stats importatnt

profilelolo1339
13.pdf

Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing www.iiste.org

ISSN 2422-8419 An International Peer-reviewed Journal

Vol.18, 2015

25

Knowledge of Palliative Care among Bachelors Nursing Students

Mrs. Lubna Harazneh 1 Mr. Ahmad Ayed

1 Dr. Imad Fashafsheh

1

Assistant Professor Ghona Abd El-Nasser Ali 2

1.Department of Nursing, Arab American University/Jenin, Palestine

2.Medical-Surgical Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Sohag University, Egypt

Abstract

Background: Palliative care clinical nurse specialists play an important role in specialist palliative care. They

spend time with patients and their families, helping them come to terms with an array of complex emotional and

practical problems, facilitating communication, giving information and advice about treatments and also offering

expertise in controlling pain and other distressing symptoms. Aim of the study: The purpose of this study was to

assess the PC knowledge using PCQN of BSN students in Arab American University/ Jenin, Palestine.Subjects

and methods: Descriptive, cross sectional study was used for conducting the study, A convenience sample 198

nursing students were included from the two respective nursing levels third year and fourth year. Data collected

through; demographic characteristic and PC knowledge. The PCQN scale was used as the tool to assess the PC

knowledge level. Results: The total percentage rate on the PCQN was 40.58% (SD=13.89011). There is no

statistically significant difference at (p < 0.05) between PC knowledge and gender, academic level, personal or

professional experience with palliative care, and course of palliative care (0.377, 0.896, 0.741, and 0.829)

respectively. Highly statistically significant relation according age (p˃0.000).Conclusion: Clinical Relevance:

third and fourth level BSN students had lack adequate information on palliative care, and did not meet the

AACN expectation of a generalist registered nurse.

Keywords: Knowledge, Nursing students, Palliative care

1. Background

The word ”palliative” is derived from the Greek language. It is translated as ”to cloak”. In the care of the dying,

the interventions are meant to prevent the experience of pain and other agonizing symptoms. The National

Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (NHCPO) in the USA defines palliative care as ”treatment that

enhances comfort and improves the quality of an individual’s life during the last phase of life.” (Connor, 2009).

Palliative care can be defined as an approach that improves the quality of life of patients and their families facing

the problem associated with life-threatening illness, through the prevention and relief of suffering by means of

early identification and impeccable assessment and treatment of pain and other problems, physical, psychosocial

and spiritual (World Health Organization (WHO), 2014). Palliative care is the active, total care of patients and

their families by a multidisciplinary team; at a time when the patient’s disease is no longer responsive to curative

treatment and life expectancy is relatively short (Twycross 2003). Lynn & Adamson’s model (2003) indicates

that the principles of palliative care are already applicable in an early stage of the disease and can go together

with therapies that are initially aimed at the prolongation of life. A system approach is important, as the

palliative process progresses the relief of symptoms will get more attention; the family care becomes more

intensive (Visser, 2006). Palliative care is not limited to cancer or even to the terminal stages of illness; it can

last for years, and can be applied to any life-threatening disease, though it is most often associated with cancer.

Palliative care is not an alternative to other care, but is a complementary and essential component of total patient

care (Costello 2004). Palliative care is not restricted to a certain setting but takes place in different environments,

both at home, in hospitals, in nursing and old-people’s homes, in psychiatry and in hospices (Ahmedzai et al.,

2004). In Europe palliative care is considered as general care, which means that every professional health-care

provider must be able to provide care for palliative patients in different healthcare services. General care

promotes the accessibility and availability of palliative care (Ahmedzai et al., 2004). Palliative care is an

essential part of the nursing care that can be delivered at different levels of complexity (De Vlieger et al., 2004).

Palliative care clinical nurse specialists play an important role in specialist palliative care (Skilbeck et al. 2002).

