one page assignment on ITIL with zero plagiarism

profilemanpreetk
1IntrotoLaw2021.pdf

ISSM 561 - Introduction to Law and Ethics

Martin Kratz, QC © 2021

1

Agenda Introductions

Using Meet

Overview of the course and evaluation

Role of private security in society

Ethics vs. Law

Introduction to law

Types of Law

How to read a judge’s decision

The Court System

The Constitution

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms

2

Introductions Martin Kratz, B.Sc., J.D., Q.C.

Long history in computer security and law

I also teach at Osgoode Hall Law School where I am codirector of the IP LLM program

Experience acting on IRTs, cyber security, breach response

I was a founder and first director of (ISC)2, and a Fellow of CIPS

You …

Background education or work?

But first let us talk about Meet 3

Meet Meet is a basic video conference tool

I can post and work through the presentation materials.

You can ask questions using your microphones.

I cannot see chat messages when presenting slides.

Just be patient. Meet does not have a queue system.

I ask you to keep your microphones muted during the lectures so we do not get distracted with background noise.

4

Meet When I switch from speaking (where you can see me) to presentation mode, my screen is filled with the slides.

You have copies of the slides from Moodle.

When you ask questions I cannot see you.

That makes things artificial but we just have to work through that.

I do encourage you to ask questions.

It makes the class better for all students and I have calculated question time into the length of the lectures.

5

Your introductions

Your introductions are a way for us to practice communicating using Meet.

I am advised that there are many students enrolled in the course.

Please introduce who you are

Please tell me your background education or work experience

6

Overview of Course and Evaluation Resources:

1. Course outline

2. Text – Canada’s Internet Law, 2013

This text is optional - the Course covers additional material unique for computer security

It is a good professional reference and gives deeper discussion on many issues we will discuss

3. Handouts, Readings – uploaded to Moodle

4. Lectures - slides uploaded to Moodle

7

Overview of Course and Evaluation

Asynchronous assignments

Several readings and/or resources are posted on Moodle

These help you to get the most out of the lecture

Lecture time is adjusted for the asynchronous work

8

Learning Objectives

This course provides an introduction for the non-legally trained student of how the Canadian system of law works

contrasts and reviews and contrasts ethical and legal obligations, and

introduces key areas of law for the information system security professional or manager.

9

Learning Objectives Specific course learning objectives include to introduce students to:

differences between law and ethics and to review the ethical codes of the leading IT professional organization in Canada, Canadian Information Processing Society (CIPS), and of the world’s leading computer security certification service, the International Information System Security Certification Consortium (ISC)2.

law and the constitutional division of powers in Canada, and the court system in Canada.

the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and its interaction with law especially in respect of search and seizure from electronic devices.

contract law generally as well as in an online context.

criminal law and civilian powers of arrest featuring common computer related offenses.

civil litigation and common relief useful in computer security.

selected evidentiary issues and types of proceedings available in Canadian courts including how to work with the police.

mandatory private sector privacy law, the law regulating electronic communications and to intellectual property law and border remedies.

legal principles that govern the preparation for, responding to and management of data breaches, giving notification of a breach and the legal implications of data breaches.

internet law and resolution of internet disputes including domain name conflicts and selected content disputes as well as orders addressing online anonymity.

10

Overview of Course and Evaluation Law and Ethics

Constitution and Charter and Rights and Freedoms

Criminal Law - search and seizure issues

Introduction to investigations

Mandatory private sector privacy law

Intellectual property law

Contract law

Anti-spam law

Introduction to data breaches

Canadian data breach litigation

Breach notification

Cyber insurance

Internet disputes

Anonymity and non-litigation remedies

11

Overview of Course

The course covers a lot of content

It is difficult to convey this level of detail with out content heavy slides

We have limited time and a lot to cover …

12

Course Outline

Health and wellness resources are listed in the course outline

Please reach out to the supports if needed

Stress levels can be higher when learning online

If you need help … Concordia has many resources and supports available

13

Class Lectures We begin at the course’s assigned time

The Google Meet link is posted on the course page on Moodle

Lectures will take about a 10 minute break each hour

Meal break? Mental break?

Duration of the lectures will depend on your questions and include credit for planned asynchronous work

Expect to have some guest lectures

14

Overview of Course and Evaluation Final evaluation - Final paper - 70% of course grade

3 interim exams - each worth 10%

Given out in some classes - each due two days later

Focus on the key subjects covered in the course

Expect several short answer questions, multiple choice and some longer topics to address

I will have emphasized most issues

Final exam questions are released last class

Final exam is due one week later

Attendance in class and studying the resources are the best way to do well

15

Academic Honesty The interim and final exams are to be your own work.

Academic honesty is fundamental to the academic enterprise.

Students are urged to familiarize themselves with Section 9.2.5 of the Calendar.

Note that cases of academic dishonesty (e.g., cheating, plagiarism, collusion, unauthorized submission for credit of previously graded work, and misrepresentation) are serious offences.

Penalties for academic dishonesty range from a grade of zero on the work in question to expulsion.

16

Academic Honesty

Concordia takes academic honesty very seriously.

