experiment 4 Heat Conduction in Metals 2

profileKawthar12
1550592068168_LabReportTemplate-EnergyConversion.docx

16SMCE422 Francis turbine at varying speeds

Energy Conversion

School/ Department Name

School of Engineering / Mechanical Engineering

Program Code and Title:

BEMS16 Bachelor of Technology in Mechanical Engineering

Course Code and Title:

16SMCE422, ENEM14011, 151MCE422: Energy Conversion

Assessment Number and Title:

Experiment no. 2 - Francis Turbine – Varying Speeds

Assessment Type:

Lab Report

Assessment Location:

ACK – Building 4 – Mechanical Lab

Assessment Date:

10/2/209

Assessment Time/Duration:

10:00 -12:00

Student Name:

Yousef Alhawaj

Student ID:

0804921

Section (s):

G4M1

Assessment General Instructions:

· Report should be neat, well organized and stapled. Ensure any text is clear, concise, grammatically correct and appropriate. Use spelling and grammar check.

· Report should be submitted on time.

· Pages should be numbered sequentially.

· A list of content should be included.

· Data and Calculations, Results and Graphs, Discussion, Conclusions and Recommendations sections are crucial part of the technical report and should be completed.

· The used font throughout the report should be Times New Roman size 12, except for the headings. Line spacing should be 1.5.

· All figures and tables should be labelled. Refer to figures and tables in the text.

· Figure caption should be below the figure itself, and table caption should be above the table.

· All equations should be numbered. Refer to the equations in the text.

· All sources used should be cited. Include a Reference page ensuring that Harvard Referencing style is used and that ACK Copyright Policy (ACK.PL.VPAC.30) is followed.

ASSESSMENT MARKING GUIDE

Task

Maximum Marks

Student Marks

Lab Report Format

5

Objectives

1

Introduction and Theory

2

Apparatus

1

Methodology

1

Data and Calculations

5

Sample Calculation

1

Results and Graphs

5

Discussion

5

Conclusion

2

References

1

Worksheet

1

Total Mark

30

Assessor Feedback:

Assessor Name:

Date:

Assessor Signature:

Student Name:

Date:

Student Signature:

C:\Users\s.baz\Desktop\ack logo.JPG Lab Report Template

Lab Report Template Issue No.1 Revision No. 0

Reference Number/Code: [ACK.FO.SOE.02.01] Revision Date: November 2018 Next Revision Date: November 2021

Page 2/18

School of Engineering

Department of Mechanical Engineering

C:\Users\n.jaques\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\HKK0KY5T\ACK%20Logo%20sp.png

16SMCE422

Energy Conversion

Experiment # 2

Francis Turbine – Varying Speeds

Macintosh HD:Users:Sarah:Desktop:Word tempalte-01.jpg

Yousef Alhawaj

0804921

G4M1

10/2/2018

24/2/2018

ENG: Jessica Lopez

Contents

I. OBJECTIVES 5

II. INTRODUCTION AND THEORY 6

III. APPARATUS 7

IV. METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURE 9

V. DATA AND CALCULATIONS 10

VI. RESULTS AND GRAPHS 12

VII. SAMPLE OF CALCULATIONS 14

VIII. DISCUSSION 15

IX. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16

X. REFERENCES 17

XI. DATA APPENDIX/ DATA WORKSHEET 18

OBJECTIVES

· To determine the characteristic curves of the Francis Turbine at varying speed.

· To Study behavior of torque, volumetric Flow Rate by changing Guide Vane Position

· To draw the graph between speed vs flow rate, speed vs mechanical and hydraulic power, speed vs efficiency.

INTRODUCTION AND THEORY

Turbines are subdivided into impulse and reaction machines. In the impulse turbines, the total head available is converted into the kinetic energy. This is usually accomplished in one or more nozzles. In the reaction turbines, only some part of the available total head of the fluid is converted into kinetic energy so that the fluid entering the runner has pressure energy as well as kinetic energy. the pressure energy is then converted into kinetic energy in the runner.