They spend time with patients and their families, helping them come to terms with an array of complex

emotional and practical problems, facilitating communication, giving information and advice about treatments

and also offering expertise in controlling pain and other distressing symptoms. These nurses are equipped with

specialist skills to assess the complex palliative care needs of patients referred to the service. However, Bliss et

al. (2000) found that referral to services is dependent upon the individual who initiates it and, although

unintentional, may result in a form of gate-keeping with patients and carers not receiving services relevant to

their needs. The positive impact of palliative care is well documented, including improving patient pain

symptoms and patient satisfaction with care (Strasser, 2004; Lautrette et al, 2007; Ciemins et al, 2007) as well

as decreasing hospital costs (Temel et al., 2010; Ferris et al., 2009). Furthermore, a recent study showed that

palliative care provided from the time of diagnosis for lung cancer patients may increase patient survival in

Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing www.iiste.org

ISSN 2422-8419 An International Peer-reviewed Journal

Vol.18, 2015

26

addition to benefitting mood and quality of life (Ferris et al., 2009). Nurses find it difficult and emotionally

heavy to deliver palliative care to patients and often do not feel competent enough (Cooke,1996; Linder et al.,

1999; De Veer et al., 2003; White et al., 2004). Nurses as well as other healthcare workers often feel not well-

prepared for their task in palliative care and are much in need of more expertise in the field of pain and symptom

management, communication and dealing with ethical dilemmas. They would moreover like to be supported in

the coordination of the care when many different care providers are involved (Armes & Addington - Hall, 2003;

Yates et al., 2004; Andershed, 2006; Osse et al., 2006). It can be argued that nursing and palliative care are

natural partners in clinical practice and that the knowledge and skills required in this area are applicable to all

nurses. People die in many environments and all have a right to supportive and palliative care, regardless of

diagnosis or circumstances (the National Comprehensive Cancer Network ( NICE), 2004). The effects of

palliative courses on different levels can be measured both with the students themselves and with the patients. A

frequently occurring outcome indicator is the satisfaction of the student him/herself with the education and self-

perceived knowledge (Jordan, 2000). It is important to develop adequate programs in the field of palliative care

for nurses at all levels, as these discipline is seen as core disciplines (Ahmedzai et al., 2004). The nurses make up

a large part of the healthcare profession, yet they are falling behind on instituting palliative care within the

curriculum (Karkada, Nayak, and Malathi, 2011). This is impressive considering how prevalent nurses are in

initiating patient care and being the primary caregiver to those hospitalized. When entering the healthcare field,

death of a patient is unavoidable and becomes part of the job as a nurse. It is important to integrate PC education

within the BSN degree to better prepare new graduates for the inevitable care of a terminally ill patient. Nursing

students and new graduate nurses are not adequately prepared for caring for this specific population (Brajtman et

al., 2007; Karkada et al., 2011; Kuebler, 2012; Sadhu et al., 2010). The challenge with integrating PC education

into nursing curricula are time constraints and the volume of materials necessary to prepare BSN nurses for the

complexities of caring for terminally ill patients and their families (Brajtman et al., 2007; Brajtman et al., 2009;

Karkada et al., 2011; Malloy et al., 2006). Nursing schools have not adequately incorporated palliative care into

the curriculum to increase awareness of PC content and skills (Sadhu et al., 2010). Sadhu et al. (2010) asserted

that students are lacking in knowledge on PC. Students cannot be expected to be experts in any capacity due to

lack of experience in the clinical area; however, schools and hospitals are holding students and new graduates

accountable for this material and expect an adequate competency level despite lack of training and teaching on

the subject (Sadhu et al., 2010). In order to better prepare students to care for dying individuals, implementation

of PC experiences within the nursing curriculum is critical (Brajtman et al., 2007). Cross-sectional survey of 363

nurses in a multispecialty hospital in India conducted by Prem, Karvannan, Kumar, Karthikbabu, Syed, Sisodia,

Jaykumar (2012) to assess the knowledge about palliative care amongst nursing professionals using the palliative

care knowledge test (PCKT). Results showed that, the overall total score of PCKT was 7.16 ± 2.69 (35.8%). The

philosophy score was 73 ± .65 (36.5%), pain score was 2.09 ± 1.19 (34.83%), dyspnea score was 1.13 ± .95

(28.25%), psychiatric problems score was 1.83 ± 1.02 (45.75%), and gastro-intestinal problems score was 1.36

± .97 (34%). (P = .00). Weber, Schmiedel, Nauck and Alt-Epping (2011) assess the knowledge and attitude of

final year medical students in Germany towards palliative care an inter institutional questionnaire based study.