The dean has asked each professor to ask each student to review and sign an Academic Honesty Pledge.

Please download from Moodle.

Please post to Moodle once signed.

Due January 14, 2021.

17

Evaluation The final exam papers are evaluated based on:

Demonstrated understanding

You demonstrate an understanding of the topic and applicable law

Argument

You answer the question which includes your perspective (argument)

Writing

Your writing is coherent, legible and you cite your sources

18

Evaluation Demonstrated understanding - about 23% of weight (16 points)

Foundational legal principles, materials discussed in the class

Basic legal concepts involved are correctly used

Argument - 57% of weight (40 points of weight)

Explanation of the topic, development of the thesis and conclusion

Thoroughness of discussion, acknowledgement / treatment of counter arguments

Use of research to support

Writing - 20 % of weight (14 points)

Appropriateness, form, use of footnotes, citation of sources

Grammar, structure and flow, style

19

Preparation tips Plan your answer well

Check the deadline

Give yourself time to show your research and writing efforts

Cite your sources

Comply with academic honesty rules

See notes in the Course Outline

Submit your work only

Work toward the deadline

20

Deadlines

3 Interim exams (10% each) issued on Moodle

Answers are due 5 pm two days later

You deliver answers electronically on Moodle

Prefer Word documents

21

Final Exam

Will circulate final exam in the last class

Final paper is due one week later by 5 pm

Deliver answers electronically on Moodle

Prefer Word format

22

Final Grade

Final grade is relative to a student’s position in the class

The numbers in Moodle are an important part of the analysis but Moodle is not set up for relative grading

Final grades are not based on the raw scores

Ultimately, the Dean authorizes the final grades

Final grades are approved after the last class in the term

23

Role of Private Security in Society

24

Role of Private Security

Long history of private security

Role of the public police is more recent

Look at trends, regulation of private security industry

Key issues – role vis-à-vis

the public

The public police

25

Role of Private Security Law Reform Commission 'In Search of Security: The Roles of Public Police and Private Agencies’

Risk society – growing desire for security, orderliness and control – management of risk

Dominant theme in US and British culture

Per capita police per 100,000 population

Increases to about 1975

Flat to about 1990

Continuing decline since about 1990

26

Role of Private Security Trends

Policing mass spaces – West Edmonton Mall

Average population of over 60,000 per day – 200,000 on Saturdays

Security service gets about 40,000 calls for service each year

Despite a drop in crime, the demand for protection has increased significantly over the past few years as a result of:

(a) strong media coverage of criminal acts,

(b) growing feeling of insecurity among the public, and

(c) high insurance premiums

27

Role of Private Security Trends

September 11, 2001 - Concerns about terrorist attacks have heightened feelings of insecurity and, as a result, fueled renewed demand for protection

Gradual transfer of responsibilities in the field of protection over the past 20 years

government budget constraints, private security firms have increased market share in protection services

ratio of security guards and related occupations to police officers

about 1.2 in the early 1990s

approximately 1.5 since 2003

28

Role of Private Security Types of roles in privacy security

Forensic accountants

Security managers

Computer security

Insurance investigators

Security guards airport security guard armoured car guard bodyguard bouncer commissionaire crossing guard gate attendant night watchman pre-boarding security guard security guard

29

Role of Private Security

Census data –

Number of security guards and related occupations increased sharply following the events of September 11, 2001 and the increased only slightly since

Investigation and security services accounted for approximately 56% of security guards and related occupations

Women held approximately 25% of all positions in this occupational group

30

Role of Private Security

Private policing is omnipresent

Policing large tracts of land

Malls, housing developments

Gated communities

Addressing frauds and economic crimes Forensic accountants Insurance investigators Banks Computer security

31

Role of Private Security

Public and private roles also blur

Private contributions to policing Community can purchase RCMP assistance Pay duty – police performing private security functions Formal and informal cooperation arrangements

Private security work in conjunction with police

32

Regulation of Private Security

Provincial regulation – Security Services and Investigators Act (Alberta)

Act, regulations and policy establish licensing and reporting requirements uniform standards code of conduct training programs, and a public complaints process

for the security, investigation and locksmith industries in Alberta

33

Regulation of Private Security Section 2(1) No person may, without a licence to do so, for remuneration, investigate, conduct surveillance activities or seek or obtain information about

(a) crimes, offences, contraventions of enactments or misconduct, or allegations of crimes, offences, contraventions of enactments or misconduct,

(b) the cause of an accident, incident, property damage, personal injury or damage to premises,

(c) the activity, conduct, character or reputation of a person,

(d) the location of property, or

(e) the whereabouts of a person.

