Dr.Rocal

102.docx

For our final assignment, choose a current bioethical current event or limited resource issue that is of interest to you. I will list a few suggestions. Feel free to use one of them, or explore another topic on your own. This will be in a written format, but will also be discussed in small groups in class. As you write your essay, present different sides/theories/opinions as well as your own. Think critically about the implications to the various choices.

Examples:

1. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-administration-cdc-banned-words_us_5a348ed2e4b0ff955ad3221d (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/crispr-human-genes-bioethicists_us_566099d7e4b079b2818db09a (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

2. http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-martin-shkreli-securities-probe-20151217-story.html (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

3. http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/10/us/michigan-cancer-doctor-sentenced/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

4. http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/05/health/zika-virus-aids-comparison/index.html (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

5. https://www.ted.com/topics/bioethics (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

6. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/could-gene-therapy-cure-sickle-cell-anemia-60-minutes/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

These are only a few current examples, from a few sources. There are many, many options out there. Choose something that interests you.

Please bring your completed essay to class. It should be approximately two pages, double-spaced. See the rubric for other scoring information.

If you need any help with suggestions, ideas, let me know.

Essay rubric

Essay rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus and details

5.0 pts

There is one clear, well-focues topic. Main ideas are clear and are well supported by detailed and accurate information.

4.0 pts

There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear but are not well supported by detailed information.

3.0 pts

There is one topic. Main ideas are somewhat clear.

1.0 pts

The topic and main ideas are difficult to follow.

0.0 pts

minimal attempt at clarity or focus.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

5.0 pts

The introduction is inviting, states the main topic, and provides an overview of the paper. Information is relevant and presented in a logical order. The conclusion is strong.

4.0 pts

The introduction states the main topic and provides an overview of the paper. A conclusion is included.

3.0 pts

The introduction states the main topic. A conclusion is included.

1.0 pts

The introduction, structure or conclusion are unclear.

0.0 pts

Minimal attempt at organization. Difficult to read and follow.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVoice.

5.0 pts

The author's purpose of writing is very clear, and there is strong evidence of attention to audience. The author's interest in the topic very evident.

4.0 pts

The author's purpose of writing is clear, and there is some attention to audience. The author's interest in the topic is evident.

3.0 pts

The author's purpose of writing somewhat clear, and there is evidence of attention to the audience. The author's interest appears limited.

1.0 pts

The author's purpose of writing is difficult to follow. The interest in the subject is very limited.

0.0 pts

Minimal purpose or interest in the subject.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWord Choice

5.0 pts

The author used vivid words and phrases. The choice and placement of words seems accurate, natural, and not forced.

4.0 pts

The author uses vivid words and phrases. The choice and placement of words is somewhat forced or overdone.

3.0 pts

The author uses words that communicate clearly, but the writing lacks variety or style.

1.0 pts

The writer ises a limited vocabulary. Jargon or cliches may be present and detract from the essay.

0.0 pts

Minimal effort on word choice.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSentence Structure, Grammar, Mechanics and Spelling

5.0 pts

All sentences are well constructed and have varied structure and length. The author makes no errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling.

4.0 pts

Most sentences are well constructed and have varied structure and length. The author makes a few errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling, but they do not interfere with understanding.

2.0 pts

Most sentences are well constructed, but they have a similar structure and/or length. The author makes several errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling that interfere with understanding.

1.0 pts

Sentences sound awkward, are distractingly repetitive, or are difficult to understand. The author makes numerous erros in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling that interfere with understanding.

0.0 pts

Minimal effort on structure, grammar, mechanics or spelling.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGroup participation

10.0 pts

Full Marks

Student shared as well as listened to colleagues as they discussed their topic.

5.0 pts

Student had an excused absence. Essay turned in on or before due date.

0.0 pts

No Marks

Student was absent from class.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 35.0