The study designed a composite, three-step questionnaire (self estimation of confidence, knowledge questions,

and opinion on the actual and future medical curriculum) conducted online of final- year medical students at two

universities in Germany. Results showed that from a total of 318 enrolled students, 101 responded and described

limited confidence in dealing with specific palliative care issues, except for pain therapy. With regard to

questions examining their knowledge base in palliative care, only one third of the students (33%) answered more

than half of the questions correctly. Only a small percentage of students stated they had gained sufficient

knowledge and experience in palliative care during their studies, and the vast majority supported the introduction

of palliative care as a mandatory part of the undergraduate curriculum. Karkada, Nayak, and Malathi (2011)

assessed PC knowledge and attitudes of 83 Indian diploma nursing students. The aim of the study was to

pinpoint the needs of the students in the coursework in regards to palliative care, and to identify strategies for

incorporating PC practices throughout the curriculum. Karkada et al. administered a structured twenty question

multiple choice questionnaire to ascertain the level of knowledge held by the students about PC. Results revealed

that 79.5% of students had poor knowledge on PC practices. Despite this low finding, 92.8% of the students

expressed favorable attitudes towards PC. Kuebler (2012) conducted a project where she compared senior BSN

students’ self-perceived knowledge with actual PC knowledge at a southeastern U.S. university (n = 36) and a

northeastern U.S. university (n = 54). The study goal was to identify the learning needs of students in relation to

PC. Kuebler administered a 4-point Likert scale to determine students’ self-perceptions of knowledge, and then a

45 question multiple-choice quiz, the chronic disease objective knowledge examination, to assess students’

knowledge of pathophysiology and symptom management. Results revealed that both cohorts scored low on the

45 question quiz, with a mean score less than 50%. There were a weak correlation between perceived and actual

PC knowledge in both groups. Sadhu, Salins, and Kamath (2010) assessed PC knowledge among BSN students,

undergraduate medical students, and allied health science students in India (n = 326). The study used a

Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing www.iiste.org

ISSN 2422-8419 An International Peer-reviewed Journal

Vol.18, 2015

27

nonrandomized sample and administered an internally valid 39 point questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted

of ten subscales. Sadhu and colleagues reported that students scored in the range of 50-70%, lack of education on

end-of life care in the sample, and recommended curricular revision in the form of establishing a holistic

approach to end-of-life care and educating on communication, pain management, and spirituality. Brajtman,

Fothergill-Bourbonnais, Casey, Alain, and Fiset (2007) studied the attitudes, knowledge, and skills of graduating

BSN students (n = 58) in relation to PC. The study utilized a demographic questionnaire, the palliative care quiz

for nursing (PCQN), and Frommelt attitudes toward care of the dying scale (FATCOD). The students scored

61% on the PCQN, and 86% on the FATCOD. While knowledge level was low, attitudes were positive towards

PC. Brajtman et al. (2009) have found that nursing faculty have a similar level of basic PC knowledge as the

students they are teaching. In order to educate students, it is important for faculty to possess PC knowledge and

to seek out resources to assist with the successful implementation of PC material within the curriculum. As

Ferrell and colleagues (2005) reported, instituting PC modules was effective in helping to improve students’ PC

knowledge, as well as encouragement and accountability from faculty. Cross sectional study conducted by Ayed,

Sayej, Harazneh, Fashafsheh, and Eqtait (2015) to assess the nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards PC among

nurses working in selected hospitals in Northern districts, Palestine. A purposive sample consisted of 96 nurses.

Results showed that 20.8 % of the respondents had good overall knowledge towards PC, 59.4 % had training of

palliative care, and 6.2 % of participants had good attitude towards PC. There was a significant difference

between Nurses' qualification, experience, and training of palliative care towards Knowledge of PC.

2. Subjects and Method

2.1 Aim of the study: The purpose of this study was to assess the PC knowledge using PCQN of BSN students

in Arab American University/ Jenin, Palestine.

2.2 Research Questions: The following research questions and hypothesis were proposed:

1. What is the PC knowledge level of third and fourth level BSN nursing students?

2. Is there a difference in PC knowledge level towards selected demographic variables?

2.3 Research Hypothesis: There is no significant differences between PC knowledge scores as measured by the

Palliative Care Quiz for Nursing (PCQN) than age, gender, academic level, personal and professional

experience, and attending courses of palliative care.