34

Regulation of Private Security Exemptions from Licensing regulation – Section 10

Police

Lawyers

Persons acting in an investigative capacity under banking and similar legislation

Insurance adjusters

Credit rating agencies, banks, credit union employees

Armored car service

Voluntary security guards

Hotel staff responsible for keys

Many other specific exemptions

35

Accountability measures Police

Political and legal accountability

Criminal law

Internal investigative agencies

Police Commissions

Arms length from political masters

Complaints processes

36

Accountability measures Private Security

Market place accountability

Legal accountability

Provincial regulations

Criminal law

Contract law

Labour/employment law

37

Trends in Computer Security

38

Trends in Private Security

Trend is towards increasing professionalism of the private security function

Industry wide standards and training

Certifications serve as evidence of knowledge and skill

Desirable by employers

Rise of professional associations

39

Trends in Computer Security

(ISC)2 Cybersecurity Workforce Study 2019

cyber security professionals are “generally satisfied in their careers and optimistic about their futures”

Strong work place demand identified …

561,000 cyber security professionals needed in North America

over 4 million needed worldwide

40

Trends in Computer Security

CSE Cyber Security Career Guide 2021

Issued by the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security

Cyber security jobs growing by 7% each year

Estimate 3.5 Million vacant positions worldwide in 2021

Well paid - Average salary in 2020 $97,000

Seeking diversity

41

Trends in Computer Security

CSE Cyber Security Career Guide 2021

Identify paths for success

Encourage certification and identify certifications that employers value

Identify Canadian cyber security programs across Canada

Concordia University of Edmonton

Identify that CSE is recruiting

42

Private Security

Questions?

43

Means to Regulate Behaviour

44

Means of Control

Professor Lawrence Lessig describes four modalities of control of human behaviour:

Law

Social norms

Markets

Architecture

45

Means of Control Your studies cover each aspect of these controls

Law (top-down regulation)

This course – binding enforcement

Focus on the role of the state

Use of coercive power to enforce compliance

Key issues:

Who makes the law?

How do we interpret the law?

46

Means of Control Your studies cover each aspect of these controls

Social norms –

Social behaviours taught at home, in school, in society generally

Experience as a source of confidence in a service provider,

Role of Professional Associations, setting minimum standards

This course looks at some of these questions

Key issues

Who makes the rules in the codes of ethics

How to enforce the codes

47

Means of Control Your studies cover each aspect of these controls

Markets –

Markets if allowed to operate provide signals to the participants

Contracts are a way of setting up how a market will work

Contract parties can make their own rules

Courts will enforce the terms of the agreement

This course looks at contract law

48

Means of Control Your studies cover each aspect of these controls

Architecture –

Your other courses would address such issues as

Access controls

Technical security measures

Physical security measures

Barriers accomplish enforcement (but are ultimately backed up by Law)

49

Means of Control

For each means of control the law plays an enforcement role

Next questions

How are ethical codes different from the law?

How are they enforced?

50

Means of Control

Questions?

51

Ethics vs. Law

52

Ethics vs. Law Law

Top down regulation

Sets minimum standards of conduct or behaviour

Generally applies broadly

Enforced by the Courts

Ethics

Set standards specific for a profession or sector or industry – social norms

minimum standards of conduct or behaviour expected of members of the group

Applies to members of the group who adopt the rules

Enforced by the governing body – often as a contractual matter

53

Example of ethics in Information Processing Computer Ethics Institute “Ten Commandments of Computer Ethics”

Thou shalt not use a computer to harm other people

Thou shalt not interfere with other people’s work

Thou shalt not snoop around in other people’s computer files.

Thou shalt not use a computer to steal.

Thou shalt not use a computer to bear false witness.

Thou shalt not copy or use proprietary software for which you have not paid.

54

Example of ethics in Information Processing Computer Ethics Institute “Ten Commandments of Computer Ethics” continued …

Thou shalt not use other people’s resources without authorization or proper compensation.

Thou shalt not appropriate other people’s intellectual output.

Thou shalt think about the social consequences of the program you are writing or the system you are designing.

Thou shalt always use a computer in ways that ensure consideration and respect for your fellow humans.

Encyclopedia of Business and Finance, 2nd Ed., 2007 Thomson Gale

55

Ethics in a Professional Context

56

The Information Processing Profession

57

Ethics in Information Processing Canadian Information Processing Society (CIPS)

Canada's professional association for information systems professionals

Registered as professional associations in many provinces

Hold exclusive rights to certain designations – ISP, etc.

Professionals can identify themselves as holders of the designation

Typically to hold the designation a person must qualify:

Must address a body of knowledge

Agree to comply with the Code of Ethics 58

CIPS Code of Ethics The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada supports the work of IT professionals in setting a Code of Ethics for their profession.  The leadership demonstrated by CIPS is to be applauded and emulated.  By incorporating privacy protection as a core element of its ethical framework, CIPS not only demonstrates that IT professionals are an integral part of the value chain of their organizations by ensuring that systems and the information assets they contain are protected against abuse and misuse; CIPS also affirms that privacy protection is both an ethical imperative as well as a set of design principles that are essential to the proper functioning of our organizations and institutions."  Jennifer Stoddart Privacy Commissioner of Canada

CIPS Code of Ethics CIPS Code of Ethics

Newly revised for 2018

The code sets out obligations that are additional to other (legal) obligations

Key imperatives

Protect the Public Interest and Privacy of Information

Avoid Conflicts of Interest

Take Professional Responsibility

Contribute to the IT Profession 60

Protect the Public Interest CIPS Members must

Carry out work or study with primary regard for public interest (including health, security, safety, privacy, protection of the environment and social responsibility) and in accordance with regulatory requirements and legislation.

