2-3AssigmentH.docx

Running Head: ASSIGMENT 2-3: HYPOTHESIS TESTING 1

ASSIGMENT 2-3: HYPOTHESIS TESTING

A. Example 1

Solution in no.1 Problem in minitab finding

Significance Level (x)

55(given)

Standard Deviation (O)

286.2(determined using Minitab )

Mean Time (x)

.025 (given)

Sample Size (x)

30 (given)

Reject Null Hypothesis if X> P- Valve

Null hypothesis μ

275

Alternative hypothesis u

>275

In this problem Jeffery’s father assumed that his son will be faster by the use of new expensive google. The null hypothesis is rejected, as you can see on the solution the X (.05) is > than the P value of .019. It means that Jeffery can swim faster than 16.43 seconds with the use of google that receive form his father.

B. Example 2

Solution: Problem in Minitab finding

Significance Level (x)

55(given)

Standard Deviation (O)

286.2(determined using Minitab )

Mean Time (x)

.025 (Given)

Sample Size (x)

30 (given)

Reject Null Hypothesis if X> P- Valve < .025

Null hypothesis μ

275

In conclusion in no. 2 there is no enough evidence to prove that the players have more than 275 pounds. It says here that the null cannot be rejected in this case P is .132 > X Valve of .025.

C. Example 3

Solution: Problem in Minitab finding

Unknown deviation

In this problem the statistic data says the 05 being > P valve .04 with rejected in null hypothesis. The average score is >65 as per teacher’s prediction.

D. Example 4

By the use of normal approximation, P value is .549.

There is no evidence that the brides are younger to their grooms that are diff. than 50%. The 99% level of confidence can’t capable to reject by the null hypothesis in the value X valve= 0.1 < the P value is .549.

E. Example 5

They have no evidence to tell of the percentage of the household have 3 phones is not 30 percent. The X<P is the answer to the null hypothesis can’t reject.

Reference

Majaski, Christina. (Feb 2019). Hypothesis Testing. Retrieved from

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/hypothesistesting.asp

null hypothesis U =65

alternative hypothesis U > 65

Rejected null hypothesis if X > P - Valve

Test of μ 65 vs > 65

variableNMeanSt DevSE Mean 95%L BoundTP

C110673.21.0165.151.980.04

significan level (x).01 (given)

sample size (n)100 (given)

alternative hypothesis p ≠ 50

null hypothesis of p0.5

test and C1 for 1 Proportiontest of P0.5 vs ≠ .05

SampleXNSample P99%CIZ valuePvalue

1531000.530.4014441, 06585590.60.549

Significance Level (n):.05(not given, inferred)

Sample Size (n): 150 (given)

null hypothesis of p0.3

alternative hypothesis p ≠ .30

test of p = 0.3 vs p ≠ 0.3

samplexnsample p95% CIz valuep value

1431500.2866670.214300 And 0.359033-0.360.722

test of μ =16.43 vs 16.43Assumed deviation0.8

NMeanSE Mean 95%Upper BoundZP

15160.20716.34-2.080.019

test of μ 275 vs>275Standard assumed deviation55

NMean SE MEAN 97.5%Lower BoundzP

30286.210266.51.12 0.1230.123

Segnificance of level (x).05 (given)

Mean Score67 (determined by Minitab)

Sample size (n)10 (Given)

No Standard given deviation