The Francis turbine is a type of reaction turbine that was developed by James B.Francis .Francis turbines are the most common water turbine in use today. They operate in a water head from 40 to 600m and are primarily used for electrical power production. The electric generators which most often use this type of turbine have a power output which generally ranges just a few kilowatts up to 800 MW.

APPARATUS

· Francis Turbine

· Potentiometer

· Pump

Figure 1

Figure 2

Potentiometer

Figure 3

PUMP

METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURE

1. I Set the desired guide vane position.

2. With the potentiometer, we set the speed of the pump, so the pressure is at 1. 5bar.Control the turbine speed depending on the requirement.

3. We Recorded or Noted the following Values;

· Torque

· Volumetric Flow

· Inlet pressure

· Outlet pressure

Repeating the procedure at different guide vane positions

DATA AND CALCULATIONS

TABLE 1 GUIDE VANE POSITION 3

speed(rpm)

Volumetric Flow Rate, (liters/min)

Torque,M(N-m)

Inlet pressure,P1(bar)

Outlet pressure,P2(bar)

change in pressure,∆P(bar)

Hydraulic power, Phyd(W)

Mechanical power,Pmech(W)

Efficiency, ɳ (%)

1000

309

3.74

1.5

-0.042

1.542

790.953

391.45

49.491

1250

303

3.36

1.5

-0.049

1.549

779.116

439.6

56.42

1500

278

2.19

1.5

-0.007

1.507

695.450

343.83

49.43

1700

243

1.09

1.5

0

1.5

605.07

193.94

32.053

TABLE 2 GUIDE VANE POSITION 5

speed,N(rpm)

Volumetric Flow Rate,Q(liters/min)

Torque,M(N-m)

Inlet pressure,P1(bar)

Outlet pressure,P2(bar)

change in pressure,∆P(bar)

Hydraulic power, Phyd(W)

Mechanical power,Pmech(W)

Efficiency, ɳ (%)

1000

471

6.17

1.5

0

1.5

1172.79

645.7

55.064

1250

476

5.95

1.5

-0.042

1.542

1218.42

778.4

63.89

1500

466

4.48

1.5

-0.029

1.529

1182.77

703.36

59.467

1700

412

2.8

1.5

0

1.5

1025.88

498.21

48.56

TABLE 3 GUIDE VANE POSITION 7

speed,N(rpm)

Volumetric Flow Rate,Q.(liters/min)

Torque,M(N-m)

Inlet pressure,P1(bar)

Outlet pressure,P2(bar)

change in pressure,∆P(bar)

Hydraulic power, Phyd(W)

Mechanical power,Pmech(W)

Efficiency, ɳ (%)

1000

620

7.86

1.5

0

1.5

1543.8

822.68

53.289

1250

642

7.74

1.5

-0.023

1.523

1623.09

1012.6

62.390

1500

643

6.97

1.5

-0.045

1.545

1649.10

1094.2

66.356

1700

672

5.46

1.5

0

1.5

1673.28

971.51

58.060

RESULTS AND GRAPHS

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

SAMPLE OF CALCULATIONS

Pmech(Watts)= M x N x

From table 2 Putting M=471 (liters/min)

N=1000 (RPM)

Pmech = 471 x 1000x

Pmech = 645.7 watt

Phyd(Watts)=1.66 x ∆p x Q

Putting ∆p=1.50 (bar)

Q=471 (liters/min)

Phyd = 1.66 x 1.50 x 471

Phyd = 1172.2 watt

Efficiency ɳ = (Pmech / Phyd )x100

ɳ = 55.0%

DISCUSSION

In this lab we have to determine the characteristic curves of the Francis Turbine by varying its speed and changing the guided vane position.

And then we Study behavior of torque, volumetric Flow Rate by changing Guide Vane Position, then we draw the graph between speed vs flow rate, speed vs mechanical and hydraulic power, speed vs efficiency

From the table and graph we see that when the

Guided Vane at position 3 when we increase the speed volumetric flow rate torque and Hydraulic power decreases while Mechanical Power and efficiency increases up to 1250 RPM and then start to decrease from 1250 to 1700 rpm. and the maximum efficiency 56.4% we achieve when we have speed 1250.