Report to the relevant authority problems that might result in serious damage to persons, organizations, property or the economy.

Work in accordance with legitimate rights of 3rd parties, and conduct all activities with due regard for ownership, property rights and privacy.

Treat all employer/client business information as confidential, respect copyrights, trade secrets, privacy and terms of license agreements.

61

Protect the Privacy of Information CIPS Members must

Give credit where it is due on all reports, papers and ownership of code and designs.

Understand and comply with obligations imposed on them under applicable privacy legislation, including The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA), and any amendments to or successor legislation.

Not discriminate in any manner based on issues such as race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, disability, national origin, or social class.

Behave as directed regarding any other issue protected by legislation.

Exemplify the values of equality, tolerance, and respect for others. 62

Avoid Conflicts of Interest CIPS members must

Maintain objective integrity and independence in professional judgment.

Not place personal interests or those of colleagues above interests of employers/clients, nor place any interests above those of the public. (If this hierarchy causes conflict you have an ethical dilemma).

Make efforts to notify all parties involved and to make full disclosure to the relevant authority if any conflict might be seen to occur by an independent 3rd party.

Not enter into reciprocal relationships with third parties who stand to gain as a result of their work.

63

Take professional responsibility CIPS members must

Take responsibility for results.

Achieve and maintain professional competency in their area(s) of practice, as described in the CIPS Common Body of Knowledge.

Demonstrate knowledge required to undertake work, be compliant with relevant legislation and accepted standards of practice.

Tell the truth and avoid misrepresentation. Be honest and candid. Have integrity.

64

Take professional responsibility CIPS members must … continued …

Be fair to competing vendors.

Balance quality and cost in a very transparent way. Quality includes meeting the requirements of the client AND meeting their need for timeliness.

Follow policies and procedures of client including procurement. Follow client’s code of business conduct, and any contract requirements.

65

Contribute to the IT Profession CIPS members must

Act in a manner that upholds the reputation of CIPS and the IT profession in general, in relationships with anyone with whom they work.

Support professional development for current and new CIPS members, for potential members, colleagues and subordinates.

Work to enhance the public's understanding of information systems and their current capabilities and limitations.

Make all reasonable efforts to counter misinformation that could bring the IT profession or CIPS into disrepute.

Be collegial. Maintain respectful workplace relationships.

Make reasonable efforts to voluntarily participate in activities such as development of standards of practice and advancements in bodies of knowledge.

66

Process of ethical decision making Steps to take

Identify the key ethical issues in the situation

Identify what ethical imperatives are relevant to the situation

Determine what standards of conduct are of major importance to the situation and begin to implement some possible actions by:

generating alternatives and examining the risks and benefits of each

securing additional information

consulting with colleagues, the CIPS Registrar, or with other appropriate sources

examining the probable outcomes of various courses of action

Take a moment to reflect. (Include in the decision making process the feelings and intuitions evoked by the ethical challenges. You might decide that you would feel uncomfortable with certain alternatives even if the action can be justified)

Determine action plan

Take action (follow a concrete action plan, evaluate the plan, and be prepared to correct any negative consequences that might occur from the action taken).

67

Enforcment of the Code CIPS Code of Ethics

Enforcement

Complaint can be submitted to CIPS

Must specify the breach

CIPS investigates

Notification of accused - Accused has an opportunity to respond

Seek rebuttal or answer

Hearing by CIPS

Decision

Appeal to CIPS Executive Committees

68

CIPS Code of Ethics

Questions?

69

Ethics in the Computer Security Profession

70

Ethics in Computer Security In a field such as computer security clients and the public need a high level of trust in the computer security professionals

They get this trust through many things such as:

consistent, honest and competent work

knowing that the professionals are current with the risk environment

knowing that the professionals are trained and skilled

Credentials and certifications are a way to communicate many of these messages

Customers look for credentials and certifications as a source of trust and confidence

71

Ethics in Computer Security (ISC)2 Code of ethics

(ISC)2 certifies computer security professionals

World's largest computer security certification organization

(ISC)2 owns and administer designations such as CISSP, etc.

CISSP - Certified Information Systems Security Professional

CCSP - Certified Cloud Security Professional

CCFP - Certified Cyber Forensics Professional

HCISPP - HealthCare Information Security and Privacy Practitioner

To hold the certification an individual must qualify –

Address need for both knowledge & experience for certifications

Agree to be bound by code of ethics

72

(ISC)2 Code of Ethics

(ISC)2 Code of ethics

The safety and welfare of society and the common good, duty to our principals, and to each other, requires that we adhere, and be seen to adhere, to the highest ethical standards of behavior.

Therefore, strict adherence to this Code is a condition of certification.

73

(ISC)2 Code of Ethics

… strict adherence to this Code is a condition of certification.

Protect society, the common good, necessary public trust and confidence, and the infrastructure.

Act honorably, honestly, justly, responsibly, and legally.

