Homework Question
Running head: KOTTER’S STEPS 5 THROUGH 8
1
Running head: KOTTER’S STEPS 5 THROUGH 8
4
KOTTER’S STEPS 5 THROUGH 8
Name: Patricia Vela
Instructor: Dr. Paul Lockwood Brown ED. D, MBA
OUR ICEBERG IS MELTING
The “Our Iceberg is Melting” is a simple story that was authored by Kotter to provide techniques that can be adapted when dealing with change and uncertainty through eight steps. The process of change can be very difficult and there are so many obstacles that can stand in the way. The tale is about resistance to change, therefore, Kotter provides us with a framework that can be used in dealing with obstacles. Fred observes the treads in the icebergs and does not panic and wants to do something about, however, he is no position to dictate how other people should act. Fred empowered the other penguins to act, Fred helped others to see and feel the problem, (Kotter & Rathgeber, 2006). He removed all the barriers to make the vision a reality for those who wanted to do so; Alice understood what they were up against.
Buddy suggested solution is a vision of nomadic life that could serve as a short-term win for the colony. Prior to the conclusion, Fred has suggested that the problem could be solved by freezing the bottle. His ideas put so many people in fear and more realistic solutions are called for. In the tale, there are several meetings which are arranged to address a possible solution for the icebergs. When Buddy decides to make a presentation of PowerPoint slides it shows that he kept pushing for change until the solution had become a reality for the rest of the penguins.
Nono was not pleased with the solution and kept finding faults which were ignored by most penguins. Amanda believed in the vision and worked for long hours to make it a reality, (Kotter & Rathgeber, 2006). Despite Nono resisting, the strategy was made to stick and a new culture was created to increase the popularity nomadic life through kindergartens where parents were also swayed to adapt the change. Today the colony accepted the reality and move around like nomads and became more skilled on how to handle anticipated dangers or risks.
Strengths
APL approach was dynamic and therefore, Nokia what they did right to sustain and push for leadership change was that they used business simulations to increase popularity and manage resistance. The transformation was persisted by the leadership for almost three years and by 2016 over 700 managers had gone through the programme and finally they accepted. The vision was made a reality being relentless to initiate change in the company and with time the new culture was stuck, (Kotter & Rathgeber, 2006). Leadership development played a very significant role in Nokia’s journey of success.
Weaknesses
Organizational change can be very difficult to carry out and most of the corporations avoid it at times. Nokia has over the years engaged in organizational changes to improve performance. Leadership and management decisions were introduced in the company in 2012. Leadership change led to internal rivalry which sparked disagreements and tension that had been stirred by a diverse leadership style. What they failed to address was cultural integration when the company wanted to transform to Complex Adaptive Leadership (CAL) or Adaptable Leader Program (ALP) which was done by Obolensky’s and Kracklauer’s company. Bureaucracy contributed to the failure of the model in the company, they failed to empower the employees and senior managers to act so that the change could be made a reality, (Kotter & Rathgeber, 2006). They failed to produce a short-term vision for mangers leading to resistance and disagreements.
References
Kotter, J. P., & Rathgeber, H. (2006). Our iceberg is melting: Changing and succeeding under any conditions. Macmillan. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2810/40cf99b29063fa0b121132a1382b5273c058.pdf