Case Study 3: emotional dimensions
|
Excellent |
Satisfactory |
Basic |
|
|
MINIMUM WORD COUNT |
|||
|
Minimum length of 200 words per question (e.g. Question 1 > 200 words, Question 2 > 200 words) & format is followed consistently. 6 pts |
Word count LESS THAN 200 words per question and/or format not followed. 3 pts |
||
|
UNDERSTANDING AND ACCURATE APPLICATION OF COURSE CONCEPT/ASSIGNED TOPIC |
|||
|
Assignment responses reflect full understanding of course material. 5 pts
Assignment responses use course concepts accurately. 4 pts |
Assignment responses reflect some understanding of course concept. 3 pts
Unclear use of course concepts in assignment responses. 2 pts |
Assignment responses reflect limited understanding of course concept. 2 pts
Assignment responses use course concepts inaccurately. 1 pt |
|
|
|
DEPTH OF ANALYSIS |
||
|
Assignment responses display significant depth of analysis. 6 pts
Assignment responses relate to questions asked. 2 pts |
Assignment responses display some depth of analysis. 4 pts
Assignment responses are mostly relevant to the questions asked. 1 pt |
Assignment responses suffer from limited depth of analysis. 3 pts
Assignment responses are mostly irrelevant to the questions asked. 0 pts |
|
|
PROVIDING SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE WITH REASONED IMPLICATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS |
|||
|
|
Assignment responses mostly incorporate specific content and examples from course material to competently substantiate independent points and ideas. 4 pts
Reasoned implications and conclusions are also clearly and accurately identified. 5 pts |
Assignment responses incorporate some use of specific content and examples from course material which may be mostly but not fully appropriate to substantiating points and ideas. 2 pts
Reasoned implications and conclusion limited with low to moderate level of accuracy. 2 pts |
Assignment responses incorporate limited use of specific content and examples from course material are mostly irrelevant and do not support the ideas being developed. 1 pt
Reasoned implications and conclusions absent. 1 pt |
|
|
INCORPORATING EXTERNAL SOURCES |
||
|
Assignment responses accurately incorporate 2 or more external sources plus any course resources (text chapter, video) used. 6 pts
All references and citations of external sources fully utilize APA format. 4 pts
(Both in-text citations and references required. No title page is needed.) |
Assignment responses accurately incorporate 1 external source plus any course resources used. 4 pts
Some references and citations of external sources utilize APA format. 3 pts
(Both in-text citations and references required. No title page is needed.) |
Assignment responses only incorporate course resources used, but no external source. 2 pts
No included references and citations of external sources utilize APA format. 2 pts
(Both in-text citations and references required. No title page is needed.) |
|
|
LANGUAGE, SPELLING, AND GRAMMAR |
|||
|
Assignment responses are written using language that is clear, concise and easy to understand. 4 pts Content has few to no grammar or spelling errors. 4 pts |
Assignment responses are adequately written, but writing may be ambiguous. 2 pts
Content has some grammar or spelling errors. 2 pts |
Assignment responses are poorly written and difficult to understand. 1 pt
Content has many grammar and spelling errors. 1 pt |