Provide diligent and competent service to principals.

Advance and protect the profession.

74

Enforcement (ISC)2 Code of ethics

Enforcement

Complaint to ethics committee

Must specify breach of code of ethics

Writing, sworn affidavit

Accused has an opportunity to respond

Assessment of the facts by (ISC)2

Findings and recommendations to the board

Notification of decision

Disciplinary action

75

Ethical Codes

Employers see value in ethical codes

A way to demonstrate mastery of the specialized skills

Encourages professional behaviour by the individual

Demonstrates due diligence

76

Reminder - ethics v. law

Law

Top down regulation

Sets minimum standards of conduct or behaviour

Generally applies broadly for everyone

Enforced by the Courts

77

Reminder - ethics v. law Ethics

Set standards specific for a profession or group – social norms

minimum standards of conduct or behaviour expected of members of the group

Applies to members of the group who adopt the rules

Enforced by the governing body – often as a contractual connection

The balance of our course is focused on law

78

Ethical Codes

Questions?

79

Introduction to Law

80

What is Law?

Definition of “law” is affected by many things:

History,

Theory,

Legal system in place, and

Social realities

81

What is Law? Philosophical theories of law

Legal Positivism

Law is what the ruler says

Natural law

Law is what God says it is

Legal realism

Law is what the Courts say it is / will enforce

82

Theories of Law

Legal Positivism

Law is what the ruler says

Enforced by brute force

No moral basis to law

Example – secret laws, social engineering

83

Theories of Law

Natural law

Law is what God says it is

Based on a moral code

Historical view – e.g. religious codes / Nuremberg trials

e.g. Basis of “intent” requirement in criminal law

84

Theories of Law

Legal realism

Law is what the Courts say it is

Reflect social moral values

A rule is only law if the Courts will enforce it

e.g. Morgentaler criminal prosecutions

85

Legal Realism Morgentaler v. The Queen, [1976] 1 S.C.R. 616 decision of the Supreme Court where Dr. Morgentaler unsuccessfully challenged the prohibition of abortion in Canada under the Criminal Code. The Court found the abortion law was appropriately passed by Parliament under the constitution.

1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms in enacted

R v Morgentaler, [1988] 1 SCR 30 decision of the Supreme Court which held that the abortion provision in the Criminal Code was unconstitutional because it violated woman’s rights under section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to security of the person.

R v Morgentaler[1] 1993, decision of the Supreme Court invalidating a provincial attempt to regulate abortions in Canada.

86

Legal Realism This moment in Canadian history wa significant as it pertains to a controversial social debate over the morality of abortion in Canada and the rights of Canadian women.

By tracing the contentious legal history of the abortion discussion and its culmination in the R. v. Morgentaler decision, you can see the evolving public attitude shifting.

The R. v. Morgentaler ruling signified a shift in Canadian law about women’s rights and set a new legal precedent which expanded women’s rights to choose.

For our course … it is an example of the Courts reflecting that shift and changing the direction of what law will be enforced.

87

What is Law?

For our course …

Law is the body of rules that can be enforced by the Courts or other governmental agencies

88

Legal Theories

Questions?

89

Understanding categories in law

90

Understanding categories of law

Substantive law

The rules that govern behaviour and set limits on conduct

This is the primary focus of this course

E.g. the specific rules under criminal law, copyright law, contract law

91

Understanding categories of law Procedural law

The procedure and processes by which rights and obligations are enforced

Applicable times frames to take steps, forms that must be used

How to commence a claim against a person

How to defend yourself against a claim

How to register a copyright or trademark

Etc.

This course does not cover procedural issues in detail

92

Understanding categories of law

Public law

These are the rules that regulate our relationship with state

e.g. Criminal law – relationship of the state and individuals

93

Understanding categories of law

Private law

These are the rules that regulate personal, social and business relationships

Relationships between individuals

Intellectual Property law

Privacy law

Contract law

94

The Legal System

95

Types of Legal Systems

Common law

Civilian

96

Common Law The common law originated in the practices of the courts of the English kings in the centuries following the Norman Conquest in 1066.

described as “common law” since it was "common" to all the king's courts across England

The British Empire spread the common law legal system to its colonies

many of these colonies retain the common law system

These "common law systems" are legal systems that give great weight to judicial precedent, and to the style of reasoning inherited from the English legal system

Examples the common law is used in Great Britain, Commonwealth countries, US

About a third of the world use some common law

Judge made law – "discovered" by judges – look to customs & traditions

97

Common Law The defining characteristic of “common law” is precedent.

In cases where the parties disagree on what the law is, a common law court looks to past precedential decisions of relevant courts.

If a similar dispute has been decided in the past, the court is usually bound to follow the reasoning used in the prior decision (stare decisis).

This leads to certainty and predictability

If a court finds that the current dispute is fundamentally distinct from previous cases and legislative statutes are either silent or ambiguous on the question, judges have the authority and the duty to resolve the issue.