2.4 Study Design: This study used a non-experimental quantitative, cross-sectional, survey design that focused

on BSN students at Arab American university/ Jenin and their knowledge of PC. A non-experimental, cross-

sectional survey design was appropriate for this study and the participants completed the Palliative Care Quiz for

Nursing (PCQN) created by Ross, McDonald, and McGuinness (1996) at one time point.

2.5 Study Setting and period: The setting for this study was nursing Department of the Arab American

University. The study conducted between June and August 2015.

2.6 Study Sample: The population for this study was third level and fourth level BSN students at nursing

department in the Arab American university.

2.7 Inclusion criteria: The following inclusion criteria were used for this study:

1. Participants had to be in third or fourth year level

2. had to be a current student in the Arab American university/ nursing department.

2.8 Tool of data collection: A demographic information form was administered in addition to the PCQN via

face to face (Appendix A). Demographic data included the student’s age, gender, current level in school (third or

fourth level), personal or professional experience with PC, and if they were enrolled in the PC course. The

PCQN, created by Ross et al. (1996), at the University of Ottawa, Canada, was used as the tool to assess the PC

knowledge level among the two groups of students. Permission to use the PCQN was obtained prior to data

collection from one of the authors, Margaret M. Ross, via email. The PCQN was designed to assess basic PC

knowledge among nurses. The PCQN was appropriate for use on nursing students as the original authors

sampled nursing students to determine reliability and difficulty of the PCQN.

The PCQN is a twenty question quiz with the choices of true, false, and don’t know. Ross et al. (1996)

scored the quiz by giving each participant one point for a right answer and zero points for wrong or don’t know

responses for a maximum score of 20. The authors scored the test using total mean percentages among the

various samples (Ross et al., 1996).. The total score of both groups was expressed as a percentage and was used

to describe the general PC knowledge level of the BSN students.

Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing www.iiste.org

ISSN 2422-8419 An International Peer-reviewed Journal

Vol.18, 2015

28

3. Validity and reliability of the study: The validity of the tool was verified by Ross et al. (1996) by the large

sample size of nursing students (n=200) and registered nurses (n=196).

4. A pilot study: A pilot study was conducted with ten nurse's students from third and fourth level of Al-Najah

university to determine the clarity of questions, effectiveness of instructions, completeness of response sets, time

required to complete the questionnaire and success of data collection technique. Pilot subjects were asked to

comment on the applicability and appropriateness (validity) of the questionnaire. All questions were answered no

clarity of questions was required. The researchers determined that it would take twenty (20) minutes to complete

the questionnaire.

5. Data analysis: The quantitative data were entered and analyzed using the SPSS (Statistical Package for Social

Sciences version 20.0), and the level of significance (α) was set at 0.05. Demographic and baseline variables

were analyzed using frequency, percentage, and bar chart. Hypothesis were tested and analyzed by using t. test

and Anova one way test.

6. Ethical considerations: This study was approved by the nursing department, Arab American University.

Approval from nurses' students were obtained. Several strategies were utilized to protect the nurse's rights who

agreed to participate in this study. First, oral verbal consent of the nurses was obtained prior to the administration

of the questionnaire. The nurses were informed of the purpose of the study, and that they had the right to refuse

to participate. Also the voluntary nature of participation was stressed as well as confidentiality. Furthermore, the

nurses were told that they can refrain from answering any questions and they can terminate at any time.

Anonymity of the nurses was maintained at all times.

7. Results

7.1 Sample Characteristics: The sample ranged in age from 19-32 years. The mean age was 21.9 (SD =

1.74436) (Table 1). More half of respondents 113 (57.1%) were females and 85 (42.9%) males. Around two

third of them 125 ( 63.1%) were third year but 73 (36.9%) fourth year. When asked if there was prior palliative

care experience, whether it be personal or professional, more than half of the sample stated “no” (n=108, 54.5%).

For individuals indicating that they did have palliative care experience (n=90, 45.5%), there was no

differentiation between personal or professional experience. Only 61 (30.8%) indicated that he/she had taken the

palliative care course. (Table 2).

