFUSION COMPLICATED DUE TO MoAb THERAPY
Volume 55, June 2015 TRANSFUSION 1561
5. de Weers M, Tai YT, van der Veer MS, et al. Daratumumab, a
novel therapeutic human CD38 monoclonal antibody, indu-
ces killing of multiple myeloma and other hematological
tumors. J Immunol 2011;186:1840-8.
6. van der Veer MS, de Weers M, van Kessel B, et al. The thera-
peutic human CD38 antibody daratumumab improves the
anti-myeloma effect of newly emerging multi-drug thera-
pies. Blood Cancer J 2011;1:e41.
7. van der Veer MS, de Weers M, van Kessel B, et al. Towards
effective immunotherapy of myeloma: enhanced elimination
of myeloma cells by combination of lenalidomide with the
human CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab. Haema-
tologica 2011;96:284-90.
8. Vink T, Oudshoorn-Dickmann M, Roza M, et al. A simple,
robust and highly efficient transient expression system for
producing antibodies. Methods 2014;65:5-10.
9. Lammerts van Bueren JJ, Bleeker WK, Bøgh HO, et al. Effect
of target dynamics on pharmacokinetics of a novel thera-
peutic antibody against the epidermal growth factor recep-
tor: implications for the mechanisms of action. Cancer Res
2006;66:7630-8.
10. Albeniz I, Demir O, T€urker-Sener L, et al. Erythrocyte CD38
as a prognostic marker in cancer. Hematology 2007;12:409-
14.
11. Frank MM, Schreiber AD, Atkinson JP, et al. NIH conference.
Pathophysiology of immune hemolytic anemia. Ann Intern
Med 1977;87:210-22.
12. Heddle NM, Soutar RL, O’Hoski PL, et al. A prospective
study to determine the frequency and clinical significance of
alloimmunization post-transfusion. Br J Haematol 1995;91:
1000-5.
13. Schonewille H, Haak HL, van Zijl AM. Alloimmunization
after blood transfusion in patients with hematologic and
oncologic diseases. Transfusion 1999;39:763-71.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the
online version of this article at the publisher’s website:
Table S1. RBC agglutination patterns of fresh frozen
plasma spiked with two other anti-CD38 antibodies
MOR03087 (top) and Ab79 (bottom) in the indirect anti-
globulin test using a 3-cell RBC screening panel.
Table S2. Agglutination strengths of RBC eluates pre-
pared from donor RBCs incubated with daratumumab-
spiked plasma using a 3-cell screening panel. The aver-
age daratumumab concentration in the eluate was
86.8 6 36.7 ng/mL, as measured using an ELISA. No
human IgG was detected in acid eluate control samples
of RBCs that were not incubated with daratumumab.
Table S3. Agglutination patterns of age-separated RBCs
from three healthy donors with daratumumab-spiked
plasma. For Fraction 1, agglutination patterns could not
be determined due to a very low yield, likely caused by
the absence of significant amounts of reticulocytes in
healthy donors.
Fig. S1. Daratumumab (DARA) in the patient’s serum
binds to the test RBCs. After adding the anti-IgG rea-
gent, RBC agglutination is observed, thereby generating
a false positive result. The presence of irregular antibod-
ies is masked by the presence of DARA.
Fig. S2. Daratumumab (DARA) specific anti-idiotype
antibodies are added to the patient’s serum and bind to
daratumumab. If the patient has no irregular antibod-
ies, the anti-idiotype blocks the binding of DARA to
RBCs and no agglutination is observed in the indirect
antiglobulin test. However, if the patient does have
irregular antibodies, the anti-idiotype also specifically
binds DARA and RBC agglutination is solely due to the
presence of irregular blood group antibodies. Inhibition
of DARA binding to RBCs was also obtained using a
sCD38 protein.
Fig. S3. A) Dot-plot of double staining, showing the
erythrocyte population in green (CD235a-FITC1/CD71-
APC-) and the reticulocyte population in red (CD235a-
FITC1/CD71-APC1). B) Histograms showing the PE-
fluorescence for reticulocytes and erythrocytes. Results
indicate that red blood cells express low levels of CD38.
OOSTENDORP ET AL.
1562 TRANSFUSION Volume 55, June 2015