98

Common Law

Difficult to research

Flexible in dealing with new situations or problems - e.g. internet

Judges inherently have the ability to change the law

99

Civil Law

Efforts to harmonize the law

Seek to provide certainty by having the law all recorded and be able to be read by all

Long history of rulers efforts to record the law

100

Recording the Law The Code of Hammurab is a Babylonian code of law of ancient Mesopotamia, from about 1754 BC.

It is one of the oldest deciphered writings of significant length in the world.

Babylonian king, Hammurabi, enacted the code.

A partial copy exists on a 2.25-metre-tall (7.5 ft) stone stele.

It consists of 282 laws.

half of the code deals with matters of contract

other provisions set the terms of a transaction

a third of the code addresses issues concerning household and family relationships

Updating the Law The Code of Justinian is part of the Corpus Juris Civilis

This was a codification of Roman law ordered early in the 6th century AD by Justinian I.

Much of the law had contradictions and obsolete provisions over time.

Justinian was an Eastern Roman emperor in Constantinople.

Civil Code Civil Law

E.g. Roman law under Justinian codified

Updated and modified by Napoleon

Used in Europe and many developing countries

Quebec's legal system is based on the French civil code

Easy to research

Slow to react to change

103

Sources of Law Common law

The precedent making decisions of the courts

Became rigid in early years – based on a positive law theory

Law of Equity

Decisions made by courts of chancery

Courts seek justice – based on a natural law theory

Common law and equity now merged in Canada’s courts

104

Sources of Law Judges decisions make up the common law

Precedent system seeks to resolve disputes the same way

This provides certainty … in investments, relationships, conduct

Law can evolve both where judges “find” a new decision or by action of the legislature

A law passed by Parliament or a legislature is a Statute

Those laws are created by the legislature

They can amend or change judge made law

They can summarize or modify the common law e.g. criminal code

105

Common Law

Questions?

106

Reading a case

107

Reading a case

Decisions of a court can be difficult to read

They are written in legal language

Important elements are:

Date of the decision

Level of the court

Who are the parties?

108

Reading a case Parties

Plaintiff or Appellant

Defendant or Respondent

Citation

Where to locate the decision

Which Court

Date

Her Majesty The Queen

v.

Cole

2012 SCC 53

Reading a case

Which judges were involved?

Where did the case come from?

Keywords - used for research purposes

Present: McLachlin C.J. and LeBel, Fish, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell and Moldaver JJ.

ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

Constitutional law — Charter of Rights — Search and seizure — Information contained on computer — Pornographic pictures of child found on employer- issued work computer — Whether accused had reason- able expectation of privacy in employer-issued work computer — Whether warrantless search and seizure of laptop computer and disc containing Internet files breached accused’s rights under s. 8 of Charter — If so, whether evidence ought to be excluded pursuant to s. 24(2) of Charter.

Reading a case

Headnote - a summary of the decision

Not a formal part of the law

A good way to get the idea of what the decision was

Note the majority decision

Note if there is a dissenting opinion

The accused, a high-school teacher, was charged with possession of child pornography and unauthorized use of a computer. He was permitted to use his work-issued laptop computer for incidental personal purposes which he did. While performing maintenance activities, a technician found on the accused’s laptop a hidden folder containing nude and partially nude photographs of an underage female student. The technician notified the principal, and copied the photographs to a compact disc. The principal seized the laptop, and school board technicians copied the temporary Internet files onto a second disc. The laptop and both discs were handed over to the police, who without a warrant reviewed their contents and then created a mirror image of the hard drive for forensic purposes. The trial judge excluded all of the computer material pursuant to ss. 8 and 24(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The summary conviction appeal court reversed the deci- sion, finding that there was no s. 8 breach. The Court of Appeal for Ontario set aside that decision and excluded the disc containing the temporary Internet files, the laptop and the mirror image of its hard drive. The disc containing the photographs of the student was found to be legally obtained and therefore admissible. As the trial judge had wrongly excluded this evidence, the Court of Appeal ordered a new trial.

Held (Abella J. dissenting): The appeal should be allowed. The exclusionary order of the Court of Appeal is set aside and the order of a new trial is affirmed.

Per McLachlin C.J., and LeBel, Fish, Rothstein, Cromwell and Moldaver JJ.: Computers that are reasonably used for personal purposes — whether found in the workplace or the home — contain information that is meaningful, intimate, and touching on the user’s biographical core. Canadians may therefore reasonably expect privacy in the information contained on these computers, at least where personal use is permitted or reasonably expected. Ownership of property is a rele- vant consideration, but is not determinative. Workplace policies are also not determinative of a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy. Whatever the policies state, one must consider the totality of the circumstances in order to determine whether privacy is a reasonable expectation in the particular situation. While workplace policies and practices may diminish an individual’s expectation of privacy in a work computer, these sorts of operational realities do not in themselves remove the expectation entirely. A reasonable though diminished expectation of privacy is nonetheless a reasonable ex- pectation of privacy, protected by s. 8 of the Charter. Accordingly, it is subject to state intrusion only under the authority of a reasonable law. …

Reading a case

The majority decision

Numbered paragraphs help quickly identify location of key parts of the decision.