Table 1. Assessment the age of the sample

Parameters N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

Age 198 19.00 32.00 21.8611 1.74436

Table 2. Assessment the base line demographic and characteristics of the sample

Parameters No. %

Gender Male 85 42.9

Female 113 57.1

Academic level Third year 125 63.1

Fourth year 73 36.9

Personal or professional experience

with palliative care

Yes 90 45.5

No 108 54.5

Course of palliative care Yes 61 30.8

No 137 69.2

7.2 Research Question 1 The first research question asked in this study was regarding the overall knowledge level of third and fourth level

BSN nursing students. The range of scores for the total sample of this study on the PCQN was 0 to 100 out of a

possible 20 points. The students scored, as a whole, 40.58% (SD=13.89011) on the PCQN which is considered

poor. (Table 3).

Table 3. Assessment the knowledge of the sample

Parameters N Range Mean Std. Deviation

Knowledge of palliative care. 198 100.00 40.5808 13.89011

Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing www.iiste.org

ISSN 2422-8419 An International Peer-reviewed Journal

Vol.18, 2015

29

Figure 1 Assessment of palliative care knowledge levels

Figure 5 shows that palliative care knowledge level was low for both third and fourth year level

(118(59.6%) and 72(36.4%)) respectively. Third year had high knowledge level better than fourth year (7(3.5%)

and 1(0.5%)) respectively.

The following table is the PCQN broken down per question with the frequency and percentage of

students who answered correctly and incorrectly (Table 4)

Table 4. Assessment of palliative care knowledge of the sample

No. Item Correct Incorrect

1 Palliative care is appropriate only in situations where there is evidence of a

downhill trajectory or deterioration.

95(48.0 103(52.0)

2 Morphine is the standard used to compare the analgesic effect of other

opioids.

105(53.0 93(47.0

3 The extent of the disease determines the method of pain treatment 46(23.2 152(76.8

4 Adjuvant therapies are important in managing pain. 158(79.8 40(20.2

5 It is crucial for family members to remain at the bedside until death occurs. 81(40.9 117(59.1

6 During the last days of life, the drowsiness associated with electrolyte

imbalance may decrease the need for sedation.

75(37.9 123(62.1

7 Drug addiction is a major problem when morphine is used on a long-term

basis for the management of pain.

38(19.2 160(80.8

8 Individuals who are taking opioids should also follow a bowel regime. 100(50.5 98(49.5

9 The provision of palliative care requires emotional detachment. 45(22.7 153(77.3

10 During the terminal stages of an illness, drugs that can cause respiratory

depression are appropriate for the treatment for severe dyspnea.

60(30.3 138(69.7

11 Men generally reconcile their grief more quickly than women. 69(34.8 129(65.2

12 The philosophy of palliative care is compatible with that of aggressive

treatment.

85(42.9 113(57.1

13 The use of placebos is appropriate in the treatment of some types of pain. 50(25.3 148(74.7

14 In high doses, codeine causes more nausea and vomiting than morphine. 109(55.1 89(44.9

15 Suffering and physical pain are synonymous. 71(35.9 127(64.1

16 Demerol is not an effective analgesic in the control of chronic pain. 82(41.4 116(58.6

17 The accumulation of losses renders burnout inevitable for those who seek

work in palliative care.

63(31.8 135(68.2

18 Manifestations of chronic pain are different from those of acute pain. 116(58.6 82(41.4

19 The loss of a distant or contentious relationship is easier to resolve than the

loss of one that is close or intimate.

61(30.8 137(69.2

20 The pain threshold is lowered by anxiety or fatigue. 88(44.4 110(55.6

Table 4 shows that most items answered incorrect except items 2,4,8, and 18 answered somehow with

Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing www.iiste.org

ISSN 2422-8419 An International Peer-reviewed Journal

Vol.18, 2015

30

correct answers. These items explain medications and manifestations of chronic pain in palliative care. These

medications used generally for medical and surgical patients and the nurses students trained in medical, surgical

and intensive care wards. This explain the high correct rate of these items. Also, Manifestations of chronic pain

passed with them in many courses as fundamentals of nursing and medical surgical nursing.