Guided Vane at position 5 when we increase the speed, torque decreases, while volumetric flow rate, hydraulic power, mechanical power and efficiency increases up to 1250 also when we further increase the speed volumetric flow rate, hydraulic power, mechanical power and efficiency decreases up to 1700. and the maximum efficiency 63.39% we achieve when we have speed 1250

Guided vane at position 7 when we increase the speed, torque decreases, while volumetric flow, hydraulic power, mechanical power and efficiency increases from 1250 to 1500 while when speed further increases from 1500 to 1700 mechanical power and efficiency start to decrease and the maximum efficiency 66% we achieve when we have speed 1500 which is overall maximum efficiency.

The possible and non-removable error which affect our results were atmospheric pressure, friction between inner surface of penstock and water which we can calculate from Darcy equation but in this experiment, we neglected all type of Darcy frictions. One of the main errors in the excrement is the pressure 1 in Potentiometer nope it was over used and unstable therefor the reading varies each time.

The fluctuation of the pressure 2 digital indicator which will close error in the result later.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

In this experiment we determined the characteristic curves of the Francis Turbine at varying speed, and Study behavior of torque, volumetric Flow Rate by changing Guide Vane Position than draw the graph between speed vs flow rate, speed vs mechanical and hydraulic power, speed vs efficiency so we concluded from the results that when we change the position of guide vane and speed our results get change accordingly we can get maximum efficiency when the guided vane is at position 7 and at speed 1500RPM and minimum efficiency of 32% when guide vane is at position 3 at speed of 1700 rpm.

REFERENCES

[1] R.K. Rajput, “Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulic Machines”, Laxmi Publications (P) Ltd.

[2] R. K. Bansal,” Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulic Machines”, Laxmi Publications (P) Ltd.

[3] D. S. Kumar,” Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulic Machines”, Laxmi Publications (P) Ltd.New Delhi (India).

[4] Yunus A. Cengel and John M. Cimbala, “Fluid Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications” McGraw Hill.

[5] D. S. Kumar, “Fluid Mechanics & Fluid Power Engineering” S.K. Kataria Publications.

[6] C.P. Kothandaraman & R. Rudramoorthy” Basic Fluid Mechanics” New Age Publications.

DATA APPENDIX/ DATA WORKSHEET

Figure 8

Figure 9

Figure 10

Figure 11

Volumetric Flow Rate VS Speed

TABLE 1 1000 1250 1500 1700 309 303 278 243 TABLE 2 1000 1250 1500 1700 471 476 466 412 TABLE 3 1000 1250 1500 1700 620 642 643 672

Speed(RPM)

Volumetric Flow Rate liters/min,

Hydraulic Power VS Speed

TABLE 1 1000 1250 1500 1700 790.95348000000001 779.11601999999993 695.45035999999982 605.06999999999994 TABLE 2 1000 1250 1500 1700 1172.79 1218.4267199999999 1182.77324 1025.8799999999999 TABLE 2 1000 1250 1500 1700 1543.8 1623.0915599999998 1649.1020999999998 1673.2799999999997

Speed (RPM)

Hydraulic Power (WATT)

Mechanical VS Speed

TABLE 1 1000 1250 1500 1700 391.45333333333338 439.6 343.83000000000004 193.94733333333338 TABLE 2 1000 1250 1500 1700 645.79333333333341 778.45833333333337 703.36000000000013 498.21333333333337 TABLE 3 1000 1250 1500 1700 822.68000000000006 1012.6500000000001 1094.29 971.51600000000008

Speed

MECHANICAL POWER

Efficiency VS Speed

TABLE 1 1000 1250 1500 1700 49.491321959078221 56.422918886971431 49.439905387352177 32.053701775552149 TABLE 2 1000 1250 1500 1700 55.064703257474349 63.890451559806024 59.467020068867996 48.564484475117311 TABLE 3 1000 1250 1500 1700 53.289286176965931 62.390195658463057 66.356716179064961 58.060575635876852

Speed (RPM)

Efficiency ɳ (%)

© Australian College of Kuwait 2018

School of Engineering Mechanical Engineering

Page 18/18