Usually sets out the facts

What happened in prior court(s)

The legal principles involved

How the law is applied to the facts

The decision

The judgment of McLachlin C.J. and LeBel, Fish, Rothstein, Cromwell and Moldaver JJ. was delivered by

Fish J. —

I

[1] The Court left no doubt in R. v. Morelli, 2010 SCC 8, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 253, that Canadians may reasonably expect privacy in the information contained on their own personal computers. In my view, the same applies to information on work computers, at least where personal use is permitted or reasonably expected.

[2] Computers that are reasonably used for per- sonal purposes — whether found in the work-place or the home — contain information that is meaningful, intimate, and touching on the user’s biographical core. Vis- à-vis the state, everyone in Canada is constitutionally entitled to expect pri- vacy in personal information of this kind.

[3] While workplace policies and practices may diminish an individual’s expectation of privacy in a work computer, these sorts of operational realities do not in themselves remove the expectation entirely: The nature of the information at stake exposes the likes, interests, thoughts, activities, ideas, and searches for information of the individual user.

[4] Such was the case here. Mr. Cole, a high-school teacher, was permitted to use his work- issued laptop computer for incidental personal purposes. He did. He browsed the Internet and stored personal information on his hard drive.

Reading a case Try to understand what the decision was

What facts were relevant?

What policy was relevant?

Were any statutory or prior decisions relevant?

Did the court choose not to follow an earlier decision? Why?

What was the conclusion?

Obiter dicta - comments of the court not necessary for the decision.

Not binding

Gives an idea of what the Court is thinking about this side situation 113

The Law in Canada

114

The Law in Canada Canada is a constitutional monarchy

We recognize Her Majesty Elizabeth II, Queen of Canada, as the head of state.

This role is now largely symbolic with the Queen having no real juridical power

The Queen, is represented in Canada

federally by the Governor-General  

provincially by Lieutenant-Governors

Canada enacts laws in the name of the Queen

115

The Law in Canada Canada inherited certain conventions and traditions from Great Britain

Democratic parliamentary system

Rule of law

Principles established in the Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights

Important to note that Canada's constitutional structure is essentially different from Britain

Britain – unitary system – moving to a federal system – Scotland, Wales, N. Ireland

Canada – federal system - of 10 provinces, 3 territories – each with own legislative powers

116

The Law in Canada The Constitution

Need a written constitution in a federal system to delineate powers among the elements of governing power

Examples - Canada, US, Germany

British North America Act, 1867

Creation of a federal government and various provincial governments and various court systems

Renamed Constitution Act, 1867 in 1982

Division of powers between federal and provincial governments

117

Division of Legislative Powers Exclusive Federal government legislative powers(s. 91)

the regulation of trade and commerce

unemployment insurance

postal service

militia, military and naval service, and defence

navigation and shipping

banking

patents and copyright

marriage and divorce

118

Division of Legislative Powers Exclusive Provincial government legislative powers(s. 92)

direct taxation within the province to raise revenue for provincial purposes

prisons (but not penitentiaries)

the incorporation of companies with provincial objects

the solemnization of marriage in the province

property and civil rights in the province

generally all matters of a merely local or private nature in the province

119

Division of Legislative Powers

s. 91, Federal government has a residual legislative power

Exclusive power to "make Laws for the Peace, Order, and good Government of Canada, in relation to all Matters not coming within the Classes of Subjects by this Act assigned exclusively to the Legislatures of the Provinces."

120

Division of Legislative Powers Generally speaking, things not mentioned as belonging to the provincial legislatures comes under the powers of the Federal government

opposite to the same situation in the United States

E.g. Things that did not exist in 1867

Aerospace industry

Nuclear industry

Telecommunications

Internet 121

Division of Legislative Powers

Parliament and the provincial legislatures both have power over agriculture and immigration, and over certain aspects of natural resources

but if their laws conflict, the national law prevails

Parliament and the provincial legislatures both have power over old age, disability and survivors’ pensions

but if their laws conflict, the provincial power prevails 122

Parliament Constitution Act, 1867 sets out the structure of governing bodies

The federal Parliament is modeled after the British Parliament, and has two “chambers”:

the House of Commons comprising elected politicians, and

the Senate comprising (generally) unelected Senators, appointed by the Prime Minister

Either chamber can initiate bills,

the Senate cannot initiate financial legislation

Provincially – only a single chamber – the Legislature

Same for Territories

123

The Law in Canada

Questions?