7.3 Research Question 2 and Hypothesis Testing The second research question asked in this study was regarding the difference in PC knowledge level towards

selected demographic variables and the hypothesis was proposed there is no significant differences between PC

knowledge scores as measured by the Palliative Care Quiz for Nursing (PCQN) than age, gender, academic

level, personal and professional experience, and attending courses of palliative care. Anova one way test and t

test were was conducted to explore PC knowledge towards gender, academic level, personal and professional

experience, courses of palliative care, and age.

Table 5. The relationship between selected demographic data and knowledge of palliative care

Demographic data N Mean Std. Deviation F Sig.

Gender Female 113 39.8230 12.65845 0.783 0.377

Male 85 41.5882 15.39581

Academic level Third year 125 40.6800 13.57987 0.017 0.896

Fourth year 73 40.4110 14.49984

Personal and professional experience Yes 90 40.2222 13.10955 0.109 0.741

No 108 40.8796 14.56261

Course of PC Yes 61 40.9016 13.05464 0.047 0.829

No 137 40.4380 14.29051

Table (5) revealed that no statistical significant relation among total mean of knowledge of palliative

care with the gender, academic level, personal or professional experience with palliative care, and course of

palliative care (0.377, 0.896, 0.741, and 0.829) respectively

Table 6. The relationship between knowledge of PC and Age

Item Mean N Std. Deviation t df Sig. (2-tailed)

Age 21.8611 198 1.74436 18.837 197 0.000

Knowledge of palliative care 40.5808 198 13.89011

Table (6) revealed that a highly statistically significant relation between Nurses students' age and total

mean of knowledge scores (p˃0.000).

8. Discussion

The first research question posed in this study addressed overall PC knowledge of BSN students. The BSN

student participants in this study scored 40.58% (SD=13.89011) average on the PCQN. A score of 40.58% was

expected by the researcher as it was hypothesized that the PC knowledge held by the BSN students would be low

and insufficient for patient care. In a previous study, Ross and her colleagues (1996) found that registered nurses

and nursing students scored an average of 61% on the Palliative Care Quiz for Nursing.

Other researchers who used the PCQN found similar results in their data analysis (Brajtman et al., 2007;

Brazil et al., 2012; Knapp et al., 2009). Brajtman et al. (2007) performed a study examining PC knowledge

among Canadian nursing students which resulted in an average score of 61% (M=12.29). Brazil et al. (2012)

assessed the PC knowledge among long-term care nurses in three Ontario facilities, reporting in a 45%-75%

average score among the three groups. Knapp et al. (2009) found pediatric nurses in Florida scored a mean raw

score of 10.9 (54.9%) on the PCQN. Past researchers have reported an inadequate PC knowledge level among

nurses and nursing students, similar to the findings in this study. The second research question in this study was:

Is there a difference in PC knowledge level towards selected demographic variables? The study hypothesis was

that there is no significant differences between knowledge scores towards age, gender, academic level, personal

and professional experience, and attending courses of palliative care. It was found to be true according to gender,

academic level, personal and professional experience, and attending courses of palliative care. At the same time,

it was incorrect according to age. However, that amount of PC knowledge possessed by either group of students

is not sufficient enough to care for a dying individual. Mean scores on the PCQN among both groups, despite

statistical significance, are not considered a passing grade of 75% which is used as a minimal passing benchmark

within the BSN program the students are attending. The AACN (2008) guidelines for newly licensed registered

nurses to care for dying individuals across the lifespan are not being met by this specific program, as evidenced

Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing www.iiste.org

ISSN 2422-8419 An International Peer-reviewed Journal

Vol.18, 2015

31

by the low scores from the senior level participants.

9. Conclusion

The aim of this study was to assess the PC knowledge among BSN students, and to compare the difference between

knowledge level and selected demographic variables. The research questions were answered using the PCQN to a

satisfactory amount of responses. While there was a statistically significant difference between knowledge level and

age, the students had a low level of PC knowledge overall. The difference in mean PC knowledge was not significant

enough to meet the AACN guidelines of a baccalaureate prepared nurse to care for PC patients.

10. Recommendations

It is recommended to the university to take the data presented in this study and attempt to include more PC and pain

management content within the courses in the program to help increase PC knowledge and understanding. Future

studies focusing on PC and knowledge of BSN students would be to recruit a larger sample.

11. Acknowledgement The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the hospitals administrating team who helped in facilitating

conduction of this study. Great appreciation as well is to the nursing staff who accepted to participate in the current

study.

