2.3
Getting Started
This assignment will have you debate the possibilities for responding to reality in two ways, using rationalism (reason) or empiricism (experience). You will come to appreciate the place for each type of approach and discover which is primary to your understanding of reality and your sense of life priorities. This scenario is based on the distinction between the body and the mind discussion in Chapter 4 of A Christian Philosophical Journey (CPJ). Philosophers have debated the primary importance of the body or the mind in learning and processing our human response to outside stimulus. Does one “know” something best by thinking through it or by experiencing it (or even both)? Which is more reliable or true? This question goes right to the heart of determining if there is one ultimate approach in epistemology.
Upon successful completion of this discussion, you will be able to:
· Discuss the differences between sources of knowledge and the values we assign to them.
· Determine the difference between rationalism and empiricism.
Resources
· Textbook: A Christian Philosophical Journey
Instructions
1. Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
2. Review Chapter 4 of your textbook, A Christian Philosophical Journey.
a. Give an everyday example of where you have observed reason and experience, and the value of each.
b. In processing reality, which comes first—the body or the mind? Which is more important to understand the truth of reality? Do we need to choose between them at all, or should all our approach to life be holistic? Which approach do you tend to use? Give an example.
c. You may also want to try to do the synthesis step by coming up with your own new paradigm for these concepts (and your own illustration).