124

The Court System

125

The Court System Constitution Act, 1867 sets out the structure of the courts

Three different court systems :

Superior courts – E.g. Alberta Queen's Bench

judges are appointed by the federal government

generally have unlimited jurisdiction

Provincial courts

judges are appointed by the provincial government

generally only have the powers given to them by provincial statute

Federal courts

judges are appointed by the federal government

jurisdiction limited to matters involving federal law, including intellectual property disputes, maritime law and claims against the government

126

The Court System

Three levels of Courts

Trial Court

Appeals Court

Supreme Court

127

The Court System Trial Court

Federal or Provincial

Sitting with a single judge who hears live witnesses

Key role is to determine the facts in order to apply the applicable law to a dispute

May have a jury

Generally role of the jury is to find the facts

Judge instructs the jury on the applicable law

If no jury, trial judge finds the facts and applies the law

128

The Court System Appeals Court

Federal or Provincial (superior jurisdiction)

Usually sitting with 3 judges who hear the appeal

Decision by a majority of the judges

Usually no oral evidence (live witnesses under oath)

Rely on a written trial record

General bound by the facts found by the trial judge or jury

Generally role is to address errors of law

129

The Court System Supreme Court

Generally sit as either 7 or 9 judges, depending on the matter being heard

Majority decision - may be several decisions

No general right to go to the Supreme Court

Court decides which cases to hear

Reconcile the law

Where an appeal had a strong dissenting opinion

Where different provincial appeal decisions conflict

Where a matter or national concern

Hears many Charter of Rights and Freedoms cases especially in criminal law cases

130

The Court System

Questions?

131

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms

132

The Law in Canada 1982, government took steps to "repatriate" Canada’s constitution

Also as part of the constitution, Canada introduced the Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Constitutional document that guarantees certain basic rights and freedoms,

The basic rights and freedoms are subject only "to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society" (s. 1)

Balancing of interests

The equality provisions in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (s. 15) came into force in 1985

133

Charter of Rights and Freedoms

The effect of the Charter is to limit the law making power of the Federal and Provincial governments

In favour of the individual’s rights and freedoms

134

Charter of Rights and Freedoms Fundamental Freedoms – Section 2

Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

(a) freedom of conscience and religion

No state religion

(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other means of communication,

(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and

Peaceful protests

(d) freedom of association.

Unions, political organizations

135

Charter of Rights and Freedoms Democratic Rights – Sections 3 – 5

Every citizen of Canada Right to vote in an election of members of House of Commons or legislative assembly

No House of Commons or legislative assembly to continue beyond 5 years without election

Exception in case of war, invasion or insurrection – if not opposed by more than 1/3

Sitting of Parliament and each Legislature at least once every 12 months

136

Charter of Rights and Freedoms Mobility Rights – Section 6

Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in, and leave Canada

Every citizen and permanent resident of Canada has the right:

to move to and take up residence in any province; and

to pursue the gaining of livelihood in any province

These rights are subject to:

laws or practices of general application in force in a province other than those that discriminate among persons primarily on the basis of present or previous residence,

laws providing for reasonable residency requirements as a qualification for the receipt of publicly provided social services

137

Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Legal Rights – Sections 7 – 14

S. 7 - Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice

S. 8 - Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure

S. 9 - Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned

138

Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Legal Rights – Section 10

Everyone has the right on arrest or detention

to be informed promptly of the reason therefor;

to retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of that right; and

to have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas corpus and to be released if the detention is not lawful.

139

Charter of Rights and Freedoms Legal Rights – Section 11

Any person charged with an offence has the right

to be informed without unreasonable delay of the specific offence;

to be tried within a reasonable time;

not to be compelled to be a witness in a proceedings against that person in respect of the offence;

to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;

not to be denied reasonable bail without cause; 140

Charter of Rights and Freedoms Legal Rights – Section 11

Any person charged with an offence has the right …(continued)

except in the case of an offence under military law tried before a military tribunal, to the benefit of trial by jury where the maximum punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or a more severe punishment;

not to be found guilty on account of any act or omission unless, at the time of the act or omission, it constituted an offence under Canadian or International law or was criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations;

if finally acquitted of the offence, not to be tried for it again and, if finally found guilty and punished for the offence, not to be tried or punished for it again; and

if found guilty of the offence and if punishment for the offence has been varied between the time of commission and the time of sentencing, to the benefit of the lesser punishment

141

Charter of Rights and Freedoms Legal Rights

S. 12 - Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel or unusual treatment or punishment

S. 13 - A witness who testifies in any proceedings has the right not to have any incriminating evidence so given used to incriminate that witness in any other proceedings, except in a prosecution for perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence

S. 14 - A party or witness in any proceedings who does not understand or speak the language in which the proceedings are conducted or who is deaf has the right to the assistance of an interpreter

142

Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Equality Rights – Section 15

Every individual is equal before the law and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age, or mental or physical disability

Can have laws to ameliorate the conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups

143

Charter of Rights and Freedoms Enforcement – Section 24

S. 24(1) - Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances

E.g. a law can be declared invalid

S. 24(2) - Where, in proceedings under subsection (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this Charter, the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all the circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute

144

Charter of Rights and Freedoms Notwithstanding provision – Section 33

Parliament or the legislature of a province may expressly declare in an Act of Parliament or of the legislature, as the case may be, that the Act or a provision thereof shall operate notwithstanding a provision included in section 2 or section 7 to 15 of this Charter

Limited to fundamental freedoms, legal rights, equality rights

Not democratic rights or mobility rights

Such a declaration ceases to have effect after five years

But can be reinstated for a further five year period

145

Charter of Rights and Freedoms

None of the Charter rights or freedoms are absolute

Limits on those rights and freedoms are subject to:

such reasonable limits

prescribed by law

as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society" (s. 1)

146

Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Questions?

147