References

Ahmedzai, S.H., Costa, A., Blengini, C., Bosch, A., Sanz-Ortiz, J., Ventafridda, V., & Verhagen, S.C. (2004). A

new international framework for palliative care. European Journal of Cancer, 40(15), 2192- 2200.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2008). The essentials of baccalaureate education for

professional nursing practice. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/order-

form/baccalaureate-essentials.

Andershed, B. (2006). Relatives in end-of-life care. Part 1: a systematic review of the literature the five last years.

January 1999-February 2004. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15(9) 1158-69.

Armes, P.J., & Addington-Hall J.M. (2003). Perspectives on symptom control in patients receiving

Ayed A., Sayej S., Harazneh L., Fashafsheh I., and Eqtait F. (2015). The Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes

towards the Palliative Care. Journal of Education and Practice; 6(4): 91-99

Bliss J, Cowley S, While A (2000) Interprofessional working in palliative care in the community: a review of the

literature. Journal of Interprofessional Care 14 (3), 281–290.

Brajtman, S., Fothergill-Bourbonnais, F., Casey, A., Alain, D., & Fiset, V. (2007). Providing direction for

change: assessing Canadian nursing students’ learning needs. International Journal of Palliative

Nursing, 13(5), 213-221.

Brajtman, S., Fothergill-Bourbonnais, F., Fiset, V., & Alain, D. (2009). Survey of educators’ end-of-life care

learning needs in a Canadian baccalaureate nursing program. International Journal of Palliative

Nursing, 15 (5), 233-241.

Ciemins, EL, Blum, L, Nunley, M, Lasher, A, & Newman, JM. The economic and clinical impact of an

inpatient palliative care consultation service: a multifaceted approach. J Palliat Med. 2007; 10:1347-

1355.

Connor, S. (2009) Hospice and Palliative Care. The Essential Guide. 2nd Ed. Routledge. New York. USA.

Cooke, M. (1996). Nursing students’ perceptions of difficult or challenging clinical situations. Journal of

Advanced Nursing, 24(6), 1281-1287.

Costello J (2004) Nursing the Dying Patient: Caring in Different Contexts. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

De Veer, A.J.E., Francke, A.L., & Poortvliet, E.P. (2003). Zorg rond het levenseinde vooral geestelijk belastend.

Tijdschrift voor Verpleegkundigen, 113(5), 42-43.

De Vlieger, M., Gorchs, N., Lankin, P.J., & Porschet, F. (2004a). Palliative nurse education towards a common

language. Palliative Medicine, 18 (5), 401-403.

Ferrell, B. R., Virani, R., Paice, J. A., Malloy, P., & Dahlin, C. (2010). Statewide efforts to improve palliative

care in critical care settings. Critical Care Nurse, 30(6), 40- 45. doi: 10.4037/ccn2010248.

Ferris, F. D., Bruera, E., Cherny, N., Cummings, C., Currow, D., Dudgeon, D., & Von Roenn, J. H. (2009).

Palliative cancer care a decade later: accomplishments, the need, next steps—from the American

Society of Clinical Oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(18), 3052--‐3058. Jordan, S.J. (2000). Educational input and patient outcomes: exploring the gap. Journal of Advanced Nursing,

31(2), 461-71.

Karkada, S., Nayak, B. S., & Malathi. (2011). Awareness of palliative care among diploma nursing students.

Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 17(1), 20-23. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.78445

Knapp, C.A., Madden, V., Wang, H., Kassing, K., Curtis, C., Sloyer, P., & Shenkman, E.A. (2009). Paediatric

Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing www.iiste.org

ISSN 2422-8419 An International Peer-reviewed Journal

Vol.18, 2015

32

nurses’ knowledge of palliative care in Florida: A quantitative study. International Journal of Palliative

Nursing, 15(9), 432-439.

Kuebler, K. (2012). Implications for palliative care nursing education. Clinical Scholars Review, 5(2), 86-90. doi:

10.1891/1939-2095.5.2.86.

Lautrette, A., Darmon, M., Megarbane, B., Joly, L. M., Chevret, S., et al. A communication strategy and

brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. New England Journal of Medicine. 2007;356:469-

78.

Linder, J.F., Blais, J., Enders, S.R., Melberg, S.E., & Meyer, F.J. (1999). Palliative education: a didactic and

experimental approach to teaching end-of-life care. Journal of Cancer Education, 14(3), 154-160.

Lynn, J., & Adamson, D.M. (2003). Living well at the end of life: adapting health care to serious chronic illness

in old age. Arlington: VA. Rand Health. www.medicaring.org/educate/download/wp137.pdf. retrieved

from the web 2007-01-20.

Malloy, P., Ferrell, B. R., Virani, R., Uman, G., Rhome, A. M., Whitlactch, B., & Bednash, G. (2006).

Evaluation of end-of-life nursing education for continuing education and clinical staff development

educators. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 22(1), 31-36.

NICE (2004) Improving Supportive and Palliative Care for Adults with Cancer.

www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/CSGSP

Osse, B.H., Vernooij-Dasse, M.J., Schade, E., & Grol, R.P. (2006). Problems experienced by the informal

caregivers of cancer patients and their needs for support. Cancer Nursing, 29(5), 378-388.

Prem V., Karvannan H., Kumar S., Karthikbabu S., Syed N., Sisodia V., Jaykumar S. (2012). Study of Nurses’

Knowledge about Palliative Care: A Quantitative Cross-sectional Survey. Indian Journal of Palliative

Care; 18(2): 122-127

Ross, M.M., McDonald, B., & McGuinness, J. (1996). The palliative care quiz for nursing (PCQN): The

development of an instrument to measure nurses’ knowledge of palliative care. Journal of Advanced

Nursing, 23, 126-137.

Sadhu, S., Salins, N. S., & Kamath, A. (2010). Palliative care awareness among Indian undergraduate health

students: A needs-assessment study to determine incorporation of palliative care education in

undergraduate medical, nursing, and allied health education. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 16(3),

154-159. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.73645.

Skilbeck J, Corner J, Bath P, et al. (2002) Clinical nurse specialists in palliative care. Part 1: A description of the

Macmillan nurse caseload. Palliative Medicine 16 (4), 285–296.

Strasser, F, Sweeney, C, Willey, J, Benisch--‐Tolley, S, Palmer, JL, et al. Impact of a half day multidisciplinary symptom control and palliative care outpatient clinic in a comprehensive cancer center on

recommendations, symptom intensity, and patient satisfaction: a retrospective descriptive study. J Pain

Symptom Manag. 2004

Temel, J.S., Greer, J.A. Muzikansky, A. M. Gallagher, E.R., Admane, S., et al. Early palliative care for patients

with metastatic non–small--‐cell lung cancer, N Engl J Med 2010; 363:733--‐742 Twycross R (2003) Introducing Palliative Care, 4th edn. Radcliffe Medical Press, Abingdon.

Visser, G. (2006). Mantelzorg in de palliatief terminale fase. Den Haag: NIZW Zorg/Lemma.

Weber M., Schmiedel S., Nauck F. and Alt-Epping B. (2011). Knowledge and attitude of final - year medical

students in Germany towards palliative care – an interinstitutional questionnaire-based study. BMC

Palliative Care 10 (19)

White, K., Wilkes, L., Cooper, K., & Barbato, M. (2004). The impact of unrelieved patient suffering on

palliative care nurses. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 10(9), 438-444.

WHO (2014) WHO Definition of Palliative Care Available at http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/

[accessed 17 February 2014].

Yates, P., Aranda, S., Edwards, H., Nash, R., & Skerman, H. (2004). Family caregivers’ experiences and

involvement with cancer pain management. Journal of Palliative Care, 20(4), 287-96.

The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open-Access hosting service and academic event management.

The aim of the firm is Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.

More information about the firm can be found on the homepage:

http://www.iiste.org

CALL FOR JOURNAL PAPERS

There are more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals hosted under the hosting platform.

Prospective authors of journals can find the submission instruction on the following

page: http://www.iiste.org/journals/ All the journals articles are available online to the

readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those

inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Paper version of the journals is also

available upon request of readers and authors.

MORE RESOURCES

Book publication information: http://www.iiste.org/book/

Academic conference: http://www.iiste.org/conference/upcoming-conferences-call-for-paper/

IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners

EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open

Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek

EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial Library , NewJour, Google Scholar